Polynomial Modeling of Child and Adult Intonation in German Spontaneous Speech

In a data set of 291 spontaneous utterances from German 5-year-olds, 7-year-olds and adults, nuclear pitch contours were labeled manually using the GToBI annotation system. Ten different contour types were identified.The fundamental frequency (F0) of these contours was modeled using third-order orth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Language and speech 2011-06, Vol.54 (2), p.199-223
1. Verfasser: de Ruiter, Laura E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 223
container_issue 2
container_start_page 199
container_title Language and speech
container_volume 54
creator de Ruiter, Laura E.
description In a data set of 291 spontaneous utterances from German 5-year-olds, 7-year-olds and adults, nuclear pitch contours were labeled manually using the GToBI annotation system. Ten different contour types were identified.The fundamental frequency (F0) of these contours was modeled using third-order orthogonal polynomials, following an approach similar to the one Grabe, Kochanski, and Coleman (2007) used for English. Statistical analyses showed that all but one contour pair differed significantly from each other in at least one of the four coefficients. This demonstrates that polynomial modeling can provide quantitative empirical support for phonological labels in unscripted speech, and for languages other than English. Furthermore, polynomial expressions can be used to derive the alignment of tonal targets relative to the syllable structure, making polynomial modeling more accessible to the phonological research community. Finally, within-contour comparisons of the three age groups showed that for children, the magnitude of the higher coefficients is lower, suggesting that they are not yet able to modulate their pitch as fast as adults.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0023830910397495
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_884424721</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A260582236</galeid><ericid>EJ926162</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0023830910397495</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A260582236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-ebbf0dc83e38338b4b39abe2db100213ce6757ccb0b8c7ad0a82feaef436bd353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kstv1DAQxi0EosvCnQOCCA5wSfEjiZ3jalVKUXlIwDnyY5K6cuzFTg797_EqpaXVgnzwY37feObTIPSc4GNCOH-PMWWC4ZZg1vKqrR-gFeF1Uza4Zg_Rah8u9_Ej9CSlS5zvDRWP0RElohJY4BX68i24Kx9GK13xORhw1g9F6IvthXWmkN4UGzO7qTjzU_ByssEX1henEEfpi--74CfpIcwpnwH0xVP0qJcuwbPrfY1-fjj5sf1Ynn89PdtuzktdCzGVoFSPjRYMcvlMqEqxViqgRpFcI2EaGl5zrRVWQnNpsBS0Bwl9xRplWM3W6O2SdxfDrxnS1I02aXBuqaYToqpoxXOqNXr3XzJbh0VbCdJm9PU99DLM0ec-OsEJq-u25Rl6tUCDdNC5qAc5p9RtaPZcUMqaTLz5i7C-D1OUev_rXao8QA3gIUoXPPQ2P9_hjw_weRkYrT4owItAx5BShL7bRTvKeJVb7vbT092fnix5eW3ArEYwN4I_45KBFwsA0eqb8Mmnljakobc9JTnArXn__O83teTQmg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>871355997</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Polynomial Modeling of Child and Adult Intonation in German Spontaneous Speech</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>de Ruiter, Laura E.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Ruiter, Laura E.</creatorcontrib><description>In a data set of 291 spontaneous utterances from German 5-year-olds, 7-year-olds and adults, nuclear pitch contours were labeled manually using the GToBI annotation system. Ten different contour types were identified.The fundamental frequency (F0) of these contours was modeled using third-order orthogonal polynomials, following an approach similar to the one Grabe, Kochanski, and Coleman (2007) used for English. Statistical analyses showed that all but one contour pair differed significantly from each other in at least one of the four coefficients. This demonstrates that polynomial modeling can provide quantitative empirical support for phonological labels in unscripted speech, and for languages other than English. Furthermore, polynomial expressions can be used to derive the alignment of tonal targets relative to the syllable structure, making polynomial modeling more accessible to the phonological research community. Finally, within-contour comparisons of the three age groups showed that for children, the magnitude of the higher coefficients is lower, suggesting that they are not yet able to modulate their pitch as fast as adults.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-8309</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-6053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0023830910397495</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21848080</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANSA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adults ; Age Factors ; Aging ; Algebra ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Children &amp; youth ; Comparative Analysis ; Demographic aspects ; Descriptive labeling ; Elementary Education ; Elementary Schools ; English language ; Evaluation Methods ; Evidence ; Fundamental frequency ; German ; German language ; Humans ; Intonation ; Intonation (Phonetics) ; Labeling ; Language Development ; Language Patterns ; Mathematical Formulas ; Models, Statistical ; Native Speakers ; Phonetics ; Phonology ; Pitch ; Polynomials ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Sound Spectrography ; Speech ; Speech Acoustics ; Speech Communication ; Speech Production Measurement ; Spontaneous speech ; Story Telling ; Studies ; Syllable structure ; Syllables ; Usability ; Voice</subject><ispartof>Language and speech, 2011-06, Vol.54 (2), p.199-223</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2011</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Jun 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-ebbf0dc83e38338b4b39abe2db100213ce6757ccb0b8c7ad0a82feaef436bd353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-ebbf0dc83e38338b4b39abe2db100213ce6757ccb0b8c7ad0a82feaef436bd353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0023830910397495$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0023830910397495$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ926162$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21848080$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Ruiter, Laura E.</creatorcontrib><title>Polynomial Modeling of Child and Adult Intonation in German Spontaneous Speech</title><title>Language and speech</title><addtitle>Lang Speech</addtitle><description>In a data set of 291 spontaneous utterances from German 5-year-olds, 7-year-olds and adults, nuclear pitch contours were labeled manually using the GToBI annotation system. Ten different contour types were identified.The fundamental frequency (F0) of these contours was modeled using third-order orthogonal polynomials, following an approach similar to the one Grabe, Kochanski, and Coleman (2007) used for English. Statistical analyses showed that all but one contour pair differed significantly from each other in at least one of the four coefficients. This demonstrates that polynomial modeling can provide quantitative empirical support for phonological labels in unscripted speech, and for languages other than English. Furthermore, polynomial expressions can be used to derive the alignment of tonal targets relative to the syllable structure, making polynomial modeling more accessible to the phonological research community. Finally, within-contour comparisons of the three age groups showed that for children, the magnitude of the higher coefficients is lower, suggesting that they are not yet able to modulate their pitch as fast as adults.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Algebra</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Descriptive labeling</subject><subject>Elementary Education</subject><subject>Elementary Schools</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Fundamental frequency</subject><subject>German</subject><subject>German language</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intonation</subject><subject>Intonation (Phonetics)</subject><subject>Labeling</subject><subject>Language Development</subject><subject>Language Patterns</subject><subject>Mathematical Formulas</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Native Speakers</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Pitch</subject><subject>Polynomials</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Sound Spectrography</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Acoustics</subject><subject>Speech Communication</subject><subject>Speech Production Measurement</subject><subject>Spontaneous speech</subject><subject>Story Telling</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Syllable structure</subject><subject>Syllables</subject><subject>Usability</subject><subject>Voice</subject><issn>0023-8309</issn><issn>1756-6053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kstv1DAQxi0EosvCnQOCCA5wSfEjiZ3jalVKUXlIwDnyY5K6cuzFTg797_EqpaXVgnzwY37feObTIPSc4GNCOH-PMWWC4ZZg1vKqrR-gFeF1Uza4Zg_Rah8u9_Ej9CSlS5zvDRWP0RElohJY4BX68i24Kx9GK13xORhw1g9F6IvthXWmkN4UGzO7qTjzU_ByssEX1henEEfpi--74CfpIcwpnwH0xVP0qJcuwbPrfY1-fjj5sf1Ynn89PdtuzktdCzGVoFSPjRYMcvlMqEqxViqgRpFcI2EaGl5zrRVWQnNpsBS0Bwl9xRplWM3W6O2SdxfDrxnS1I02aXBuqaYToqpoxXOqNXr3XzJbh0VbCdJm9PU99DLM0ec-OsEJq-u25Rl6tUCDdNC5qAc5p9RtaPZcUMqaTLz5i7C-D1OUev_rXao8QA3gIUoXPPQ2P9_hjw_weRkYrT4owItAx5BShL7bRTvKeJVb7vbT092fnix5eW3ArEYwN4I_45KBFwsA0eqb8Mmnljakobc9JTnArXn__O83teTQmg</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>de Ruiter, Laura E.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ILR</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>Polynomial Modeling of Child and Adult Intonation in German Spontaneous Speech</title><author>de Ruiter, Laura E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-ebbf0dc83e38338b4b39abe2db100213ce6757ccb0b8c7ad0a82feaef436bd353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Algebra</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Descriptive labeling</topic><topic>Elementary Education</topic><topic>Elementary Schools</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Fundamental frequency</topic><topic>German</topic><topic>German language</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intonation</topic><topic>Intonation (Phonetics)</topic><topic>Labeling</topic><topic>Language Development</topic><topic>Language Patterns</topic><topic>Mathematical Formulas</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Native Speakers</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Pitch</topic><topic>Polynomials</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Sound Spectrography</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Acoustics</topic><topic>Speech Communication</topic><topic>Speech Production Measurement</topic><topic>Spontaneous speech</topic><topic>Story Telling</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Syllable structure</topic><topic>Syllables</topic><topic>Usability</topic><topic>Voice</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Ruiter, Laura E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Literature Resource Center</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Language and speech</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Ruiter, Laura E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ926162</ericid><atitle>Polynomial Modeling of Child and Adult Intonation in German Spontaneous Speech</atitle><jtitle>Language and speech</jtitle><addtitle>Lang Speech</addtitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>223</epage><pages>199-223</pages><issn>0023-8309</issn><eissn>1756-6053</eissn><coden>LANSA4</coden><abstract>In a data set of 291 spontaneous utterances from German 5-year-olds, 7-year-olds and adults, nuclear pitch contours were labeled manually using the GToBI annotation system. Ten different contour types were identified.The fundamental frequency (F0) of these contours was modeled using third-order orthogonal polynomials, following an approach similar to the one Grabe, Kochanski, and Coleman (2007) used for English. Statistical analyses showed that all but one contour pair differed significantly from each other in at least one of the four coefficients. This demonstrates that polynomial modeling can provide quantitative empirical support for phonological labels in unscripted speech, and for languages other than English. Furthermore, polynomial expressions can be used to derive the alignment of tonal targets relative to the syllable structure, making polynomial modeling more accessible to the phonological research community. Finally, within-contour comparisons of the three age groups showed that for children, the magnitude of the higher coefficients is lower, suggesting that they are not yet able to modulate their pitch as fast as adults.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>21848080</pmid><doi>10.1177/0023830910397495</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-8309
ispartof Language and speech, 2011-06, Vol.54 (2), p.199-223
issn 0023-8309
1756-6053
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_884424721
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Adult
Adults
Age Factors
Aging
Algebra
Child
Child, Preschool
Children
Children & youth
Comparative Analysis
Demographic aspects
Descriptive labeling
Elementary Education
Elementary Schools
English language
Evaluation Methods
Evidence
Fundamental frequency
German
German language
Humans
Intonation
Intonation (Phonetics)
Labeling
Language Development
Language Patterns
Mathematical Formulas
Models, Statistical
Native Speakers
Phonetics
Phonology
Pitch
Polynomials
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Sound Spectrography
Speech
Speech Acoustics
Speech Communication
Speech Production Measurement
Spontaneous speech
Story Telling
Studies
Syllable structure
Syllables
Usability
Voice
title Polynomial Modeling of Child and Adult Intonation in German Spontaneous Speech
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T21%3A17%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Polynomial%20Modeling%20of%20Child%20and%20Adult%20Intonation%20in%20German%20Spontaneous%20Speech&rft.jtitle=Language%20and%20speech&rft.au=de%20Ruiter,%20Laura%20E.&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=223&rft.pages=199-223&rft.issn=0023-8309&rft.eissn=1756-6053&rft.coden=LANSA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0023830910397495&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA260582236%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=871355997&rft_id=info:pmid/21848080&rft_galeid=A260582236&rft_ericid=EJ926162&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0023830910397495&rfr_iscdi=true