The effects of condom choice on self-reported condom use among men in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa: a randomized trial

Abstract Background Male condoms are readily available and affordable in many settings, but risky sexual acts still go unprotected. Study Design This unblinded randomized trial, conducted in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa, was designed to assess the impact of providing a choice of condoms on self-rep...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contraception (Stoneham) 2011-09, Vol.84 (3), p.291-298
Hauptverfasser: Weaver, Mark A, Joanis, Carol, Toroitich-Ruto, Cathy, Parker, Warren, Gyamenah, Nana A, Rinaldi, Anne, Omungo, Zablon, Steiner, Markus J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 298
container_issue 3
container_start_page 291
container_title Contraception (Stoneham)
container_volume 84
creator Weaver, Mark A
Joanis, Carol
Toroitich-Ruto, Cathy
Parker, Warren
Gyamenah, Nana A
Rinaldi, Anne
Omungo, Zablon
Steiner, Markus J
description Abstract Background Male condoms are readily available and affordable in many settings, but risky sexual acts still go unprotected. Study Design This unblinded randomized trial, conducted in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa, was designed to assess the impact of providing a choice of condoms on self-reported use and uptake over 6 months. Results We enrolled 1274 men. The mean subject-specific proportion of protected acts with all partners increased from baseline to 6 months by 0.07 in the control group compared to 0.03 in the choice group (p=.025). The observed results were largely consistent across all three countries. In the choice group, men clearly preferred one condom type over the others, and this preference was consistent across all three countries. Conclusions Providing one type of male condom in public sector programs appears justified. Programs should not focus on the number of brands available, but should encourage effective promotion and consistent and correct use of available brands.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_884121315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010782411000114</els_id><sourcerecordid>884121315</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-e6bff20232ead7767c75aeacc72a530355f7326da8fdb1b02439d9a1d5e41ab03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkm9rFDEQxoMo9lr9ChIQ8U33TLJ_sqsglFKrWPBF6-swm0y8nLvJmewq56c3y10VfWUYCEyeeSb8Zgh5ztmaM9682q518FMEjbvJBb8WjPM1W4I9ICveyq5gNW8fkhXLqUK2ojohpyltGWOyq-VjciJ4W5VN16zIj7sNUrQW9ZRosDRbmzBSvQlOIw2eJhxsEXEX4oTm_nlOSGEM_gsd0VPn6fUGPJzTj-j3QMEbehvmaUMvbHQaXlOgEZZC9zN7TNHB8IQ8sjAkfHq8z8jnd1d3l--Lm0_XHy4vbgpdNXIqsOmtFUyUAsFI2Ugta0DQWgqoS1bWtZWlaAy01vS8Z6IqO9MBNzVWHHpWnpGXB99dDN9mTJMaXdI4DOAxzEm1bcUFL3mdlW8OSh1DShGt2kU3QtwrztQCXm3VX-DVAl6xJZY-z4595n5E87v2nnQWvDgKIGkYbAaiXfqjq_JhVZd1VwcdZirfHUaVtEOv0biYh6RMcP_5obf_-OjB-TyN4SvuMW3DHH0Gr7hKQjF1u-zKsiqc5zXhvCp_AfB_vng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>884121315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of condom choice on self-reported condom use among men in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa: a randomized trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Weaver, Mark A ; Joanis, Carol ; Toroitich-Ruto, Cathy ; Parker, Warren ; Gyamenah, Nana A ; Rinaldi, Anne ; Omungo, Zablon ; Steiner, Markus J</creator><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Mark A ; Joanis, Carol ; Toroitich-Ruto, Cathy ; Parker, Warren ; Gyamenah, Nana A ; Rinaldi, Anne ; Omungo, Zablon ; Steiner, Markus J</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Male condoms are readily available and affordable in many settings, but risky sexual acts still go unprotected. Study Design This unblinded randomized trial, conducted in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa, was designed to assess the impact of providing a choice of condoms on self-reported use and uptake over 6 months. Results We enrolled 1274 men. The mean subject-specific proportion of protected acts with all partners increased from baseline to 6 months by 0.07 in the control group compared to 0.03 in the choice group (p=.025). The observed results were largely consistent across all three countries. In the choice group, men clearly preferred one condom type over the others, and this preference was consistent across all three countries. Conclusions Providing one type of male condom in public sector programs appears justified. Programs should not focus on the number of brands available, but should encourage effective promotion and consistent and correct use of available brands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-7824</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21843696</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CCPTAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acceptability ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Africa South of the Sahara ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Choice Behavior ; Condom uptake ; Condoms - standards ; Genital system. Reproduction ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Male ; Male latex condoms ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Other methods of contraception. Sterilization ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Preference ; Self Report ; Sexual Behavior - psychology ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Contraception (Stoneham), 2011-09, Vol.84 (3), p.291-298</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-e6bff20232ead7767c75aeacc72a530355f7326da8fdb1b02439d9a1d5e41ab03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-e6bff20232ead7767c75aeacc72a530355f7326da8fdb1b02439d9a1d5e41ab03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24444049$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21843696$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joanis, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toroitich-Ruto, Cathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Warren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gyamenah, Nana A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinaldi, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omungo, Zablon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiner, Markus J</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of condom choice on self-reported condom use among men in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa: a randomized trial</title><title>Contraception (Stoneham)</title><addtitle>Contraception</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Male condoms are readily available and affordable in many settings, but risky sexual acts still go unprotected. Study Design This unblinded randomized trial, conducted in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa, was designed to assess the impact of providing a choice of condoms on self-reported use and uptake over 6 months. Results We enrolled 1274 men. The mean subject-specific proportion of protected acts with all partners increased from baseline to 6 months by 0.07 in the control group compared to 0.03 in the choice group (p=.025). The observed results were largely consistent across all three countries. In the choice group, men clearly preferred one condom type over the others, and this preference was consistent across all three countries. Conclusions Providing one type of male condom in public sector programs appears justified. Programs should not focus on the number of brands available, but should encourage effective promotion and consistent and correct use of available brands.</description><subject>Acceptability</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Africa South of the Sahara</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Condom uptake</subject><subject>Condoms - standards</subject><subject>Genital system. Reproduction</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Male latex condoms</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Other methods of contraception. Sterilization</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Preference</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0010-7824</issn><issn>1879-0518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkm9rFDEQxoMo9lr9ChIQ8U33TLJ_sqsglFKrWPBF6-swm0y8nLvJmewq56c3y10VfWUYCEyeeSb8Zgh5ztmaM9682q518FMEjbvJBb8WjPM1W4I9ICveyq5gNW8fkhXLqUK2ojohpyltGWOyq-VjciJ4W5VN16zIj7sNUrQW9ZRosDRbmzBSvQlOIw2eJhxsEXEX4oTm_nlOSGEM_gsd0VPn6fUGPJzTj-j3QMEbehvmaUMvbHQaXlOgEZZC9zN7TNHB8IQ8sjAkfHq8z8jnd1d3l--Lm0_XHy4vbgpdNXIqsOmtFUyUAsFI2Ugta0DQWgqoS1bWtZWlaAy01vS8Z6IqO9MBNzVWHHpWnpGXB99dDN9mTJMaXdI4DOAxzEm1bcUFL3mdlW8OSh1DShGt2kU3QtwrztQCXm3VX-DVAl6xJZY-z4595n5E87v2nnQWvDgKIGkYbAaiXfqjq_JhVZd1VwcdZirfHUaVtEOv0biYh6RMcP_5obf_-OjB-TyN4SvuMW3DHH0Gr7hKQjF1u-zKsiqc5zXhvCp_AfB_vng</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>Weaver, Mark A</creator><creator>Joanis, Carol</creator><creator>Toroitich-Ruto, Cathy</creator><creator>Parker, Warren</creator><creator>Gyamenah, Nana A</creator><creator>Rinaldi, Anne</creator><creator>Omungo, Zablon</creator><creator>Steiner, Markus J</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>The effects of condom choice on self-reported condom use among men in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa: a randomized trial</title><author>Weaver, Mark A ; Joanis, Carol ; Toroitich-Ruto, Cathy ; Parker, Warren ; Gyamenah, Nana A ; Rinaldi, Anne ; Omungo, Zablon ; Steiner, Markus J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-e6bff20232ead7767c75aeacc72a530355f7326da8fdb1b02439d9a1d5e41ab03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Acceptability</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Africa South of the Sahara</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Condom uptake</topic><topic>Condoms - standards</topic><topic>Genital system. Reproduction</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Male latex condoms</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Other methods of contraception. Sterilization</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Preference</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joanis, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toroitich-Ruto, Cathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Warren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gyamenah, Nana A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinaldi, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omungo, Zablon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiner, Markus J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Contraception (Stoneham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weaver, Mark A</au><au>Joanis, Carol</au><au>Toroitich-Ruto, Cathy</au><au>Parker, Warren</au><au>Gyamenah, Nana A</au><au>Rinaldi, Anne</au><au>Omungo, Zablon</au><au>Steiner, Markus J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of condom choice on self-reported condom use among men in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa: a randomized trial</atitle><jtitle>Contraception (Stoneham)</jtitle><addtitle>Contraception</addtitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>298</epage><pages>291-298</pages><issn>0010-7824</issn><eissn>1879-0518</eissn><coden>CCPTAY</coden><abstract>Abstract Background Male condoms are readily available and affordable in many settings, but risky sexual acts still go unprotected. Study Design This unblinded randomized trial, conducted in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa, was designed to assess the impact of providing a choice of condoms on self-reported use and uptake over 6 months. Results We enrolled 1274 men. The mean subject-specific proportion of protected acts with all partners increased from baseline to 6 months by 0.07 in the control group compared to 0.03 in the choice group (p=.025). The observed results were largely consistent across all three countries. In the choice group, men clearly preferred one condom type over the others, and this preference was consistent across all three countries. Conclusions Providing one type of male condom in public sector programs appears justified. Programs should not focus on the number of brands available, but should encourage effective promotion and consistent and correct use of available brands.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21843696</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.010</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-7824
ispartof Contraception (Stoneham), 2011-09, Vol.84 (3), p.291-298
issn 0010-7824
1879-0518
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_884121315
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Acceptability
Adolescent
Adult
Africa South of the Sahara
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Birth control
Choice Behavior
Condom uptake
Condoms - standards
Genital system. Reproduction
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Male
Male latex condoms
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Other methods of contraception. Sterilization
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Preference
Self Report
Sexual Behavior - psychology
Statistics, Nonparametric
Young Adult
title The effects of condom choice on self-reported condom use among men in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa: a randomized trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T20%3A30%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20condom%20choice%20on%20self-reported%20condom%20use%20among%20men%20in%20Ghana,%20Kenya%20and%20South%20Africa:%20a%20randomized%20trial&rft.jtitle=Contraception%20(Stoneham)&rft.au=Weaver,%20Mark%20A&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=298&rft.pages=291-298&rft.issn=0010-7824&rft.eissn=1879-0518&rft.coden=CCPTAY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E884121315%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=884121315&rft_id=info:pmid/21843696&rft_els_id=S0010782411000114&rfr_iscdi=true