The effects of condom choice on self-reported condom use among men in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa: a randomized trial
Abstract Background Male condoms are readily available and affordable in many settings, but risky sexual acts still go unprotected. Study Design This unblinded randomized trial, conducted in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa, was designed to assess the impact of providing a choice of condoms on self-rep...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Contraception (Stoneham) 2011-09, Vol.84 (3), p.291-298 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 298 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 291 |
container_title | Contraception (Stoneham) |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Weaver, Mark A Joanis, Carol Toroitich-Ruto, Cathy Parker, Warren Gyamenah, Nana A Rinaldi, Anne Omungo, Zablon Steiner, Markus J |
description | Abstract Background Male condoms are readily available and affordable in many settings, but risky sexual acts still go unprotected. Study Design This unblinded randomized trial, conducted in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa, was designed to assess the impact of providing a choice of condoms on self-reported use and uptake over 6 months. Results We enrolled 1274 men. The mean subject-specific proportion of protected acts with all partners increased from baseline to 6 months by 0.07 in the control group compared to 0.03 in the choice group (p=.025). The observed results were largely consistent across all three countries. In the choice group, men clearly preferred one condom type over the others, and this preference was consistent across all three countries. Conclusions Providing one type of male condom in public sector programs appears justified. Programs should not focus on the number of brands available, but should encourage effective promotion and consistent and correct use of available brands. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_884121315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010782411000114</els_id><sourcerecordid>884121315</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-e6bff20232ead7767c75aeacc72a530355f7326da8fdb1b02439d9a1d5e41ab03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkm9rFDEQxoMo9lr9ChIQ8U33TLJ_sqsglFKrWPBF6-swm0y8nLvJmewq56c3y10VfWUYCEyeeSb8Zgh5ztmaM9682q518FMEjbvJBb8WjPM1W4I9ICveyq5gNW8fkhXLqUK2ojohpyltGWOyq-VjciJ4W5VN16zIj7sNUrQW9ZRosDRbmzBSvQlOIw2eJhxsEXEX4oTm_nlOSGEM_gsd0VPn6fUGPJzTj-j3QMEbehvmaUMvbHQaXlOgEZZC9zN7TNHB8IQ8sjAkfHq8z8jnd1d3l--Lm0_XHy4vbgpdNXIqsOmtFUyUAsFI2Ugta0DQWgqoS1bWtZWlaAy01vS8Z6IqO9MBNzVWHHpWnpGXB99dDN9mTJMaXdI4DOAxzEm1bcUFL3mdlW8OSh1DShGt2kU3QtwrztQCXm3VX-DVAl6xJZY-z4595n5E87v2nnQWvDgKIGkYbAaiXfqjq_JhVZd1VwcdZirfHUaVtEOv0biYh6RMcP_5obf_-OjB-TyN4SvuMW3DHH0Gr7hKQjF1u-zKsiqc5zXhvCp_AfB_vng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>884121315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of condom choice on self-reported condom use among men in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa: a randomized trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Weaver, Mark A ; Joanis, Carol ; Toroitich-Ruto, Cathy ; Parker, Warren ; Gyamenah, Nana A ; Rinaldi, Anne ; Omungo, Zablon ; Steiner, Markus J</creator><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Mark A ; Joanis, Carol ; Toroitich-Ruto, Cathy ; Parker, Warren ; Gyamenah, Nana A ; Rinaldi, Anne ; Omungo, Zablon ; Steiner, Markus J</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Male condoms are readily available and affordable in many settings, but risky sexual acts still go unprotected. Study Design This unblinded randomized trial, conducted in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa, was designed to assess the impact of providing a choice of condoms on self-reported use and uptake over 6 months. Results We enrolled 1274 men. The mean subject-specific proportion of protected acts with all partners increased from baseline to 6 months by 0.07 in the control group compared to 0.03 in the choice group (p=.025). The observed results were largely consistent across all three countries. In the choice group, men clearly preferred one condom type over the others, and this preference was consistent across all three countries. Conclusions Providing one type of male condom in public sector programs appears justified. Programs should not focus on the number of brands available, but should encourage effective promotion and consistent and correct use of available brands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-7824</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21843696</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CCPTAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acceptability ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Africa South of the Sahara ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Choice Behavior ; Condom uptake ; Condoms - standards ; Genital system. Reproduction ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Male ; Male latex condoms ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Other methods of contraception. Sterilization ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Preference ; Self Report ; Sexual Behavior - psychology ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Contraception (Stoneham), 2011-09, Vol.84 (3), p.291-298</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-e6bff20232ead7767c75aeacc72a530355f7326da8fdb1b02439d9a1d5e41ab03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-e6bff20232ead7767c75aeacc72a530355f7326da8fdb1b02439d9a1d5e41ab03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24444049$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21843696$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joanis, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toroitich-Ruto, Cathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Warren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gyamenah, Nana A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinaldi, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omungo, Zablon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiner, Markus J</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of condom choice on self-reported condom use among men in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa: a randomized trial</title><title>Contraception (Stoneham)</title><addtitle>Contraception</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Male condoms are readily available and affordable in many settings, but risky sexual acts still go unprotected. Study Design This unblinded randomized trial, conducted in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa, was designed to assess the impact of providing a choice of condoms on self-reported use and uptake over 6 months. Results We enrolled 1274 men. The mean subject-specific proportion of protected acts with all partners increased from baseline to 6 months by 0.07 in the control group compared to 0.03 in the choice group (p=.025). The observed results were largely consistent across all three countries. In the choice group, men clearly preferred one condom type over the others, and this preference was consistent across all three countries. Conclusions Providing one type of male condom in public sector programs appears justified. Programs should not focus on the number of brands available, but should encourage effective promotion and consistent and correct use of available brands.</description><subject>Acceptability</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Africa South of the Sahara</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Condom uptake</subject><subject>Condoms - standards</subject><subject>Genital system. Reproduction</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Male latex condoms</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Other methods of contraception. Sterilization</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Preference</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0010-7824</issn><issn>1879-0518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkm9rFDEQxoMo9lr9ChIQ8U33TLJ_sqsglFKrWPBF6-swm0y8nLvJmewq56c3y10VfWUYCEyeeSb8Zgh5ztmaM9682q518FMEjbvJBb8WjPM1W4I9ICveyq5gNW8fkhXLqUK2ojohpyltGWOyq-VjciJ4W5VN16zIj7sNUrQW9ZRosDRbmzBSvQlOIw2eJhxsEXEX4oTm_nlOSGEM_gsd0VPn6fUGPJzTj-j3QMEbehvmaUMvbHQaXlOgEZZC9zN7TNHB8IQ8sjAkfHq8z8jnd1d3l--Lm0_XHy4vbgpdNXIqsOmtFUyUAsFI2Ugta0DQWgqoS1bWtZWlaAy01vS8Z6IqO9MBNzVWHHpWnpGXB99dDN9mTJMaXdI4DOAxzEm1bcUFL3mdlW8OSh1DShGt2kU3QtwrztQCXm3VX-DVAl6xJZY-z4595n5E87v2nnQWvDgKIGkYbAaiXfqjq_JhVZd1VwcdZirfHUaVtEOv0biYh6RMcP_5obf_-OjB-TyN4SvuMW3DHH0Gr7hKQjF1u-zKsiqc5zXhvCp_AfB_vng</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>Weaver, Mark A</creator><creator>Joanis, Carol</creator><creator>Toroitich-Ruto, Cathy</creator><creator>Parker, Warren</creator><creator>Gyamenah, Nana A</creator><creator>Rinaldi, Anne</creator><creator>Omungo, Zablon</creator><creator>Steiner, Markus J</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>The effects of condom choice on self-reported condom use among men in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa: a randomized trial</title><author>Weaver, Mark A ; Joanis, Carol ; Toroitich-Ruto, Cathy ; Parker, Warren ; Gyamenah, Nana A ; Rinaldi, Anne ; Omungo, Zablon ; Steiner, Markus J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-e6bff20232ead7767c75aeacc72a530355f7326da8fdb1b02439d9a1d5e41ab03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Acceptability</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Africa South of the Sahara</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Condom uptake</topic><topic>Condoms - standards</topic><topic>Genital system. Reproduction</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Male latex condoms</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Other methods of contraception. Sterilization</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Preference</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joanis, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toroitich-Ruto, Cathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Warren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gyamenah, Nana A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinaldi, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omungo, Zablon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiner, Markus J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Contraception (Stoneham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weaver, Mark A</au><au>Joanis, Carol</au><au>Toroitich-Ruto, Cathy</au><au>Parker, Warren</au><au>Gyamenah, Nana A</au><au>Rinaldi, Anne</au><au>Omungo, Zablon</au><au>Steiner, Markus J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of condom choice on self-reported condom use among men in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa: a randomized trial</atitle><jtitle>Contraception (Stoneham)</jtitle><addtitle>Contraception</addtitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>298</epage><pages>291-298</pages><issn>0010-7824</issn><eissn>1879-0518</eissn><coden>CCPTAY</coden><abstract>Abstract Background Male condoms are readily available and affordable in many settings, but risky sexual acts still go unprotected. Study Design This unblinded randomized trial, conducted in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa, was designed to assess the impact of providing a choice of condoms on self-reported use and uptake over 6 months. Results We enrolled 1274 men. The mean subject-specific proportion of protected acts with all partners increased from baseline to 6 months by 0.07 in the control group compared to 0.03 in the choice group (p=.025). The observed results were largely consistent across all three countries. In the choice group, men clearly preferred one condom type over the others, and this preference was consistent across all three countries. Conclusions Providing one type of male condom in public sector programs appears justified. Programs should not focus on the number of brands available, but should encourage effective promotion and consistent and correct use of available brands.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21843696</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.010</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-7824 |
ispartof | Contraception (Stoneham), 2011-09, Vol.84 (3), p.291-298 |
issn | 0010-7824 1879-0518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_884121315 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Acceptability Adolescent Adult Africa South of the Sahara Aged Biological and medical sciences Birth control Choice Behavior Condom uptake Condoms - standards Genital system. Reproduction Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Male Male latex condoms Medical sciences Middle Aged Obstetrics and Gynecology Other methods of contraception. Sterilization Pharmacology. Drug treatments Preference Self Report Sexual Behavior - psychology Statistics, Nonparametric Young Adult |
title | The effects of condom choice on self-reported condom use among men in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa: a randomized trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T20%3A30%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20condom%20choice%20on%20self-reported%20condom%20use%20among%20men%20in%20Ghana,%20Kenya%20and%20South%20Africa:%20a%20randomized%20trial&rft.jtitle=Contraception%20(Stoneham)&rft.au=Weaver,%20Mark%20A&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=298&rft.pages=291-298&rft.issn=0010-7824&rft.eissn=1879-0518&rft.coden=CCPTAY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E884121315%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=884121315&rft_id=info:pmid/21843696&rft_els_id=S0010782411000114&rfr_iscdi=true |