Dynamic Calibration Approach for Determining Catechins and Gallic Acid in Green Tea Using LC–ESI/MS

Catechins and gallic acid are antioxidant constituents of Camellia sinensis, or green tea. Liquid chromatography with both ultraviolet (UV) absorbance and electrospray ionization mass spectrometric (ESI/MS) detection was used to determine catechins and gallic acid in three green tea matrix materials...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Analytical chemistry (Washington) 2011-08, Vol.83 (16), p.6169-6176
Hauptverfasser: Bedner, Mary, Duewer, David L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6176
container_issue 16
container_start_page 6169
container_title Analytical chemistry (Washington)
container_volume 83
creator Bedner, Mary
Duewer, David L
description Catechins and gallic acid are antioxidant constituents of Camellia sinensis, or green tea. Liquid chromatography with both ultraviolet (UV) absorbance and electrospray ionization mass spectrometric (ESI/MS) detection was used to determine catechins and gallic acid in three green tea matrix materials that are commonly used as dietary supplements. The results from both detection modes were evaluated with 14 quantitation models, all of which were based on the analyte response relative to an internal standard. Half of the models were static, where quantitation was achieved with calibration factors that were constant over an analysis set. The other half were dynamic, with calibration factors calculated from interpolated response factor data at each time a sample was injected to correct for potential variations in analyte response over time. For all analytes, the relatively nonselective UV responses were found to be very stable over time and independent of the calibrant concentration; comparable results with low variability were obtained regardless of the quantitation model used. Conversely, the highly selective MS responses were found to vary both with time and as a function of the calibrant concentration. A dynamic quantitation model based on polynomial data-fitting was used to reduce the variability in the quantitative results using the MS data.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/ac200372d
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883309254</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>883309254</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a371t-c9067f27e18e9e63ead9014723c1cd664f643e5dccdfb526dc4d91faaa16bd3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpl0M9O3DAQBnCrApUt7aEvgCwkVHEI-H-S42qBBWkrDsA5mrUnxShxFjt74MY78IZ9khqxsBI9jWT9PPPpI-QnZyecCX4KVjAmS-G-kAnXghWmqsQOmbD8WoiSsT3yLaUHxjhn3Hwle4KXFauYnBA8ewrQe0tn0PllhNEPgU5XqziAvaftEOkZjhh7H3z4k9GI9t6HRCE4Ooeuyz-n1jvqA51HxEBvEehdesWL2d_nl_Obq9PfN9_Jbgtdwh-buU_uLs5vZ5fF4np-NZsuCpAlHwtbM1O2okReYY1GIriacVUKabl1xqjWKInaWevapRbGWeVq3gIAN0snQe6TX297c_7HNaax6X2y2HUQcFinpqqkZLXQKsvDT_JhWMeQw2WktNKm1BkdvyEbh5Qits0q-h7iU8NZ89p889F8tgebhetlj-5DvledwdEGQLLQtRGC9WnrlBKaa751YNM21P8H_wG0iJXX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>884545675</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic Calibration Approach for Determining Catechins and Gallic Acid in Green Tea Using LC–ESI/MS</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Bedner, Mary ; Duewer, David L</creator><creatorcontrib>Bedner, Mary ; Duewer, David L</creatorcontrib><description>Catechins and gallic acid are antioxidant constituents of Camellia sinensis, or green tea. Liquid chromatography with both ultraviolet (UV) absorbance and electrospray ionization mass spectrometric (ESI/MS) detection was used to determine catechins and gallic acid in three green tea matrix materials that are commonly used as dietary supplements. The results from both detection modes were evaluated with 14 quantitation models, all of which were based on the analyte response relative to an internal standard. Half of the models were static, where quantitation was achieved with calibration factors that were constant over an analysis set. The other half were dynamic, with calibration factors calculated from interpolated response factor data at each time a sample was injected to correct for potential variations in analyte response over time. For all analytes, the relatively nonselective UV responses were found to be very stable over time and independent of the calibrant concentration; comparable results with low variability were obtained regardless of the quantitation model used. Conversely, the highly selective MS responses were found to vary both with time and as a function of the calibrant concentration. A dynamic quantitation model based on polynomial data-fitting was used to reduce the variability in the quantitative results using the MS data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2700</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6882</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/ac200372d</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21780803</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANCHAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Analytical chemistry ; Antioxidants - analysis ; Biological Products - analysis ; Calibration ; Camellia sinensis - chemistry ; Catechin - analysis ; Chemistry ; Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography ; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods ; Exact sciences and technology ; Gallic Acid - analysis ; Hydrolyzable Tannins - analysis ; Mass spectrometry ; Mass Spectrometry - methods ; Models, Statistical ; Other chromatographic methods ; Reference Standards ; Reproducibility of Results ; Spectrometric and optical methods ; Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization - methods ; Tea ; Ultraviolet radiation</subject><ispartof>Analytical chemistry (Washington), 2011-08, Vol.83 (16), p.6169-6176</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 U.S. Government</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Aug 15, 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a371t-c9067f27e18e9e63ead9014723c1cd664f643e5dccdfb526dc4d91faaa16bd3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a371t-c9067f27e18e9e63ead9014723c1cd664f643e5dccdfb526dc4d91faaa16bd3a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ac200372d$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac200372d$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2763,27074,27922,27923,56736,56786</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24425151$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21780803$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bedner, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duewer, David L</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic Calibration Approach for Determining Catechins and Gallic Acid in Green Tea Using LC–ESI/MS</title><title>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</title><addtitle>Anal. Chem</addtitle><description>Catechins and gallic acid are antioxidant constituents of Camellia sinensis, or green tea. Liquid chromatography with both ultraviolet (UV) absorbance and electrospray ionization mass spectrometric (ESI/MS) detection was used to determine catechins and gallic acid in three green tea matrix materials that are commonly used as dietary supplements. The results from both detection modes were evaluated with 14 quantitation models, all of which were based on the analyte response relative to an internal standard. Half of the models were static, where quantitation was achieved with calibration factors that were constant over an analysis set. The other half were dynamic, with calibration factors calculated from interpolated response factor data at each time a sample was injected to correct for potential variations in analyte response over time. For all analytes, the relatively nonselective UV responses were found to be very stable over time and independent of the calibrant concentration; comparable results with low variability were obtained regardless of the quantitation model used. Conversely, the highly selective MS responses were found to vary both with time and as a function of the calibrant concentration. A dynamic quantitation model based on polynomial data-fitting was used to reduce the variability in the quantitative results using the MS data.</description><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Antioxidants - analysis</subject><subject>Biological Products - analysis</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Camellia sinensis - chemistry</subject><subject>Catechin - analysis</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</subject><subject>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Gallic Acid - analysis</subject><subject>Hydrolyzable Tannins - analysis</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Other chromatographic methods</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Spectrometric and optical methods</subject><subject>Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization - methods</subject><subject>Tea</subject><subject>Ultraviolet radiation</subject><issn>0003-2700</issn><issn>1520-6882</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpl0M9O3DAQBnCrApUt7aEvgCwkVHEI-H-S42qBBWkrDsA5mrUnxShxFjt74MY78IZ9khqxsBI9jWT9PPPpI-QnZyecCX4KVjAmS-G-kAnXghWmqsQOmbD8WoiSsT3yLaUHxjhn3Hwle4KXFauYnBA8ewrQe0tn0PllhNEPgU5XqziAvaftEOkZjhh7H3z4k9GI9t6HRCE4Ooeuyz-n1jvqA51HxEBvEehdesWL2d_nl_Obq9PfN9_Jbgtdwh-buU_uLs5vZ5fF4np-NZsuCpAlHwtbM1O2okReYY1GIriacVUKabl1xqjWKInaWevapRbGWeVq3gIAN0snQe6TX297c_7HNaax6X2y2HUQcFinpqqkZLXQKsvDT_JhWMeQw2WktNKm1BkdvyEbh5Qits0q-h7iU8NZ89p889F8tgebhetlj-5DvledwdEGQLLQtRGC9WnrlBKaa751YNM21P8H_wG0iJXX</recordid><startdate>20110815</startdate><enddate>20110815</enddate><creator>Bedner, Mary</creator><creator>Duewer, David L</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110815</creationdate><title>Dynamic Calibration Approach for Determining Catechins and Gallic Acid in Green Tea Using LC–ESI/MS</title><author>Bedner, Mary ; Duewer, David L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a371t-c9067f27e18e9e63ead9014723c1cd664f643e5dccdfb526dc4d91faaa16bd3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Antioxidants - analysis</topic><topic>Biological Products - analysis</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Camellia sinensis - chemistry</topic><topic>Catechin - analysis</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</topic><topic>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Gallic Acid - analysis</topic><topic>Hydrolyzable Tannins - analysis</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Other chromatographic methods</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Spectrometric and optical methods</topic><topic>Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization - methods</topic><topic>Tea</topic><topic>Ultraviolet radiation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bedner, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duewer, David L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bedner, Mary</au><au>Duewer, David L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic Calibration Approach for Determining Catechins and Gallic Acid in Green Tea Using LC–ESI/MS</atitle><jtitle>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</jtitle><addtitle>Anal. Chem</addtitle><date>2011-08-15</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>6169</spage><epage>6176</epage><pages>6169-6176</pages><issn>0003-2700</issn><eissn>1520-6882</eissn><coden>ANCHAM</coden><abstract>Catechins and gallic acid are antioxidant constituents of Camellia sinensis, or green tea. Liquid chromatography with both ultraviolet (UV) absorbance and electrospray ionization mass spectrometric (ESI/MS) detection was used to determine catechins and gallic acid in three green tea matrix materials that are commonly used as dietary supplements. The results from both detection modes were evaluated with 14 quantitation models, all of which were based on the analyte response relative to an internal standard. Half of the models were static, where quantitation was achieved with calibration factors that were constant over an analysis set. The other half were dynamic, with calibration factors calculated from interpolated response factor data at each time a sample was injected to correct for potential variations in analyte response over time. For all analytes, the relatively nonselective UV responses were found to be very stable over time and independent of the calibrant concentration; comparable results with low variability were obtained regardless of the quantitation model used. Conversely, the highly selective MS responses were found to vary both with time and as a function of the calibrant concentration. A dynamic quantitation model based on polynomial data-fitting was used to reduce the variability in the quantitative results using the MS data.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>21780803</pmid><doi>10.1021/ac200372d</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2700
ispartof Analytical chemistry (Washington), 2011-08, Vol.83 (16), p.6169-6176
issn 0003-2700
1520-6882
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883309254
source MEDLINE; ACS Publications
subjects Analytical chemistry
Antioxidants - analysis
Biological Products - analysis
Calibration
Camellia sinensis - chemistry
Catechin - analysis
Chemistry
Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods
Exact sciences and technology
Gallic Acid - analysis
Hydrolyzable Tannins - analysis
Mass spectrometry
Mass Spectrometry - methods
Models, Statistical
Other chromatographic methods
Reference Standards
Reproducibility of Results
Spectrometric and optical methods
Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization - methods
Tea
Ultraviolet radiation
title Dynamic Calibration Approach for Determining Catechins and Gallic Acid in Green Tea Using LC–ESI/MS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T01%3A04%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20Calibration%20Approach%20for%20Determining%20Catechins%20and%20Gallic%20Acid%20in%20Green%20Tea%20Using%20LC%E2%80%93ESI/MS&rft.jtitle=Analytical%20chemistry%20(Washington)&rft.au=Bedner,%20Mary&rft.date=2011-08-15&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=6169&rft.epage=6176&rft.pages=6169-6176&rft.issn=0003-2700&rft.eissn=1520-6882&rft.coden=ANCHAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/ac200372d&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E883309254%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=884545675&rft_id=info:pmid/21780803&rfr_iscdi=true