Dynamic Calibration Approach for Determining Catechins and Gallic Acid in Green Tea Using LC–ESI/MS
Catechins and gallic acid are antioxidant constituents of Camellia sinensis, or green tea. Liquid chromatography with both ultraviolet (UV) absorbance and electrospray ionization mass spectrometric (ESI/MS) detection was used to determine catechins and gallic acid in three green tea matrix materials...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Analytical chemistry (Washington) 2011-08, Vol.83 (16), p.6169-6176 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6176 |
---|---|
container_issue | 16 |
container_start_page | 6169 |
container_title | Analytical chemistry (Washington) |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Bedner, Mary Duewer, David L |
description | Catechins and gallic acid are antioxidant constituents of Camellia sinensis, or green tea. Liquid chromatography with both ultraviolet (UV) absorbance and electrospray ionization mass spectrometric (ESI/MS) detection was used to determine catechins and gallic acid in three green tea matrix materials that are commonly used as dietary supplements. The results from both detection modes were evaluated with 14 quantitation models, all of which were based on the analyte response relative to an internal standard. Half of the models were static, where quantitation was achieved with calibration factors that were constant over an analysis set. The other half were dynamic, with calibration factors calculated from interpolated response factor data at each time a sample was injected to correct for potential variations in analyte response over time. For all analytes, the relatively nonselective UV responses were found to be very stable over time and independent of the calibrant concentration; comparable results with low variability were obtained regardless of the quantitation model used. Conversely, the highly selective MS responses were found to vary both with time and as a function of the calibrant concentration. A dynamic quantitation model based on polynomial data-fitting was used to reduce the variability in the quantitative results using the MS data. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/ac200372d |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883309254</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>883309254</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a371t-c9067f27e18e9e63ead9014723c1cd664f643e5dccdfb526dc4d91faaa16bd3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpl0M9O3DAQBnCrApUt7aEvgCwkVHEI-H-S42qBBWkrDsA5mrUnxShxFjt74MY78IZ9khqxsBI9jWT9PPPpI-QnZyecCX4KVjAmS-G-kAnXghWmqsQOmbD8WoiSsT3yLaUHxjhn3Hwle4KXFauYnBA8ewrQe0tn0PllhNEPgU5XqziAvaftEOkZjhh7H3z4k9GI9t6HRCE4Ooeuyz-n1jvqA51HxEBvEehdesWL2d_nl_Obq9PfN9_Jbgtdwh-buU_uLs5vZ5fF4np-NZsuCpAlHwtbM1O2okReYY1GIriacVUKabl1xqjWKInaWevapRbGWeVq3gIAN0snQe6TX297c_7HNaax6X2y2HUQcFinpqqkZLXQKsvDT_JhWMeQw2WktNKm1BkdvyEbh5Qits0q-h7iU8NZ89p889F8tgebhetlj-5DvledwdEGQLLQtRGC9WnrlBKaa751YNM21P8H_wG0iJXX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>884545675</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic Calibration Approach for Determining Catechins and Gallic Acid in Green Tea Using LC–ESI/MS</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Bedner, Mary ; Duewer, David L</creator><creatorcontrib>Bedner, Mary ; Duewer, David L</creatorcontrib><description>Catechins and gallic acid are antioxidant constituents of Camellia sinensis, or green tea. Liquid chromatography with both ultraviolet (UV) absorbance and electrospray ionization mass spectrometric (ESI/MS) detection was used to determine catechins and gallic acid in three green tea matrix materials that are commonly used as dietary supplements. The results from both detection modes were evaluated with 14 quantitation models, all of which were based on the analyte response relative to an internal standard. Half of the models were static, where quantitation was achieved with calibration factors that were constant over an analysis set. The other half were dynamic, with calibration factors calculated from interpolated response factor data at each time a sample was injected to correct for potential variations in analyte response over time. For all analytes, the relatively nonselective UV responses were found to be very stable over time and independent of the calibrant concentration; comparable results with low variability were obtained regardless of the quantitation model used. Conversely, the highly selective MS responses were found to vary both with time and as a function of the calibrant concentration. A dynamic quantitation model based on polynomial data-fitting was used to reduce the variability in the quantitative results using the MS data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2700</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6882</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/ac200372d</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21780803</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANCHAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Analytical chemistry ; Antioxidants - analysis ; Biological Products - analysis ; Calibration ; Camellia sinensis - chemistry ; Catechin - analysis ; Chemistry ; Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography ; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods ; Exact sciences and technology ; Gallic Acid - analysis ; Hydrolyzable Tannins - analysis ; Mass spectrometry ; Mass Spectrometry - methods ; Models, Statistical ; Other chromatographic methods ; Reference Standards ; Reproducibility of Results ; Spectrometric and optical methods ; Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization - methods ; Tea ; Ultraviolet radiation</subject><ispartof>Analytical chemistry (Washington), 2011-08, Vol.83 (16), p.6169-6176</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 U.S. Government</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Aug 15, 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a371t-c9067f27e18e9e63ead9014723c1cd664f643e5dccdfb526dc4d91faaa16bd3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a371t-c9067f27e18e9e63ead9014723c1cd664f643e5dccdfb526dc4d91faaa16bd3a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ac200372d$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac200372d$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2763,27074,27922,27923,56736,56786</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24425151$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21780803$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bedner, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duewer, David L</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic Calibration Approach for Determining Catechins and Gallic Acid in Green Tea Using LC–ESI/MS</title><title>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</title><addtitle>Anal. Chem</addtitle><description>Catechins and gallic acid are antioxidant constituents of Camellia sinensis, or green tea. Liquid chromatography with both ultraviolet (UV) absorbance and electrospray ionization mass spectrometric (ESI/MS) detection was used to determine catechins and gallic acid in three green tea matrix materials that are commonly used as dietary supplements. The results from both detection modes were evaluated with 14 quantitation models, all of which were based on the analyte response relative to an internal standard. Half of the models were static, where quantitation was achieved with calibration factors that were constant over an analysis set. The other half were dynamic, with calibration factors calculated from interpolated response factor data at each time a sample was injected to correct for potential variations in analyte response over time. For all analytes, the relatively nonselective UV responses were found to be very stable over time and independent of the calibrant concentration; comparable results with low variability were obtained regardless of the quantitation model used. Conversely, the highly selective MS responses were found to vary both with time and as a function of the calibrant concentration. A dynamic quantitation model based on polynomial data-fitting was used to reduce the variability in the quantitative results using the MS data.</description><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Antioxidants - analysis</subject><subject>Biological Products - analysis</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Camellia sinensis - chemistry</subject><subject>Catechin - analysis</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</subject><subject>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Gallic Acid - analysis</subject><subject>Hydrolyzable Tannins - analysis</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Other chromatographic methods</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Spectrometric and optical methods</subject><subject>Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization - methods</subject><subject>Tea</subject><subject>Ultraviolet radiation</subject><issn>0003-2700</issn><issn>1520-6882</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpl0M9O3DAQBnCrApUt7aEvgCwkVHEI-H-S42qBBWkrDsA5mrUnxShxFjt74MY78IZ9khqxsBI9jWT9PPPpI-QnZyecCX4KVjAmS-G-kAnXghWmqsQOmbD8WoiSsT3yLaUHxjhn3Hwle4KXFauYnBA8ewrQe0tn0PllhNEPgU5XqziAvaftEOkZjhh7H3z4k9GI9t6HRCE4Ooeuyz-n1jvqA51HxEBvEehdesWL2d_nl_Obq9PfN9_Jbgtdwh-buU_uLs5vZ5fF4np-NZsuCpAlHwtbM1O2okReYY1GIriacVUKabl1xqjWKInaWevapRbGWeVq3gIAN0snQe6TX297c_7HNaax6X2y2HUQcFinpqqkZLXQKsvDT_JhWMeQw2WktNKm1BkdvyEbh5Qits0q-h7iU8NZ89p889F8tgebhetlj-5DvledwdEGQLLQtRGC9WnrlBKaa751YNM21P8H_wG0iJXX</recordid><startdate>20110815</startdate><enddate>20110815</enddate><creator>Bedner, Mary</creator><creator>Duewer, David L</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110815</creationdate><title>Dynamic Calibration Approach for Determining Catechins and Gallic Acid in Green Tea Using LC–ESI/MS</title><author>Bedner, Mary ; Duewer, David L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a371t-c9067f27e18e9e63ead9014723c1cd664f643e5dccdfb526dc4d91faaa16bd3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Antioxidants - analysis</topic><topic>Biological Products - analysis</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Camellia sinensis - chemistry</topic><topic>Catechin - analysis</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</topic><topic>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Gallic Acid - analysis</topic><topic>Hydrolyzable Tannins - analysis</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Other chromatographic methods</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Spectrometric and optical methods</topic><topic>Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization - methods</topic><topic>Tea</topic><topic>Ultraviolet radiation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bedner, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duewer, David L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bedner, Mary</au><au>Duewer, David L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic Calibration Approach for Determining Catechins and Gallic Acid in Green Tea Using LC–ESI/MS</atitle><jtitle>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</jtitle><addtitle>Anal. Chem</addtitle><date>2011-08-15</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>6169</spage><epage>6176</epage><pages>6169-6176</pages><issn>0003-2700</issn><eissn>1520-6882</eissn><coden>ANCHAM</coden><abstract>Catechins and gallic acid are antioxidant constituents of Camellia sinensis, or green tea. Liquid chromatography with both ultraviolet (UV) absorbance and electrospray ionization mass spectrometric (ESI/MS) detection was used to determine catechins and gallic acid in three green tea matrix materials that are commonly used as dietary supplements. The results from both detection modes were evaluated with 14 quantitation models, all of which were based on the analyte response relative to an internal standard. Half of the models were static, where quantitation was achieved with calibration factors that were constant over an analysis set. The other half were dynamic, with calibration factors calculated from interpolated response factor data at each time a sample was injected to correct for potential variations in analyte response over time. For all analytes, the relatively nonselective UV responses were found to be very stable over time and independent of the calibrant concentration; comparable results with low variability were obtained regardless of the quantitation model used. Conversely, the highly selective MS responses were found to vary both with time and as a function of the calibrant concentration. A dynamic quantitation model based on polynomial data-fitting was used to reduce the variability in the quantitative results using the MS data.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>21780803</pmid><doi>10.1021/ac200372d</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-2700 |
ispartof | Analytical chemistry (Washington), 2011-08, Vol.83 (16), p.6169-6176 |
issn | 0003-2700 1520-6882 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883309254 |
source | MEDLINE; ACS Publications |
subjects | Analytical chemistry Antioxidants - analysis Biological Products - analysis Calibration Camellia sinensis - chemistry Catechin - analysis Chemistry Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods Exact sciences and technology Gallic Acid - analysis Hydrolyzable Tannins - analysis Mass spectrometry Mass Spectrometry - methods Models, Statistical Other chromatographic methods Reference Standards Reproducibility of Results Spectrometric and optical methods Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization - methods Tea Ultraviolet radiation |
title | Dynamic Calibration Approach for Determining Catechins and Gallic Acid in Green Tea Using LC–ESI/MS |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T01%3A04%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20Calibration%20Approach%20for%20Determining%20Catechins%20and%20Gallic%20Acid%20in%20Green%20Tea%20Using%20LC%E2%80%93ESI/MS&rft.jtitle=Analytical%20chemistry%20(Washington)&rft.au=Bedner,%20Mary&rft.date=2011-08-15&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=6169&rft.epage=6176&rft.pages=6169-6176&rft.issn=0003-2700&rft.eissn=1520-6882&rft.coden=ANCHAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/ac200372d&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E883309254%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=884545675&rft_id=info:pmid/21780803&rfr_iscdi=true |