Is power training or conventional resistance training better for function in elderly persons? A meta-analysis
Objective: to determine the effects of power training with high movement velocity compared with conventional resistance training with low movement velocity for older community-dwelling people. Design: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Data sources: the Cochrane Central Register of C...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Age and ageing 2011-09, Vol.40 (5), p.549-556 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 556 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 549 |
| container_title | Age and ageing |
| container_volume | 40 |
| creator | Tschopp, Marielle Sattelmayer, Martin Karl Hilfiker, Roger |
| description | Objective: to determine the effects of power training with high movement velocity compared with conventional resistance training with low movement velocity for older community-dwelling people.
Design: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
Data sources: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro and Scholar-Google.
Trials: all randomised or quasi-randomised trials investigating power training with high movement velocity versus conventional resistance training with low movement velocity in elderly persons over the age of 60 years. The primary outcomes were measures of functional outcomes; secondary outcomes were balance, gait, strength, power, muscle volume and adverse effects.
Results: eleven trials were identified involving 377 subjects. The pooled effect size for the follow-up values of the functional outcomes was 0.32 in favour of the power training (95% CI 0.06 to 0.57) and 0.38 (95% CI −0.51 to 1.28) for the change value. The pooled effect from three studies for self-reported function was 0.16 in favour of power training (95% CI −0.17 to 0.49).
Conclusion: power training is feasible for elderly persons and has a small advantage over strength training for functional outcomes. No firm conclusion can be made for safety. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ageing/afr005 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883307428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A268309432</galeid><oup_id>10.1093/ageing/afr005</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A268309432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-48c487419c617998c46f4a9c4dd33ac84e1d62d63e55f42d630a9f68edb2f15a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtrGzEUhUVoaVy3y2yD6KbdTKPXjKVVMKaPgCGbdi1kzZWZoJEmkiat_31lnNbQRbuRdOHT4Z5zELqi5CMlit-YPQxhf2NcIqS9QAsqOtkwycULtCCEsIasmLpEr3N-qCNtKXuFLhnlkhPGF2i8y3iKPyDhkswQqhSOCdsYniCUIQbjcYI85GKChTOzg1LqH1dZNwd7JPEQMPgekj_gCVKOId_iNR6hmMZUnUNVeYNeOuMzvH2-l-j750_fNl-b7f2Xu81621jRsdIIaYVcCapsR1dK1alzwigr-p5zY6UA2nes7zi0rRPHBzHKdRL6HXO0NXyJ3p90pxQfZ8hFj0O24L0JEOespeScrESNaYk-_JOkkvGW1INX9N1f6EOcU3VW9RQXVIoa6xI1J2hvPOgh1CQL_Cw2eg970NXl5l6vWVfjV4KzM29TzDmB01MaRpMOmhJ9LFifCtangit__bzEvBuh_0P_bvRsKM7Tf7R-Afs0sBs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>893418421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is power training or conventional resistance training better for function in elderly persons? A meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tschopp, Marielle ; Sattelmayer, Martin Karl ; Hilfiker, Roger</creator><creatorcontrib>Tschopp, Marielle ; Sattelmayer, Martin Karl ; Hilfiker, Roger</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: to determine the effects of power training with high movement velocity compared with conventional resistance training with low movement velocity for older community-dwelling people.
Design: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
Data sources: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro and Scholar-Google.
Trials: all randomised or quasi-randomised trials investigating power training with high movement velocity versus conventional resistance training with low movement velocity in elderly persons over the age of 60 years. The primary outcomes were measures of functional outcomes; secondary outcomes were balance, gait, strength, power, muscle volume and adverse effects.
Results: eleven trials were identified involving 377 subjects. The pooled effect size for the follow-up values of the functional outcomes was 0.32 in favour of the power training (95% CI 0.06 to 0.57) and 0.38 (95% CI −0.51 to 1.28) for the change value. The pooled effect from three studies for self-reported function was 0.16 in favour of power training (95% CI −0.17 to 0.49).
Conclusion: power training is feasible for elderly persons and has a small advantage over strength training for functional outcomes. No firm conclusion can be made for safety.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-0729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afr005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21383023</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AANGAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging ; Demographic aspects ; Elderly ; Elderly people ; Exercise ; Functional impairment ; Gait ; Humans ; Locomotion ; Male ; Meta-analysis ; Middle Aged ; Mobility ; Muscle Strength ; Muscle Weakness - physiopathology ; Muscle Weakness - therapy ; Muscles ; Older people ; Physiological aspects ; Postural Balance ; Power ; Resistance training ; Resistance Training - adverse effects ; Safety ; Side effects ; Training ; Weight training</subject><ispartof>Age and ageing, 2011-09, Vol.40 (5), p.549-556</ispartof><rights>The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2011</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Sep 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-48c487419c617998c46f4a9c4dd33ac84e1d62d63e55f42d630a9f68edb2f15a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-48c487419c617998c46f4a9c4dd33ac84e1d62d63e55f42d630a9f68edb2f15a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925,30999,31000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21383023$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tschopp, Marielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sattelmayer, Martin Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilfiker, Roger</creatorcontrib><title>Is power training or conventional resistance training better for function in elderly persons? A meta-analysis</title><title>Age and ageing</title><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><description>Objective: to determine the effects of power training with high movement velocity compared with conventional resistance training with low movement velocity for older community-dwelling people.
Design: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
Data sources: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro and Scholar-Google.
Trials: all randomised or quasi-randomised trials investigating power training with high movement velocity versus conventional resistance training with low movement velocity in elderly persons over the age of 60 years. The primary outcomes were measures of functional outcomes; secondary outcomes were balance, gait, strength, power, muscle volume and adverse effects.
Results: eleven trials were identified involving 377 subjects. The pooled effect size for the follow-up values of the functional outcomes was 0.32 in favour of the power training (95% CI 0.06 to 0.57) and 0.38 (95% CI −0.51 to 1.28) for the change value. The pooled effect from three studies for self-reported function was 0.16 in favour of power training (95% CI −0.17 to 0.49).
Conclusion: power training is feasible for elderly persons and has a small advantage over strength training for functional outcomes. No firm conclusion can be made for safety.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Elderly</subject><subject>Elderly people</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Functional impairment</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Locomotion</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Muscle Strength</subject><subject>Muscle Weakness - physiopathology</subject><subject>Muscle Weakness - therapy</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Postural Balance</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Resistance training</subject><subject>Resistance Training - adverse effects</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Weight training</subject><issn>0002-0729</issn><issn>1468-2834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtrGzEUhUVoaVy3y2yD6KbdTKPXjKVVMKaPgCGbdi1kzZWZoJEmkiat_31lnNbQRbuRdOHT4Z5zELqi5CMlit-YPQxhf2NcIqS9QAsqOtkwycULtCCEsIasmLpEr3N-qCNtKXuFLhnlkhPGF2i8y3iKPyDhkswQqhSOCdsYniCUIQbjcYI85GKChTOzg1LqH1dZNwd7JPEQMPgekj_gCVKOId_iNR6hmMZUnUNVeYNeOuMzvH2-l-j750_fNl-b7f2Xu81621jRsdIIaYVcCapsR1dK1alzwigr-p5zY6UA2nes7zi0rRPHBzHKdRL6HXO0NXyJ3p90pxQfZ8hFj0O24L0JEOespeScrESNaYk-_JOkkvGW1INX9N1f6EOcU3VW9RQXVIoa6xI1J2hvPOgh1CQL_Cw2eg970NXl5l6vWVfjV4KzM29TzDmB01MaRpMOmhJ9LFifCtangit__bzEvBuh_0P_bvRsKM7Tf7R-Afs0sBs</recordid><startdate>201109</startdate><enddate>201109</enddate><creator>Tschopp, Marielle</creator><creator>Sattelmayer, Martin Karl</creator><creator>Hilfiker, Roger</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201109</creationdate><title>Is power training or conventional resistance training better for function in elderly persons? A meta-analysis</title><author>Tschopp, Marielle ; Sattelmayer, Martin Karl ; Hilfiker, Roger</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-48c487419c617998c46f4a9c4dd33ac84e1d62d63e55f42d630a9f68edb2f15a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Elderly</topic><topic>Elderly people</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Functional impairment</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Locomotion</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Muscle Strength</topic><topic>Muscle Weakness - physiopathology</topic><topic>Muscle Weakness - therapy</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Postural Balance</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Resistance training</topic><topic>Resistance Training - adverse effects</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Weight training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tschopp, Marielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sattelmayer, Martin Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilfiker, Roger</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tschopp, Marielle</au><au>Sattelmayer, Martin Karl</au><au>Hilfiker, Roger</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is power training or conventional resistance training better for function in elderly persons? A meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><date>2011-09</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>549</spage><epage>556</epage><pages>549-556</pages><issn>0002-0729</issn><eissn>1468-2834</eissn><coden>AANGAH</coden><abstract>Objective: to determine the effects of power training with high movement velocity compared with conventional resistance training with low movement velocity for older community-dwelling people.
Design: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
Data sources: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro and Scholar-Google.
Trials: all randomised or quasi-randomised trials investigating power training with high movement velocity versus conventional resistance training with low movement velocity in elderly persons over the age of 60 years. The primary outcomes were measures of functional outcomes; secondary outcomes were balance, gait, strength, power, muscle volume and adverse effects.
Results: eleven trials were identified involving 377 subjects. The pooled effect size for the follow-up values of the functional outcomes was 0.32 in favour of the power training (95% CI 0.06 to 0.57) and 0.38 (95% CI −0.51 to 1.28) for the change value. The pooled effect from three studies for self-reported function was 0.16 in favour of power training (95% CI −0.17 to 0.49).
Conclusion: power training is feasible for elderly persons and has a small advantage over strength training for functional outcomes. No firm conclusion can be made for safety.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>21383023</pmid><doi>10.1093/ageing/afr005</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-0729 |
| ispartof | Age and ageing, 2011-09, Vol.40 (5), p.549-556 |
| issn | 0002-0729 1468-2834 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883307428 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Activities of Daily Living Age Factors Aged Aged, 80 and over Aging Demographic aspects Elderly Elderly people Exercise Functional impairment Gait Humans Locomotion Male Meta-analysis Middle Aged Mobility Muscle Strength Muscle Weakness - physiopathology Muscle Weakness - therapy Muscles Older people Physiological aspects Postural Balance Power Resistance training Resistance Training - adverse effects Safety Side effects Training Weight training |
| title | Is power training or conventional resistance training better for function in elderly persons? A meta-analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A54%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20power%20training%20or%20conventional%20resistance%20training%20better%20for%20function%20in%20elderly%20persons?%20A%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Age%20and%20ageing&rft.au=Tschopp,%20Marielle&rft.date=2011-09&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=549&rft.epage=556&rft.pages=549-556&rft.issn=0002-0729&rft.eissn=1468-2834&rft.coden=AANGAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afr005&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA268309432%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=893418421&rft_id=info:pmid/21383023&rft_galeid=A268309432&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ageing/afr005&rfr_iscdi=true |