What are the best reference values for a normal serum alanine transaminase activity (ALT)? Impact on the presumed prevalence of drug induced liver injury (DILI)

In clinical research, the definition of the upper limit of normal (ULN) is rarely detailed. For alanine transaminase (ALT), there are several definitions of ULN-ALT but no recognized global reference. Furthermore the inter-laboratory variability of results expressed using ULN-ALT is higher than usin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology 2011-08, Vol.60 (3), p.290-295
Hauptverfasser: M’Kada, Helmi, Munteanu, Mona, Perazzo, Hugo, Ngo, Yen, Ramanujam, Nittia, Imbert-Bismut, Françoise, Ratziu, Vlad, Bonnefont-Rousselot, Dominique, Souberbielle, Bernard, Schuppe-Koistinen, Ina, Poynard, Thierry
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 295
container_issue 3
container_start_page 290
container_title Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology
container_volume 60
creator M’Kada, Helmi
Munteanu, Mona
Perazzo, Hugo
Ngo, Yen
Ramanujam, Nittia
Imbert-Bismut, Françoise
Ratziu, Vlad
Bonnefont-Rousselot, Dominique
Souberbielle, Bernard
Schuppe-Koistinen, Ina
Poynard, Thierry
description In clinical research, the definition of the upper limit of normal (ULN) is rarely detailed. For alanine transaminase (ALT), there are several definitions of ULN-ALT but no recognized global reference. Furthermore the inter-laboratory variability of results expressed using ULN-ALT is higher than using the actual value of ULN expressed in IU/L. Regulatory agencies still use ULN-ALT for the definition of drug adverse events such as drug induced liver disease (DILI). We applied two extreme definitions of ULN-ALT (26 and 66IU/L) in two populations with different liver disease risk: 7463 consecutive volunteers representative a low risk population, and 6865 consecutive patients hospitalized in a tertiary referral center. The same assay technique was used for both populations on fresh plasma in the same laboratory. In the low risk population the liver disease estimates ranged from 0% to 1.99% according to ULN-ALT definition and gender; prevalence of liver disease as defined by Temple’s criteria (3×ULN) decreased significantly with increased ULN-ALT threshold and prevalence of liver disease was lower in females compared to males (all P34μmol/L) decreased significantly with increased ULN-ALT threshold and females compared to males. In the low risk population the two major factors associated with ULN variability were gender and BMI. Artificial statistical modifications of the procedures chosen for the ULN-ALT definition change dramatically the prevalence of DILI estimates. A consensus in liver disease definitions seems mandatory for DILI studies in order to prevent misleading conclusions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.04.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883044310</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0273230011000705</els_id><sourcerecordid>883044310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-27a9ae5119cb19102213e17681af0a7b3d4d011461bb9f1140154c9fd7f391523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU2P0zAUtBCILQu_AAn5BntIeLaTJj6g1Wr5qlSJyyKOluO8UFf5wnYq9d_wU3ltF46c_GzPzNPMMPZaQC5ArN_v82NI8y6XIEQORQ4gn7CVAL3OQOryKVuBrFQmFcAVexHjHghR19VzdiVFqXRdqxX7_WNnE7cBedohbzAmHrDDgKNDfrD9gpF3U-CWj1MYbM8jhmXgtrejH4kU7Bjt4EcbkVuX_MGnI393t324ueWbYaYnPo1n7TlgXAZsTwMJnxdMHW_D8pP7sV0cffX-gIFu-yWQysfNdnPzkj3rbB_x1eN5zb5__vRw_zXbfvuyub_bZk5pSJmsrLZYCqFdI7QAKYVCUa1rYTuwVaPaoqWcirVoGt3RAKIsnO7aqlNalFJds7cX3TlMv8h1MoOPDnsyitMSDaUFRaEEEFJdkC5MMVJaZg5-sOFoBJhTM2Zvzs2YUzMGCkO5E-vNo_7SUAr_OH-rIMCHCwDJ5cFjMNH5U0qtD-iSaSf_3wV_ADp3oPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>883044310</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What are the best reference values for a normal serum alanine transaminase activity (ALT)? Impact on the presumed prevalence of drug induced liver injury (DILI)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>M’Kada, Helmi ; Munteanu, Mona ; Perazzo, Hugo ; Ngo, Yen ; Ramanujam, Nittia ; Imbert-Bismut, Françoise ; Ratziu, Vlad ; Bonnefont-Rousselot, Dominique ; Souberbielle, Bernard ; Schuppe-Koistinen, Ina ; Poynard, Thierry</creator><creatorcontrib>M’Kada, Helmi ; Munteanu, Mona ; Perazzo, Hugo ; Ngo, Yen ; Ramanujam, Nittia ; Imbert-Bismut, Françoise ; Ratziu, Vlad ; Bonnefont-Rousselot, Dominique ; Souberbielle, Bernard ; Schuppe-Koistinen, Ina ; Poynard, Thierry ; the DILI group of the SAFE-T consortium ; DILI group of the SAFE-T consortium</creatorcontrib><description>In clinical research, the definition of the upper limit of normal (ULN) is rarely detailed. For alanine transaminase (ALT), there are several definitions of ULN-ALT but no recognized global reference. Furthermore the inter-laboratory variability of results expressed using ULN-ALT is higher than using the actual value of ULN expressed in IU/L. Regulatory agencies still use ULN-ALT for the definition of drug adverse events such as drug induced liver disease (DILI). We applied two extreme definitions of ULN-ALT (26 and 66IU/L) in two populations with different liver disease risk: 7463 consecutive volunteers representative a low risk population, and 6865 consecutive patients hospitalized in a tertiary referral center. The same assay technique was used for both populations on fresh plasma in the same laboratory. In the low risk population the liver disease estimates ranged from 0% to 1.99% according to ULN-ALT definition and gender; prevalence of liver disease as defined by Temple’s criteria (3×ULN) decreased significantly with increased ULN-ALT threshold and prevalence of liver disease was lower in females compared to males (all P&lt;0.001). In the high risk population the estimates of liver disease prevalence ranged from 0.78% to 15.85%; disease prevalence using both Temple’s corollary and Hy’s law criteria (3×ULN-ALT and bilirubin &gt;34μmol/L) decreased significantly with increased ULN-ALT threshold and females compared to males. In the low risk population the two major factors associated with ULN variability were gender and BMI. Artificial statistical modifications of the procedures chosen for the ULN-ALT definition change dramatically the prevalence of DILI estimates. A consensus in liver disease definitions seems mandatory for DILI studies in order to prevent misleading conclusions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-2300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0295</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.04.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21539883</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Alanine Transaminase - blood ; ALT ; Biomarkers ; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury - enzymology ; DILI ; Female ; Humans ; Hy’s law ; Limit of the normal ; Liver Function Tests - methods ; Liver necrosis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reference Values ; Temple criteria</subject><ispartof>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2011-08, Vol.60 (3), p.290-295</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-27a9ae5119cb19102213e17681af0a7b3d4d011461bb9f1140154c9fd7f391523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-27a9ae5119cb19102213e17681af0a7b3d4d011461bb9f1140154c9fd7f391523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230011000705$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21539883$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>M’Kada, Helmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munteanu, Mona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perazzo, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Yen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramanujam, Nittia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imbert-Bismut, Françoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratziu, Vlad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnefont-Rousselot, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souberbielle, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuppe-Koistinen, Ina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poynard, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the DILI group of the SAFE-T consortium</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DILI group of the SAFE-T consortium</creatorcontrib><title>What are the best reference values for a normal serum alanine transaminase activity (ALT)? Impact on the presumed prevalence of drug induced liver injury (DILI)</title><title>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology</title><addtitle>Regul Toxicol Pharmacol</addtitle><description>In clinical research, the definition of the upper limit of normal (ULN) is rarely detailed. For alanine transaminase (ALT), there are several definitions of ULN-ALT but no recognized global reference. Furthermore the inter-laboratory variability of results expressed using ULN-ALT is higher than using the actual value of ULN expressed in IU/L. Regulatory agencies still use ULN-ALT for the definition of drug adverse events such as drug induced liver disease (DILI). We applied two extreme definitions of ULN-ALT (26 and 66IU/L) in two populations with different liver disease risk: 7463 consecutive volunteers representative a low risk population, and 6865 consecutive patients hospitalized in a tertiary referral center. The same assay technique was used for both populations on fresh plasma in the same laboratory. In the low risk population the liver disease estimates ranged from 0% to 1.99% according to ULN-ALT definition and gender; prevalence of liver disease as defined by Temple’s criteria (3×ULN) decreased significantly with increased ULN-ALT threshold and prevalence of liver disease was lower in females compared to males (all P&lt;0.001). In the high risk population the estimates of liver disease prevalence ranged from 0.78% to 15.85%; disease prevalence using both Temple’s corollary and Hy’s law criteria (3×ULN-ALT and bilirubin &gt;34μmol/L) decreased significantly with increased ULN-ALT threshold and females compared to males. In the low risk population the two major factors associated with ULN variability were gender and BMI. Artificial statistical modifications of the procedures chosen for the ULN-ALT definition change dramatically the prevalence of DILI estimates. A consensus in liver disease definitions seems mandatory for DILI studies in order to prevent misleading conclusions.</description><subject>Alanine Transaminase - blood</subject><subject>ALT</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury - enzymology</subject><subject>DILI</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hy’s law</subject><subject>Limit of the normal</subject><subject>Liver Function Tests - methods</subject><subject>Liver necrosis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Temple criteria</subject><issn>0273-2300</issn><issn>1096-0295</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU2P0zAUtBCILQu_AAn5BntIeLaTJj6g1Wr5qlSJyyKOluO8UFf5wnYq9d_wU3ltF46c_GzPzNPMMPZaQC5ArN_v82NI8y6XIEQORQ4gn7CVAL3OQOryKVuBrFQmFcAVexHjHghR19VzdiVFqXRdqxX7_WNnE7cBedohbzAmHrDDgKNDfrD9gpF3U-CWj1MYbM8jhmXgtrejH4kU7Bjt4EcbkVuX_MGnI393t324ueWbYaYnPo1n7TlgXAZsTwMJnxdMHW_D8pP7sV0cffX-gIFu-yWQysfNdnPzkj3rbB_x1eN5zb5__vRw_zXbfvuyub_bZk5pSJmsrLZYCqFdI7QAKYVCUa1rYTuwVaPaoqWcirVoGt3RAKIsnO7aqlNalFJds7cX3TlMv8h1MoOPDnsyitMSDaUFRaEEEFJdkC5MMVJaZg5-sOFoBJhTM2Zvzs2YUzMGCkO5E-vNo_7SUAr_OH-rIMCHCwDJ5cFjMNH5U0qtD-iSaSf_3wV_ADp3oPg</recordid><startdate>201108</startdate><enddate>201108</enddate><creator>M’Kada, Helmi</creator><creator>Munteanu, Mona</creator><creator>Perazzo, Hugo</creator><creator>Ngo, Yen</creator><creator>Ramanujam, Nittia</creator><creator>Imbert-Bismut, Françoise</creator><creator>Ratziu, Vlad</creator><creator>Bonnefont-Rousselot, Dominique</creator><creator>Souberbielle, Bernard</creator><creator>Schuppe-Koistinen, Ina</creator><creator>Poynard, Thierry</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201108</creationdate><title>What are the best reference values for a normal serum alanine transaminase activity (ALT)? Impact on the presumed prevalence of drug induced liver injury (DILI)</title><author>M’Kada, Helmi ; Munteanu, Mona ; Perazzo, Hugo ; Ngo, Yen ; Ramanujam, Nittia ; Imbert-Bismut, Françoise ; Ratziu, Vlad ; Bonnefont-Rousselot, Dominique ; Souberbielle, Bernard ; Schuppe-Koistinen, Ina ; Poynard, Thierry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-27a9ae5119cb19102213e17681af0a7b3d4d011461bb9f1140154c9fd7f391523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Alanine Transaminase - blood</topic><topic>ALT</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury - enzymology</topic><topic>DILI</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hy’s law</topic><topic>Limit of the normal</topic><topic>Liver Function Tests - methods</topic><topic>Liver necrosis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Temple criteria</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>M’Kada, Helmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munteanu, Mona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perazzo, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Yen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramanujam, Nittia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imbert-Bismut, Françoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratziu, Vlad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnefont-Rousselot, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souberbielle, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuppe-Koistinen, Ina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poynard, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the DILI group of the SAFE-T consortium</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DILI group of the SAFE-T consortium</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>M’Kada, Helmi</au><au>Munteanu, Mona</au><au>Perazzo, Hugo</au><au>Ngo, Yen</au><au>Ramanujam, Nittia</au><au>Imbert-Bismut, Françoise</au><au>Ratziu, Vlad</au><au>Bonnefont-Rousselot, Dominique</au><au>Souberbielle, Bernard</au><au>Schuppe-Koistinen, Ina</au><au>Poynard, Thierry</au><aucorp>the DILI group of the SAFE-T consortium</aucorp><aucorp>DILI group of the SAFE-T consortium</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What are the best reference values for a normal serum alanine transaminase activity (ALT)? Impact on the presumed prevalence of drug induced liver injury (DILI)</atitle><jtitle>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Regul Toxicol Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2011-08</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>290</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>290-295</pages><issn>0273-2300</issn><eissn>1096-0295</eissn><abstract>In clinical research, the definition of the upper limit of normal (ULN) is rarely detailed. For alanine transaminase (ALT), there are several definitions of ULN-ALT but no recognized global reference. Furthermore the inter-laboratory variability of results expressed using ULN-ALT is higher than using the actual value of ULN expressed in IU/L. Regulatory agencies still use ULN-ALT for the definition of drug adverse events such as drug induced liver disease (DILI). We applied two extreme definitions of ULN-ALT (26 and 66IU/L) in two populations with different liver disease risk: 7463 consecutive volunteers representative a low risk population, and 6865 consecutive patients hospitalized in a tertiary referral center. The same assay technique was used for both populations on fresh plasma in the same laboratory. In the low risk population the liver disease estimates ranged from 0% to 1.99% according to ULN-ALT definition and gender; prevalence of liver disease as defined by Temple’s criteria (3×ULN) decreased significantly with increased ULN-ALT threshold and prevalence of liver disease was lower in females compared to males (all P&lt;0.001). In the high risk population the estimates of liver disease prevalence ranged from 0.78% to 15.85%; disease prevalence using both Temple’s corollary and Hy’s law criteria (3×ULN-ALT and bilirubin &gt;34μmol/L) decreased significantly with increased ULN-ALT threshold and females compared to males. In the low risk population the two major factors associated with ULN variability were gender and BMI. Artificial statistical modifications of the procedures chosen for the ULN-ALT definition change dramatically the prevalence of DILI estimates. A consensus in liver disease definitions seems mandatory for DILI studies in order to prevent misleading conclusions.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21539883</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.04.002</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0273-2300
ispartof Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2011-08, Vol.60 (3), p.290-295
issn 0273-2300
1096-0295
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883044310
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Alanine Transaminase - blood
ALT
Biomarkers
Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury - enzymology
DILI
Female
Humans
Hy’s law
Limit of the normal
Liver Function Tests - methods
Liver necrosis
Male
Middle Aged
Reference Values
Temple criteria
title What are the best reference values for a normal serum alanine transaminase activity (ALT)? Impact on the presumed prevalence of drug induced liver injury (DILI)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T14%3A31%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20are%20the%20best%20reference%20values%20for%20a%20normal%20serum%20alanine%20transaminase%20activity%20(ALT)?%20Impact%20on%20the%20presumed%20prevalence%20of%20drug%20induced%20liver%20injury%20(DILI)&rft.jtitle=Regulatory%20toxicology%20and%20pharmacology&rft.au=M%E2%80%99Kada,%20Helmi&rft.aucorp=the%20DILI%20group%20of%20the%20SAFE-T%20consortium&rft.date=2011-08&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=290&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=290-295&rft.issn=0273-2300&rft.eissn=1096-0295&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.04.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E883044310%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=883044310&rft_id=info:pmid/21539883&rft_els_id=S0273230011000705&rfr_iscdi=true