Viral factors influencing the outcome of human cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplant recipients

Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains the leading viral cause of disease following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) despite the availability of antiviral agents for prophylaxis and therapy. Objective Examine the viral factors that influence the outcome of CMV infection following va...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical virology 2011-08, Vol.51 (4), p.229-233
Hauptverfasser: Scott, G.M, Naing, Z, Pavlovic, J, Iwasenko, J.M, Angus, P, Jones, R, Rawlinson, W.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 233
container_issue 4
container_start_page 229
container_title Journal of clinical virology
container_volume 51
creator Scott, G.M
Naing, Z
Pavlovic, J
Iwasenko, J.M
Angus, P
Jones, R
Rawlinson, W.D
description Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains the leading viral cause of disease following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) despite the availability of antiviral agents for prophylaxis and therapy. Objective Examine the viral factors that influence the outcome of CMV infection following valganciclovir prophylaxis or laboratory-guided preemptive therapy in OLT recipients. Study design The value of valganciclovir prophylaxis and laboratory-guided preemptive therapy for the prevention of CMV infection and disease was observed in 64 OLT recipients. Prophylaxis was given to all CMV seronegative recipients receiving a liver from a seropositive donor (D+R−; n = 15), and all other recipients were randomised to receive either prophylaxis ( n = 24) or laboratory-guided preemptive therapy ( n = 25). Recipients were monitored for CMV DNAemia, viral load, emergence of antiviral resistant strains and co-infections. Results CMV end-organ disease and antiviral resistant strains only occurred in D+R− recipients despite the use of prophylaxis in these patients. The D+R− recipients commencing prophylaxis immediately following transplantation had better outcomes compared to those for whom prophylaxis was delayed due to renal impairment. Prophylaxis reduced the incidence of CMV DNAemia, persistent infection, and high viral loads for CMV seropositive (D−R+and D+R+) recipients, but laboratory-guided preemptive therapy effectively controlled CMV infection and prevented disease in these OLT recipients. Conclusion Delaying the commencement of valganciclovir prophylaxis may be associated with worse outcomes for high-risk OLT recipients. Laboratory-guided pre-emptive therapy remains an alternative approach for seropositive recipients at lower risk of CMV disease.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcv.2011.05.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883044097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1386653211001843</els_id><sourcerecordid>883044097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-adad9ca3d3e30c4a6167bf3461d156a38ee020b5aee1de87426273356104d4713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFksuO1DAQRSMEYoaBD2CDskGsElzxKxES0mjESxqJBY-t5XYqPQ6J09hOS_33VNMNSCxg5bJ0brl8bxXFU2A1MFAvx3p0-7phADWTNYPmXnEJreaV7JS-TzVvVaUkby6KRymNjIHkQj8sLhpQAhotLovtVx_tVA7W5SWm0odhWjE4H7ZlvsNyWbNbZjqH8m6dbSjdIdN9a6dl7-P6U4Au-yVQVU5-j7HM0Ya0m2zIZUTndx5DTo-LB4OdEj45n1fFl7dvPt-8r24_vvtwc31bOcm7XNne9p2zvOfImRNWgdKbgQsFPUhleYvIGraRFhF6bLVoVKM5lwqY6IUGflW8OPXdxeX7iimb2SeHE42Dy5pM23ImBOv0_0mtoAOpJZFwIl1cUoo4mF30s40HA8wcgzCjoSDMMQjDpKEgSPPs3H3dzNj_VvxynoDnZ8AmZ6eBTHM-_eEE_apjnLhXJw7Jtb3HaJIjRx32ntzNpl_8P8d4_ZfaTT54evAbHjCNyxoDxWHApMYw8-m4MceFAaBlaWmGHxA6u8U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>876191575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Viral factors influencing the outcome of human cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplant recipients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Scott, G.M ; Naing, Z ; Pavlovic, J ; Iwasenko, J.M ; Angus, P ; Jones, R ; Rawlinson, W.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Scott, G.M ; Naing, Z ; Pavlovic, J ; Iwasenko, J.M ; Angus, P ; Jones, R ; Rawlinson, W.D</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains the leading viral cause of disease following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) despite the availability of antiviral agents for prophylaxis and therapy. Objective Examine the viral factors that influence the outcome of CMV infection following valganciclovir prophylaxis or laboratory-guided preemptive therapy in OLT recipients. Study design The value of valganciclovir prophylaxis and laboratory-guided preemptive therapy for the prevention of CMV infection and disease was observed in 64 OLT recipients. Prophylaxis was given to all CMV seronegative recipients receiving a liver from a seropositive donor (D+R−; n = 15), and all other recipients were randomised to receive either prophylaxis ( n = 24) or laboratory-guided preemptive therapy ( n = 25). Recipients were monitored for CMV DNAemia, viral load, emergence of antiviral resistant strains and co-infections. Results CMV end-organ disease and antiviral resistant strains only occurred in D+R− recipients despite the use of prophylaxis in these patients. The D+R− recipients commencing prophylaxis immediately following transplantation had better outcomes compared to those for whom prophylaxis was delayed due to renal impairment. Prophylaxis reduced the incidence of CMV DNAemia, persistent infection, and high viral loads for CMV seropositive (D−R+and D+R+) recipients, but laboratory-guided preemptive therapy effectively controlled CMV infection and prevented disease in these OLT recipients. Conclusion Delaying the commencement of valganciclovir prophylaxis may be associated with worse outcomes for high-risk OLT recipients. Laboratory-guided pre-emptive therapy remains an alternative approach for seropositive recipients at lower risk of CMV disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-6532</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5967</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2011.05.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21641274</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Allergy and Immunology ; Antiviral agents ; Antiviral Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemoprevention - methods ; Cytomegalovirus ; Cytomegalovirus Infections - drug therapy ; Cytomegalovirus Infections - pathology ; Cytomegalovirus Infections - virology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Ganciclovir - administration &amp; dosage ; Ganciclovir - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Human cytomegalovirus ; Human viral diseases ; Humans ; Infectious Disease ; Infectious diseases ; Liver transplantation ; Liver Transplantation - adverse effects ; Medical sciences ; Microbiology ; Miscellaneous ; Prophylaxis ; Transplantation ; Treatment Outcome ; Viral diseases ; Virology</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical virology, 2011-08, Vol.51 (4), p.229-233</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-adad9ca3d3e30c4a6167bf3461d156a38ee020b5aee1de87426273356104d4713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-adad9ca3d3e30c4a6167bf3461d156a38ee020b5aee1de87426273356104d4713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653211001843$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24335903$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21641274$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scott, G.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naing, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlovic, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwasenko, J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angus, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawlinson, W.D</creatorcontrib><title>Viral factors influencing the outcome of human cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplant recipients</title><title>Journal of clinical virology</title><addtitle>J Clin Virol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains the leading viral cause of disease following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) despite the availability of antiviral agents for prophylaxis and therapy. Objective Examine the viral factors that influence the outcome of CMV infection following valganciclovir prophylaxis or laboratory-guided preemptive therapy in OLT recipients. Study design The value of valganciclovir prophylaxis and laboratory-guided preemptive therapy for the prevention of CMV infection and disease was observed in 64 OLT recipients. Prophylaxis was given to all CMV seronegative recipients receiving a liver from a seropositive donor (D+R−; n = 15), and all other recipients were randomised to receive either prophylaxis ( n = 24) or laboratory-guided preemptive therapy ( n = 25). Recipients were monitored for CMV DNAemia, viral load, emergence of antiviral resistant strains and co-infections. Results CMV end-organ disease and antiviral resistant strains only occurred in D+R− recipients despite the use of prophylaxis in these patients. The D+R− recipients commencing prophylaxis immediately following transplantation had better outcomes compared to those for whom prophylaxis was delayed due to renal impairment. Prophylaxis reduced the incidence of CMV DNAemia, persistent infection, and high viral loads for CMV seropositive (D−R+and D+R+) recipients, but laboratory-guided preemptive therapy effectively controlled CMV infection and prevented disease in these OLT recipients. Conclusion Delaying the commencement of valganciclovir prophylaxis may be associated with worse outcomes for high-risk OLT recipients. Laboratory-guided pre-emptive therapy remains an alternative approach for seropositive recipients at lower risk of CMV disease.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Allergy and Immunology</subject><subject>Antiviral agents</subject><subject>Antiviral Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemoprevention - methods</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus Infections - pathology</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus Infections - virology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Ganciclovir - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Ganciclovir - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Human cytomegalovirus</subject><subject>Human viral diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Liver transplantation</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Virology</subject><issn>1386-6532</issn><issn>1873-5967</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFksuO1DAQRSMEYoaBD2CDskGsElzxKxES0mjESxqJBY-t5XYqPQ6J09hOS_33VNMNSCxg5bJ0brl8bxXFU2A1MFAvx3p0-7phADWTNYPmXnEJreaV7JS-TzVvVaUkby6KRymNjIHkQj8sLhpQAhotLovtVx_tVA7W5SWm0odhWjE4H7ZlvsNyWbNbZjqH8m6dbSjdIdN9a6dl7-P6U4Au-yVQVU5-j7HM0Ya0m2zIZUTndx5DTo-LB4OdEj45n1fFl7dvPt-8r24_vvtwc31bOcm7XNne9p2zvOfImRNWgdKbgQsFPUhleYvIGraRFhF6bLVoVKM5lwqY6IUGflW8OPXdxeX7iimb2SeHE42Dy5pM23ImBOv0_0mtoAOpJZFwIl1cUoo4mF30s40HA8wcgzCjoSDMMQjDpKEgSPPs3H3dzNj_VvxynoDnZ8AmZ6eBTHM-_eEE_apjnLhXJw7Jtb3HaJIjRx32ntzNpl_8P8d4_ZfaTT54evAbHjCNyxoDxWHApMYw8-m4MceFAaBlaWmGHxA6u8U</recordid><startdate>20110801</startdate><enddate>20110801</enddate><creator>Scott, G.M</creator><creator>Naing, Z</creator><creator>Pavlovic, J</creator><creator>Iwasenko, J.M</creator><creator>Angus, P</creator><creator>Jones, R</creator><creator>Rawlinson, W.D</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110801</creationdate><title>Viral factors influencing the outcome of human cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplant recipients</title><author>Scott, G.M ; Naing, Z ; Pavlovic, J ; Iwasenko, J.M ; Angus, P ; Jones, R ; Rawlinson, W.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-adad9ca3d3e30c4a6167bf3461d156a38ee020b5aee1de87426273356104d4713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Allergy and Immunology</topic><topic>Antiviral agents</topic><topic>Antiviral Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemoprevention - methods</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus Infections - pathology</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus Infections - virology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Ganciclovir - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Ganciclovir - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Human cytomegalovirus</topic><topic>Human viral diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Liver transplantation</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Virology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scott, G.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naing, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlovic, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwasenko, J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angus, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawlinson, W.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical virology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scott, G.M</au><au>Naing, Z</au><au>Pavlovic, J</au><au>Iwasenko, J.M</au><au>Angus, P</au><au>Jones, R</au><au>Rawlinson, W.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Viral factors influencing the outcome of human cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplant recipients</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical virology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Virol</addtitle><date>2011-08-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>233</epage><pages>229-233</pages><issn>1386-6532</issn><eissn>1873-5967</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains the leading viral cause of disease following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) despite the availability of antiviral agents for prophylaxis and therapy. Objective Examine the viral factors that influence the outcome of CMV infection following valganciclovir prophylaxis or laboratory-guided preemptive therapy in OLT recipients. Study design The value of valganciclovir prophylaxis and laboratory-guided preemptive therapy for the prevention of CMV infection and disease was observed in 64 OLT recipients. Prophylaxis was given to all CMV seronegative recipients receiving a liver from a seropositive donor (D+R−; n = 15), and all other recipients were randomised to receive either prophylaxis ( n = 24) or laboratory-guided preemptive therapy ( n = 25). Recipients were monitored for CMV DNAemia, viral load, emergence of antiviral resistant strains and co-infections. Results CMV end-organ disease and antiviral resistant strains only occurred in D+R− recipients despite the use of prophylaxis in these patients. The D+R− recipients commencing prophylaxis immediately following transplantation had better outcomes compared to those for whom prophylaxis was delayed due to renal impairment. Prophylaxis reduced the incidence of CMV DNAemia, persistent infection, and high viral loads for CMV seropositive (D−R+and D+R+) recipients, but laboratory-guided preemptive therapy effectively controlled CMV infection and prevented disease in these OLT recipients. Conclusion Delaying the commencement of valganciclovir prophylaxis may be associated with worse outcomes for high-risk OLT recipients. Laboratory-guided pre-emptive therapy remains an alternative approach for seropositive recipients at lower risk of CMV disease.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>21641274</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcv.2011.05.012</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1386-6532
ispartof Journal of clinical virology, 2011-08, Vol.51 (4), p.229-233
issn 1386-6532
1873-5967
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883044097
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Allergy and Immunology
Antiviral agents
Antiviral Agents - administration & dosage
Biological and medical sciences
Chemoprevention - methods
Cytomegalovirus
Cytomegalovirus Infections - drug therapy
Cytomegalovirus Infections - pathology
Cytomegalovirus Infections - virology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Ganciclovir - administration & dosage
Ganciclovir - analogs & derivatives
Human cytomegalovirus
Human viral diseases
Humans
Infectious Disease
Infectious diseases
Liver transplantation
Liver Transplantation - adverse effects
Medical sciences
Microbiology
Miscellaneous
Prophylaxis
Transplantation
Treatment Outcome
Viral diseases
Virology
title Viral factors influencing the outcome of human cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplant recipients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T14%3A34%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Viral%20factors%20influencing%20the%20outcome%20of%20human%20cytomegalovirus%20infection%20in%20liver%20transplant%20recipients&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20virology&rft.au=Scott,%20G.M&rft.date=2011-08-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=233&rft.pages=229-233&rft.issn=1386-6532&rft.eissn=1873-5967&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcv.2011.05.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E883044097%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=876191575&rft_id=info:pmid/21641274&rft_els_id=S1386653211001843&rfr_iscdi=true