Viral factors influencing the outcome of human cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplant recipients
Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains the leading viral cause of disease following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) despite the availability of antiviral agents for prophylaxis and therapy. Objective Examine the viral factors that influence the outcome of CMV infection following va...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical virology 2011-08, Vol.51 (4), p.229-233 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 233 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 229 |
container_title | Journal of clinical virology |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Scott, G.M Naing, Z Pavlovic, J Iwasenko, J.M Angus, P Jones, R Rawlinson, W.D |
description | Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains the leading viral cause of disease following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) despite the availability of antiviral agents for prophylaxis and therapy. Objective Examine the viral factors that influence the outcome of CMV infection following valganciclovir prophylaxis or laboratory-guided preemptive therapy in OLT recipients. Study design The value of valganciclovir prophylaxis and laboratory-guided preemptive therapy for the prevention of CMV infection and disease was observed in 64 OLT recipients. Prophylaxis was given to all CMV seronegative recipients receiving a liver from a seropositive donor (D+R−; n = 15), and all other recipients were randomised to receive either prophylaxis ( n = 24) or laboratory-guided preemptive therapy ( n = 25). Recipients were monitored for CMV DNAemia, viral load, emergence of antiviral resistant strains and co-infections. Results CMV end-organ disease and antiviral resistant strains only occurred in D+R− recipients despite the use of prophylaxis in these patients. The D+R− recipients commencing prophylaxis immediately following transplantation had better outcomes compared to those for whom prophylaxis was delayed due to renal impairment. Prophylaxis reduced the incidence of CMV DNAemia, persistent infection, and high viral loads for CMV seropositive (D−R+and D+R+) recipients, but laboratory-guided preemptive therapy effectively controlled CMV infection and prevented disease in these OLT recipients. Conclusion Delaying the commencement of valganciclovir prophylaxis may be associated with worse outcomes for high-risk OLT recipients. Laboratory-guided pre-emptive therapy remains an alternative approach for seropositive recipients at lower risk of CMV disease. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jcv.2011.05.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883044097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1386653211001843</els_id><sourcerecordid>883044097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-adad9ca3d3e30c4a6167bf3461d156a38ee020b5aee1de87426273356104d4713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFksuO1DAQRSMEYoaBD2CDskGsElzxKxES0mjESxqJBY-t5XYqPQ6J09hOS_33VNMNSCxg5bJ0brl8bxXFU2A1MFAvx3p0-7phADWTNYPmXnEJreaV7JS-TzVvVaUkby6KRymNjIHkQj8sLhpQAhotLovtVx_tVA7W5SWm0odhWjE4H7ZlvsNyWbNbZjqH8m6dbSjdIdN9a6dl7-P6U4Au-yVQVU5-j7HM0Ya0m2zIZUTndx5DTo-LB4OdEj45n1fFl7dvPt-8r24_vvtwc31bOcm7XNne9p2zvOfImRNWgdKbgQsFPUhleYvIGraRFhF6bLVoVKM5lwqY6IUGflW8OPXdxeX7iimb2SeHE42Dy5pM23ImBOv0_0mtoAOpJZFwIl1cUoo4mF30s40HA8wcgzCjoSDMMQjDpKEgSPPs3H3dzNj_VvxynoDnZ8AmZ6eBTHM-_eEE_apjnLhXJw7Jtb3HaJIjRx32ntzNpl_8P8d4_ZfaTT54evAbHjCNyxoDxWHApMYw8-m4MceFAaBlaWmGHxA6u8U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>876191575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Viral factors influencing the outcome of human cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplant recipients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Scott, G.M ; Naing, Z ; Pavlovic, J ; Iwasenko, J.M ; Angus, P ; Jones, R ; Rawlinson, W.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Scott, G.M ; Naing, Z ; Pavlovic, J ; Iwasenko, J.M ; Angus, P ; Jones, R ; Rawlinson, W.D</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains the leading viral cause of disease following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) despite the availability of antiviral agents for prophylaxis and therapy. Objective Examine the viral factors that influence the outcome of CMV infection following valganciclovir prophylaxis or laboratory-guided preemptive therapy in OLT recipients. Study design The value of valganciclovir prophylaxis and laboratory-guided preemptive therapy for the prevention of CMV infection and disease was observed in 64 OLT recipients. Prophylaxis was given to all CMV seronegative recipients receiving a liver from a seropositive donor (D+R−; n = 15), and all other recipients were randomised to receive either prophylaxis ( n = 24) or laboratory-guided preemptive therapy ( n = 25). Recipients were monitored for CMV DNAemia, viral load, emergence of antiviral resistant strains and co-infections. Results CMV end-organ disease and antiviral resistant strains only occurred in D+R− recipients despite the use of prophylaxis in these patients. The D+R− recipients commencing prophylaxis immediately following transplantation had better outcomes compared to those for whom prophylaxis was delayed due to renal impairment. Prophylaxis reduced the incidence of CMV DNAemia, persistent infection, and high viral loads for CMV seropositive (D−R+and D+R+) recipients, but laboratory-guided preemptive therapy effectively controlled CMV infection and prevented disease in these OLT recipients. Conclusion Delaying the commencement of valganciclovir prophylaxis may be associated with worse outcomes for high-risk OLT recipients. Laboratory-guided pre-emptive therapy remains an alternative approach for seropositive recipients at lower risk of CMV disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-6532</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5967</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2011.05.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21641274</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Allergy and Immunology ; Antiviral agents ; Antiviral Agents - administration & dosage ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemoprevention - methods ; Cytomegalovirus ; Cytomegalovirus Infections - drug therapy ; Cytomegalovirus Infections - pathology ; Cytomegalovirus Infections - virology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Ganciclovir - administration & dosage ; Ganciclovir - analogs & derivatives ; Human cytomegalovirus ; Human viral diseases ; Humans ; Infectious Disease ; Infectious diseases ; Liver transplantation ; Liver Transplantation - adverse effects ; Medical sciences ; Microbiology ; Miscellaneous ; Prophylaxis ; Transplantation ; Treatment Outcome ; Viral diseases ; Virology</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical virology, 2011-08, Vol.51 (4), p.229-233</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-adad9ca3d3e30c4a6167bf3461d156a38ee020b5aee1de87426273356104d4713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-adad9ca3d3e30c4a6167bf3461d156a38ee020b5aee1de87426273356104d4713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653211001843$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24335903$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21641274$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scott, G.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naing, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlovic, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwasenko, J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angus, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawlinson, W.D</creatorcontrib><title>Viral factors influencing the outcome of human cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplant recipients</title><title>Journal of clinical virology</title><addtitle>J Clin Virol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains the leading viral cause of disease following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) despite the availability of antiviral agents for prophylaxis and therapy. Objective Examine the viral factors that influence the outcome of CMV infection following valganciclovir prophylaxis or laboratory-guided preemptive therapy in OLT recipients. Study design The value of valganciclovir prophylaxis and laboratory-guided preemptive therapy for the prevention of CMV infection and disease was observed in 64 OLT recipients. Prophylaxis was given to all CMV seronegative recipients receiving a liver from a seropositive donor (D+R−; n = 15), and all other recipients were randomised to receive either prophylaxis ( n = 24) or laboratory-guided preemptive therapy ( n = 25). Recipients were monitored for CMV DNAemia, viral load, emergence of antiviral resistant strains and co-infections. Results CMV end-organ disease and antiviral resistant strains only occurred in D+R− recipients despite the use of prophylaxis in these patients. The D+R− recipients commencing prophylaxis immediately following transplantation had better outcomes compared to those for whom prophylaxis was delayed due to renal impairment. Prophylaxis reduced the incidence of CMV DNAemia, persistent infection, and high viral loads for CMV seropositive (D−R+and D+R+) recipients, but laboratory-guided preemptive therapy effectively controlled CMV infection and prevented disease in these OLT recipients. Conclusion Delaying the commencement of valganciclovir prophylaxis may be associated with worse outcomes for high-risk OLT recipients. Laboratory-guided pre-emptive therapy remains an alternative approach for seropositive recipients at lower risk of CMV disease.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Allergy and Immunology</subject><subject>Antiviral agents</subject><subject>Antiviral Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemoprevention - methods</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus Infections - pathology</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus Infections - virology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Ganciclovir - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Ganciclovir - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Human cytomegalovirus</subject><subject>Human viral diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Liver transplantation</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Virology</subject><issn>1386-6532</issn><issn>1873-5967</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFksuO1DAQRSMEYoaBD2CDskGsElzxKxES0mjESxqJBY-t5XYqPQ6J09hOS_33VNMNSCxg5bJ0brl8bxXFU2A1MFAvx3p0-7phADWTNYPmXnEJreaV7JS-TzVvVaUkby6KRymNjIHkQj8sLhpQAhotLovtVx_tVA7W5SWm0odhWjE4H7ZlvsNyWbNbZjqH8m6dbSjdIdN9a6dl7-P6U4Au-yVQVU5-j7HM0Ya0m2zIZUTndx5DTo-LB4OdEj45n1fFl7dvPt-8r24_vvtwc31bOcm7XNne9p2zvOfImRNWgdKbgQsFPUhleYvIGraRFhF6bLVoVKM5lwqY6IUGflW8OPXdxeX7iimb2SeHE42Dy5pM23ImBOv0_0mtoAOpJZFwIl1cUoo4mF30s40HA8wcgzCjoSDMMQjDpKEgSPPs3H3dzNj_VvxynoDnZ8AmZ6eBTHM-_eEE_apjnLhXJw7Jtb3HaJIjRx32ntzNpl_8P8d4_ZfaTT54evAbHjCNyxoDxWHApMYw8-m4MceFAaBlaWmGHxA6u8U</recordid><startdate>20110801</startdate><enddate>20110801</enddate><creator>Scott, G.M</creator><creator>Naing, Z</creator><creator>Pavlovic, J</creator><creator>Iwasenko, J.M</creator><creator>Angus, P</creator><creator>Jones, R</creator><creator>Rawlinson, W.D</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110801</creationdate><title>Viral factors influencing the outcome of human cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplant recipients</title><author>Scott, G.M ; Naing, Z ; Pavlovic, J ; Iwasenko, J.M ; Angus, P ; Jones, R ; Rawlinson, W.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-adad9ca3d3e30c4a6167bf3461d156a38ee020b5aee1de87426273356104d4713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Allergy and Immunology</topic><topic>Antiviral agents</topic><topic>Antiviral Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemoprevention - methods</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus Infections - pathology</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus Infections - virology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Ganciclovir - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Ganciclovir - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Human cytomegalovirus</topic><topic>Human viral diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Liver transplantation</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Virology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scott, G.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naing, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlovic, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwasenko, J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angus, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawlinson, W.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical virology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scott, G.M</au><au>Naing, Z</au><au>Pavlovic, J</au><au>Iwasenko, J.M</au><au>Angus, P</au><au>Jones, R</au><au>Rawlinson, W.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Viral factors influencing the outcome of human cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplant recipients</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical virology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Virol</addtitle><date>2011-08-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>233</epage><pages>229-233</pages><issn>1386-6532</issn><eissn>1873-5967</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains the leading viral cause of disease following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) despite the availability of antiviral agents for prophylaxis and therapy. Objective Examine the viral factors that influence the outcome of CMV infection following valganciclovir prophylaxis or laboratory-guided preemptive therapy in OLT recipients. Study design The value of valganciclovir prophylaxis and laboratory-guided preemptive therapy for the prevention of CMV infection and disease was observed in 64 OLT recipients. Prophylaxis was given to all CMV seronegative recipients receiving a liver from a seropositive donor (D+R−; n = 15), and all other recipients were randomised to receive either prophylaxis ( n = 24) or laboratory-guided preemptive therapy ( n = 25). Recipients were monitored for CMV DNAemia, viral load, emergence of antiviral resistant strains and co-infections. Results CMV end-organ disease and antiviral resistant strains only occurred in D+R− recipients despite the use of prophylaxis in these patients. The D+R− recipients commencing prophylaxis immediately following transplantation had better outcomes compared to those for whom prophylaxis was delayed due to renal impairment. Prophylaxis reduced the incidence of CMV DNAemia, persistent infection, and high viral loads for CMV seropositive (D−R+and D+R+) recipients, but laboratory-guided preemptive therapy effectively controlled CMV infection and prevented disease in these OLT recipients. Conclusion Delaying the commencement of valganciclovir prophylaxis may be associated with worse outcomes for high-risk OLT recipients. Laboratory-guided pre-emptive therapy remains an alternative approach for seropositive recipients at lower risk of CMV disease.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>21641274</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcv.2011.05.012</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1386-6532 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical virology, 2011-08, Vol.51 (4), p.229-233 |
issn | 1386-6532 1873-5967 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883044097 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adult Allergy and Immunology Antiviral agents Antiviral Agents - administration & dosage Biological and medical sciences Chemoprevention - methods Cytomegalovirus Cytomegalovirus Infections - drug therapy Cytomegalovirus Infections - pathology Cytomegalovirus Infections - virology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Ganciclovir - administration & dosage Ganciclovir - analogs & derivatives Human cytomegalovirus Human viral diseases Humans Infectious Disease Infectious diseases Liver transplantation Liver Transplantation - adverse effects Medical sciences Microbiology Miscellaneous Prophylaxis Transplantation Treatment Outcome Viral diseases Virology |
title | Viral factors influencing the outcome of human cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplant recipients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T14%3A34%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Viral%20factors%20influencing%20the%20outcome%20of%20human%20cytomegalovirus%20infection%20in%20liver%20transplant%20recipients&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20virology&rft.au=Scott,%20G.M&rft.date=2011-08-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=233&rft.pages=229-233&rft.issn=1386-6532&rft.eissn=1873-5967&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcv.2011.05.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E883044097%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=876191575&rft_id=info:pmid/21641274&rft_els_id=S1386653211001843&rfr_iscdi=true |