Rejuvenation vs. recycling of Archean crust in the Gawler Craton, South Australia: Evidence from U–Pb and Hf isotopes in detrital zircon
Zircon grains from modern and ancient drainages of the Gawler Craton, South Australia have been analysed to define the relative contributions of juvenile sources and recycled crust to magmatic activity as a function of time, and to constrain the role of mantle inputs during the Proterozoic rejuvenat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Lithos 2009-12, Vol.113 (3-4), p.570-582 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 582 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3-4 |
container_start_page | 570 |
container_title | Lithos |
container_volume | 113 |
creator | Belousova, E.A. Reid, A.J. Griffin, W.L. O’Reilly, Suzanne Y. |
description | Zircon grains from modern and ancient drainages of the Gawler Craton, South Australia have been analysed to define the relative contributions of juvenile sources and recycled crust to magmatic activity as a function of time, and to constrain the role of mantle inputs during the Proterozoic rejuvenation of the Archean Gawler Craton. The integration of Hf-isotope data with U–Pb age spectra shows that the crustal evolution was dominated by long periods of crustal reworking, and that crust generated in the Paleoarchean (3.2–3.5 Ga) was largely reworked during Proterozoic time. Four periods of juvenile mantle input can be recognised at ca 2540 Ma, 1853 Ma, 1595 Ma and 1169 Ma. The 1169 Ma event is not previously recognised in the Gawler Craton, but the absence of other important age peaks argues against the transport of these zircons from the Musgrave Block. Only minor proportions of the magmatic zircons with Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic ages have strongly juvenile signatures (εHf≥4), indicating that crustal reworking was the dominant process, with relatively minor mantle input. Comparison of the crustal evolution with that of nearby Australian terranes suggests that although the Gawler Craton shows some similarities with the Mount Isa Block and the Georgetown Inlier in Neoarchean–Paleoproterozoic time, it evolved independently between ca 1800 and 1550 Ma. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.lithos.2009.06.028 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883044022</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S002449370900276X</els_id><sourcerecordid>883044022</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a458t-78271dd22042a9550e132588da6bb458da89078c7fe9e5404e08613632c9c1e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFuEzEQhi1EJULLG3CYE1zYxfZ6d70ckKKotEiVqICeLceeJY42drC9qdoTZ668IU-Co3DuaTTSN79m5iPkNaM1o6x7v60nlzch1ZzSoaZdTbl8RhZM9rzqmGiekwWlXFRiaPoX5GVKW1r6pmUL8vsrbucDep1d8HBINUQ0D2Zy_geEEZbRbFB7MHFOGZyHvEG40vcTRlhFnYN_B9_CnDewLEDUk9Mf4PLgLHqDMMawg7u_v_7crkF7C9cjuBRy2GM6ZlnM0WU9waOLJvgLcjbqKeGr__Wc3H26_L66rm6-XH1eLW8qLVqZq17ynlnLORVcD21LkTW8ldLqbr0uhNVyoL00_YgDtoIKpLJjTddwMxiGojknb0-5-xh-zpiy2rlkcJq0xzAnJWVDhaCcF_LNkyRnZYtB9gUUJ9DEkFLEUe2j2-n4oBhVR0Vqq06K1FGRop0qisrYx9MYlnMPDqNKxh0_Z12xkJUN7umAfx35nS4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21220987</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rejuvenation vs. recycling of Archean crust in the Gawler Craton, South Australia: Evidence from U–Pb and Hf isotopes in detrital zircon</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Belousova, E.A. ; Reid, A.J. ; Griffin, W.L. ; O’Reilly, Suzanne Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Belousova, E.A. ; Reid, A.J. ; Griffin, W.L. ; O’Reilly, Suzanne Y.</creatorcontrib><description>Zircon grains from modern and ancient drainages of the Gawler Craton, South Australia have been analysed to define the relative contributions of juvenile sources and recycled crust to magmatic activity as a function of time, and to constrain the role of mantle inputs during the Proterozoic rejuvenation of the Archean Gawler Craton. The integration of Hf-isotope data with U–Pb age spectra shows that the crustal evolution was dominated by long periods of crustal reworking, and that crust generated in the Paleoarchean (3.2–3.5 Ga) was largely reworked during Proterozoic time. Four periods of juvenile mantle input can be recognised at ca 2540 Ma, 1853 Ma, 1595 Ma and 1169 Ma. The 1169 Ma event is not previously recognised in the Gawler Craton, but the absence of other important age peaks argues against the transport of these zircons from the Musgrave Block. Only minor proportions of the magmatic zircons with Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic ages have strongly juvenile signatures (εHf≥4), indicating that crustal reworking was the dominant process, with relatively minor mantle input. Comparison of the crustal evolution with that of nearby Australian terranes suggests that although the Gawler Craton shows some similarities with the Mount Isa Block and the Georgetown Inlier in Neoarchean–Paleoproterozoic time, it evolved independently between ca 1800 and 1550 Ma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-4937</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6143</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2009.06.028</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Crustal evolution ; Gawler Craton ; South Australia ; Zircon Hf-isotopes ; Zircon U–Pb dating</subject><ispartof>Lithos, 2009-12, Vol.113 (3-4), p.570-582</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a458t-78271dd22042a9550e132588da6bb458da89078c7fe9e5404e08613632c9c1e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a458t-78271dd22042a9550e132588da6bb458da89078c7fe9e5404e08613632c9c1e43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002449370900276X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Belousova, E.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, W.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Reilly, Suzanne Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Rejuvenation vs. recycling of Archean crust in the Gawler Craton, South Australia: Evidence from U–Pb and Hf isotopes in detrital zircon</title><title>Lithos</title><description>Zircon grains from modern and ancient drainages of the Gawler Craton, South Australia have been analysed to define the relative contributions of juvenile sources and recycled crust to magmatic activity as a function of time, and to constrain the role of mantle inputs during the Proterozoic rejuvenation of the Archean Gawler Craton. The integration of Hf-isotope data with U–Pb age spectra shows that the crustal evolution was dominated by long periods of crustal reworking, and that crust generated in the Paleoarchean (3.2–3.5 Ga) was largely reworked during Proterozoic time. Four periods of juvenile mantle input can be recognised at ca 2540 Ma, 1853 Ma, 1595 Ma and 1169 Ma. The 1169 Ma event is not previously recognised in the Gawler Craton, but the absence of other important age peaks argues against the transport of these zircons from the Musgrave Block. Only minor proportions of the magmatic zircons with Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic ages have strongly juvenile signatures (εHf≥4), indicating that crustal reworking was the dominant process, with relatively minor mantle input. Comparison of the crustal evolution with that of nearby Australian terranes suggests that although the Gawler Craton shows some similarities with the Mount Isa Block and the Georgetown Inlier in Neoarchean–Paleoproterozoic time, it evolved independently between ca 1800 and 1550 Ma.</description><subject>Crustal evolution</subject><subject>Gawler Craton</subject><subject>South Australia</subject><subject>Zircon Hf-isotopes</subject><subject>Zircon U–Pb dating</subject><issn>0024-4937</issn><issn>1872-6143</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFuEzEQhi1EJULLG3CYE1zYxfZ6d70ckKKotEiVqICeLceeJY42drC9qdoTZ668IU-Co3DuaTTSN79m5iPkNaM1o6x7v60nlzch1ZzSoaZdTbl8RhZM9rzqmGiekwWlXFRiaPoX5GVKW1r6pmUL8vsrbucDep1d8HBINUQ0D2Zy_geEEZbRbFB7MHFOGZyHvEG40vcTRlhFnYN_B9_CnDewLEDUk9Mf4PLgLHqDMMawg7u_v_7crkF7C9cjuBRy2GM6ZlnM0WU9waOLJvgLcjbqKeGr__Wc3H26_L66rm6-XH1eLW8qLVqZq17ynlnLORVcD21LkTW8ldLqbr0uhNVyoL00_YgDtoIKpLJjTddwMxiGojknb0-5-xh-zpiy2rlkcJq0xzAnJWVDhaCcF_LNkyRnZYtB9gUUJ9DEkFLEUe2j2-n4oBhVR0Vqq06K1FGRop0qisrYx9MYlnMPDqNKxh0_Z12xkJUN7umAfx35nS4</recordid><startdate>200912</startdate><enddate>200912</enddate><creator>Belousova, E.A.</creator><creator>Reid, A.J.</creator><creator>Griffin, W.L.</creator><creator>O’Reilly, Suzanne Y.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200912</creationdate><title>Rejuvenation vs. recycling of Archean crust in the Gawler Craton, South Australia: Evidence from U–Pb and Hf isotopes in detrital zircon</title><author>Belousova, E.A. ; Reid, A.J. ; Griffin, W.L. ; O’Reilly, Suzanne Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a458t-78271dd22042a9550e132588da6bb458da89078c7fe9e5404e08613632c9c1e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Crustal evolution</topic><topic>Gawler Craton</topic><topic>South Australia</topic><topic>Zircon Hf-isotopes</topic><topic>Zircon U–Pb dating</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Belousova, E.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, W.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Reilly, Suzanne Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Lithos</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Belousova, E.A.</au><au>Reid, A.J.</au><au>Griffin, W.L.</au><au>O’Reilly, Suzanne Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rejuvenation vs. recycling of Archean crust in the Gawler Craton, South Australia: Evidence from U–Pb and Hf isotopes in detrital zircon</atitle><jtitle>Lithos</jtitle><date>2009-12</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>570</spage><epage>582</epage><pages>570-582</pages><issn>0024-4937</issn><eissn>1872-6143</eissn><abstract>Zircon grains from modern and ancient drainages of the Gawler Craton, South Australia have been analysed to define the relative contributions of juvenile sources and recycled crust to magmatic activity as a function of time, and to constrain the role of mantle inputs during the Proterozoic rejuvenation of the Archean Gawler Craton. The integration of Hf-isotope data with U–Pb age spectra shows that the crustal evolution was dominated by long periods of crustal reworking, and that crust generated in the Paleoarchean (3.2–3.5 Ga) was largely reworked during Proterozoic time. Four periods of juvenile mantle input can be recognised at ca 2540 Ma, 1853 Ma, 1595 Ma and 1169 Ma. The 1169 Ma event is not previously recognised in the Gawler Craton, but the absence of other important age peaks argues against the transport of these zircons from the Musgrave Block. Only minor proportions of the magmatic zircons with Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic ages have strongly juvenile signatures (εHf≥4), indicating that crustal reworking was the dominant process, with relatively minor mantle input. Comparison of the crustal evolution with that of nearby Australian terranes suggests that although the Gawler Craton shows some similarities with the Mount Isa Block and the Georgetown Inlier in Neoarchean–Paleoproterozoic time, it evolved independently between ca 1800 and 1550 Ma.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.lithos.2009.06.028</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0024-4937 |
ispartof | Lithos, 2009-12, Vol.113 (3-4), p.570-582 |
issn | 0024-4937 1872-6143 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883044022 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Crustal evolution Gawler Craton South Australia Zircon Hf-isotopes Zircon U–Pb dating |
title | Rejuvenation vs. recycling of Archean crust in the Gawler Craton, South Australia: Evidence from U–Pb and Hf isotopes in detrital zircon |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T08%3A45%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rejuvenation%20vs.%20recycling%20of%20Archean%20crust%20in%20the%20Gawler%20Craton,%20South%20Australia:%20Evidence%20from%20U%E2%80%93Pb%20and%20Hf%20isotopes%20in%20detrital%20zircon&rft.jtitle=Lithos&rft.au=Belousova,%20E.A.&rft.date=2009-12&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=570&rft.epage=582&rft.pages=570-582&rft.issn=0024-4937&rft.eissn=1872-6143&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.lithos.2009.06.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E883044022%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21220987&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S002449370900276X&rfr_iscdi=true |