Modularity Beyond Perception: Evidence From the PRP Paradigm
The Dimension Action (DA) model asserts that the visual system is modular, and that each task involves multiple-response mechanisms rather than a unitary-response selection mechanism. The model has been supported by evidence from single-task interference paradigms. We use the psychological refractor...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 2010-04, Vol.36 (2), p.395-414 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 414 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 395 |
| container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance |
| container_volume | 36 |
| creator | Magen, Hagit Cohen, Asher |
| description | The Dimension Action (DA) model asserts that the visual system is modular, and that each task involves multiple-response mechanisms rather than a unitary-response selection mechanism. The model has been supported by evidence from single-task interference paradigms. We use the psychological refractory period paradigm and show that dual-task performance can also be explained by the DA model. In 6 experiments we contrasted predictions from the DA model with predictions from the Response Selection Bottleneck (RSB;
Pashler, 1994
) model asserting that dual-task limitations are due to a unitary-response selection mechanism. Task 1 in all experiments was a tone discrimination task. In Experiments 1 to 3, Task 2 was a variation of either the Stroop or the flanker tasks. Experiments 4 to 6 manipulated response selection directly. The results showed that response selection effects can be underadditive in some conditions and additive in others depending on the modular nature of the response effect. Together, the results support the existence of an underlying modular architecture as proposed by the DA model and pose serious difficulties for the RSB model. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0017174 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883042538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ879483</ericid><sourcerecordid>733455483</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a480t-5a1dc2f82c948980ad3ddbe7a2c94ee16e3fbfa1154dc38b8a9d6dfb1d703b663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1r3DAQBmARWpJNGugPCCWUhvbiVNLo89iG9IuE5NCexViSqYPXdiQbuv--WrxJoIdGF4HmYcS8Q8hrRs8ZBf0RKWWaabFHVsyCrRjX-gVZUWpVxSSHA3KY8x0thxm5Tw44BSUsVytycj2EucPUTpvTz3Ez9OH0NiYfx6kd-lfkZYNdjse7-4j8-nL58-JbdXXz9fvFp6sKhaFTJZEFzxvDvRXGGooBQqijxu1DjExFaOoGGZMieDC1QRtUaGoWNIVaKTgi75e-Yxru55gnt26zj12HfRzm7IwBKrgE86zUgpccZAnhWQkgpBQGinz7j7wb5tSXgZ1iQpasgP4PSc6K0ZwX9GFBPg05p9i4MbVrTBvHqNsuyj0sqtA3u35zvY7hET5spoCzHcDssWsS9r7NT45raZTd_nmyuJha_1i-_GG0XYZ7t5RxRDfmjcc0tb6L2f35PTpQjjuwEv4CuiGsEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614520330</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modularity Beyond Perception: Evidence From the PRP Paradigm</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Magen, Hagit ; Cohen, Asher</creator><creatorcontrib>Magen, Hagit ; Cohen, Asher</creatorcontrib><description>The Dimension Action (DA) model asserts that the visual system is modular, and that each task involves multiple-response mechanisms rather than a unitary-response selection mechanism. The model has been supported by evidence from single-task interference paradigms. We use the psychological refractory period paradigm and show that dual-task performance can also be explained by the DA model. In 6 experiments we contrasted predictions from the DA model with predictions from the Response Selection Bottleneck (RSB;
Pashler, 1994
) model asserting that dual-task limitations are due to a unitary-response selection mechanism. Task 1 in all experiments was a tone discrimination task. In Experiments 1 to 3, Task 2 was a variation of either the Stroop or the flanker tasks. Experiments 4 to 6 manipulated response selection directly. The results showed that response selection effects can be underadditive in some conditions and additive in others depending on the modular nature of the response effect. Together, the results support the existence of an underlying modular architecture as proposed by the DA model and pose serious difficulties for the RSB model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0017174</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20364926</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPHPDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Action Research ; Activity levels. Psychomotricity ; Additives ; Auditory Perception ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive Processes ; College Students ; Comparative Analysis ; Discrimination ; Discrimination (Psychology) ; Dual Task Performance ; Evaluation Methods ; Experimental Psychology ; Experiments ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Modularity ; Photic Stimulation ; Prediction ; Predictions ; Psychological aspects ; Psychological refractory period ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychomotor activities ; Psychomotor Performance ; Reaction Time ; Refractory Period, Psychological ; Response selection ; Signal Detection, Psychological ; Stroop Color Word Test ; Stroop Test ; Task Analysis ; Task Complexity ; Universities ; Visual Perception</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2010-04, Vol.36 (2), p.395-414</ispartof><rights>2010 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 APA, all rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Apr 2010</rights><rights>2010, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a480t-5a1dc2f82c948980ad3ddbe7a2c94ee16e3fbfa1154dc38b8a9d6dfb1d703b663</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,31000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ879483$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22758692$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20364926$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Magen, Hagit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Asher</creatorcontrib><title>Modularity Beyond Perception: Evidence From the PRP Paradigm</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><description>The Dimension Action (DA) model asserts that the visual system is modular, and that each task involves multiple-response mechanisms rather than a unitary-response selection mechanism. The model has been supported by evidence from single-task interference paradigms. We use the psychological refractory period paradigm and show that dual-task performance can also be explained by the DA model. In 6 experiments we contrasted predictions from the DA model with predictions from the Response Selection Bottleneck (RSB;
Pashler, 1994
) model asserting that dual-task limitations are due to a unitary-response selection mechanism. Task 1 in all experiments was a tone discrimination task. In Experiments 1 to 3, Task 2 was a variation of either the Stroop or the flanker tasks. Experiments 4 to 6 manipulated response selection directly. The results showed that response selection effects can be underadditive in some conditions and additive in others depending on the modular nature of the response effect. Together, the results support the existence of an underlying modular architecture as proposed by the DA model and pose serious difficulties for the RSB model.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Action Research</subject><subject>Activity levels. Psychomotricity</subject><subject>Additives</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology)</subject><subject>Dual Task Performance</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Experimental Psychology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Modularity</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychological refractory period</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychomotor activities</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Refractory Period, Psychological</subject><subject>Response selection</subject><subject>Signal Detection, Psychological</subject><subject>Stroop Color Word Test</subject><subject>Stroop Test</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Task Complexity</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><issn>0096-1523</issn><issn>1939-1277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U1r3DAQBmARWpJNGugPCCWUhvbiVNLo89iG9IuE5NCexViSqYPXdiQbuv--WrxJoIdGF4HmYcS8Q8hrRs8ZBf0RKWWaabFHVsyCrRjX-gVZUWpVxSSHA3KY8x0thxm5Tw44BSUsVytycj2EucPUTpvTz3Ez9OH0NiYfx6kd-lfkZYNdjse7-4j8-nL58-JbdXXz9fvFp6sKhaFTJZEFzxvDvRXGGooBQqijxu1DjExFaOoGGZMieDC1QRtUaGoWNIVaKTgi75e-Yxru55gnt26zj12HfRzm7IwBKrgE86zUgpccZAnhWQkgpBQGinz7j7wb5tSXgZ1iQpasgP4PSc6K0ZwX9GFBPg05p9i4MbVrTBvHqNsuyj0sqtA3u35zvY7hET5spoCzHcDssWsS9r7NT45raZTd_nmyuJha_1i-_GG0XYZ7t5RxRDfmjcc0tb6L2f35PTpQjjuwEv4CuiGsEA</recordid><startdate>20100401</startdate><enddate>20100401</enddate><creator>Magen, Hagit</creator><creator>Cohen, Asher</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100401</creationdate><title>Modularity Beyond Perception</title><author>Magen, Hagit ; Cohen, Asher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a480t-5a1dc2f82c948980ad3ddbe7a2c94ee16e3fbfa1154dc38b8a9d6dfb1d703b663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Action Research</topic><topic>Activity levels. Psychomotricity</topic><topic>Additives</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology)</topic><topic>Dual Task Performance</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Experimental Psychology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Modularity</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychological refractory period</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychomotor activities</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Refractory Period, Psychological</topic><topic>Response selection</topic><topic>Signal Detection, Psychological</topic><topic>Stroop Color Word Test</topic><topic>Stroop Test</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Task Complexity</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Magen, Hagit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Asher</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Magen, Hagit</au><au>Cohen, Asher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ879483</ericid><atitle>Modularity Beyond Perception: Evidence From the PRP Paradigm</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><date>2010-04-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>395</spage><epage>414</epage><pages>395-414</pages><issn>0096-1523</issn><eissn>1939-1277</eissn><coden>JPHPDH</coden><abstract>The Dimension Action (DA) model asserts that the visual system is modular, and that each task involves multiple-response mechanisms rather than a unitary-response selection mechanism. The model has been supported by evidence from single-task interference paradigms. We use the psychological refractory period paradigm and show that dual-task performance can also be explained by the DA model. In 6 experiments we contrasted predictions from the DA model with predictions from the Response Selection Bottleneck (RSB;
Pashler, 1994
) model asserting that dual-task limitations are due to a unitary-response selection mechanism. Task 1 in all experiments was a tone discrimination task. In Experiments 1 to 3, Task 2 was a variation of either the Stroop or the flanker tasks. Experiments 4 to 6 manipulated response selection directly. The results showed that response selection effects can be underadditive in some conditions and additive in others depending on the modular nature of the response effect. Together, the results support the existence of an underlying modular architecture as proposed by the DA model and pose serious difficulties for the RSB model.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>20364926</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0017174</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0096-1523 |
| ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2010-04, Vol.36 (2), p.395-414 |
| issn | 0096-1523 1939-1277 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883042538 |
| source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Acoustic Stimulation Action Research Activity levels. Psychomotricity Additives Auditory Perception Biological and medical sciences Cognition & reasoning Cognitive Processes College Students Comparative Analysis Discrimination Discrimination (Psychology) Dual Task Performance Evaluation Methods Experimental Psychology Experiments Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Modularity Photic Stimulation Prediction Predictions Psychological aspects Psychological refractory period Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychomotor activities Psychomotor Performance Reaction Time Refractory Period, Psychological Response selection Signal Detection, Psychological Stroop Color Word Test Stroop Test Task Analysis Task Complexity Universities Visual Perception |
| title | Modularity Beyond Perception: Evidence From the PRP Paradigm |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T03%3A19%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modularity%20Beyond%20Perception:%20Evidence%20From%20the%20PRP%20Paradigm&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Human%20perception%20and%20performance&rft.au=Magen,%20Hagit&rft.date=2010-04-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=395&rft.epage=414&rft.pages=395-414&rft.issn=0096-1523&rft.eissn=1939-1277&rft.coden=JPHPDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0017174&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733455483%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614520330&rft_id=info:pmid/20364926&rft_ericid=EJ879483&rfr_iscdi=true |