Validity of perfusion parameters obtained using the modified Tofts model: A simulation study

The two‐compartment Tofts model (2CTM) has had widespread use in research and clinical practice. It assumes there is no broadening associated with the bolus transit through the capillary bed of the tissue under study. This assumption is often violated, with consequences that are hard to predict intu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic resonance in medicine 2011-05, Vol.65 (5), p.1491-1497
Hauptverfasser: Luypaert, Robert, Sourbron, Steven, de Mey, Johan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1497
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1491
container_title Magnetic resonance in medicine
container_volume 65
creator Luypaert, Robert
Sourbron, Steven
de Mey, Johan
description The two‐compartment Tofts model (2CTM) has had widespread use in research and clinical practice. It assumes there is no broadening associated with the bolus transit through the capillary bed of the tissue under study. This assumption is often violated, with consequences that are hard to predict intuitively. The two‐compartment exchange model is a generalization of 2CTM obtained by dropping the zero‐broadening hypothesis, making it suitable for estimating the impact of violating this assumption. Using data simulated on the basis of the two‐compartment exchange model, the correspondence between the hemodynamic parameters serving as input for the two‐compartment exchange model and the parameters resulting from fitting the data with the 2CTM was investigated. The influence of tissue type and experimental setup was studied. Generally, a large tissue and setup dependent bias of the 2CTM fitting results with respect to the two‐compartment exchange model input was observed. Extreme caution is needed when interpreting 2CTM data. Magn Reson Med, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mrm.22728
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883040845</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4321374215</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3858-207be3f1bf17b8d7020630c9cc29cbcf4ca542c2c2943f36fa6c7db265a259e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLAzEUhYMotlYX_gEJuHA19uYxkxl3pfiCFkGqKyFkMommzKNOZpD-e9OHLtxIFje597sHTg5C5wSuCQAdV211Tamg6QEakpjSiMYZP0RDEBwiRjI-QCfeLwEgywQ_RgNK4rAn2BC9varSFa5b48bilWlt711T45VqVWU603rc5J1ytSlwmNTvuPswuGoKZ11oLRrb-c3TlDd4gr2r-lJ1GwHf9cX6FB1ZVXpztq8j9HJ3u5g-RLOn-8fpZBZplsZpREHkhlmSWyLytBBAIWGgM61ppnNtuVYxpzqcjDPLEqsSLYqcJrEKRg1nI3S10121zWdvfCcr57UpS1WbpvcyTRlwSHn8P5nQBCAhIpCXf8hl07d1sCHJRk-QhKaButhTfV6ZQq5aV6l2LX8-OADjHfDlSrP-nROQm-RkSE5uk5Pz5_n2wr4BlUCKaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1883071628</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity of perfusion parameters obtained using the modified Tofts model: A simulation study</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Luypaert, Robert ; Sourbron, Steven ; de Mey, Johan</creator><creatorcontrib>Luypaert, Robert ; Sourbron, Steven ; de Mey, Johan</creatorcontrib><description>The two‐compartment Tofts model (2CTM) has had widespread use in research and clinical practice. It assumes there is no broadening associated with the bolus transit through the capillary bed of the tissue under study. This assumption is often violated, with consequences that are hard to predict intuitively. The two‐compartment exchange model is a generalization of 2CTM obtained by dropping the zero‐broadening hypothesis, making it suitable for estimating the impact of violating this assumption. Using data simulated on the basis of the two‐compartment exchange model, the correspondence between the hemodynamic parameters serving as input for the two‐compartment exchange model and the parameters resulting from fitting the data with the 2CTM was investigated. The influence of tissue type and experimental setup was studied. Generally, a large tissue and setup dependent bias of the 2CTM fitting results with respect to the two‐compartment exchange model input was observed. Extreme caution is needed when interpreting 2CTM data. Magn Reson Med, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-3194</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1522-2594</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22728</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21500273</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MRMEEN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Bolus‐tracking ; Computer Simulation ; Contrast Media - pharmacokinetics ; Hemodynamics ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Models, Biological ; MRI ; perfusion ; permeability ; Tofts model</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2011-05, Vol.65 (5), p.1491-1497</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3858-207be3f1bf17b8d7020630c9cc29cbcf4ca542c2c2943f36fa6c7db265a259e43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmrm.22728$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmrm.22728$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21500273$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luypaert, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sourbron, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Mey, Johan</creatorcontrib><title>Validity of perfusion parameters obtained using the modified Tofts model: A simulation study</title><title>Magnetic resonance in medicine</title><addtitle>Magn Reson Med</addtitle><description>The two‐compartment Tofts model (2CTM) has had widespread use in research and clinical practice. It assumes there is no broadening associated with the bolus transit through the capillary bed of the tissue under study. This assumption is often violated, with consequences that are hard to predict intuitively. The two‐compartment exchange model is a generalization of 2CTM obtained by dropping the zero‐broadening hypothesis, making it suitable for estimating the impact of violating this assumption. Using data simulated on the basis of the two‐compartment exchange model, the correspondence between the hemodynamic parameters serving as input for the two‐compartment exchange model and the parameters resulting from fitting the data with the 2CTM was investigated. The influence of tissue type and experimental setup was studied. Generally, a large tissue and setup dependent bias of the 2CTM fitting results with respect to the two‐compartment exchange model input was observed. Extreme caution is needed when interpreting 2CTM data. Magn Reson Med, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Bolus‐tracking</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Contrast Media - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>MRI</subject><subject>perfusion</subject><subject>permeability</subject><subject>Tofts model</subject><issn>0740-3194</issn><issn>1522-2594</issn><issn>1522-2594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLAzEUhYMotlYX_gEJuHA19uYxkxl3pfiCFkGqKyFkMommzKNOZpD-e9OHLtxIFje597sHTg5C5wSuCQAdV211Tamg6QEakpjSiMYZP0RDEBwiRjI-QCfeLwEgywQ_RgNK4rAn2BC9varSFa5b48bilWlt711T45VqVWU603rc5J1ytSlwmNTvuPswuGoKZ11oLRrb-c3TlDd4gr2r-lJ1GwHf9cX6FB1ZVXpztq8j9HJ3u5g-RLOn-8fpZBZplsZpREHkhlmSWyLytBBAIWGgM61ppnNtuVYxpzqcjDPLEqsSLYqcJrEKRg1nI3S10121zWdvfCcr57UpS1WbpvcyTRlwSHn8P5nQBCAhIpCXf8hl07d1sCHJRk-QhKaButhTfV6ZQq5aV6l2LX8-OADjHfDlSrP-nROQm-RkSE5uk5Pz5_n2wr4BlUCKaA</recordid><startdate>201105</startdate><enddate>201105</enddate><creator>Luypaert, Robert</creator><creator>Sourbron, Steven</creator><creator>de Mey, Johan</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201105</creationdate><title>Validity of perfusion parameters obtained using the modified Tofts model: A simulation study</title><author>Luypaert, Robert ; Sourbron, Steven ; de Mey, Johan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3858-207be3f1bf17b8d7020630c9cc29cbcf4ca542c2c2943f36fa6c7db265a259e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Bolus‐tracking</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Contrast Media - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>MRI</topic><topic>perfusion</topic><topic>permeability</topic><topic>Tofts model</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luypaert, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sourbron, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Mey, Johan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luypaert, Robert</au><au>Sourbron, Steven</au><au>de Mey, Johan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity of perfusion parameters obtained using the modified Tofts model: A simulation study</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Magn Reson Med</addtitle><date>2011-05</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1491</spage><epage>1497</epage><pages>1491-1497</pages><issn>0740-3194</issn><issn>1522-2594</issn><eissn>1522-2594</eissn><coden>MRMEEN</coden><abstract>The two‐compartment Tofts model (2CTM) has had widespread use in research and clinical practice. It assumes there is no broadening associated with the bolus transit through the capillary bed of the tissue under study. This assumption is often violated, with consequences that are hard to predict intuitively. The two‐compartment exchange model is a generalization of 2CTM obtained by dropping the zero‐broadening hypothesis, making it suitable for estimating the impact of violating this assumption. Using data simulated on the basis of the two‐compartment exchange model, the correspondence between the hemodynamic parameters serving as input for the two‐compartment exchange model and the parameters resulting from fitting the data with the 2CTM was investigated. The influence of tissue type and experimental setup was studied. Generally, a large tissue and setup dependent bias of the 2CTM fitting results with respect to the two‐compartment exchange model input was observed. Extreme caution is needed when interpreting 2CTM data. Magn Reson Med, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>21500273</pmid><doi>10.1002/mrm.22728</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0740-3194
ispartof Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2011-05, Vol.65 (5), p.1491-1497
issn 0740-3194
1522-2594
1522-2594
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883040845
source Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Bolus‐tracking
Computer Simulation
Contrast Media - pharmacokinetics
Hemodynamics
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Models, Biological
MRI
perfusion
permeability
Tofts model
title Validity of perfusion parameters obtained using the modified Tofts model: A simulation study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T06%3A31%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20of%20perfusion%20parameters%20obtained%20using%20the%20modified%20Tofts%20model:%20A%20simulation%20study&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Luypaert,%20Robert&rft.date=2011-05&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1491&rft.epage=1497&rft.pages=1491-1497&rft.issn=0740-3194&rft.eissn=1522-2594&rft.coden=MRMEEN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrm.22728&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4321374215%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1883071628&rft_id=info:pmid/21500273&rfr_iscdi=true