Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration process for the treatment of olive mill wastewater
Olive mill wastewater (OMW) is an important environmental pollution problem, especially in the Mediterranean, which is the main olive oil production region worldwide. Environmental impact of OMW is related to its high organic load and particularly to the phytotoxic and antibacterial action of its ph...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water research (Oxford) 2011-10, Vol.45 (15), p.4522-4530 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4530 |
---|---|
container_issue | 15 |
container_start_page | 4522 |
container_title | Water research (Oxford) |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | El-Abbassi, Abdelilah Khayet, Mohamed Hafidi, Abdellatif |
description | Olive mill wastewater (OMW) is an important environmental pollution problem, especially in the Mediterranean, which is the main olive oil production region worldwide. Environmental impact of OMW is related to its high organic load and particularly to the phytotoxic and antibacterial action of its phenolic content. In fact, polyphenols are known as powerful antioxidants with interesting nutritional and pharmaceutical properties. In the present work, the efficiency of OMW Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration (MEUF) treatment for removal and concentration of polyphenols was investigated, using an anionic surfactant (Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate salt, SDS) and a hydrophobic poly(vinyldene fluoride) (PVDF) membrane. The effects of the process experimental conditions on the permeate flux were investigated, and the secondary membrane resistance created by SDS molecules was evaluated. The initial fluxes of OMW processing by MEUF using SDS were 25.7 and 44.5 l/m2 h under transmembrane pressures of 3.5 and 4.5 bar, respectively. The rejection rate of polyphenols without using any surfactant ranged from 5 to 28%, whereas, it reached 74% when SDS was used under optimum pH (pH 2). The MEUF provides a slightly colored permeate (about 88% less dark), which requires clearly less chemical oxygen demand (COD) for its oxidation (4.33% of the initial COD). These results showed that MEUF process can efficiently be applied to the treatment of OMW and for the concentration and recovery of polyphenols.
► Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration allowed significant polyphenols separation. ► MEUF process reduced considerably the color and the COD of OMW. ► Best phenol separation was obtained at 4 bar, pH 2 and 0.1 M SDS. ► SDS gelation concentration (Cg) in distilled water was estimated at 0.27 M. ► SDS contributes to about 91% of the total membrane resistance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.watres.2011.05.044 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883037411</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135411003186</els_id><sourcerecordid>879105845</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-c0f83405781f538e702e6ea21052eb2b8403c2c85fa5277f1e27caee68c30a4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctuFDEQRS0EIkPgDxD0BsGmmyo_xu5NJBTxkoJYkKwtj6dMPOpHsD2J-Hs89AC7sKnanPK91mHsOUKHgOu3u-7OlUS544DYgepAygdshUb3LZfSPGQrAClaFEqesCc57wCAc9E_ZiccNcreqBW7_BI9DYNLDU3XbvK0bfZDSS7EwyxxnpqbNHvKuQlzaso1NTXUlZGm0syhmYd4S80Yh6G5c7lQ7UTpKXsU3JDp2XGfsqsP7y_PP7UXXz9-Pn930XppoLQeghESlDYYlDCkgdOaHEdQnDZ8YyQIz71RwSmudUDi2juitfECnNyIU_Z6ebdW_LGnXOwY8-_vTDTvszVGgNAS8f-k7muqkaqSb-4lUWuNaJQRFZUL6tOcc6Jgb1IcXfppEezBkd3ZxZE9OLKgbHVUz14cE_abkbZ_j_5IqcCrI-Cyd0NI1UvM_zgpjFDYV-7lwgU3W_c9VebqW01SVTRCz3UlzhaCqoXbSMlmH-lgOSbyxW7neH_XX_Xqulg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777118583</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration process for the treatment of olive mill wastewater</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>El-Abbassi, Abdelilah ; Khayet, Mohamed ; Hafidi, Abdellatif</creator><creatorcontrib>El-Abbassi, Abdelilah ; Khayet, Mohamed ; Hafidi, Abdellatif</creatorcontrib><description>Olive mill wastewater (OMW) is an important environmental pollution problem, especially in the Mediterranean, which is the main olive oil production region worldwide. Environmental impact of OMW is related to its high organic load and particularly to the phytotoxic and antibacterial action of its phenolic content. In fact, polyphenols are known as powerful antioxidants with interesting nutritional and pharmaceutical properties. In the present work, the efficiency of OMW Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration (MEUF) treatment for removal and concentration of polyphenols was investigated, using an anionic surfactant (Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate salt, SDS) and a hydrophobic poly(vinyldene fluoride) (PVDF) membrane. The effects of the process experimental conditions on the permeate flux were investigated, and the secondary membrane resistance created by SDS molecules was evaluated. The initial fluxes of OMW processing by MEUF using SDS were 25.7 and 44.5 l/m2 h under transmembrane pressures of 3.5 and 4.5 bar, respectively. The rejection rate of polyphenols without using any surfactant ranged from 5 to 28%, whereas, it reached 74% when SDS was used under optimum pH (pH 2). The MEUF provides a slightly colored permeate (about 88% less dark), which requires clearly less chemical oxygen demand (COD) for its oxidation (4.33% of the initial COD). These results showed that MEUF process can efficiently be applied to the treatment of OMW and for the concentration and recovery of polyphenols.
► Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration allowed significant polyphenols separation. ► MEUF process reduced considerably the color and the COD of OMW. ► Best phenol separation was obtained at 4 bar, pH 2 and 0.1 M SDS. ► SDS gelation concentration (Cg) in distilled water was estimated at 0.27 M. ► SDS contributes to about 91% of the total membrane resistance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.05.044</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21714985</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WATRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>antioxidants ; Applied sciences ; chemical oxygen demand ; Crack opening displacement ; environmental impact ; Exact sciences and technology ; hydrophobicity ; Industrial Waste ; Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration ; Micelles ; Mills ; Olea ; Olive mill wastewater ; olive oil ; Olives ; oxidation ; Oxygen - chemistry ; Oxygen - metabolism ; phytotoxicity ; Pollution ; Polyphenols ; Polyvinyls - chemistry ; Rejection rate ; Secondary resistance ; sodium dodecyl sulfate ; Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate - chemistry ; Surface-Active Agents - chemistry ; Surfactants ; Treatment ; Ultrafiltration ; Ultrafiltration - methods ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Waste water ; wastewater ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2011-10, Vol.45 (15), p.4522-4530</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-c0f83405781f538e702e6ea21052eb2b8403c2c85fa5277f1e27caee68c30a4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-c0f83405781f538e702e6ea21052eb2b8403c2c85fa5277f1e27caee68c30a4b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135411003186$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24383519$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21714985$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>El-Abbassi, Abdelilah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khayet, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hafidi, Abdellatif</creatorcontrib><title>Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration process for the treatment of olive mill wastewater</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>Olive mill wastewater (OMW) is an important environmental pollution problem, especially in the Mediterranean, which is the main olive oil production region worldwide. Environmental impact of OMW is related to its high organic load and particularly to the phytotoxic and antibacterial action of its phenolic content. In fact, polyphenols are known as powerful antioxidants with interesting nutritional and pharmaceutical properties. In the present work, the efficiency of OMW Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration (MEUF) treatment for removal and concentration of polyphenols was investigated, using an anionic surfactant (Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate salt, SDS) and a hydrophobic poly(vinyldene fluoride) (PVDF) membrane. The effects of the process experimental conditions on the permeate flux were investigated, and the secondary membrane resistance created by SDS molecules was evaluated. The initial fluxes of OMW processing by MEUF using SDS were 25.7 and 44.5 l/m2 h under transmembrane pressures of 3.5 and 4.5 bar, respectively. The rejection rate of polyphenols without using any surfactant ranged from 5 to 28%, whereas, it reached 74% when SDS was used under optimum pH (pH 2). The MEUF provides a slightly colored permeate (about 88% less dark), which requires clearly less chemical oxygen demand (COD) for its oxidation (4.33% of the initial COD). These results showed that MEUF process can efficiently be applied to the treatment of OMW and for the concentration and recovery of polyphenols.
► Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration allowed significant polyphenols separation. ► MEUF process reduced considerably the color and the COD of OMW. ► Best phenol separation was obtained at 4 bar, pH 2 and 0.1 M SDS. ► SDS gelation concentration (Cg) in distilled water was estimated at 0.27 M. ► SDS contributes to about 91% of the total membrane resistance.</description><subject>antioxidants</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Crack opening displacement</subject><subject>environmental impact</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>hydrophobicity</subject><subject>Industrial Waste</subject><subject>Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration</subject><subject>Micelles</subject><subject>Mills</subject><subject>Olea</subject><subject>Olive mill wastewater</subject><subject>olive oil</subject><subject>Olives</subject><subject>oxidation</subject><subject>Oxygen - chemistry</subject><subject>Oxygen - metabolism</subject><subject>phytotoxicity</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Polyphenols</subject><subject>Polyvinyls - chemistry</subject><subject>Rejection rate</subject><subject>Secondary resistance</subject><subject>sodium dodecyl sulfate</subject><subject>Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate - chemistry</subject><subject>Surface-Active Agents - chemistry</subject><subject>Surfactants</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><subject>Ultrafiltration</subject><subject>Ultrafiltration - methods</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Waste water</subject><subject>wastewater</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctuFDEQRS0EIkPgDxD0BsGmmyo_xu5NJBTxkoJYkKwtj6dMPOpHsD2J-Hs89AC7sKnanPK91mHsOUKHgOu3u-7OlUS544DYgepAygdshUb3LZfSPGQrAClaFEqesCc57wCAc9E_ZiccNcreqBW7_BI9DYNLDU3XbvK0bfZDSS7EwyxxnpqbNHvKuQlzaso1NTXUlZGm0syhmYd4S80Yh6G5c7lQ7UTpKXsU3JDp2XGfsqsP7y_PP7UXXz9-Pn930XppoLQeghESlDYYlDCkgdOaHEdQnDZ8YyQIz71RwSmudUDi2juitfECnNyIU_Z6ebdW_LGnXOwY8-_vTDTvszVGgNAS8f-k7muqkaqSb-4lUWuNaJQRFZUL6tOcc6Jgb1IcXfppEezBkd3ZxZE9OLKgbHVUz14cE_abkbZ_j_5IqcCrI-Cyd0NI1UvM_zgpjFDYV-7lwgU3W_c9VebqW01SVTRCz3UlzhaCqoXbSMlmH-lgOSbyxW7neH_XX_Xqulg</recordid><startdate>20111001</startdate><enddate>20111001</enddate><creator>El-Abbassi, Abdelilah</creator><creator>Khayet, Mohamed</creator><creator>Hafidi, Abdellatif</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111001</creationdate><title>Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration process for the treatment of olive mill wastewater</title><author>El-Abbassi, Abdelilah ; Khayet, Mohamed ; Hafidi, Abdellatif</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-c0f83405781f538e702e6ea21052eb2b8403c2c85fa5277f1e27caee68c30a4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>antioxidants</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Crack opening displacement</topic><topic>environmental impact</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>hydrophobicity</topic><topic>Industrial Waste</topic><topic>Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration</topic><topic>Micelles</topic><topic>Mills</topic><topic>Olea</topic><topic>Olive mill wastewater</topic><topic>olive oil</topic><topic>Olives</topic><topic>oxidation</topic><topic>Oxygen - chemistry</topic><topic>Oxygen - metabolism</topic><topic>phytotoxicity</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Polyphenols</topic><topic>Polyvinyls - chemistry</topic><topic>Rejection rate</topic><topic>Secondary resistance</topic><topic>sodium dodecyl sulfate</topic><topic>Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate - chemistry</topic><topic>Surface-Active Agents - chemistry</topic><topic>Surfactants</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><topic>Ultrafiltration</topic><topic>Ultrafiltration - methods</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Waste water</topic><topic>wastewater</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>El-Abbassi, Abdelilah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khayet, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hafidi, Abdellatif</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>El-Abbassi, Abdelilah</au><au>Khayet, Mohamed</au><au>Hafidi, Abdellatif</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration process for the treatment of olive mill wastewater</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2011-10-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>4522</spage><epage>4530</epage><pages>4522-4530</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><coden>WATRAG</coden><abstract>Olive mill wastewater (OMW) is an important environmental pollution problem, especially in the Mediterranean, which is the main olive oil production region worldwide. Environmental impact of OMW is related to its high organic load and particularly to the phytotoxic and antibacterial action of its phenolic content. In fact, polyphenols are known as powerful antioxidants with interesting nutritional and pharmaceutical properties. In the present work, the efficiency of OMW Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration (MEUF) treatment for removal and concentration of polyphenols was investigated, using an anionic surfactant (Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate salt, SDS) and a hydrophobic poly(vinyldene fluoride) (PVDF) membrane. The effects of the process experimental conditions on the permeate flux were investigated, and the secondary membrane resistance created by SDS molecules was evaluated. The initial fluxes of OMW processing by MEUF using SDS were 25.7 and 44.5 l/m2 h under transmembrane pressures of 3.5 and 4.5 bar, respectively. The rejection rate of polyphenols without using any surfactant ranged from 5 to 28%, whereas, it reached 74% when SDS was used under optimum pH (pH 2). The MEUF provides a slightly colored permeate (about 88% less dark), which requires clearly less chemical oxygen demand (COD) for its oxidation (4.33% of the initial COD). These results showed that MEUF process can efficiently be applied to the treatment of OMW and for the concentration and recovery of polyphenols.
► Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration allowed significant polyphenols separation. ► MEUF process reduced considerably the color and the COD of OMW. ► Best phenol separation was obtained at 4 bar, pH 2 and 0.1 M SDS. ► SDS gelation concentration (Cg) in distilled water was estimated at 0.27 M. ► SDS contributes to about 91% of the total membrane resistance.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21714985</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2011.05.044</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1354 |
ispartof | Water research (Oxford), 2011-10, Vol.45 (15), p.4522-4530 |
issn | 0043-1354 1879-2448 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883037411 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | antioxidants Applied sciences chemical oxygen demand Crack opening displacement environmental impact Exact sciences and technology hydrophobicity Industrial Waste Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration Micelles Mills Olea Olive mill wastewater olive oil Olives oxidation Oxygen - chemistry Oxygen - metabolism phytotoxicity Pollution Polyphenols Polyvinyls - chemistry Rejection rate Secondary resistance sodium dodecyl sulfate Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate - chemistry Surface-Active Agents - chemistry Surfactants Treatment Ultrafiltration Ultrafiltration - methods Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods Waste water wastewater Water treatment and pollution |
title | Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration process for the treatment of olive mill wastewater |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T06%3A07%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Micellar%20enhanced%20ultrafiltration%20process%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20olive%20mill%20wastewater&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=El-Abbassi,%20Abdelilah&rft.date=2011-10-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=4522&rft.epage=4530&rft.pages=4522-4530&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft.coden=WATRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2011.05.044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E879105845%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777118583&rft_id=info:pmid/21714985&rft_els_id=S0043135411003186&rfr_iscdi=true |