Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration process for the treatment of olive mill wastewater

Olive mill wastewater (OMW) is an important environmental pollution problem, especially in the Mediterranean, which is the main olive oil production region worldwide. Environmental impact of OMW is related to its high organic load and particularly to the phytotoxic and antibacterial action of its ph...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water research (Oxford) 2011-10, Vol.45 (15), p.4522-4530
Hauptverfasser: El-Abbassi, Abdelilah, Khayet, Mohamed, Hafidi, Abdellatif
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4530
container_issue 15
container_start_page 4522
container_title Water research (Oxford)
container_volume 45
creator El-Abbassi, Abdelilah
Khayet, Mohamed
Hafidi, Abdellatif
description Olive mill wastewater (OMW) is an important environmental pollution problem, especially in the Mediterranean, which is the main olive oil production region worldwide. Environmental impact of OMW is related to its high organic load and particularly to the phytotoxic and antibacterial action of its phenolic content. In fact, polyphenols are known as powerful antioxidants with interesting nutritional and pharmaceutical properties. In the present work, the efficiency of OMW Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration (MEUF) treatment for removal and concentration of polyphenols was investigated, using an anionic surfactant (Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate salt, SDS) and a hydrophobic poly(vinyldene fluoride) (PVDF) membrane. The effects of the process experimental conditions on the permeate flux were investigated, and the secondary membrane resistance created by SDS molecules was evaluated. The initial fluxes of OMW processing by MEUF using SDS were 25.7 and 44.5 l/m2 h under transmembrane pressures of 3.5 and 4.5 bar, respectively. The rejection rate of polyphenols without using any surfactant ranged from 5 to 28%, whereas, it reached 74% when SDS was used under optimum pH (pH 2). The MEUF provides a slightly colored permeate (about 88% less dark), which requires clearly less chemical oxygen demand (COD) for its oxidation (4.33% of the initial COD). These results showed that MEUF process can efficiently be applied to the treatment of OMW and for the concentration and recovery of polyphenols. ► Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration allowed significant polyphenols separation. ► MEUF process reduced considerably the color and the COD of OMW. ► Best phenol separation was obtained at 4 bar, pH 2 and 0.1 M SDS. ► SDS gelation concentration (Cg) in distilled water was estimated at 0.27 M. ► SDS contributes to about 91% of the total membrane resistance.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.watres.2011.05.044
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883037411</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135411003186</els_id><sourcerecordid>879105845</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-c0f83405781f538e702e6ea21052eb2b8403c2c85fa5277f1e27caee68c30a4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctuFDEQRS0EIkPgDxD0BsGmmyo_xu5NJBTxkoJYkKwtj6dMPOpHsD2J-Hs89AC7sKnanPK91mHsOUKHgOu3u-7OlUS544DYgepAygdshUb3LZfSPGQrAClaFEqesCc57wCAc9E_ZiccNcreqBW7_BI9DYNLDU3XbvK0bfZDSS7EwyxxnpqbNHvKuQlzaso1NTXUlZGm0syhmYd4S80Yh6G5c7lQ7UTpKXsU3JDp2XGfsqsP7y_PP7UXXz9-Pn930XppoLQeghESlDYYlDCkgdOaHEdQnDZ8YyQIz71RwSmudUDi2juitfECnNyIU_Z6ebdW_LGnXOwY8-_vTDTvszVGgNAS8f-k7muqkaqSb-4lUWuNaJQRFZUL6tOcc6Jgb1IcXfppEezBkd3ZxZE9OLKgbHVUz14cE_abkbZ_j_5IqcCrI-Cyd0NI1UvM_zgpjFDYV-7lwgU3W_c9VebqW01SVTRCz3UlzhaCqoXbSMlmH-lgOSbyxW7neH_XX_Xqulg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777118583</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration process for the treatment of olive mill wastewater</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>El-Abbassi, Abdelilah ; Khayet, Mohamed ; Hafidi, Abdellatif</creator><creatorcontrib>El-Abbassi, Abdelilah ; Khayet, Mohamed ; Hafidi, Abdellatif</creatorcontrib><description>Olive mill wastewater (OMW) is an important environmental pollution problem, especially in the Mediterranean, which is the main olive oil production region worldwide. Environmental impact of OMW is related to its high organic load and particularly to the phytotoxic and antibacterial action of its phenolic content. In fact, polyphenols are known as powerful antioxidants with interesting nutritional and pharmaceutical properties. In the present work, the efficiency of OMW Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration (MEUF) treatment for removal and concentration of polyphenols was investigated, using an anionic surfactant (Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate salt, SDS) and a hydrophobic poly(vinyldene fluoride) (PVDF) membrane. The effects of the process experimental conditions on the permeate flux were investigated, and the secondary membrane resistance created by SDS molecules was evaluated. The initial fluxes of OMW processing by MEUF using SDS were 25.7 and 44.5 l/m2 h under transmembrane pressures of 3.5 and 4.5 bar, respectively. The rejection rate of polyphenols without using any surfactant ranged from 5 to 28%, whereas, it reached 74% when SDS was used under optimum pH (pH 2). The MEUF provides a slightly colored permeate (about 88% less dark), which requires clearly less chemical oxygen demand (COD) for its oxidation (4.33% of the initial COD). These results showed that MEUF process can efficiently be applied to the treatment of OMW and for the concentration and recovery of polyphenols. ► Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration allowed significant polyphenols separation. ► MEUF process reduced considerably the color and the COD of OMW. ► Best phenol separation was obtained at 4 bar, pH 2 and 0.1 M SDS. ► SDS gelation concentration (Cg) in distilled water was estimated at 0.27 M. ► SDS contributes to about 91% of the total membrane resistance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.05.044</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21714985</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WATRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>antioxidants ; Applied sciences ; chemical oxygen demand ; Crack opening displacement ; environmental impact ; Exact sciences and technology ; hydrophobicity ; Industrial Waste ; Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration ; Micelles ; Mills ; Olea ; Olive mill wastewater ; olive oil ; Olives ; oxidation ; Oxygen - chemistry ; Oxygen - metabolism ; phytotoxicity ; Pollution ; Polyphenols ; Polyvinyls - chemistry ; Rejection rate ; Secondary resistance ; sodium dodecyl sulfate ; Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate - chemistry ; Surface-Active Agents - chemistry ; Surfactants ; Treatment ; Ultrafiltration ; Ultrafiltration - methods ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Waste water ; wastewater ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2011-10, Vol.45 (15), p.4522-4530</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-c0f83405781f538e702e6ea21052eb2b8403c2c85fa5277f1e27caee68c30a4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-c0f83405781f538e702e6ea21052eb2b8403c2c85fa5277f1e27caee68c30a4b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135411003186$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24383519$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21714985$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>El-Abbassi, Abdelilah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khayet, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hafidi, Abdellatif</creatorcontrib><title>Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration process for the treatment of olive mill wastewater</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>Olive mill wastewater (OMW) is an important environmental pollution problem, especially in the Mediterranean, which is the main olive oil production region worldwide. Environmental impact of OMW is related to its high organic load and particularly to the phytotoxic and antibacterial action of its phenolic content. In fact, polyphenols are known as powerful antioxidants with interesting nutritional and pharmaceutical properties. In the present work, the efficiency of OMW Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration (MEUF) treatment for removal and concentration of polyphenols was investigated, using an anionic surfactant (Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate salt, SDS) and a hydrophobic poly(vinyldene fluoride) (PVDF) membrane. The effects of the process experimental conditions on the permeate flux were investigated, and the secondary membrane resistance created by SDS molecules was evaluated. The initial fluxes of OMW processing by MEUF using SDS were 25.7 and 44.5 l/m2 h under transmembrane pressures of 3.5 and 4.5 bar, respectively. The rejection rate of polyphenols without using any surfactant ranged from 5 to 28%, whereas, it reached 74% when SDS was used under optimum pH (pH 2). The MEUF provides a slightly colored permeate (about 88% less dark), which requires clearly less chemical oxygen demand (COD) for its oxidation (4.33% of the initial COD). These results showed that MEUF process can efficiently be applied to the treatment of OMW and for the concentration and recovery of polyphenols. ► Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration allowed significant polyphenols separation. ► MEUF process reduced considerably the color and the COD of OMW. ► Best phenol separation was obtained at 4 bar, pH 2 and 0.1 M SDS. ► SDS gelation concentration (Cg) in distilled water was estimated at 0.27 M. ► SDS contributes to about 91% of the total membrane resistance.</description><subject>antioxidants</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Crack opening displacement</subject><subject>environmental impact</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>hydrophobicity</subject><subject>Industrial Waste</subject><subject>Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration</subject><subject>Micelles</subject><subject>Mills</subject><subject>Olea</subject><subject>Olive mill wastewater</subject><subject>olive oil</subject><subject>Olives</subject><subject>oxidation</subject><subject>Oxygen - chemistry</subject><subject>Oxygen - metabolism</subject><subject>phytotoxicity</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Polyphenols</subject><subject>Polyvinyls - chemistry</subject><subject>Rejection rate</subject><subject>Secondary resistance</subject><subject>sodium dodecyl sulfate</subject><subject>Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate - chemistry</subject><subject>Surface-Active Agents - chemistry</subject><subject>Surfactants</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><subject>Ultrafiltration</subject><subject>Ultrafiltration - methods</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Waste water</subject><subject>wastewater</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctuFDEQRS0EIkPgDxD0BsGmmyo_xu5NJBTxkoJYkKwtj6dMPOpHsD2J-Hs89AC7sKnanPK91mHsOUKHgOu3u-7OlUS544DYgepAygdshUb3LZfSPGQrAClaFEqesCc57wCAc9E_ZiccNcreqBW7_BI9DYNLDU3XbvK0bfZDSS7EwyxxnpqbNHvKuQlzaso1NTXUlZGm0syhmYd4S80Yh6G5c7lQ7UTpKXsU3JDp2XGfsqsP7y_PP7UXXz9-Pn930XppoLQeghESlDYYlDCkgdOaHEdQnDZ8YyQIz71RwSmudUDi2juitfECnNyIU_Z6ebdW_LGnXOwY8-_vTDTvszVGgNAS8f-k7muqkaqSb-4lUWuNaJQRFZUL6tOcc6Jgb1IcXfppEezBkd3ZxZE9OLKgbHVUz14cE_abkbZ_j_5IqcCrI-Cyd0NI1UvM_zgpjFDYV-7lwgU3W_c9VebqW01SVTRCz3UlzhaCqoXbSMlmH-lgOSbyxW7neH_XX_Xqulg</recordid><startdate>20111001</startdate><enddate>20111001</enddate><creator>El-Abbassi, Abdelilah</creator><creator>Khayet, Mohamed</creator><creator>Hafidi, Abdellatif</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111001</creationdate><title>Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration process for the treatment of olive mill wastewater</title><author>El-Abbassi, Abdelilah ; Khayet, Mohamed ; Hafidi, Abdellatif</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-c0f83405781f538e702e6ea21052eb2b8403c2c85fa5277f1e27caee68c30a4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>antioxidants</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Crack opening displacement</topic><topic>environmental impact</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>hydrophobicity</topic><topic>Industrial Waste</topic><topic>Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration</topic><topic>Micelles</topic><topic>Mills</topic><topic>Olea</topic><topic>Olive mill wastewater</topic><topic>olive oil</topic><topic>Olives</topic><topic>oxidation</topic><topic>Oxygen - chemistry</topic><topic>Oxygen - metabolism</topic><topic>phytotoxicity</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Polyphenols</topic><topic>Polyvinyls - chemistry</topic><topic>Rejection rate</topic><topic>Secondary resistance</topic><topic>sodium dodecyl sulfate</topic><topic>Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate - chemistry</topic><topic>Surface-Active Agents - chemistry</topic><topic>Surfactants</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><topic>Ultrafiltration</topic><topic>Ultrafiltration - methods</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Waste water</topic><topic>wastewater</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>El-Abbassi, Abdelilah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khayet, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hafidi, Abdellatif</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>El-Abbassi, Abdelilah</au><au>Khayet, Mohamed</au><au>Hafidi, Abdellatif</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration process for the treatment of olive mill wastewater</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2011-10-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>4522</spage><epage>4530</epage><pages>4522-4530</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><coden>WATRAG</coden><abstract>Olive mill wastewater (OMW) is an important environmental pollution problem, especially in the Mediterranean, which is the main olive oil production region worldwide. Environmental impact of OMW is related to its high organic load and particularly to the phytotoxic and antibacterial action of its phenolic content. In fact, polyphenols are known as powerful antioxidants with interesting nutritional and pharmaceutical properties. In the present work, the efficiency of OMW Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration (MEUF) treatment for removal and concentration of polyphenols was investigated, using an anionic surfactant (Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate salt, SDS) and a hydrophobic poly(vinyldene fluoride) (PVDF) membrane. The effects of the process experimental conditions on the permeate flux were investigated, and the secondary membrane resistance created by SDS molecules was evaluated. The initial fluxes of OMW processing by MEUF using SDS were 25.7 and 44.5 l/m2 h under transmembrane pressures of 3.5 and 4.5 bar, respectively. The rejection rate of polyphenols without using any surfactant ranged from 5 to 28%, whereas, it reached 74% when SDS was used under optimum pH (pH 2). The MEUF provides a slightly colored permeate (about 88% less dark), which requires clearly less chemical oxygen demand (COD) for its oxidation (4.33% of the initial COD). These results showed that MEUF process can efficiently be applied to the treatment of OMW and for the concentration and recovery of polyphenols. ► Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration allowed significant polyphenols separation. ► MEUF process reduced considerably the color and the COD of OMW. ► Best phenol separation was obtained at 4 bar, pH 2 and 0.1 M SDS. ► SDS gelation concentration (Cg) in distilled water was estimated at 0.27 M. ► SDS contributes to about 91% of the total membrane resistance.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21714985</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2011.05.044</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1354
ispartof Water research (Oxford), 2011-10, Vol.45 (15), p.4522-4530
issn 0043-1354
1879-2448
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883037411
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects antioxidants
Applied sciences
chemical oxygen demand
Crack opening displacement
environmental impact
Exact sciences and technology
hydrophobicity
Industrial Waste
Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration
Micelles
Mills
Olea
Olive mill wastewater
olive oil
Olives
oxidation
Oxygen - chemistry
Oxygen - metabolism
phytotoxicity
Pollution
Polyphenols
Polyvinyls - chemistry
Rejection rate
Secondary resistance
sodium dodecyl sulfate
Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate - chemistry
Surface-Active Agents - chemistry
Surfactants
Treatment
Ultrafiltration
Ultrafiltration - methods
Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods
Waste water
wastewater
Water treatment and pollution
title Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration process for the treatment of olive mill wastewater
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T06%3A07%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Micellar%20enhanced%20ultrafiltration%20process%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20olive%20mill%20wastewater&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=El-Abbassi,%20Abdelilah&rft.date=2011-10-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=4522&rft.epage=4530&rft.pages=4522-4530&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft.coden=WATRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2011.05.044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E879105845%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777118583&rft_id=info:pmid/21714985&rft_els_id=S0043135411003186&rfr_iscdi=true