The detection and influence of food soils on microorganisms on stainless steel using scanning electron microscopy and epifluorescence microscopy
A range of food soils and components (complex [meat extract, fish extract, and cottage cheese extract]; oils [cholesterol, fish oil, and mixed fatty acids]; proteins [bovine serum albumin (BSA), fish peptones, and casein]; and carbohydrates [glycogen, starch, and lactose]) were deposited onto 304 2B...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of food microbiology 2010-07, Vol.141, p.S125-S133 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S133 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | S125 |
container_title | International journal of food microbiology |
container_volume | 141 |
creator | Whitehead, Kathryn A. Smith, Lindsay A. Verran, Joanna |
description | A range of food soils and components (complex [meat extract, fish extract, and cottage cheese extract]; oils [cholesterol, fish oil, and mixed fatty acids]; proteins [bovine serum albumin (BSA), fish peptones, and casein]; and carbohydrates [glycogen, starch, and lactose]) were deposited onto 304 2B finish stainless steel surfaces at different concentrations (10–0.001%). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and epifluorescence microscopy were used to visualise the cell and food soil distribution across the surface. Epifluorescence microscopy was also used to quantify the percentage of a field covered by cells or soil. At 10% concentration, most soils, with the exception of BSA and fish peptone were easily visualised using SEM, presenting differences in gross soil morphology and distribution. When soil was stained with acridine orange and visualised by epifluorescence microscopy, the limit of detection of the method varied between soils, but some (meat, cottage cheese and glycogen) were detected at the lowest concentrations used (0.001%). The decrease in soil concentration did not always relate to the surface coverage measurement. When 10% food soil was applied to a surface with
Escherichia coli and compared, cell attachment differed depending on the nature of the soil. The highest percentage coverage of cells was observed on surfaces with fish extract and related products (fish peptone and fish oil), followed by carbohydrates, meat extract/meat protein, cottage cheese/casein and the least to the oils (cholesterol and mixed fatty acids). Cells could not be clearly observed in the presence of some food soils using SEM. Findings demonstrate that food soils heterogeneously covered stainless steel surfaces in differing patterns. The pattern and amount of cell attachment was related to food soil type rather than to the amount of food soil detected. This work demonstrates that in the study of conditioning film and cell retention on the hygienic properties of surfaces, SEM may not reveal the presence of retained conditioning film, and thus methods such as epifluorescence microscopy should also be used. This is an essential facet to the methodology design of future work carried out in our laboratories on the effectiveness of the removal of cells and conditioning films from surfaces using different cleaning regimes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.01.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883036291</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168160510000292</els_id><sourcerecordid>754012712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-7d2bca3ce76b1e7c9e9c9818b2f4dede77478a8adcd34cd794c8c55fc0607d5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUcGO1DAMjRCIHRZ-AcppTx2cpm3SIxrBgrQSB3bPUZq4Q0ZtMsQt0v4Fn0w6swvcQLIUy37Pz_Fj7C2HLQfevjts_WGI0U3epritINeB56iesA1XsitF3cJTtslYVfIWmgv2gugAAI0Q8JxdZEojQPIN-3n7DQuHM9rZx1CY4AofhnHBYLGIQ7HKFBT9SEVunwRj2pvgaTpVaDY-jEiUM8SxWMiHfUHWhLAmOObB6ZFJNh7vTxp49FkkJiR7UvrTfsmeDWYkfPXwXrK7jx9ud5_Kmy_Xn3fvb0pbi2oupat6a4RF2fYcpe2ws53iqq-G2qFDKWupjDLOOlFbJ7vaKts0g4UWpGt6ccmuznOPKX5fkGY9-bzMOJqAcSGtlADRVh3_J1I2dT695FVGdmfk-hlKOOhj8pNJ95qDXp3TB_2Xc3p1TgPPsXJfP6gs_YTuN_PRqgx4cwYMJmqzT5703dfcFcCVqlroMmJ3RmC-2w-PSZP163mdT9kG7aL_j0V-AbsPvjI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>754012712</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The detection and influence of food soils on microorganisms on stainless steel using scanning electron microscopy and epifluorescence microscopy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Whitehead, Kathryn A. ; Smith, Lindsay A. ; Verran, Joanna</creator><creatorcontrib>Whitehead, Kathryn A. ; Smith, Lindsay A. ; Verran, Joanna</creatorcontrib><description>A range of food soils and components (complex [meat extract, fish extract, and cottage cheese extract]; oils [cholesterol, fish oil, and mixed fatty acids]; proteins [bovine serum albumin (BSA), fish peptones, and casein]; and carbohydrates [glycogen, starch, and lactose]) were deposited onto 304 2B finish stainless steel surfaces at different concentrations (10–0.001%). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and epifluorescence microscopy were used to visualise the cell and food soil distribution across the surface. Epifluorescence microscopy was also used to quantify the percentage of a field covered by cells or soil. At 10% concentration, most soils, with the exception of BSA and fish peptone were easily visualised using SEM, presenting differences in gross soil morphology and distribution. When soil was stained with acridine orange and visualised by epifluorescence microscopy, the limit of detection of the method varied between soils, but some (meat, cottage cheese and glycogen) were detected at the lowest concentrations used (0.001%). The decrease in soil concentration did not always relate to the surface coverage measurement. When 10% food soil was applied to a surface with
Escherichia coli and compared, cell attachment differed depending on the nature of the soil. The highest percentage coverage of cells was observed on surfaces with fish extract and related products (fish peptone and fish oil), followed by carbohydrates, meat extract/meat protein, cottage cheese/casein and the least to the oils (cholesterol and mixed fatty acids). Cells could not be clearly observed in the presence of some food soils using SEM. Findings demonstrate that food soils heterogeneously covered stainless steel surfaces in differing patterns. The pattern and amount of cell attachment was related to food soil type rather than to the amount of food soil detected. This work demonstrates that in the study of conditioning film and cell retention on the hygienic properties of surfaces, SEM may not reveal the presence of retained conditioning film, and thus methods such as epifluorescence microscopy should also be used. This is an essential facet to the methodology design of future work carried out in our laboratories on the effectiveness of the removal of cells and conditioning films from surfaces using different cleaning regimes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1605</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3460</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.01.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20153071</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acridine Orange ; Animals ; Bacterial Adhesion ; Carbohydrates ; Cattle ; Cheese - microbiology ; cleaning ; Conditioning film ; disinfection ; E. coli ; Epifluorescence ; epifluorescence microscopy ; Equipment and Supplies - microbiology ; Equipment Contamination ; equipment performance ; Escherichia coli ; Escherichia coli - growth & development ; Fats ; Fish Products - microbiology ; fluorescence ; fluorescent dyes ; Food ; food contact surfaces ; food contamination ; Food Microbiology ; food pathogens ; food safety ; Food Safety - methods ; food sanitation ; fouling ; Hygiene ; Meat Products - microbiology ; microorganisms ; Microscopy - methods ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning - methods ; Microscopy, Fluorescence - methods ; model food systems ; Proteins ; scanning electron microscopy ; SEM ; Soil ; Stainless Steel ; Surface ; Surface Properties</subject><ispartof>International journal of food microbiology, 2010-07, Vol.141, p.S125-S133</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-7d2bca3ce76b1e7c9e9c9818b2f4dede77478a8adcd34cd794c8c55fc0607d5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-7d2bca3ce76b1e7c9e9c9818b2f4dede77478a8adcd34cd794c8c55fc0607d5b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168160510000292$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20153071$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whitehead, Kathryn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Lindsay A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verran, Joanna</creatorcontrib><title>The detection and influence of food soils on microorganisms on stainless steel using scanning electron microscopy and epifluorescence microscopy</title><title>International journal of food microbiology</title><addtitle>Int J Food Microbiol</addtitle><description>A range of food soils and components (complex [meat extract, fish extract, and cottage cheese extract]; oils [cholesterol, fish oil, and mixed fatty acids]; proteins [bovine serum albumin (BSA), fish peptones, and casein]; and carbohydrates [glycogen, starch, and lactose]) were deposited onto 304 2B finish stainless steel surfaces at different concentrations (10–0.001%). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and epifluorescence microscopy were used to visualise the cell and food soil distribution across the surface. Epifluorescence microscopy was also used to quantify the percentage of a field covered by cells or soil. At 10% concentration, most soils, with the exception of BSA and fish peptone were easily visualised using SEM, presenting differences in gross soil morphology and distribution. When soil was stained with acridine orange and visualised by epifluorescence microscopy, the limit of detection of the method varied between soils, but some (meat, cottage cheese and glycogen) were detected at the lowest concentrations used (0.001%). The decrease in soil concentration did not always relate to the surface coverage measurement. When 10% food soil was applied to a surface with
Escherichia coli and compared, cell attachment differed depending on the nature of the soil. The highest percentage coverage of cells was observed on surfaces with fish extract and related products (fish peptone and fish oil), followed by carbohydrates, meat extract/meat protein, cottage cheese/casein and the least to the oils (cholesterol and mixed fatty acids). Cells could not be clearly observed in the presence of some food soils using SEM. Findings demonstrate that food soils heterogeneously covered stainless steel surfaces in differing patterns. The pattern and amount of cell attachment was related to food soil type rather than to the amount of food soil detected. This work demonstrates that in the study of conditioning film and cell retention on the hygienic properties of surfaces, SEM may not reveal the presence of retained conditioning film, and thus methods such as epifluorescence microscopy should also be used. This is an essential facet to the methodology design of future work carried out in our laboratories on the effectiveness of the removal of cells and conditioning films from surfaces using different cleaning regimes.</description><subject>Acridine Orange</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacterial Adhesion</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cheese - microbiology</subject><subject>cleaning</subject><subject>Conditioning film</subject><subject>disinfection</subject><subject>E. coli</subject><subject>Epifluorescence</subject><subject>epifluorescence microscopy</subject><subject>Equipment and Supplies - microbiology</subject><subject>Equipment Contamination</subject><subject>equipment performance</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - growth & development</subject><subject>Fats</subject><subject>Fish Products - microbiology</subject><subject>fluorescence</subject><subject>fluorescent dyes</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>food contact surfaces</subject><subject>food contamination</subject><subject>Food Microbiology</subject><subject>food pathogens</subject><subject>food safety</subject><subject>Food Safety - methods</subject><subject>food sanitation</subject><subject>fouling</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Meat Products - microbiology</subject><subject>microorganisms</subject><subject>Microscopy - methods</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning - methods</subject><subject>Microscopy, Fluorescence - methods</subject><subject>model food systems</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>SEM</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Stainless Steel</subject><subject>Surface</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><issn>0168-1605</issn><issn>1879-3460</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUcGO1DAMjRCIHRZ-AcppTx2cpm3SIxrBgrQSB3bPUZq4Q0ZtMsQt0v4Fn0w6swvcQLIUy37Pz_Fj7C2HLQfevjts_WGI0U3epritINeB56iesA1XsitF3cJTtslYVfIWmgv2gugAAI0Q8JxdZEojQPIN-3n7DQuHM9rZx1CY4AofhnHBYLGIQ7HKFBT9SEVunwRj2pvgaTpVaDY-jEiUM8SxWMiHfUHWhLAmOObB6ZFJNh7vTxp49FkkJiR7UvrTfsmeDWYkfPXwXrK7jx9ud5_Kmy_Xn3fvb0pbi2oupat6a4RF2fYcpe2ws53iqq-G2qFDKWupjDLOOlFbJ7vaKts0g4UWpGt6ccmuznOPKX5fkGY9-bzMOJqAcSGtlADRVh3_J1I2dT695FVGdmfk-hlKOOhj8pNJ95qDXp3TB_2Xc3p1TgPPsXJfP6gs_YTuN_PRqgx4cwYMJmqzT5703dfcFcCVqlroMmJ3RmC-2w-PSZP163mdT9kG7aL_j0V-AbsPvjI</recordid><startdate>20100731</startdate><enddate>20100731</enddate><creator>Whitehead, Kathryn A.</creator><creator>Smith, Lindsay A.</creator><creator>Verran, Joanna</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>[Amsterdam; New York, NY]: Elsevier Science</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100731</creationdate><title>The detection and influence of food soils on microorganisms on stainless steel using scanning electron microscopy and epifluorescence microscopy</title><author>Whitehead, Kathryn A. ; Smith, Lindsay A. ; Verran, Joanna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-7d2bca3ce76b1e7c9e9c9818b2f4dede77478a8adcd34cd794c8c55fc0607d5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Acridine Orange</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacterial Adhesion</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cheese - microbiology</topic><topic>cleaning</topic><topic>Conditioning film</topic><topic>disinfection</topic><topic>E. coli</topic><topic>Epifluorescence</topic><topic>epifluorescence microscopy</topic><topic>Equipment and Supplies - microbiology</topic><topic>Equipment Contamination</topic><topic>equipment performance</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - growth & development</topic><topic>Fats</topic><topic>Fish Products - microbiology</topic><topic>fluorescence</topic><topic>fluorescent dyes</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>food contact surfaces</topic><topic>food contamination</topic><topic>Food Microbiology</topic><topic>food pathogens</topic><topic>food safety</topic><topic>Food Safety - methods</topic><topic>food sanitation</topic><topic>fouling</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Meat Products - microbiology</topic><topic>microorganisms</topic><topic>Microscopy - methods</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning - methods</topic><topic>Microscopy, Fluorescence - methods</topic><topic>model food systems</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>SEM</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Stainless Steel</topic><topic>Surface</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whitehead, Kathryn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Lindsay A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verran, Joanna</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of food microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whitehead, Kathryn A.</au><au>Smith, Lindsay A.</au><au>Verran, Joanna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The detection and influence of food soils on microorganisms on stainless steel using scanning electron microscopy and epifluorescence microscopy</atitle><jtitle>International journal of food microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Food Microbiol</addtitle><date>2010-07-31</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>141</volume><spage>S125</spage><epage>S133</epage><pages>S125-S133</pages><issn>0168-1605</issn><eissn>1879-3460</eissn><abstract>A range of food soils and components (complex [meat extract, fish extract, and cottage cheese extract]; oils [cholesterol, fish oil, and mixed fatty acids]; proteins [bovine serum albumin (BSA), fish peptones, and casein]; and carbohydrates [glycogen, starch, and lactose]) were deposited onto 304 2B finish stainless steel surfaces at different concentrations (10–0.001%). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and epifluorescence microscopy were used to visualise the cell and food soil distribution across the surface. Epifluorescence microscopy was also used to quantify the percentage of a field covered by cells or soil. At 10% concentration, most soils, with the exception of BSA and fish peptone were easily visualised using SEM, presenting differences in gross soil morphology and distribution. When soil was stained with acridine orange and visualised by epifluorescence microscopy, the limit of detection of the method varied between soils, but some (meat, cottage cheese and glycogen) were detected at the lowest concentrations used (0.001%). The decrease in soil concentration did not always relate to the surface coverage measurement. When 10% food soil was applied to a surface with
Escherichia coli and compared, cell attachment differed depending on the nature of the soil. The highest percentage coverage of cells was observed on surfaces with fish extract and related products (fish peptone and fish oil), followed by carbohydrates, meat extract/meat protein, cottage cheese/casein and the least to the oils (cholesterol and mixed fatty acids). Cells could not be clearly observed in the presence of some food soils using SEM. Findings demonstrate that food soils heterogeneously covered stainless steel surfaces in differing patterns. The pattern and amount of cell attachment was related to food soil type rather than to the amount of food soil detected. This work demonstrates that in the study of conditioning film and cell retention on the hygienic properties of surfaces, SEM may not reveal the presence of retained conditioning film, and thus methods such as epifluorescence microscopy should also be used. This is an essential facet to the methodology design of future work carried out in our laboratories on the effectiveness of the removal of cells and conditioning films from surfaces using different cleaning regimes.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>20153071</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.01.012</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-1605 |
ispartof | International journal of food microbiology, 2010-07, Vol.141, p.S125-S133 |
issn | 0168-1605 1879-3460 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883036291 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Acridine Orange Animals Bacterial Adhesion Carbohydrates Cattle Cheese - microbiology cleaning Conditioning film disinfection E. coli Epifluorescence epifluorescence microscopy Equipment and Supplies - microbiology Equipment Contamination equipment performance Escherichia coli Escherichia coli - growth & development Fats Fish Products - microbiology fluorescence fluorescent dyes Food food contact surfaces food contamination Food Microbiology food pathogens food safety Food Safety - methods food sanitation fouling Hygiene Meat Products - microbiology microorganisms Microscopy - methods Microscopy, Electron, Scanning - methods Microscopy, Fluorescence - methods model food systems Proteins scanning electron microscopy SEM Soil Stainless Steel Surface Surface Properties |
title | The detection and influence of food soils on microorganisms on stainless steel using scanning electron microscopy and epifluorescence microscopy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T02%3A46%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20detection%20and%20influence%20of%20food%20soils%20on%20microorganisms%20on%20stainless%20steel%20using%20scanning%20electron%20microscopy%20and%20epifluorescence%20microscopy&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20food%20microbiology&rft.au=Whitehead,%20Kathryn%20A.&rft.date=2010-07-31&rft.volume=141&rft.spage=S125&rft.epage=S133&rft.pages=S125-S133&rft.issn=0168-1605&rft.eissn=1879-3460&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.01.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E754012712%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=754012712&rft_id=info:pmid/20153071&rft_els_id=S0168160510000292&rfr_iscdi=true |