Using knowledge structures to redesign an instructor–operator station
Frequently, user interface (UI) designers must choose between modifying an established, but suboptimal and familiar, UI or to avoid such changes. Changing the UI’s, organization may frustrate users who have become familiar with the original design, whereas failing to make changes may force users to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied ergonomics 2011-11, Vol.42 (6), p.934-940 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 940 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 934 |
container_title | Applied ergonomics |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Branaghan, Russell J. Covas-Smith, Christine M. Jackson, Kenneth D. Eidman, Craig |
description | Frequently, user interface (UI) designers must choose between modifying an established, but suboptimal and familiar, UI or to avoid such changes. Changing the UI’s, organization may frustrate users who have become familiar with the original design, whereas failing to make changes may force users to perform at an unsatisfactory level. This paper presents two studies that investigate whether users familiar with a poorly designed UI would find items faster, and prefer a reorganized UI that conformed to domain expert knowledge, or would their familiarity with the original UI yield faster performance and higher satisfaction.
This paper describes activities to redesign a menu structure in a simulator instructor–operator station (IOS) using hierarchical card sorting and cluster analysis (
Romesburg, 2004). This analysis was used to reorganize the menu structure to reflect the knowledge representations of domain experts in accordance with the principle of proximity compatibility (
Wickens and Carswell, 1995; Rothrock et al., 2006). The new design was validated with a separate set of users by a reaction time experiment and preference selection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.03.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883031763</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003687011000299</els_id><sourcerecordid>883031763</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-b782aaf8ff3202d87aab5af5a8bd8727e4f55721998a580e9b63590f61fdee323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcGOFCEQhonRuOPqGxjTMdl46raApqEvJmajq8kmXtwzoeliwtgDI3Sv8eY77Bv6JDL2qIkHPUGFr34oPkKeUmgo0O7lrjEHTNvYMKC0Ad4AsHtkQ5VkdU9Zd59sAIDXnZJwRh7lvCulaql4SM4YbUXPO7ohVzfZh231KcQvE45brPKcFjsvCXM1xyrhiNlvQ2VC5cN6FtP3b3ex3G3KtvBm9jE8Jg-cmTI-Oa3n5Obtm4-X7-rrD1fvL19f17YVMNeDVMwYp5zjDNiopDGDME4YNZSCSWydEJLRvldGKMB-6LjowXXUjYic8XPyYs09pPh5wTzrvc8Wp8kEjEvWSnHgVHb8_6RUwDmwY-bzv8hdXFIoY5S4nvaqk22B2hWyKeac0OlD8nuTvmoK-ihE7_QqRB-FaOC6CCltz07Zy7DH8XfTLwMFuDgBJlszuWSC9fkP1_JWtj_HebVyWH731mPS2XoMFkef0M56jP7fL_kBUxmrrA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>889198674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using knowledge structures to redesign an instructor–operator station</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Branaghan, Russell J. ; Covas-Smith, Christine M. ; Jackson, Kenneth D. ; Eidman, Craig</creator><creatorcontrib>Branaghan, Russell J. ; Covas-Smith, Christine M. ; Jackson, Kenneth D. ; Eidman, Craig</creatorcontrib><description>Frequently, user interface (UI) designers must choose between modifying an established, but suboptimal and familiar, UI or to avoid such changes. Changing the UI’s, organization may frustrate users who have become familiar with the original design, whereas failing to make changes may force users to perform at an unsatisfactory level. This paper presents two studies that investigate whether users familiar with a poorly designed UI would find items faster, and prefer a reorganized UI that conformed to domain expert knowledge, or would their familiarity with the original UI yield faster performance and higher satisfaction.
This paper describes activities to redesign a menu structure in a simulator instructor–operator station (IOS) using hierarchical card sorting and cluster analysis (
Romesburg, 2004). This analysis was used to reorganize the menu structure to reflect the knowledge representations of domain experts in accordance with the principle of proximity compatibility (
Wickens and Carswell, 1995; Rothrock et al., 2006). The new design was validated with a separate set of users by a reaction time experiment and preference selection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6870</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.03.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21459361</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AERGBW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aircraft ; Applied physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Computer Simulation - standards ; Data Display ; Ergonomics ; Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology ; Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology ; Humans ; Knowledge ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mental models ; Menu design ; Middle Aged ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Simulation training ; Systems design ; Teaching - methods ; User interface ; User-Computer Interface ; Validation studies</subject><ispartof>Applied ergonomics, 2011-11, Vol.42 (6), p.934-940</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Nov 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-b782aaf8ff3202d87aab5af5a8bd8727e4f55721998a580e9b63590f61fdee323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-b782aaf8ff3202d87aab5af5a8bd8727e4f55721998a580e9b63590f61fdee323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.03.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24347463$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21459361$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Branaghan, Russell J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Covas-Smith, Christine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Kenneth D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eidman, Craig</creatorcontrib><title>Using knowledge structures to redesign an instructor–operator station</title><title>Applied ergonomics</title><addtitle>Appl Ergon</addtitle><description>Frequently, user interface (UI) designers must choose between modifying an established, but suboptimal and familiar, UI or to avoid such changes. Changing the UI’s, organization may frustrate users who have become familiar with the original design, whereas failing to make changes may force users to perform at an unsatisfactory level. This paper presents two studies that investigate whether users familiar with a poorly designed UI would find items faster, and prefer a reorganized UI that conformed to domain expert knowledge, or would their familiarity with the original UI yield faster performance and higher satisfaction.
This paper describes activities to redesign a menu structure in a simulator instructor–operator station (IOS) using hierarchical card sorting and cluster analysis (
Romesburg, 2004). This analysis was used to reorganize the menu structure to reflect the knowledge representations of domain experts in accordance with the principle of proximity compatibility (
Wickens and Carswell, 1995; Rothrock et al., 2006). The new design was validated with a separate set of users by a reaction time experiment and preference selection.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Applied physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Computer Simulation - standards</subject><subject>Data Display</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology</subject><subject>Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental models</subject><subject>Menu design</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Simulation training</subject><subject>Systems design</subject><subject>Teaching - methods</subject><subject>User interface</subject><subject>User-Computer Interface</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><issn>0003-6870</issn><issn>1872-9126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcGOFCEQhonRuOPqGxjTMdl46raApqEvJmajq8kmXtwzoeliwtgDI3Sv8eY77Bv6JDL2qIkHPUGFr34oPkKeUmgo0O7lrjEHTNvYMKC0Ad4AsHtkQ5VkdU9Zd59sAIDXnZJwRh7lvCulaql4SM4YbUXPO7ohVzfZh231KcQvE45brPKcFjsvCXM1xyrhiNlvQ2VC5cN6FtP3b3ex3G3KtvBm9jE8Jg-cmTI-Oa3n5Obtm4-X7-rrD1fvL19f17YVMNeDVMwYp5zjDNiopDGDME4YNZSCSWydEJLRvldGKMB-6LjowXXUjYic8XPyYs09pPh5wTzrvc8Wp8kEjEvWSnHgVHb8_6RUwDmwY-bzv8hdXFIoY5S4nvaqk22B2hWyKeac0OlD8nuTvmoK-ihE7_QqRB-FaOC6CCltz07Zy7DH8XfTLwMFuDgBJlszuWSC9fkP1_JWtj_HebVyWH731mPS2XoMFkef0M56jP7fL_kBUxmrrA</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Branaghan, Russell J.</creator><creator>Covas-Smith, Christine M.</creator><creator>Jackson, Kenneth D.</creator><creator>Eidman, Craig</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>Using knowledge structures to redesign an instructor–operator station</title><author>Branaghan, Russell J. ; Covas-Smith, Christine M. ; Jackson, Kenneth D. ; Eidman, Craig</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-b782aaf8ff3202d87aab5af5a8bd8727e4f55721998a580e9b63590f61fdee323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Applied physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Computer Simulation - standards</topic><topic>Data Display</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology</topic><topic>Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental models</topic><topic>Menu design</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Simulation training</topic><topic>Systems design</topic><topic>Teaching - methods</topic><topic>User interface</topic><topic>User-Computer Interface</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Branaghan, Russell J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Covas-Smith, Christine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Kenneth D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eidman, Craig</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Applied ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Branaghan, Russell J.</au><au>Covas-Smith, Christine M.</au><au>Jackson, Kenneth D.</au><au>Eidman, Craig</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using knowledge structures to redesign an instructor–operator station</atitle><jtitle>Applied ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Ergon</addtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>934</spage><epage>940</epage><pages>934-940</pages><issn>0003-6870</issn><eissn>1872-9126</eissn><coden>AERGBW</coden><abstract>Frequently, user interface (UI) designers must choose between modifying an established, but suboptimal and familiar, UI or to avoid such changes. Changing the UI’s, organization may frustrate users who have become familiar with the original design, whereas failing to make changes may force users to perform at an unsatisfactory level. This paper presents two studies that investigate whether users familiar with a poorly designed UI would find items faster, and prefer a reorganized UI that conformed to domain expert knowledge, or would their familiarity with the original UI yield faster performance and higher satisfaction.
This paper describes activities to redesign a menu structure in a simulator instructor–operator station (IOS) using hierarchical card sorting and cluster analysis (
Romesburg, 2004). This analysis was used to reorganize the menu structure to reflect the knowledge representations of domain experts in accordance with the principle of proximity compatibility (
Wickens and Carswell, 1995; Rothrock et al., 2006). The new design was validated with a separate set of users by a reaction time experiment and preference selection.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21459361</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apergo.2011.03.002</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-6870 |
ispartof | Applied ergonomics, 2011-11, Vol.42 (6), p.934-940 |
issn | 0003-6870 1872-9126 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883031763 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adult Aircraft Applied physiology Biological and medical sciences Computer Simulation - standards Data Display Ergonomics Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology Humans Knowledge Male Medical sciences Mental models Menu design Middle Aged Recognition (Psychology) Simulation training Systems design Teaching - methods User interface User-Computer Interface Validation studies |
title | Using knowledge structures to redesign an instructor–operator station |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T09%3A12%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20knowledge%20structures%20to%20redesign%20an%20instructor%E2%80%93operator%20station&rft.jtitle=Applied%20ergonomics&rft.au=Branaghan,%20Russell%20J.&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=934&rft.epage=940&rft.pages=934-940&rft.issn=0003-6870&rft.eissn=1872-9126&rft.coden=AERGBW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.03.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E883031763%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=889198674&rft_id=info:pmid/21459361&rft_els_id=S0003687011000299&rfr_iscdi=true |