Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 3. ECAP during bursts and loudness as function of burst duration
In this, the third paper of the series, the loudness of low-rate bursts of electrical pulses was measured as a function of the burst duration, in subjects implanted with the Nucleus ® 24 cochlear implant system (three with straight and two with Contour™ electrode arrays). In order to help distinguis...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hearing research 2009-01, Vol.247 (2), p.112-121 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 121 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 112 |
container_title | Hearing research |
container_volume | 247 |
creator | Cohen, Lawrence T. |
description | In this, the third paper of the series, the loudness of low-rate bursts of electrical pulses was measured as a function of the burst duration, in subjects implanted with the Nucleus
® 24 cochlear implant system (three with straight and two with Contour™ electrode arrays). In order to help distinguish between the contributions of peripheral and more central effects, the ECAP was recorded to the individual pulses comprising the bursts, using the Neural Response Telemetry™ (NRT™) system. At a pulse rate of 250
pulses/s, the ECAP amplitude did not decrease greatly during the bursts: the mean reduction factor was 0.89. The time-constant for summation of the loudness contributions from the pulses comprising a burst was found to be larger than that associated with normal hearing. In addition, the first pulse of a pulse train was found to contribute much more to the overall loudness than did the subsequent pulses, although a corresponding difference was not observed in the ECAP recordings. These results establish a necessary connection between the essentially single-pulse model, developed in the fourth and fifth papers of the series, and the psychophysical data for pulse bursts, but they also have broader implications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.heares.2008.11.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883028930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378595508002487</els_id><sourcerecordid>883028930</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-78da27629af3bd8f31e9959aa346cc125d5d7898e3fefef5af552ad56ac3f49c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAQgC0EokvhDRDyhfa0qX_ixOaAVK3Kj1SJHsrZ8tpj1qvECXaCyrvwsHV2F7hVPoyt-WY89ofQW0oqSmhzta92YBLkihEiK0orQtgztKKylWshFX2OVoQveyXEGXqV854QKnjNXqIzqkgjGWtX6M9dMnYK1nS4Hxx02EG2KYxTGCIePB6hHHaQSj7CvAR4sGEyh3yI2A5215U5cOjHzsQJJ7BhDBCn_AHzCt9sru-wm1OIP_B2TnnK2ESHu2F2EXI5ZOznaP9ed0AW_nDBa_TCmy7Dm1M8R98_3dxvvqxvv33-urm-XduasWndSmdY2zBlPN866TkFpYQyhteNtZQJJ1wrlQTuoSxhvBDMONEYy32tLD9Hl8e-Yxp-zpAn3YdsoSsPgmHOWkpOmFScFPLiSbJpZFuTVhawPoI2DTkn8HpMoTfpt6ZEL_70Xh_96cWfplQXf6Xs3an_vO3B_S86CSvA-xNgcpHmk4k25H8co5TL5sB9PHJQ_u1XgKSzLVYsuFAMTdoN4elJHgH9_75G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66874078</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 3. ECAP during bursts and loudness as function of burst duration</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Cohen, Lawrence T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Lawrence T.</creatorcontrib><description>In this, the third paper of the series, the loudness of low-rate bursts of electrical pulses was measured as a function of the burst duration, in subjects implanted with the Nucleus
® 24 cochlear implant system (three with straight and two with Contour™ electrode arrays). In order to help distinguish between the contributions of peripheral and more central effects, the ECAP was recorded to the individual pulses comprising the bursts, using the Neural Response Telemetry™ (NRT™) system. At a pulse rate of 250
pulses/s, the ECAP amplitude did not decrease greatly during the bursts: the mean reduction factor was 0.89. The time-constant for summation of the loudness contributions from the pulses comprising a burst was found to be larger than that associated with normal hearing. In addition, the first pulse of a pulse train was found to contribute much more to the overall loudness than did the subsequent pulses, although a corresponding difference was not observed in the ECAP recordings. These results establish a necessary connection between the essentially single-pulse model, developed in the fourth and fifth papers of the series, and the psychophysical data for pulse bursts, but they also have broader implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-5955</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.11.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19068227</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HERED3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Action Potentials ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cochlea ; Cochlear implant ; Cochlear Implants ; Cochlear Nerve - physiopathology ; Data processing ; Ear and associated structures. Auditory pathways and centers. Hearing. Vocal organ. Phonation. Sound production. Echolocation ; ECAP ; Electric Stimulation - methods ; Electrodes ; Ent. Stomatology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hearing ; Humans ; Loudness Perception ; Medical sciences ; Modeling of neural response ; Models, Neurological ; NRT ; Perceptual Masking ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Psychophysics ; Telemetry ; Temporal loudness summation ; Time Factors ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>Hearing research, 2009-01, Vol.247 (2), p.112-121</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-78da27629af3bd8f31e9959aa346cc125d5d7898e3fefef5af552ad56ac3f49c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-78da27629af3bd8f31e9959aa346cc125d5d7898e3fefef5af552ad56ac3f49c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2008.11.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21138627$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19068227$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Lawrence T.</creatorcontrib><title>Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 3. ECAP during bursts and loudness as function of burst duration</title><title>Hearing research</title><addtitle>Hear Res</addtitle><description>In this, the third paper of the series, the loudness of low-rate bursts of electrical pulses was measured as a function of the burst duration, in subjects implanted with the Nucleus
® 24 cochlear implant system (three with straight and two with Contour™ electrode arrays). In order to help distinguish between the contributions of peripheral and more central effects, the ECAP was recorded to the individual pulses comprising the bursts, using the Neural Response Telemetry™ (NRT™) system. At a pulse rate of 250
pulses/s, the ECAP amplitude did not decrease greatly during the bursts: the mean reduction factor was 0.89. The time-constant for summation of the loudness contributions from the pulses comprising a burst was found to be larger than that associated with normal hearing. In addition, the first pulse of a pulse train was found to contribute much more to the overall loudness than did the subsequent pulses, although a corresponding difference was not observed in the ECAP recordings. These results establish a necessary connection between the essentially single-pulse model, developed in the fourth and fifth papers of the series, and the psychophysical data for pulse bursts, but they also have broader implications.</description><subject>Action Potentials</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cochlea</subject><subject>Cochlear implant</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Cochlear Nerve - physiopathology</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Ear and associated structures. Auditory pathways and centers. Hearing. Vocal organ. Phonation. Sound production. Echolocation</subject><subject>ECAP</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Ent. Stomatology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Loudness Perception</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Modeling of neural response</subject><subject>Models, Neurological</subject><subject>NRT</subject><subject>Perceptual Masking</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Psychophysics</subject><subject>Telemetry</subject><subject>Temporal loudness summation</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>0378-5955</issn><issn>1878-5891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAQgC0EokvhDRDyhfa0qX_ixOaAVK3Kj1SJHsrZ8tpj1qvECXaCyrvwsHV2F7hVPoyt-WY89ofQW0oqSmhzta92YBLkihEiK0orQtgztKKylWshFX2OVoQveyXEGXqV854QKnjNXqIzqkgjGWtX6M9dMnYK1nS4Hxx02EG2KYxTGCIePB6hHHaQSj7CvAR4sGEyh3yI2A5215U5cOjHzsQJJ7BhDBCn_AHzCt9sru-wm1OIP_B2TnnK2ESHu2F2EXI5ZOznaP9ed0AW_nDBa_TCmy7Dm1M8R98_3dxvvqxvv33-urm-XduasWndSmdY2zBlPN866TkFpYQyhteNtZQJJ1wrlQTuoSxhvBDMONEYy32tLD9Hl8e-Yxp-zpAn3YdsoSsPgmHOWkpOmFScFPLiSbJpZFuTVhawPoI2DTkn8HpMoTfpt6ZEL_70Xh_96cWfplQXf6Xs3an_vO3B_S86CSvA-xNgcpHmk4k25H8co5TL5sB9PHJQ_u1XgKSzLVYsuFAMTdoN4elJHgH9_75G</recordid><startdate>200901</startdate><enddate>200901</enddate><creator>Cohen, Lawrence T.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200901</creationdate><title>Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 3. ECAP during bursts and loudness as function of burst duration</title><author>Cohen, Lawrence T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-78da27629af3bd8f31e9959aa346cc125d5d7898e3fefef5af552ad56ac3f49c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Action Potentials</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cochlea</topic><topic>Cochlear implant</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Cochlear Nerve - physiopathology</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Ear and associated structures. Auditory pathways and centers. Hearing. Vocal organ. Phonation. Sound production. Echolocation</topic><topic>ECAP</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Ent. Stomatology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Loudness Perception</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Modeling of neural response</topic><topic>Models, Neurological</topic><topic>NRT</topic><topic>Perceptual Masking</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Psychophysics</topic><topic>Telemetry</topic><topic>Temporal loudness summation</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Lawrence T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hearing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohen, Lawrence T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 3. ECAP during bursts and loudness as function of burst duration</atitle><jtitle>Hearing research</jtitle><addtitle>Hear Res</addtitle><date>2009-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>247</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>112</spage><epage>121</epage><pages>112-121</pages><issn>0378-5955</issn><eissn>1878-5891</eissn><coden>HERED3</coden><abstract>In this, the third paper of the series, the loudness of low-rate bursts of electrical pulses was measured as a function of the burst duration, in subjects implanted with the Nucleus
® 24 cochlear implant system (three with straight and two with Contour™ electrode arrays). In order to help distinguish between the contributions of peripheral and more central effects, the ECAP was recorded to the individual pulses comprising the bursts, using the Neural Response Telemetry™ (NRT™) system. At a pulse rate of 250
pulses/s, the ECAP amplitude did not decrease greatly during the bursts: the mean reduction factor was 0.89. The time-constant for summation of the loudness contributions from the pulses comprising a burst was found to be larger than that associated with normal hearing. In addition, the first pulse of a pulse train was found to contribute much more to the overall loudness than did the subsequent pulses, although a corresponding difference was not observed in the ECAP recordings. These results establish a necessary connection between the essentially single-pulse model, developed in the fourth and fifth papers of the series, and the psychophysical data for pulse bursts, but they also have broader implications.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>19068227</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.heares.2008.11.002</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-5955 |
ispartof | Hearing research, 2009-01, Vol.247 (2), p.112-121 |
issn | 0378-5955 1878-5891 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883028930 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Action Potentials Biological and medical sciences Cochlea Cochlear implant Cochlear Implants Cochlear Nerve - physiopathology Data processing Ear and associated structures. Auditory pathways and centers. Hearing. Vocal organ. Phonation. Sound production. Echolocation ECAP Electric Stimulation - methods Electrodes Ent. Stomatology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Hearing Humans Loudness Perception Medical sciences Modeling of neural response Models, Neurological NRT Perceptual Masking Pharmacology. Drug treatments Psychophysics Telemetry Temporal loudness summation Time Factors Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs |
title | Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 3. ECAP during bursts and loudness as function of burst duration |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T17%3A52%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Practical%20model%20description%20of%20peripheral%20neural%20excitation%20in%20cochlear%20implant%20recipients:%203.%20ECAP%20during%20bursts%20and%20loudness%20as%20function%20of%20burst%20duration&rft.jtitle=Hearing%20research&rft.au=Cohen,%20Lawrence%20T.&rft.date=2009-01&rft.volume=247&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=112&rft.epage=121&rft.pages=112-121&rft.issn=0378-5955&rft.eissn=1878-5891&rft.coden=HERED3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.heares.2008.11.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E883028930%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66874078&rft_id=info:pmid/19068227&rft_els_id=S0378595508002487&rfr_iscdi=true |