Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 3. ECAP during bursts and loudness as function of burst duration

In this, the third paper of the series, the loudness of low-rate bursts of electrical pulses was measured as a function of the burst duration, in subjects implanted with the Nucleus ® 24 cochlear implant system (three with straight and two with Contour™ electrode arrays). In order to help distinguis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hearing research 2009-01, Vol.247 (2), p.112-121
1. Verfasser: Cohen, Lawrence T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 121
container_issue 2
container_start_page 112
container_title Hearing research
container_volume 247
creator Cohen, Lawrence T.
description In this, the third paper of the series, the loudness of low-rate bursts of electrical pulses was measured as a function of the burst duration, in subjects implanted with the Nucleus ® 24 cochlear implant system (three with straight and two with Contour™ electrode arrays). In order to help distinguish between the contributions of peripheral and more central effects, the ECAP was recorded to the individual pulses comprising the bursts, using the Neural Response Telemetry™ (NRT™) system. At a pulse rate of 250 pulses/s, the ECAP amplitude did not decrease greatly during the bursts: the mean reduction factor was 0.89. The time-constant for summation of the loudness contributions from the pulses comprising a burst was found to be larger than that associated with normal hearing. In addition, the first pulse of a pulse train was found to contribute much more to the overall loudness than did the subsequent pulses, although a corresponding difference was not observed in the ECAP recordings. These results establish a necessary connection between the essentially single-pulse model, developed in the fourth and fifth papers of the series, and the psychophysical data for pulse bursts, but they also have broader implications.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.heares.2008.11.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883028930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378595508002487</els_id><sourcerecordid>883028930</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-78da27629af3bd8f31e9959aa346cc125d5d7898e3fefef5af552ad56ac3f49c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAQgC0EokvhDRDyhfa0qX_ixOaAVK3Kj1SJHsrZ8tpj1qvECXaCyrvwsHV2F7hVPoyt-WY89ofQW0oqSmhzta92YBLkihEiK0orQtgztKKylWshFX2OVoQveyXEGXqV854QKnjNXqIzqkgjGWtX6M9dMnYK1nS4Hxx02EG2KYxTGCIePB6hHHaQSj7CvAR4sGEyh3yI2A5215U5cOjHzsQJJ7BhDBCn_AHzCt9sru-wm1OIP_B2TnnK2ESHu2F2EXI5ZOznaP9ed0AW_nDBa_TCmy7Dm1M8R98_3dxvvqxvv33-urm-XduasWndSmdY2zBlPN866TkFpYQyhteNtZQJJ1wrlQTuoSxhvBDMONEYy32tLD9Hl8e-Yxp-zpAn3YdsoSsPgmHOWkpOmFScFPLiSbJpZFuTVhawPoI2DTkn8HpMoTfpt6ZEL_70Xh_96cWfplQXf6Xs3an_vO3B_S86CSvA-xNgcpHmk4k25H8co5TL5sB9PHJQ_u1XgKSzLVYsuFAMTdoN4elJHgH9_75G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66874078</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 3. ECAP during bursts and loudness as function of burst duration</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Cohen, Lawrence T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Lawrence T.</creatorcontrib><description>In this, the third paper of the series, the loudness of low-rate bursts of electrical pulses was measured as a function of the burst duration, in subjects implanted with the Nucleus ® 24 cochlear implant system (three with straight and two with Contour™ electrode arrays). In order to help distinguish between the contributions of peripheral and more central effects, the ECAP was recorded to the individual pulses comprising the bursts, using the Neural Response Telemetry™ (NRT™) system. At a pulse rate of 250 pulses/s, the ECAP amplitude did not decrease greatly during the bursts: the mean reduction factor was 0.89. The time-constant for summation of the loudness contributions from the pulses comprising a burst was found to be larger than that associated with normal hearing. In addition, the first pulse of a pulse train was found to contribute much more to the overall loudness than did the subsequent pulses, although a corresponding difference was not observed in the ECAP recordings. These results establish a necessary connection between the essentially single-pulse model, developed in the fourth and fifth papers of the series, and the psychophysical data for pulse bursts, but they also have broader implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-5955</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.11.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19068227</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HERED3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Action Potentials ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cochlea ; Cochlear implant ; Cochlear Implants ; Cochlear Nerve - physiopathology ; Data processing ; Ear and associated structures. Auditory pathways and centers. Hearing. Vocal organ. Phonation. Sound production. Echolocation ; ECAP ; Electric Stimulation - methods ; Electrodes ; Ent. Stomatology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hearing ; Humans ; Loudness Perception ; Medical sciences ; Modeling of neural response ; Models, Neurological ; NRT ; Perceptual Masking ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Psychophysics ; Telemetry ; Temporal loudness summation ; Time Factors ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>Hearing research, 2009-01, Vol.247 (2), p.112-121</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-78da27629af3bd8f31e9959aa346cc125d5d7898e3fefef5af552ad56ac3f49c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-78da27629af3bd8f31e9959aa346cc125d5d7898e3fefef5af552ad56ac3f49c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2008.11.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21138627$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19068227$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Lawrence T.</creatorcontrib><title>Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 3. ECAP during bursts and loudness as function of burst duration</title><title>Hearing research</title><addtitle>Hear Res</addtitle><description>In this, the third paper of the series, the loudness of low-rate bursts of electrical pulses was measured as a function of the burst duration, in subjects implanted with the Nucleus ® 24 cochlear implant system (three with straight and two with Contour™ electrode arrays). In order to help distinguish between the contributions of peripheral and more central effects, the ECAP was recorded to the individual pulses comprising the bursts, using the Neural Response Telemetry™ (NRT™) system. At a pulse rate of 250 pulses/s, the ECAP amplitude did not decrease greatly during the bursts: the mean reduction factor was 0.89. The time-constant for summation of the loudness contributions from the pulses comprising a burst was found to be larger than that associated with normal hearing. In addition, the first pulse of a pulse train was found to contribute much more to the overall loudness than did the subsequent pulses, although a corresponding difference was not observed in the ECAP recordings. These results establish a necessary connection between the essentially single-pulse model, developed in the fourth and fifth papers of the series, and the psychophysical data for pulse bursts, but they also have broader implications.</description><subject>Action Potentials</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cochlea</subject><subject>Cochlear implant</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Cochlear Nerve - physiopathology</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Ear and associated structures. Auditory pathways and centers. Hearing. Vocal organ. Phonation. Sound production. Echolocation</subject><subject>ECAP</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Ent. Stomatology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Loudness Perception</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Modeling of neural response</subject><subject>Models, Neurological</subject><subject>NRT</subject><subject>Perceptual Masking</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Psychophysics</subject><subject>Telemetry</subject><subject>Temporal loudness summation</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>0378-5955</issn><issn>1878-5891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAQgC0EokvhDRDyhfa0qX_ixOaAVK3Kj1SJHsrZ8tpj1qvECXaCyrvwsHV2F7hVPoyt-WY89ofQW0oqSmhzta92YBLkihEiK0orQtgztKKylWshFX2OVoQveyXEGXqV854QKnjNXqIzqkgjGWtX6M9dMnYK1nS4Hxx02EG2KYxTGCIePB6hHHaQSj7CvAR4sGEyh3yI2A5215U5cOjHzsQJJ7BhDBCn_AHzCt9sru-wm1OIP_B2TnnK2ESHu2F2EXI5ZOznaP9ed0AW_nDBa_TCmy7Dm1M8R98_3dxvvqxvv33-urm-XduasWndSmdY2zBlPN866TkFpYQyhteNtZQJJ1wrlQTuoSxhvBDMONEYy32tLD9Hl8e-Yxp-zpAn3YdsoSsPgmHOWkpOmFScFPLiSbJpZFuTVhawPoI2DTkn8HpMoTfpt6ZEL_70Xh_96cWfplQXf6Xs3an_vO3B_S86CSvA-xNgcpHmk4k25H8co5TL5sB9PHJQ_u1XgKSzLVYsuFAMTdoN4elJHgH9_75G</recordid><startdate>200901</startdate><enddate>200901</enddate><creator>Cohen, Lawrence T.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200901</creationdate><title>Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 3. ECAP during bursts and loudness as function of burst duration</title><author>Cohen, Lawrence T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-78da27629af3bd8f31e9959aa346cc125d5d7898e3fefef5af552ad56ac3f49c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Action Potentials</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cochlea</topic><topic>Cochlear implant</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Cochlear Nerve - physiopathology</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Ear and associated structures. Auditory pathways and centers. Hearing. Vocal organ. Phonation. Sound production. Echolocation</topic><topic>ECAP</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Ent. Stomatology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Loudness Perception</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Modeling of neural response</topic><topic>Models, Neurological</topic><topic>NRT</topic><topic>Perceptual Masking</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Psychophysics</topic><topic>Telemetry</topic><topic>Temporal loudness summation</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Lawrence T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hearing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohen, Lawrence T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 3. ECAP during bursts and loudness as function of burst duration</atitle><jtitle>Hearing research</jtitle><addtitle>Hear Res</addtitle><date>2009-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>247</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>112</spage><epage>121</epage><pages>112-121</pages><issn>0378-5955</issn><eissn>1878-5891</eissn><coden>HERED3</coden><abstract>In this, the third paper of the series, the loudness of low-rate bursts of electrical pulses was measured as a function of the burst duration, in subjects implanted with the Nucleus ® 24 cochlear implant system (three with straight and two with Contour™ electrode arrays). In order to help distinguish between the contributions of peripheral and more central effects, the ECAP was recorded to the individual pulses comprising the bursts, using the Neural Response Telemetry™ (NRT™) system. At a pulse rate of 250 pulses/s, the ECAP amplitude did not decrease greatly during the bursts: the mean reduction factor was 0.89. The time-constant for summation of the loudness contributions from the pulses comprising a burst was found to be larger than that associated with normal hearing. In addition, the first pulse of a pulse train was found to contribute much more to the overall loudness than did the subsequent pulses, although a corresponding difference was not observed in the ECAP recordings. These results establish a necessary connection between the essentially single-pulse model, developed in the fourth and fifth papers of the series, and the psychophysical data for pulse bursts, but they also have broader implications.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>19068227</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.heares.2008.11.002</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-5955
ispartof Hearing research, 2009-01, Vol.247 (2), p.112-121
issn 0378-5955
1878-5891
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883028930
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Action Potentials
Biological and medical sciences
Cochlea
Cochlear implant
Cochlear Implants
Cochlear Nerve - physiopathology
Data processing
Ear and associated structures. Auditory pathways and centers. Hearing. Vocal organ. Phonation. Sound production. Echolocation
ECAP
Electric Stimulation - methods
Electrodes
Ent. Stomatology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hearing
Humans
Loudness Perception
Medical sciences
Modeling of neural response
Models, Neurological
NRT
Perceptual Masking
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Psychophysics
Telemetry
Temporal loudness summation
Time Factors
Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs
title Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 3. ECAP during bursts and loudness as function of burst duration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T17%3A52%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Practical%20model%20description%20of%20peripheral%20neural%20excitation%20in%20cochlear%20implant%20recipients:%203.%20ECAP%20during%20bursts%20and%20loudness%20as%20function%20of%20burst%20duration&rft.jtitle=Hearing%20research&rft.au=Cohen,%20Lawrence%20T.&rft.date=2009-01&rft.volume=247&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=112&rft.epage=121&rft.pages=112-121&rft.issn=0378-5955&rft.eissn=1878-5891&rft.coden=HERED3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.heares.2008.11.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E883028930%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66874078&rft_id=info:pmid/19068227&rft_els_id=S0378595508002487&rfr_iscdi=true