Mantle peridotites from the Dinaridic ophiolite belt and the Vardar zone western belt, central Balkan: A petrological comparison

The nearly parallel Dinaridic ophiolite belt and the Vardar zone western belt are assumed to be the remnants of two distinct oceanic basins, constituting different parts of the Tethys Ocean that separated the Gondwana and Eurasia continents during Mesozoic time. These belts comprise numerous large p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lithos 2009-03, Vol.108 (1), p.37-71
Hauptverfasser: Bazylev, B.A., Popević, A., Karamata, S., Kononkova, N.N., Simakin, S.G., Olujić, J., Vujnović, L., Memović, E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 71
container_issue 1
container_start_page 37
container_title Lithos
container_volume 108
creator Bazylev, B.A.
Popević, A.
Karamata, S.
Kononkova, N.N.
Simakin, S.G.
Olujić, J.
Vujnović, L.
Memović, E.
description The nearly parallel Dinaridic ophiolite belt and the Vardar zone western belt are assumed to be the remnants of two distinct oceanic basins, constituting different parts of the Tethys Ocean that separated the Gondwana and Eurasia continents during Mesozoic time. These belts comprise numerous large peridotite massifs and small bodies whose petrology was poorly known. This paper presents a large set of internally consistent analytical data for peridotites, including primary mineralogy, major-element chemistry and clinopyroxene geochemistry for massifs of both the ophiolitic belts. We propose, discuss and apply a set of mineralogical, geochemical and petrologic criteria that allow a recognition of the probable geodynamic setting of formation of the ultramafic massifs. Ultramafic massifs of the Vardar zone western belt gradually change in composition northwards from depleted spinel lherzolites (Banjska massif) to depleted harzburgites (Maljen massif); these bodies originated in the same geodynamic setting, probably a back-arc spreading center. By contrast, the Dinaridic belt ultramafic massifs include several different types that formed in different geodynamic environments. Orogenic lherzolites, interpreted as subcontinental peridotites (Kozara, Čavka, Borja, Sjenički Ozren and Bistrica massifs) are dominated by fertile spinel and plagioclase lherzolites with subordinate amounts of depleted spinel lherzolite, spinel harzburgite, rare dunite and very rare vein garnet clinopyroxenite. The inferred subcontinental peridotites of these massifs are not co-magmatic with neighboring basalts and cannot be considered as members of a single ophiolitic assemblage. Massifs of two other types are less common in the Dinaridic ophiolite belt. These are composed of spinel lherzolite–harzburgite (Zlatibor and possibly Bosanski Ozren massifs) and depleted harzburgite (Tuzinje and Brezovica massifs); both probably originated in a suprasubduction environment. The available data suggest that the studied ultramafic rocks formed in two different oceanic basins, probably marginal seas. We also suggest that the orogenic lherzolites that dominate the central-northern part of the Dinaridic ophiolite belt formed as a result of continental lithosphere extension after closure of the Dinaride oceanic basin and were later tectonically incorporated into the ophiolitic mélange.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.lithos.2008.09.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883026848</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0024493708002193</els_id><sourcerecordid>883026848</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-2d61526f4b679168f592930e6816edc74515648a1fe7bd36b22e7876917d7f823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UD1PHDEQtSIi5SD5BxTuaNjF9u7a3hSR4AgfEogmobV89mzOh89ebEOUVPnpMRw11Wie3sfMQ-iQkpYSyk82rXdlHXPLCJEtGVtC6Qe0oFKwhtO-20MLQljf9GMnPqH9nDek7t1AF-jfrQ7FA54hORuLK5DxlOIWlzXgcxd0hZ3BcV67WEMAr8AXrIN9JdzrZHXCf2MA_BtygRReCcfYQChJe3ym_YMOX_FpTSgp-vjLmQqbuJ2rdY7hM_o4aZ_hy9s8QD8vvv9YXjU3d5fXy9ObRnecloZZTgfGp37FxUi5nIaRjR0BLikHa0Q_0IH3UtMJxMp2fMUYCCn4SIUVk2TdATra-c4pPj7VW9XWZQPe6wDxKSspO8K47GVl9jumSTHnBJOak9vq9EdRol76Vhu161u99K3IqGrfVfZtJ4P6xbODpLJxEAxYl8AUZaN73-A_zKWMOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>883026848</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mantle peridotites from the Dinaridic ophiolite belt and the Vardar zone western belt, central Balkan: A petrological comparison</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Bazylev, B.A. ; Popević, A. ; Karamata, S. ; Kononkova, N.N. ; Simakin, S.G. ; Olujić, J. ; Vujnović, L. ; Memović, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bazylev, B.A. ; Popević, A. ; Karamata, S. ; Kononkova, N.N. ; Simakin, S.G. ; Olujić, J. ; Vujnović, L. ; Memović, E.</creatorcontrib><description>The nearly parallel Dinaridic ophiolite belt and the Vardar zone western belt are assumed to be the remnants of two distinct oceanic basins, constituting different parts of the Tethys Ocean that separated the Gondwana and Eurasia continents during Mesozoic time. These belts comprise numerous large peridotite massifs and small bodies whose petrology was poorly known. This paper presents a large set of internally consistent analytical data for peridotites, including primary mineralogy, major-element chemistry and clinopyroxene geochemistry for massifs of both the ophiolitic belts. We propose, discuss and apply a set of mineralogical, geochemical and petrologic criteria that allow a recognition of the probable geodynamic setting of formation of the ultramafic massifs. Ultramafic massifs of the Vardar zone western belt gradually change in composition northwards from depleted spinel lherzolites (Banjska massif) to depleted harzburgites (Maljen massif); these bodies originated in the same geodynamic setting, probably a back-arc spreading center. By contrast, the Dinaridic belt ultramafic massifs include several different types that formed in different geodynamic environments. Orogenic lherzolites, interpreted as subcontinental peridotites (Kozara, Čavka, Borja, Sjenički Ozren and Bistrica massifs) are dominated by fertile spinel and plagioclase lherzolites with subordinate amounts of depleted spinel lherzolite, spinel harzburgite, rare dunite and very rare vein garnet clinopyroxenite. The inferred subcontinental peridotites of these massifs are not co-magmatic with neighboring basalts and cannot be considered as members of a single ophiolitic assemblage. Massifs of two other types are less common in the Dinaridic ophiolite belt. These are composed of spinel lherzolite–harzburgite (Zlatibor and possibly Bosanski Ozren massifs) and depleted harzburgite (Tuzinje and Brezovica massifs); both probably originated in a suprasubduction environment. The available data suggest that the studied ultramafic rocks formed in two different oceanic basins, probably marginal seas. We also suggest that the orogenic lherzolites that dominate the central-northern part of the Dinaridic ophiolite belt formed as a result of continental lithosphere extension after closure of the Dinaride oceanic basin and were later tectonically incorporated into the ophiolitic mélange.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-4937</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6143</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2008.09.011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Abyssal peridotite ; Back-arc peridotite ; Dinarides ; Geochemistry ; Subcontinental lithospheric mantle ; Vardar zone</subject><ispartof>Lithos, 2009-03, Vol.108 (1), p.37-71</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-2d61526f4b679168f592930e6816edc74515648a1fe7bd36b22e7876917d7f823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-2d61526f4b679168f592930e6816edc74515648a1fe7bd36b22e7876917d7f823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2008.09.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bazylev, B.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popević, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karamata, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kononkova, N.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simakin, S.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olujić, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vujnović, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Memović, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Mantle peridotites from the Dinaridic ophiolite belt and the Vardar zone western belt, central Balkan: A petrological comparison</title><title>Lithos</title><description>The nearly parallel Dinaridic ophiolite belt and the Vardar zone western belt are assumed to be the remnants of two distinct oceanic basins, constituting different parts of the Tethys Ocean that separated the Gondwana and Eurasia continents during Mesozoic time. These belts comprise numerous large peridotite massifs and small bodies whose petrology was poorly known. This paper presents a large set of internally consistent analytical data for peridotites, including primary mineralogy, major-element chemistry and clinopyroxene geochemistry for massifs of both the ophiolitic belts. We propose, discuss and apply a set of mineralogical, geochemical and petrologic criteria that allow a recognition of the probable geodynamic setting of formation of the ultramafic massifs. Ultramafic massifs of the Vardar zone western belt gradually change in composition northwards from depleted spinel lherzolites (Banjska massif) to depleted harzburgites (Maljen massif); these bodies originated in the same geodynamic setting, probably a back-arc spreading center. By contrast, the Dinaridic belt ultramafic massifs include several different types that formed in different geodynamic environments. Orogenic lherzolites, interpreted as subcontinental peridotites (Kozara, Čavka, Borja, Sjenički Ozren and Bistrica massifs) are dominated by fertile spinel and plagioclase lherzolites with subordinate amounts of depleted spinel lherzolite, spinel harzburgite, rare dunite and very rare vein garnet clinopyroxenite. The inferred subcontinental peridotites of these massifs are not co-magmatic with neighboring basalts and cannot be considered as members of a single ophiolitic assemblage. Massifs of two other types are less common in the Dinaridic ophiolite belt. These are composed of spinel lherzolite–harzburgite (Zlatibor and possibly Bosanski Ozren massifs) and depleted harzburgite (Tuzinje and Brezovica massifs); both probably originated in a suprasubduction environment. The available data suggest that the studied ultramafic rocks formed in two different oceanic basins, probably marginal seas. We also suggest that the orogenic lherzolites that dominate the central-northern part of the Dinaridic ophiolite belt formed as a result of continental lithosphere extension after closure of the Dinaride oceanic basin and were later tectonically incorporated into the ophiolitic mélange.</description><subject>Abyssal peridotite</subject><subject>Back-arc peridotite</subject><subject>Dinarides</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Subcontinental lithospheric mantle</subject><subject>Vardar zone</subject><issn>0024-4937</issn><issn>1872-6143</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UD1PHDEQtSIi5SD5BxTuaNjF9u7a3hSR4AgfEogmobV89mzOh89ebEOUVPnpMRw11Wie3sfMQ-iQkpYSyk82rXdlHXPLCJEtGVtC6Qe0oFKwhtO-20MLQljf9GMnPqH9nDek7t1AF-jfrQ7FA54hORuLK5DxlOIWlzXgcxd0hZ3BcV67WEMAr8AXrIN9JdzrZHXCf2MA_BtygRReCcfYQChJe3ym_YMOX_FpTSgp-vjLmQqbuJ2rdY7hM_o4aZ_hy9s8QD8vvv9YXjU3d5fXy9ObRnecloZZTgfGp37FxUi5nIaRjR0BLikHa0Q_0IH3UtMJxMp2fMUYCCn4SIUVk2TdATra-c4pPj7VW9XWZQPe6wDxKSspO8K47GVl9jumSTHnBJOak9vq9EdRol76Vhu161u99K3IqGrfVfZtJ4P6xbODpLJxEAxYl8AUZaN73-A_zKWMOw</recordid><startdate>20090301</startdate><enddate>20090301</enddate><creator>Bazylev, B.A.</creator><creator>Popević, A.</creator><creator>Karamata, S.</creator><creator>Kononkova, N.N.</creator><creator>Simakin, S.G.</creator><creator>Olujić, J.</creator><creator>Vujnović, L.</creator><creator>Memović, E.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090301</creationdate><title>Mantle peridotites from the Dinaridic ophiolite belt and the Vardar zone western belt, central Balkan: A petrological comparison</title><author>Bazylev, B.A. ; Popević, A. ; Karamata, S. ; Kononkova, N.N. ; Simakin, S.G. ; Olujić, J. ; Vujnović, L. ; Memović, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-2d61526f4b679168f592930e6816edc74515648a1fe7bd36b22e7876917d7f823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Abyssal peridotite</topic><topic>Back-arc peridotite</topic><topic>Dinarides</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Subcontinental lithospheric mantle</topic><topic>Vardar zone</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bazylev, B.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popević, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karamata, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kononkova, N.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simakin, S.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olujić, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vujnović, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Memović, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Lithos</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bazylev, B.A.</au><au>Popević, A.</au><au>Karamata, S.</au><au>Kononkova, N.N.</au><au>Simakin, S.G.</au><au>Olujić, J.</au><au>Vujnović, L.</au><au>Memović, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mantle peridotites from the Dinaridic ophiolite belt and the Vardar zone western belt, central Balkan: A petrological comparison</atitle><jtitle>Lithos</jtitle><date>2009-03-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>37-71</pages><issn>0024-4937</issn><eissn>1872-6143</eissn><abstract>The nearly parallel Dinaridic ophiolite belt and the Vardar zone western belt are assumed to be the remnants of two distinct oceanic basins, constituting different parts of the Tethys Ocean that separated the Gondwana and Eurasia continents during Mesozoic time. These belts comprise numerous large peridotite massifs and small bodies whose petrology was poorly known. This paper presents a large set of internally consistent analytical data for peridotites, including primary mineralogy, major-element chemistry and clinopyroxene geochemistry for massifs of both the ophiolitic belts. We propose, discuss and apply a set of mineralogical, geochemical and petrologic criteria that allow a recognition of the probable geodynamic setting of formation of the ultramafic massifs. Ultramafic massifs of the Vardar zone western belt gradually change in composition northwards from depleted spinel lherzolites (Banjska massif) to depleted harzburgites (Maljen massif); these bodies originated in the same geodynamic setting, probably a back-arc spreading center. By contrast, the Dinaridic belt ultramafic massifs include several different types that formed in different geodynamic environments. Orogenic lherzolites, interpreted as subcontinental peridotites (Kozara, Čavka, Borja, Sjenički Ozren and Bistrica massifs) are dominated by fertile spinel and plagioclase lherzolites with subordinate amounts of depleted spinel lherzolite, spinel harzburgite, rare dunite and very rare vein garnet clinopyroxenite. The inferred subcontinental peridotites of these massifs are not co-magmatic with neighboring basalts and cannot be considered as members of a single ophiolitic assemblage. Massifs of two other types are less common in the Dinaridic ophiolite belt. These are composed of spinel lherzolite–harzburgite (Zlatibor and possibly Bosanski Ozren massifs) and depleted harzburgite (Tuzinje and Brezovica massifs); both probably originated in a suprasubduction environment. The available data suggest that the studied ultramafic rocks formed in two different oceanic basins, probably marginal seas. We also suggest that the orogenic lherzolites that dominate the central-northern part of the Dinaridic ophiolite belt formed as a result of continental lithosphere extension after closure of the Dinaride oceanic basin and were later tectonically incorporated into the ophiolitic mélange.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.lithos.2008.09.011</doi><tpages>35</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0024-4937
ispartof Lithos, 2009-03, Vol.108 (1), p.37-71
issn 0024-4937
1872-6143
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883026848
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Abyssal peridotite
Back-arc peridotite
Dinarides
Geochemistry
Subcontinental lithospheric mantle
Vardar zone
title Mantle peridotites from the Dinaridic ophiolite belt and the Vardar zone western belt, central Balkan: A petrological comparison
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A03%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mantle%20peridotites%20from%20the%20Dinaridic%20ophiolite%20belt%20and%20the%20Vardar%20zone%20western%20belt,%20central%20Balkan:%20A%20petrological%20comparison&rft.jtitle=Lithos&rft.au=Bazylev,%20B.A.&rft.date=2009-03-01&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=37-71&rft.issn=0024-4937&rft.eissn=1872-6143&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.lithos.2008.09.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E883026848%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=883026848&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0024493708002193&rfr_iscdi=true