Analysis of buried pipelines subjected to reverse fault motion
Presently available simplified analytical methods and semi-empirical methods for the analysis of buried pipelines subjected to fault motion are suitable only for the strike-slip and the normal-slip type fault motions, and cannot be used for the reverse fault crossing case. A simple finite element mo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984) 2011-07, Vol.31 (7), p.930-940 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 940 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 930 |
container_title | Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984) |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Joshi, Shantanu Prashant, Amit Deb, Arghya Jain, Sudhir K. |
description | Presently available simplified analytical methods and semi-empirical methods for the analysis of buried pipelines subjected to fault motion are suitable only for the strike-slip and the normal-slip type fault motions, and cannot be used for the reverse fault crossing case. A simple finite element model, which uses beam elements for the pipeline and discrete nonlinear springs for the soil, has been proposed to analyse buried pipeline subjected to reverse fault motion. The material nonlinearities associated with pipe-material and soil, and geometric nonlinearity associated with large deformations were incorporated in the analysis. Complex reverse fault motion was simulated using suitable constraints between pipe-nodes and ground ends of the soil spring. Results of the parametric study suggest that the pipeline's capacity to accommodate reverse fault offset can be increased significantly by choosing a near-parallel orientation in plan with respect to the fault line. Further improvement in the response of the pipeline is possible by adopting loose backfill, smooth and hard surface coating, and shallow burial depth in the fault crossing region. For normal or near normal orientations, pipeline is expected to fail due to beam buckling at very small fault offsets. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.02.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883024209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0267726111000327</els_id><sourcerecordid>1786212727</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a493t-37aa5b205d468fb0d0cc76b10596ae5cde0d6d69587efc5eb769e5839e261e493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1L7DAQhoMouH78BKE3crxpnaRN0t4oIscPWPBGwbuQJlPI0m3WTCvsvz9ddjmXejUwPO87w8PYFYeCA1e3q4Ji6P12KARwXoAoAMojtuC1bvKy4p_HbAFC6VwLxU_ZGdEKgGteqwW7exhsv6VAWeyydkoBfbYJG-zDgJTR1K7QjfNujFnCb0yEWWenfszWcQxxuGAnne0JLw_znH08_X1_fMmXb8-vjw_L3FZNOealtla2AqSvVN214ME5rVoOslEWpfMIXnnVyFpj5yS2WjUo67LB-WOcK87Zn33vJsWvCWk060AO-94OGCcydV2CqATsyJsfSa5rJbjQQs-o3KMuRaKEndmksLZpaziYnVmzMgezZmfWgDCz2Tl3fThhydm-S3Zwgf6HRcW1lnzXf7_ncDbzHTAZcgEHhz6k2arxMfxy6R_EQJFp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1786212727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of buried pipelines subjected to reverse fault motion</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Joshi, Shantanu ; Prashant, Amit ; Deb, Arghya ; Jain, Sudhir K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Joshi, Shantanu ; Prashant, Amit ; Deb, Arghya ; Jain, Sudhir K.</creatorcontrib><description>Presently available simplified analytical methods and semi-empirical methods for the analysis of buried pipelines subjected to fault motion are suitable only for the strike-slip and the normal-slip type fault motions, and cannot be used for the reverse fault crossing case. A simple finite element model, which uses beam elements for the pipeline and discrete nonlinear springs for the soil, has been proposed to analyse buried pipeline subjected to reverse fault motion. The material nonlinearities associated with pipe-material and soil, and geometric nonlinearity associated with large deformations were incorporated in the analysis. Complex reverse fault motion was simulated using suitable constraints between pipe-nodes and ground ends of the soil spring. Results of the parametric study suggest that the pipeline's capacity to accommodate reverse fault offset can be increased significantly by choosing a near-parallel orientation in plan with respect to the fault line. Further improvement in the response of the pipeline is possible by adopting loose backfill, smooth and hard surface coating, and shallow burial depth in the fault crossing region. For normal or near normal orientations, pipeline is expected to fail due to beam buckling at very small fault offsets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0267-7261</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-341X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.02.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SDEEEJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Buried pipeline ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Earthquake induced ground movements ; Earthquakes, seismology ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Engineering geology ; Exact sciences and technology ; Faults ; Finite element analysis ; Internal geophysics ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc ; Nonlinear quasi-static analysis ; Nonlinearity ; Offsets ; Oil and gas pipelines ; Orientation ; Pipeline buckling ; Pipelines ; Pipe–soil interaction ; Reverse fault motion ; Soil (material) ; Structural design of pipelines</subject><ispartof>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984), 2011-07, Vol.31 (7), p.930-940</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a493t-37aa5b205d468fb0d0cc76b10596ae5cde0d6d69587efc5eb769e5839e261e493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a493t-37aa5b205d468fb0d0cc76b10596ae5cde0d6d69587efc5eb769e5839e261e493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726111000327$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24177517$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Joshi, Shantanu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prashant, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deb, Arghya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Sudhir K.</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of buried pipelines subjected to reverse fault motion</title><title>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</title><description>Presently available simplified analytical methods and semi-empirical methods for the analysis of buried pipelines subjected to fault motion are suitable only for the strike-slip and the normal-slip type fault motions, and cannot be used for the reverse fault crossing case. A simple finite element model, which uses beam elements for the pipeline and discrete nonlinear springs for the soil, has been proposed to analyse buried pipeline subjected to reverse fault motion. The material nonlinearities associated with pipe-material and soil, and geometric nonlinearity associated with large deformations were incorporated in the analysis. Complex reverse fault motion was simulated using suitable constraints between pipe-nodes and ground ends of the soil spring. Results of the parametric study suggest that the pipeline's capacity to accommodate reverse fault offset can be increased significantly by choosing a near-parallel orientation in plan with respect to the fault line. Further improvement in the response of the pipeline is possible by adopting loose backfill, smooth and hard surface coating, and shallow burial depth in the fault crossing region. For normal or near normal orientations, pipeline is expected to fail due to beam buckling at very small fault offsets.</description><subject>Buried pipeline</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Earthquake induced ground movements</subject><subject>Earthquakes, seismology</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Engineering geology</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Faults</subject><subject>Finite element analysis</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc</subject><subject>Nonlinear quasi-static analysis</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>Offsets</subject><subject>Oil and gas pipelines</subject><subject>Orientation</subject><subject>Pipeline buckling</subject><subject>Pipelines</subject><subject>Pipe–soil interaction</subject><subject>Reverse fault motion</subject><subject>Soil (material)</subject><subject>Structural design of pipelines</subject><issn>0267-7261</issn><issn>1879-341X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF1L7DAQhoMouH78BKE3crxpnaRN0t4oIscPWPBGwbuQJlPI0m3WTCvsvz9ddjmXejUwPO87w8PYFYeCA1e3q4Ji6P12KARwXoAoAMojtuC1bvKy4p_HbAFC6VwLxU_ZGdEKgGteqwW7exhsv6VAWeyydkoBfbYJG-zDgJTR1K7QjfNujFnCb0yEWWenfszWcQxxuGAnne0JLw_znH08_X1_fMmXb8-vjw_L3FZNOealtla2AqSvVN214ME5rVoOslEWpfMIXnnVyFpj5yS2WjUo67LB-WOcK87Zn33vJsWvCWk060AO-94OGCcydV2CqATsyJsfSa5rJbjQQs-o3KMuRaKEndmksLZpaziYnVmzMgezZmfWgDCz2Tl3fThhydm-S3Zwgf6HRcW1lnzXf7_ncDbzHTAZcgEHhz6k2arxMfxy6R_EQJFp</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Joshi, Shantanu</creator><creator>Prashant, Amit</creator><creator>Deb, Arghya</creator><creator>Jain, Sudhir K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Analysis of buried pipelines subjected to reverse fault motion</title><author>Joshi, Shantanu ; Prashant, Amit ; Deb, Arghya ; Jain, Sudhir K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a493t-37aa5b205d468fb0d0cc76b10596ae5cde0d6d69587efc5eb769e5839e261e493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Buried pipeline</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Earthquake induced ground movements</topic><topic>Earthquakes, seismology</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Engineering geology</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Faults</topic><topic>Finite element analysis</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc</topic><topic>Nonlinear quasi-static analysis</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>Offsets</topic><topic>Oil and gas pipelines</topic><topic>Orientation</topic><topic>Pipeline buckling</topic><topic>Pipelines</topic><topic>Pipe–soil interaction</topic><topic>Reverse fault motion</topic><topic>Soil (material)</topic><topic>Structural design of pipelines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Joshi, Shantanu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prashant, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deb, Arghya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Sudhir K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Joshi, Shantanu</au><au>Prashant, Amit</au><au>Deb, Arghya</au><au>Jain, Sudhir K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of buried pipelines subjected to reverse fault motion</atitle><jtitle>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</jtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>930</spage><epage>940</epage><pages>930-940</pages><issn>0267-7261</issn><eissn>1879-341X</eissn><coden>SDEEEJ</coden><abstract>Presently available simplified analytical methods and semi-empirical methods for the analysis of buried pipelines subjected to fault motion are suitable only for the strike-slip and the normal-slip type fault motions, and cannot be used for the reverse fault crossing case. A simple finite element model, which uses beam elements for the pipeline and discrete nonlinear springs for the soil, has been proposed to analyse buried pipeline subjected to reverse fault motion. The material nonlinearities associated with pipe-material and soil, and geometric nonlinearity associated with large deformations were incorporated in the analysis. Complex reverse fault motion was simulated using suitable constraints between pipe-nodes and ground ends of the soil spring. Results of the parametric study suggest that the pipeline's capacity to accommodate reverse fault offset can be increased significantly by choosing a near-parallel orientation in plan with respect to the fault line. Further improvement in the response of the pipeline is possible by adopting loose backfill, smooth and hard surface coating, and shallow burial depth in the fault crossing region. For normal or near normal orientations, pipeline is expected to fail due to beam buckling at very small fault offsets.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.02.003</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0267-7261 |
ispartof | Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984), 2011-07, Vol.31 (7), p.930-940 |
issn | 0267-7261 1879-341X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883024209 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Buried pipeline Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Earthquake induced ground movements Earthquakes, seismology Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics Engineering geology Exact sciences and technology Faults Finite element analysis Internal geophysics Mathematical analysis Mathematical models Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc Nonlinear quasi-static analysis Nonlinearity Offsets Oil and gas pipelines Orientation Pipeline buckling Pipelines Pipe–soil interaction Reverse fault motion Soil (material) Structural design of pipelines |
title | Analysis of buried pipelines subjected to reverse fault motion |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T02%3A01%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20buried%20pipelines%20subjected%20to%20reverse%20fault%20motion&rft.jtitle=Soil%20dynamics%20and%20earthquake%20engineering%20(1984)&rft.au=Joshi,%20Shantanu&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=930&rft.epage=940&rft.pages=930-940&rft.issn=0267-7261&rft.eissn=1879-341X&rft.coden=SDEEEJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.02.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1786212727%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1786212727&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0267726111000327&rfr_iscdi=true |