Analysis of buried pipelines subjected to reverse fault motion

Presently available simplified analytical methods and semi-empirical methods for the analysis of buried pipelines subjected to fault motion are suitable only for the strike-slip and the normal-slip type fault motions, and cannot be used for the reverse fault crossing case. A simple finite element mo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984) 2011-07, Vol.31 (7), p.930-940
Hauptverfasser: Joshi, Shantanu, Prashant, Amit, Deb, Arghya, Jain, Sudhir K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 940
container_issue 7
container_start_page 930
container_title Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)
container_volume 31
creator Joshi, Shantanu
Prashant, Amit
Deb, Arghya
Jain, Sudhir K.
description Presently available simplified analytical methods and semi-empirical methods for the analysis of buried pipelines subjected to fault motion are suitable only for the strike-slip and the normal-slip type fault motions, and cannot be used for the reverse fault crossing case. A simple finite element model, which uses beam elements for the pipeline and discrete nonlinear springs for the soil, has been proposed to analyse buried pipeline subjected to reverse fault motion. The material nonlinearities associated with pipe-material and soil, and geometric nonlinearity associated with large deformations were incorporated in the analysis. Complex reverse fault motion was simulated using suitable constraints between pipe-nodes and ground ends of the soil spring. Results of the parametric study suggest that the pipeline's capacity to accommodate reverse fault offset can be increased significantly by choosing a near-parallel orientation in plan with respect to the fault line. Further improvement in the response of the pipeline is possible by adopting loose backfill, smooth and hard surface coating, and shallow burial depth in the fault crossing region. For normal or near normal orientations, pipeline is expected to fail due to beam buckling at very small fault offsets.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.02.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883024209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0267726111000327</els_id><sourcerecordid>1786212727</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a493t-37aa5b205d468fb0d0cc76b10596ae5cde0d6d69587efc5eb769e5839e261e493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1L7DAQhoMouH78BKE3crxpnaRN0t4oIscPWPBGwbuQJlPI0m3WTCvsvz9ddjmXejUwPO87w8PYFYeCA1e3q4Ji6P12KARwXoAoAMojtuC1bvKy4p_HbAFC6VwLxU_ZGdEKgGteqwW7exhsv6VAWeyydkoBfbYJG-zDgJTR1K7QjfNujFnCb0yEWWenfszWcQxxuGAnne0JLw_znH08_X1_fMmXb8-vjw_L3FZNOealtla2AqSvVN214ME5rVoOslEWpfMIXnnVyFpj5yS2WjUo67LB-WOcK87Zn33vJsWvCWk060AO-94OGCcydV2CqATsyJsfSa5rJbjQQs-o3KMuRaKEndmksLZpaziYnVmzMgezZmfWgDCz2Tl3fThhydm-S3Zwgf6HRcW1lnzXf7_ncDbzHTAZcgEHhz6k2arxMfxy6R_EQJFp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1786212727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of buried pipelines subjected to reverse fault motion</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Joshi, Shantanu ; Prashant, Amit ; Deb, Arghya ; Jain, Sudhir K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Joshi, Shantanu ; Prashant, Amit ; Deb, Arghya ; Jain, Sudhir K.</creatorcontrib><description>Presently available simplified analytical methods and semi-empirical methods for the analysis of buried pipelines subjected to fault motion are suitable only for the strike-slip and the normal-slip type fault motions, and cannot be used for the reverse fault crossing case. A simple finite element model, which uses beam elements for the pipeline and discrete nonlinear springs for the soil, has been proposed to analyse buried pipeline subjected to reverse fault motion. The material nonlinearities associated with pipe-material and soil, and geometric nonlinearity associated with large deformations were incorporated in the analysis. Complex reverse fault motion was simulated using suitable constraints between pipe-nodes and ground ends of the soil spring. Results of the parametric study suggest that the pipeline's capacity to accommodate reverse fault offset can be increased significantly by choosing a near-parallel orientation in plan with respect to the fault line. Further improvement in the response of the pipeline is possible by adopting loose backfill, smooth and hard surface coating, and shallow burial depth in the fault crossing region. For normal or near normal orientations, pipeline is expected to fail due to beam buckling at very small fault offsets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0267-7261</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-341X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.02.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SDEEEJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Buried pipeline ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Earthquake induced ground movements ; Earthquakes, seismology ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Engineering geology ; Exact sciences and technology ; Faults ; Finite element analysis ; Internal geophysics ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc ; Nonlinear quasi-static analysis ; Nonlinearity ; Offsets ; Oil and gas pipelines ; Orientation ; Pipeline buckling ; Pipelines ; Pipe–soil interaction ; Reverse fault motion ; Soil (material) ; Structural design of pipelines</subject><ispartof>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984), 2011-07, Vol.31 (7), p.930-940</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a493t-37aa5b205d468fb0d0cc76b10596ae5cde0d6d69587efc5eb769e5839e261e493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a493t-37aa5b205d468fb0d0cc76b10596ae5cde0d6d69587efc5eb769e5839e261e493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726111000327$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24177517$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Joshi, Shantanu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prashant, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deb, Arghya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Sudhir K.</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of buried pipelines subjected to reverse fault motion</title><title>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</title><description>Presently available simplified analytical methods and semi-empirical methods for the analysis of buried pipelines subjected to fault motion are suitable only for the strike-slip and the normal-slip type fault motions, and cannot be used for the reverse fault crossing case. A simple finite element model, which uses beam elements for the pipeline and discrete nonlinear springs for the soil, has been proposed to analyse buried pipeline subjected to reverse fault motion. The material nonlinearities associated with pipe-material and soil, and geometric nonlinearity associated with large deformations were incorporated in the analysis. Complex reverse fault motion was simulated using suitable constraints between pipe-nodes and ground ends of the soil spring. Results of the parametric study suggest that the pipeline's capacity to accommodate reverse fault offset can be increased significantly by choosing a near-parallel orientation in plan with respect to the fault line. Further improvement in the response of the pipeline is possible by adopting loose backfill, smooth and hard surface coating, and shallow burial depth in the fault crossing region. For normal or near normal orientations, pipeline is expected to fail due to beam buckling at very small fault offsets.</description><subject>Buried pipeline</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Earthquake induced ground movements</subject><subject>Earthquakes, seismology</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Engineering geology</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Faults</subject><subject>Finite element analysis</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc</subject><subject>Nonlinear quasi-static analysis</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>Offsets</subject><subject>Oil and gas pipelines</subject><subject>Orientation</subject><subject>Pipeline buckling</subject><subject>Pipelines</subject><subject>Pipe–soil interaction</subject><subject>Reverse fault motion</subject><subject>Soil (material)</subject><subject>Structural design of pipelines</subject><issn>0267-7261</issn><issn>1879-341X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF1L7DAQhoMouH78BKE3crxpnaRN0t4oIscPWPBGwbuQJlPI0m3WTCvsvz9ddjmXejUwPO87w8PYFYeCA1e3q4Ji6P12KARwXoAoAMojtuC1bvKy4p_HbAFC6VwLxU_ZGdEKgGteqwW7exhsv6VAWeyydkoBfbYJG-zDgJTR1K7QjfNujFnCb0yEWWenfszWcQxxuGAnne0JLw_znH08_X1_fMmXb8-vjw_L3FZNOealtla2AqSvVN214ME5rVoOslEWpfMIXnnVyFpj5yS2WjUo67LB-WOcK87Zn33vJsWvCWk060AO-94OGCcydV2CqATsyJsfSa5rJbjQQs-o3KMuRaKEndmksLZpaziYnVmzMgezZmfWgDCz2Tl3fThhydm-S3Zwgf6HRcW1lnzXf7_ncDbzHTAZcgEHhz6k2arxMfxy6R_EQJFp</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Joshi, Shantanu</creator><creator>Prashant, Amit</creator><creator>Deb, Arghya</creator><creator>Jain, Sudhir K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Analysis of buried pipelines subjected to reverse fault motion</title><author>Joshi, Shantanu ; Prashant, Amit ; Deb, Arghya ; Jain, Sudhir K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a493t-37aa5b205d468fb0d0cc76b10596ae5cde0d6d69587efc5eb769e5839e261e493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Buried pipeline</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Earthquake induced ground movements</topic><topic>Earthquakes, seismology</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Engineering geology</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Faults</topic><topic>Finite element analysis</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc</topic><topic>Nonlinear quasi-static analysis</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>Offsets</topic><topic>Oil and gas pipelines</topic><topic>Orientation</topic><topic>Pipeline buckling</topic><topic>Pipelines</topic><topic>Pipe–soil interaction</topic><topic>Reverse fault motion</topic><topic>Soil (material)</topic><topic>Structural design of pipelines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Joshi, Shantanu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prashant, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deb, Arghya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Sudhir K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Joshi, Shantanu</au><au>Prashant, Amit</au><au>Deb, Arghya</au><au>Jain, Sudhir K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of buried pipelines subjected to reverse fault motion</atitle><jtitle>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</jtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>930</spage><epage>940</epage><pages>930-940</pages><issn>0267-7261</issn><eissn>1879-341X</eissn><coden>SDEEEJ</coden><abstract>Presently available simplified analytical methods and semi-empirical methods for the analysis of buried pipelines subjected to fault motion are suitable only for the strike-slip and the normal-slip type fault motions, and cannot be used for the reverse fault crossing case. A simple finite element model, which uses beam elements for the pipeline and discrete nonlinear springs for the soil, has been proposed to analyse buried pipeline subjected to reverse fault motion. The material nonlinearities associated with pipe-material and soil, and geometric nonlinearity associated with large deformations were incorporated in the analysis. Complex reverse fault motion was simulated using suitable constraints between pipe-nodes and ground ends of the soil spring. Results of the parametric study suggest that the pipeline's capacity to accommodate reverse fault offset can be increased significantly by choosing a near-parallel orientation in plan with respect to the fault line. Further improvement in the response of the pipeline is possible by adopting loose backfill, smooth and hard surface coating, and shallow burial depth in the fault crossing region. For normal or near normal orientations, pipeline is expected to fail due to beam buckling at very small fault offsets.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.02.003</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0267-7261
ispartof Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984), 2011-07, Vol.31 (7), p.930-940
issn 0267-7261
1879-341X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883024209
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Buried pipeline
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Earthquake induced ground movements
Earthquakes, seismology
Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics
Engineering geology
Exact sciences and technology
Faults
Finite element analysis
Internal geophysics
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc
Nonlinear quasi-static analysis
Nonlinearity
Offsets
Oil and gas pipelines
Orientation
Pipeline buckling
Pipelines
Pipe–soil interaction
Reverse fault motion
Soil (material)
Structural design of pipelines
title Analysis of buried pipelines subjected to reverse fault motion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T02%3A01%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20buried%20pipelines%20subjected%20to%20reverse%20fault%20motion&rft.jtitle=Soil%20dynamics%20and%20earthquake%20engineering%20(1984)&rft.au=Joshi,%20Shantanu&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=930&rft.epage=940&rft.pages=930-940&rft.issn=0267-7261&rft.eissn=1879-341X&rft.coden=SDEEEJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.02.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1786212727%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1786212727&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0267726111000327&rfr_iscdi=true