Fish as ecological tools to complement biodiversity inventories of benthic macroinvertebrates

Sampling benthic macroinvertebrates in large rivers has several limitations, arising not only from the selectivity of traditional sampling gears but also from difficulty in capturing organisms that inhabit the deeper zones and high current velocities. Considering the importance of benthic macroinver...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrobiologia 2011-09, Vol.673 (1), p.29-40
Hauptverfasser: Maroneze, Daniel M., Tupinambás, Taynan H., Alves, Carlos B. M., Vieira, Fábio, Pompeu, Paulo S., Callisto, Marcos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 40
container_issue 1
container_start_page 29
container_title Hydrobiologia
container_volume 673
creator Maroneze, Daniel M.
Tupinambás, Taynan H.
Alves, Carlos B. M.
Vieira, Fábio
Pompeu, Paulo S.
Callisto, Marcos
description Sampling benthic macroinvertebrates in large rivers has several limitations, arising not only from the selectivity of traditional sampling gears but also from difficulty in capturing organisms that inhabit the deeper zones and high current velocities. Considering the importance of benthic macroinvertebrates as a food resource for fishes, the sampling restrictions in sediment collection done by dredges, and the importance of surveying benthos biodiversity, the objective of this study was to evaluate the stomach contents of five commonly-occurring invertivorous fish species as a means of complementing a benthic macroinvertebrate inventory. Three sampling campaigns (fish and benthic macroinvertebrate) were conducted in a reach of the Araguari River (Minas Gerais, Brazil), approximately 9 km long and 90 m wide. Astyanax altiparanae Garutti & Britski 2000, Leporinus friderici (Bloch 1794), Leporinus amblyrhynchus Garavello & Britski 1987, Iheringichthys labrosus (Lütken 1874) and Pimelodus maculatus Lacepède 1803 were the fish species collected and studied. To determine benthic macroinvertebrate taxonomic richness, a total of 54 Van Veen sediment samples were obtained. We compared lists of the benthic taxa found in fish stomachs with those from the sediment samples. The differences in the taxonomic composition of the benthic macroinvertebrate communities between the sediment samples and each fish species stomachs contents were assessed through NMDS and ANOSIM analyses, using a Sorensen similarity index with the presence/absence of taxa data. Independent of sampling period, additional benthic macroinvertebrate families or classes were provided by identifying fish stomach contents. We found a total of 30 taxa in this study, including 5 unique taxa (or 17% of the total) in the sediment samples, 9 unique taxa (30%) in the stomach samples, and 16 taxa (53%) common to both. The NMDS and ANOSIM analyses showed a significant separation between Van Veen sediment samples and two fish species stomach contents— L. amblyrhynchus and P. maculatus . These results indicate that fish can be used as additional samplers and are an efficient method to complement the benthic taxonomic inventory obtained through traditional sediment sampling techniques in large areas, as river segments and catchments.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10750-011-0747-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883021550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>883021550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-b1e6dfa12209405cbd73019ba078ffe27312a6344acc890f8d192ff3038187be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouH78AG9BEE_VmaTdpEcRv0DwokcJaTbRSNusma7gvzfLioLgJSEzz7xMHsaOEM4QQJ0TgmqgAsQKVK0qvcVm2ChZNYhqm80AUFcaG73L9ojeoMy0Ambs-TrSK7fEvUt9eonO9nxKqadycpeGZe8HP068i2kRP3ymOH3yOH6UWsrRE0-Bd-XxGh0frMtp3cuT77KdPB2wnWB78off9z57ur56vLyt7h9u7i4v7isnlZqqDv18ESwKAW0NjesWSgK2nQWlQ_BCSRR2LuvaOqdbCHqBrQhBgtSoVeflPjvd5C5zel95mswQyfm-t6NPKzJaSxDYNFDI4z_kW1rlsSxXIFCqyJsXCDdQ-Q9R9sEscxxs_jQIZq3bbHSbotusdRtdZk6-gy0ViSHb0UX6GRS11LJGUTix4ai0xheffxf4P_wLXXeQNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>880770746</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fish as ecological tools to complement biodiversity inventories of benthic macroinvertebrates</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Maroneze, Daniel M. ; Tupinambás, Taynan H. ; Alves, Carlos B. M. ; Vieira, Fábio ; Pompeu, Paulo S. ; Callisto, Marcos</creator><creatorcontrib>Maroneze, Daniel M. ; Tupinambás, Taynan H. ; Alves, Carlos B. M. ; Vieira, Fábio ; Pompeu, Paulo S. ; Callisto, Marcos</creatorcontrib><description>Sampling benthic macroinvertebrates in large rivers has several limitations, arising not only from the selectivity of traditional sampling gears but also from difficulty in capturing organisms that inhabit the deeper zones and high current velocities. Considering the importance of benthic macroinvertebrates as a food resource for fishes, the sampling restrictions in sediment collection done by dredges, and the importance of surveying benthos biodiversity, the objective of this study was to evaluate the stomach contents of five commonly-occurring invertivorous fish species as a means of complementing a benthic macroinvertebrate inventory. Three sampling campaigns (fish and benthic macroinvertebrate) were conducted in a reach of the Araguari River (Minas Gerais, Brazil), approximately 9 km long and 90 m wide. Astyanax altiparanae Garutti &amp; Britski 2000, Leporinus friderici (Bloch 1794), Leporinus amblyrhynchus Garavello &amp; Britski 1987, Iheringichthys labrosus (Lütken 1874) and Pimelodus maculatus Lacepède 1803 were the fish species collected and studied. To determine benthic macroinvertebrate taxonomic richness, a total of 54 Van Veen sediment samples were obtained. We compared lists of the benthic taxa found in fish stomachs with those from the sediment samples. The differences in the taxonomic composition of the benthic macroinvertebrate communities between the sediment samples and each fish species stomachs contents were assessed through NMDS and ANOSIM analyses, using a Sorensen similarity index with the presence/absence of taxa data. Independent of sampling period, additional benthic macroinvertebrate families or classes were provided by identifying fish stomach contents. We found a total of 30 taxa in this study, including 5 unique taxa (or 17% of the total) in the sediment samples, 9 unique taxa (30%) in the stomach samples, and 16 taxa (53%) common to both. The NMDS and ANOSIM analyses showed a significant separation between Van Veen sediment samples and two fish species stomach contents— L. amblyrhynchus and P. maculatus . These results indicate that fish can be used as additional samplers and are an efficient method to complement the benthic taxonomic inventory obtained through traditional sediment sampling techniques in large areas, as river segments and catchments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-011-0747-8</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HYDRB8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agnatha. Pisces ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Astyanax altiparanae ; Benthos ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Ecology ; Fish ; Food resources ; Freshwater ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Iheringichthys labrosus ; Invertebrates ; Leporinus amblyrhynchus ; Leporinus friderici ; Life Sciences ; Macroevolution ; Macroinvertebrates ; Pimelodus maculatus ; Primary Research Paper ; Rivers ; Samplers ; Sediment samplers ; Synecology ; Taxa ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2011-09, Vol.673 (1), p.29-40</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-b1e6dfa12209405cbd73019ba078ffe27312a6344acc890f8d192ff3038187be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-b1e6dfa12209405cbd73019ba078ffe27312a6344acc890f8d192ff3038187be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10750-011-0747-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10750-011-0747-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24383412$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maroneze, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tupinambás, Taynan H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Carlos B. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieira, Fábio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pompeu, Paulo S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callisto, Marcos</creatorcontrib><title>Fish as ecological tools to complement biodiversity inventories of benthic macroinvertebrates</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><addtitle>Hydrobiologia</addtitle><description>Sampling benthic macroinvertebrates in large rivers has several limitations, arising not only from the selectivity of traditional sampling gears but also from difficulty in capturing organisms that inhabit the deeper zones and high current velocities. Considering the importance of benthic macroinvertebrates as a food resource for fishes, the sampling restrictions in sediment collection done by dredges, and the importance of surveying benthos biodiversity, the objective of this study was to evaluate the stomach contents of five commonly-occurring invertivorous fish species as a means of complementing a benthic macroinvertebrate inventory. Three sampling campaigns (fish and benthic macroinvertebrate) were conducted in a reach of the Araguari River (Minas Gerais, Brazil), approximately 9 km long and 90 m wide. Astyanax altiparanae Garutti &amp; Britski 2000, Leporinus friderici (Bloch 1794), Leporinus amblyrhynchus Garavello &amp; Britski 1987, Iheringichthys labrosus (Lütken 1874) and Pimelodus maculatus Lacepède 1803 were the fish species collected and studied. To determine benthic macroinvertebrate taxonomic richness, a total of 54 Van Veen sediment samples were obtained. We compared lists of the benthic taxa found in fish stomachs with those from the sediment samples. The differences in the taxonomic composition of the benthic macroinvertebrate communities between the sediment samples and each fish species stomachs contents were assessed through NMDS and ANOSIM analyses, using a Sorensen similarity index with the presence/absence of taxa data. Independent of sampling period, additional benthic macroinvertebrate families or classes were provided by identifying fish stomach contents. We found a total of 30 taxa in this study, including 5 unique taxa (or 17% of the total) in the sediment samples, 9 unique taxa (30%) in the stomach samples, and 16 taxa (53%) common to both. The NMDS and ANOSIM analyses showed a significant separation between Van Veen sediment samples and two fish species stomach contents— L. amblyrhynchus and P. maculatus . These results indicate that fish can be used as additional samplers and are an efficient method to complement the benthic taxonomic inventory obtained through traditional sediment sampling techniques in large areas, as river segments and catchments.</description><subject>Agnatha. Pisces</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Astyanax altiparanae</subject><subject>Benthos</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Food resources</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Iheringichthys labrosus</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Leporinus amblyrhynchus</subject><subject>Leporinus friderici</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Macroevolution</subject><subject>Macroinvertebrates</subject><subject>Pimelodus maculatus</subject><subject>Primary Research Paper</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Samplers</subject><subject>Sediment samplers</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouH78AG9BEE_VmaTdpEcRv0DwokcJaTbRSNusma7gvzfLioLgJSEzz7xMHsaOEM4QQJ0TgmqgAsQKVK0qvcVm2ChZNYhqm80AUFcaG73L9ojeoMy0Ambs-TrSK7fEvUt9eonO9nxKqadycpeGZe8HP068i2kRP3ymOH3yOH6UWsrRE0-Bd-XxGh0frMtp3cuT77KdPB2wnWB78off9z57ur56vLyt7h9u7i4v7isnlZqqDv18ESwKAW0NjesWSgK2nQWlQ_BCSRR2LuvaOqdbCHqBrQhBgtSoVeflPjvd5C5zel95mswQyfm-t6NPKzJaSxDYNFDI4z_kW1rlsSxXIFCqyJsXCDdQ-Q9R9sEscxxs_jQIZq3bbHSbotusdRtdZk6-gy0ViSHb0UX6GRS11LJGUTix4ai0xheffxf4P_wLXXeQNA</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>Maroneze, Daniel M.</creator><creator>Tupinambás, Taynan H.</creator><creator>Alves, Carlos B. M.</creator><creator>Vieira, Fábio</creator><creator>Pompeu, Paulo S.</creator><creator>Callisto, Marcos</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>H96</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>Fish as ecological tools to complement biodiversity inventories of benthic macroinvertebrates</title><author>Maroneze, Daniel M. ; Tupinambás, Taynan H. ; Alves, Carlos B. M. ; Vieira, Fábio ; Pompeu, Paulo S. ; Callisto, Marcos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-b1e6dfa12209405cbd73019ba078ffe27312a6344acc890f8d192ff3038187be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Agnatha. Pisces</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Astyanax altiparanae</topic><topic>Benthos</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Food resources</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Iheringichthys labrosus</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Leporinus amblyrhynchus</topic><topic>Leporinus friderici</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Macroevolution</topic><topic>Macroinvertebrates</topic><topic>Pimelodus maculatus</topic><topic>Primary Research Paper</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Samplers</topic><topic>Sediment samplers</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maroneze, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tupinambás, Taynan H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Carlos B. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieira, Fábio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pompeu, Paulo S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callisto, Marcos</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maroneze, Daniel M.</au><au>Tupinambás, Taynan H.</au><au>Alves, Carlos B. M.</au><au>Vieira, Fábio</au><au>Pompeu, Paulo S.</au><au>Callisto, Marcos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fish as ecological tools to complement biodiversity inventories of benthic macroinvertebrates</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><stitle>Hydrobiologia</stitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>673</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>29</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>29-40</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><coden>HYDRB8</coden><abstract>Sampling benthic macroinvertebrates in large rivers has several limitations, arising not only from the selectivity of traditional sampling gears but also from difficulty in capturing organisms that inhabit the deeper zones and high current velocities. Considering the importance of benthic macroinvertebrates as a food resource for fishes, the sampling restrictions in sediment collection done by dredges, and the importance of surveying benthos biodiversity, the objective of this study was to evaluate the stomach contents of five commonly-occurring invertivorous fish species as a means of complementing a benthic macroinvertebrate inventory. Three sampling campaigns (fish and benthic macroinvertebrate) were conducted in a reach of the Araguari River (Minas Gerais, Brazil), approximately 9 km long and 90 m wide. Astyanax altiparanae Garutti &amp; Britski 2000, Leporinus friderici (Bloch 1794), Leporinus amblyrhynchus Garavello &amp; Britski 1987, Iheringichthys labrosus (Lütken 1874) and Pimelodus maculatus Lacepède 1803 were the fish species collected and studied. To determine benthic macroinvertebrate taxonomic richness, a total of 54 Van Veen sediment samples were obtained. We compared lists of the benthic taxa found in fish stomachs with those from the sediment samples. The differences in the taxonomic composition of the benthic macroinvertebrate communities between the sediment samples and each fish species stomachs contents were assessed through NMDS and ANOSIM analyses, using a Sorensen similarity index with the presence/absence of taxa data. Independent of sampling period, additional benthic macroinvertebrate families or classes were provided by identifying fish stomach contents. We found a total of 30 taxa in this study, including 5 unique taxa (or 17% of the total) in the sediment samples, 9 unique taxa (30%) in the stomach samples, and 16 taxa (53%) common to both. The NMDS and ANOSIM analyses showed a significant separation between Van Veen sediment samples and two fish species stomach contents— L. amblyrhynchus and P. maculatus . These results indicate that fish can be used as additional samplers and are an efficient method to complement the benthic taxonomic inventory obtained through traditional sediment sampling techniques in large areas, as river segments and catchments.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-011-0747-8</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-8158
ispartof Hydrobiologia, 2011-09, Vol.673 (1), p.29-40
issn 0018-8158
1573-5117
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883021550
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Agnatha. Pisces
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Astyanax altiparanae
Benthos
Biodiversity
Biological and medical sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Ecology
Fish
Food resources
Freshwater
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Iheringichthys labrosus
Invertebrates
Leporinus amblyrhynchus
Leporinus friderici
Life Sciences
Macroevolution
Macroinvertebrates
Pimelodus maculatus
Primary Research Paper
Rivers
Samplers
Sediment samplers
Synecology
Taxa
Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution
Zoology
title Fish as ecological tools to complement biodiversity inventories of benthic macroinvertebrates
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T05%3A50%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fish%20as%20ecological%20tools%20to%20complement%20biodiversity%20inventories%20of%20benthic%20macroinvertebrates&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=Maroneze,%20Daniel%20M.&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=673&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=29-40&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft.coden=HYDRB8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-011-0747-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E883021550%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=880770746&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true