Source Credibility and Idea Improvement Have Independent Effects on Unconscious Plagiarism Errors in Recall and Generate-New Tasks

Unconscious plagiarism occurs when people try to generate new ideas or when they try to recall their own ideas from among a set generated by a group. In this study, the factors that independently influence these two forms of plagiarism error were examined. Participants initially generated solutions...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2009-01, Vol.35 (1), p.267-274
Hauptverfasser: Perfect, Timothy J, Field, Ian, Jones, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 274
container_issue 1
container_start_page 267
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
container_volume 35
creator Perfect, Timothy J
Field, Ian
Jones, Robert
description Unconscious plagiarism occurs when people try to generate new ideas or when they try to recall their own ideas from among a set generated by a group. In this study, the factors that independently influence these two forms of plagiarism error were examined. Participants initially generated solutions to real-world problems in 2 domains of knowledge in collaboration with a confederate presented as an expert in 1 domain. Subsequently, the participant generated improvements to half of the ideas from each person. Participants returned 1 day later to recall either their own ideas or their partner's ideas and to complete a generate-new task. A double dissociation was observed. Generate-new plagiarism was driven by partner expertise but not by idea improvement, whereas recall plagiarism was driven by improvement but not expertise. This improvement effect on recall plagiarism was seen for the recall-own but not the recall-partner task, suggesting that the increase in recall-own plagiarism is due to mistaken idea ownership, not source confusion.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/a0013936
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883019898</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ825152</ericid><sourcerecordid>883019898</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a484t-7741fdb13ee940e75b77c0f95fdb4e0c8289cd10fc0a123ea3586a03111f60bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkl2L1DAUhoso7rgK_gCRIIqCVHOStkkuZRh3RxYV3b0OmfRUsrZpTdrVufWXm86MK4poLhI478N7vpJl94G-AMrFS0MpcMWrG9kCFFc5MFnezBaUCZmLJBxld2K8pPPh8nZ2BIoBpUossu8f-ylYJMuAtdu41o1bYnxN1jUasu6G0F9hh34kp-YKydrXOGC6UmDVNGjHSHpPLrztfbSunyJ535pPzgQXO7IKoQ-ROE8-oDVtuzM-QY_BjJi_xa_k3MTP8W52qzFtxHuH9zi7eL06X57mZ-9O1stXZ7kpZDHmQhTQ1BvgiKqgKMqNEJY2qkzBAqmVTCpbA20sNcA4Gl7KylAOAE1FNw0_zp7ufVNTXyaMo-5ctNi2xmOqXEvJKSip5H9JwbkCWYqZfPQHeZnm6VMbuoKi5JSX7F8Qg4JXQsDs9GwP2dDHGLDRQ3CdCVsNVM9L1j-XnNCHB79p02H9CzxsNQFPDoCJafBNMN66eM3NFGO7nA_2HAZnr-XVG8lK2NX9fC-bweghbq0Jo7MtRjuFkL6A_tZ2mpcaNKvmpI__Tv-O_QDa29Jw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614530352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Source Credibility and Idea Improvement Have Independent Effects on Unconscious Plagiarism Errors in Recall and Generate-New Tasks</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Perfect, Timothy J ; Field, Ian ; Jones, Robert</creator><contributor>Martin, Randi C</contributor><creatorcontrib>Perfect, Timothy J ; Field, Ian ; Jones, Robert ; Martin, Randi C</creatorcontrib><description>Unconscious plagiarism occurs when people try to generate new ideas or when they try to recall their own ideas from among a set generated by a group. In this study, the factors that independently influence these two forms of plagiarism error were examined. Participants initially generated solutions to real-world problems in 2 domains of knowledge in collaboration with a confederate presented as an expert in 1 domain. Subsequently, the participant generated improvements to half of the ideas from each person. Participants returned 1 day later to recall either their own ideas or their partner's ideas and to complete a generate-new task. A double dissociation was observed. Generate-new plagiarism was driven by partner expertise but not by idea improvement, whereas recall plagiarism was driven by improvement but not expertise. This improvement effect on recall plagiarism was seen for the recall-own but not the recall-partner task, suggesting that the increase in recall-own plagiarism is due to mistaken idea ownership, not source confusion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0013936</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19210097</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cooperation ; Cooperative Behavior ; Creativity ; Credibility ; Errors ; Experimental psychology ; Experiments ; Expertise ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Learning. Memory ; Memory ; Mental Recall - physiology ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Plagiarism ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reality Testing ; Recall ; Recall (Learning) ; Recall (Psychology) ; Unconscious (Psychology)</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2009-01, Vol.35 (1), p.267-274</ispartof><rights>2009 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2009</rights><rights>2009, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a484t-7741fdb13ee940e75b77c0f95fdb4e0c8289cd10fc0a123ea3586a03111f60bf3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ825152$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21002218$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19210097$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Martin, Randi C</contributor><creatorcontrib>Perfect, Timothy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Field, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Source Credibility and Idea Improvement Have Independent Effects on Unconscious Plagiarism Errors in Recall and Generate-New Tasks</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>Unconscious plagiarism occurs when people try to generate new ideas or when they try to recall their own ideas from among a set generated by a group. In this study, the factors that independently influence these two forms of plagiarism error were examined. Participants initially generated solutions to real-world problems in 2 domains of knowledge in collaboration with a confederate presented as an expert in 1 domain. Subsequently, the participant generated improvements to half of the ideas from each person. Participants returned 1 day later to recall either their own ideas or their partner's ideas and to complete a generate-new task. A double dissociation was observed. Generate-new plagiarism was driven by partner expertise but not by idea improvement, whereas recall plagiarism was driven by improvement but not expertise. This improvement effect on recall plagiarism was seen for the recall-own but not the recall-partner task, suggesting that the increase in recall-own plagiarism is due to mistaken idea ownership, not source confusion.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Expertise</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall - physiology</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Plagiarism</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reality Testing</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Recall (Learning)</subject><subject>Recall (Psychology)</subject><subject>Unconscious (Psychology)</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkl2L1DAUhoso7rgK_gCRIIqCVHOStkkuZRh3RxYV3b0OmfRUsrZpTdrVufWXm86MK4poLhI478N7vpJl94G-AMrFS0MpcMWrG9kCFFc5MFnezBaUCZmLJBxld2K8pPPh8nZ2BIoBpUossu8f-ylYJMuAtdu41o1bYnxN1jUasu6G0F9hh34kp-YKydrXOGC6UmDVNGjHSHpPLrztfbSunyJ535pPzgQXO7IKoQ-ROE8-oDVtuzM-QY_BjJi_xa_k3MTP8W52qzFtxHuH9zi7eL06X57mZ-9O1stXZ7kpZDHmQhTQ1BvgiKqgKMqNEJY2qkzBAqmVTCpbA20sNcA4Gl7KylAOAE1FNw0_zp7ufVNTXyaMo-5ctNi2xmOqXEvJKSip5H9JwbkCWYqZfPQHeZnm6VMbuoKi5JSX7F8Qg4JXQsDs9GwP2dDHGLDRQ3CdCVsNVM9L1j-XnNCHB79p02H9CzxsNQFPDoCJafBNMN66eM3NFGO7nA_2HAZnr-XVG8lK2NX9fC-bweghbq0Jo7MtRjuFkL6A_tZ2mpcaNKvmpI__Tv-O_QDa29Jw</recordid><startdate>200901</startdate><enddate>200901</enddate><creator>Perfect, Timothy J</creator><creator>Field, Ian</creator><creator>Jones, Robert</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200901</creationdate><title>Source Credibility and Idea Improvement Have Independent Effects on Unconscious Plagiarism Errors in Recall and Generate-New Tasks</title><author>Perfect, Timothy J ; Field, Ian ; Jones, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a484t-7741fdb13ee940e75b77c0f95fdb4e0c8289cd10fc0a123ea3586a03111f60bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Expertise</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall - physiology</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Plagiarism</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reality Testing</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Recall (Learning)</topic><topic>Recall (Psychology)</topic><topic>Unconscious (Psychology)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perfect, Timothy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Field, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perfect, Timothy J</au><au>Field, Ian</au><au>Jones, Robert</au><au>Martin, Randi C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ825152</ericid><atitle>Source Credibility and Idea Improvement Have Independent Effects on Unconscious Plagiarism Errors in Recall and Generate-New Tasks</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2009-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>267</spage><epage>274</epage><pages>267-274</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>Unconscious plagiarism occurs when people try to generate new ideas or when they try to recall their own ideas from among a set generated by a group. In this study, the factors that independently influence these two forms of plagiarism error were examined. Participants initially generated solutions to real-world problems in 2 domains of knowledge in collaboration with a confederate presented as an expert in 1 domain. Subsequently, the participant generated improvements to half of the ideas from each person. Participants returned 1 day later to recall either their own ideas or their partner's ideas and to complete a generate-new task. A double dissociation was observed. Generate-new plagiarism was driven by partner expertise but not by idea improvement, whereas recall plagiarism was driven by improvement but not expertise. This improvement effect on recall plagiarism was seen for the recall-own but not the recall-partner task, suggesting that the increase in recall-own plagiarism is due to mistaken idea ownership, not source confusion.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>19210097</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0013936</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-7393
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2009-01, Vol.35 (1), p.267-274
issn 0278-7393
1939-1285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883019898
source MEDLINE; APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Cooperation
Cooperative Behavior
Creativity
Credibility
Errors
Experimental psychology
Experiments
Expertise
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Learning. Memory
Memory
Mental Recall - physiology
Neuropsychological Tests
Plagiarism
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reality Testing
Recall
Recall (Learning)
Recall (Psychology)
Unconscious (Psychology)
title Source Credibility and Idea Improvement Have Independent Effects on Unconscious Plagiarism Errors in Recall and Generate-New Tasks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T15%3A19%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Source%20Credibility%20and%20Idea%20Improvement%20Have%20Independent%20Effects%20on%20Unconscious%20Plagiarism%20Errors%20in%20Recall%20and%20Generate-New%20Tasks&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Perfect,%20Timothy%20J&rft.date=2009-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=267&rft.epage=274&rft.pages=267-274&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0013936&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E883019898%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614530352&rft_id=info:pmid/19210097&rft_ericid=EJ825152&rfr_iscdi=true