Source Credibility and Idea Improvement Have Independent Effects on Unconscious Plagiarism Errors in Recall and Generate-New Tasks
Unconscious plagiarism occurs when people try to generate new ideas or when they try to recall their own ideas from among a set generated by a group. In this study, the factors that independently influence these two forms of plagiarism error were examined. Participants initially generated solutions...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2009-01, Vol.35 (1), p.267-274 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 274 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 267 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Perfect, Timothy J Field, Ian Jones, Robert |
description | Unconscious plagiarism occurs when people try to generate new ideas or when they try to recall their own ideas from among a set generated by a group. In this study, the factors that independently influence these two forms of plagiarism error were examined. Participants initially generated solutions to real-world problems in 2 domains of knowledge in collaboration with a confederate presented as an expert in 1 domain. Subsequently, the participant generated improvements to half of the ideas from each person. Participants returned 1 day later to recall either their own ideas or their partner's ideas and to complete a generate-new task. A double dissociation was observed. Generate-new plagiarism was driven by partner expertise but not by idea improvement, whereas recall plagiarism was driven by improvement but not expertise. This improvement effect on recall plagiarism was seen for the recall-own but not the recall-partner task, suggesting that the increase in recall-own plagiarism is due to mistaken idea ownership, not source confusion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0013936 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883019898</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ825152</ericid><sourcerecordid>883019898</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a484t-7741fdb13ee940e75b77c0f95fdb4e0c8289cd10fc0a123ea3586a03111f60bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkl2L1DAUhoso7rgK_gCRIIqCVHOStkkuZRh3RxYV3b0OmfRUsrZpTdrVufWXm86MK4poLhI478N7vpJl94G-AMrFS0MpcMWrG9kCFFc5MFnezBaUCZmLJBxld2K8pPPh8nZ2BIoBpUossu8f-ylYJMuAtdu41o1bYnxN1jUasu6G0F9hh34kp-YKydrXOGC6UmDVNGjHSHpPLrztfbSunyJ535pPzgQXO7IKoQ-ROE8-oDVtuzM-QY_BjJi_xa_k3MTP8W52qzFtxHuH9zi7eL06X57mZ-9O1stXZ7kpZDHmQhTQ1BvgiKqgKMqNEJY2qkzBAqmVTCpbA20sNcA4Gl7KylAOAE1FNw0_zp7ufVNTXyaMo-5ctNi2xmOqXEvJKSip5H9JwbkCWYqZfPQHeZnm6VMbuoKi5JSX7F8Qg4JXQsDs9GwP2dDHGLDRQ3CdCVsNVM9L1j-XnNCHB79p02H9CzxsNQFPDoCJafBNMN66eM3NFGO7nA_2HAZnr-XVG8lK2NX9fC-bweghbq0Jo7MtRjuFkL6A_tZ2mpcaNKvmpI__Tv-O_QDa29Jw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614530352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Source Credibility and Idea Improvement Have Independent Effects on Unconscious Plagiarism Errors in Recall and Generate-New Tasks</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Perfect, Timothy J ; Field, Ian ; Jones, Robert</creator><contributor>Martin, Randi C</contributor><creatorcontrib>Perfect, Timothy J ; Field, Ian ; Jones, Robert ; Martin, Randi C</creatorcontrib><description>Unconscious plagiarism occurs when people try to generate new ideas or when they try to recall their own ideas from among a set generated by a group. In this study, the factors that independently influence these two forms of plagiarism error were examined. Participants initially generated solutions to real-world problems in 2 domains of knowledge in collaboration with a confederate presented as an expert in 1 domain. Subsequently, the participant generated improvements to half of the ideas from each person. Participants returned 1 day later to recall either their own ideas or their partner's ideas and to complete a generate-new task. A double dissociation was observed. Generate-new plagiarism was driven by partner expertise but not by idea improvement, whereas recall plagiarism was driven by improvement but not expertise. This improvement effect on recall plagiarism was seen for the recall-own but not the recall-partner task, suggesting that the increase in recall-own plagiarism is due to mistaken idea ownership, not source confusion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0013936</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19210097</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cooperation ; Cooperative Behavior ; Creativity ; Credibility ; Errors ; Experimental psychology ; Experiments ; Expertise ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Learning. Memory ; Memory ; Mental Recall - physiology ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Plagiarism ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reality Testing ; Recall ; Recall (Learning) ; Recall (Psychology) ; Unconscious (Psychology)</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2009-01, Vol.35 (1), p.267-274</ispartof><rights>2009 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2009</rights><rights>2009, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a484t-7741fdb13ee940e75b77c0f95fdb4e0c8289cd10fc0a123ea3586a03111f60bf3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ825152$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21002218$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19210097$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Martin, Randi C</contributor><creatorcontrib>Perfect, Timothy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Field, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Source Credibility and Idea Improvement Have Independent Effects on Unconscious Plagiarism Errors in Recall and Generate-New Tasks</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>Unconscious plagiarism occurs when people try to generate new ideas or when they try to recall their own ideas from among a set generated by a group. In this study, the factors that independently influence these two forms of plagiarism error were examined. Participants initially generated solutions to real-world problems in 2 domains of knowledge in collaboration with a confederate presented as an expert in 1 domain. Subsequently, the participant generated improvements to half of the ideas from each person. Participants returned 1 day later to recall either their own ideas or their partner's ideas and to complete a generate-new task. A double dissociation was observed. Generate-new plagiarism was driven by partner expertise but not by idea improvement, whereas recall plagiarism was driven by improvement but not expertise. This improvement effect on recall plagiarism was seen for the recall-own but not the recall-partner task, suggesting that the increase in recall-own plagiarism is due to mistaken idea ownership, not source confusion.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Expertise</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall - physiology</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Plagiarism</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reality Testing</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Recall (Learning)</subject><subject>Recall (Psychology)</subject><subject>Unconscious (Psychology)</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkl2L1DAUhoso7rgK_gCRIIqCVHOStkkuZRh3RxYV3b0OmfRUsrZpTdrVufWXm86MK4poLhI478N7vpJl94G-AMrFS0MpcMWrG9kCFFc5MFnezBaUCZmLJBxld2K8pPPh8nZ2BIoBpUossu8f-ylYJMuAtdu41o1bYnxN1jUasu6G0F9hh34kp-YKydrXOGC6UmDVNGjHSHpPLrztfbSunyJ535pPzgQXO7IKoQ-ROE8-oDVtuzM-QY_BjJi_xa_k3MTP8W52qzFtxHuH9zi7eL06X57mZ-9O1stXZ7kpZDHmQhTQ1BvgiKqgKMqNEJY2qkzBAqmVTCpbA20sNcA4Gl7KylAOAE1FNw0_zp7ufVNTXyaMo-5ctNi2xmOqXEvJKSip5H9JwbkCWYqZfPQHeZnm6VMbuoKi5JSX7F8Qg4JXQsDs9GwP2dDHGLDRQ3CdCVsNVM9L1j-XnNCHB79p02H9CzxsNQFPDoCJafBNMN66eM3NFGO7nA_2HAZnr-XVG8lK2NX9fC-bweghbq0Jo7MtRjuFkL6A_tZ2mpcaNKvmpI__Tv-O_QDa29Jw</recordid><startdate>200901</startdate><enddate>200901</enddate><creator>Perfect, Timothy J</creator><creator>Field, Ian</creator><creator>Jones, Robert</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200901</creationdate><title>Source Credibility and Idea Improvement Have Independent Effects on Unconscious Plagiarism Errors in Recall and Generate-New Tasks</title><author>Perfect, Timothy J ; Field, Ian ; Jones, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a484t-7741fdb13ee940e75b77c0f95fdb4e0c8289cd10fc0a123ea3586a03111f60bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Expertise</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall - physiology</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Plagiarism</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reality Testing</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Recall (Learning)</topic><topic>Recall (Psychology)</topic><topic>Unconscious (Psychology)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perfect, Timothy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Field, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perfect, Timothy J</au><au>Field, Ian</au><au>Jones, Robert</au><au>Martin, Randi C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ825152</ericid><atitle>Source Credibility and Idea Improvement Have Independent Effects on Unconscious Plagiarism Errors in Recall and Generate-New Tasks</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2009-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>267</spage><epage>274</epage><pages>267-274</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>Unconscious plagiarism occurs when people try to generate new ideas or when they try to recall their own ideas from among a set generated by a group. In this study, the factors that independently influence these two forms of plagiarism error were examined. Participants initially generated solutions to real-world problems in 2 domains of knowledge in collaboration with a confederate presented as an expert in 1 domain. Subsequently, the participant generated improvements to half of the ideas from each person. Participants returned 1 day later to recall either their own ideas or their partner's ideas and to complete a generate-new task. A double dissociation was observed. Generate-new plagiarism was driven by partner expertise but not by idea improvement, whereas recall plagiarism was driven by improvement but not expertise. This improvement effect on recall plagiarism was seen for the recall-own but not the recall-partner task, suggesting that the increase in recall-own plagiarism is due to mistaken idea ownership, not source confusion.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>19210097</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0013936</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-7393 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2009-01, Vol.35 (1), p.267-274 |
issn | 0278-7393 1939-1285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883019898 |
source | MEDLINE; APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Cooperation Cooperative Behavior Creativity Credibility Errors Experimental psychology Experiments Expertise Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Learning. Memory Memory Mental Recall - physiology Neuropsychological Tests Plagiarism Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reality Testing Recall Recall (Learning) Recall (Psychology) Unconscious (Psychology) |
title | Source Credibility and Idea Improvement Have Independent Effects on Unconscious Plagiarism Errors in Recall and Generate-New Tasks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T15%3A19%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Source%20Credibility%20and%20Idea%20Improvement%20Have%20Independent%20Effects%20on%20Unconscious%20Plagiarism%20Errors%20in%20Recall%20and%20Generate-New%20Tasks&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Perfect,%20Timothy%20J&rft.date=2009-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=267&rft.epage=274&rft.pages=267-274&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0013936&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E883019898%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614530352&rft_id=info:pmid/19210097&rft_ericid=EJ825152&rfr_iscdi=true |