Physicochemical characterization of biomaterials commonly used in dentistry as bone substitutes-Comparison with human bone
The present work focuses on the physicochemical characterization of selected mineral‐based biomaterials that are frequently used in dental applications. The selected materials are commercially available as granules from different biological origins: bovine, porcine, and coralline. Natural and calcin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials Applied biomaterials, 2010-02, Vol.92B (2), p.409-419 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 419 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 409 |
container_title | Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials |
container_volume | 92B |
creator | Figueiredo, Margarida Henriques, Jose Martins, Gabriela Guerra, Fernando Judas, Fernando Figueiredo, Helena |
description | The present work focuses on the physicochemical characterization of selected mineral‐based biomaterials that are frequently used in dental applications. The selected materials are commercially available as granules from different biological origins: bovine, porcine, and coralline. Natural and calcined human bone were used for comparison purposes. Besides a classical rationalization of chemical composition and crystallinity, a major emphasis was placed on the measurement of various morphostructural properties such as particle size, porosity, density, and specific surface area. Such properties are crucial to acquiring a full interpretation of the in vivo performance. The studied samples exhibited distinct particle sizes (between 200 and 1000 μm) and shapes. Mercury intrusion revealed not only that the total sample porosity varied considerably (33% for OsteoBiol®, 50% for PepGen P‐15®, and 60% for BioOss®) but also that a significant percentage of that porosity corresponded to submicron pores. Biocoral® was not analyzed by this technique as it possesses larger pores than those of the porosimeter upper limit. The density values determined for the calcined samples were close to the theoretical values of hydroxyapatite. However, the values for the collagenated samples were lower, in accordance with their lower mineral content. The specific surface areas ranged from less than 1 m2/g (Biocoral) up to 60 m2/g (BioOss). The chemical and phase composition of most of the samples, the exception being Biocoral (aragonite), were hydroxyapatite based. Nonetheless, the samples exhibited different organic material content as a consequence of the distinct heat treatments that each had received. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2010 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jbm.b.31529 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883016245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>879479155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4999-3ab59f9416a3baf73d958c1bad105740f0d31182a3c72385d78f78b1d83a000f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0Utv1DAUBeAIgegDVuyRN4gFyuBHPLaXMIIWVB5CPCQ21rXjaFzieLATtemvx9MZhh1d2bK-eyzdU1VPCF4QjOnLSxMWZsEIp-pedUw4p3WjJLl_uAt2VJ3kfFnwEnP2sDoiSuFGUnxc3Xxez9nbaNcueAs9smtIYEeX_A2MPg4odsj4GGD7BH1GNoYQh35GU3Yt8gNq3TD6PKYZQUYmDg7lyeTRj9Pocr2KYQPJ55J05cc1Wk8Bhlv2qHrQlUD3eH-eVt_evvm6Oq8vPp29W726qG2jlKoZGK461ZAlMAOdYK3i0hIDLcFcNLjDLSNEUmBWUCZ5K2QnpCGtZIAx7thp9XyXu0nx9-TyqIPP1vU9DC5OWUvJMFnSht8thWqEKlu9UwrGpJSUbOWLnbQp5pxcpzfJB0izJlhv-9OlP230bX9FP93nTia49p_dF1bAsz2AXOrqEgzW54OjtGkwZqQ4snNXvnfz__7U719_-Pt5vZspbbrrwwykX3opmOD6x8czLdX387KHL_on-wNT38Ni</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733888215</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physicochemical characterization of biomaterials commonly used in dentistry as bone substitutes-Comparison with human bone</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Figueiredo, Margarida ; Henriques, Jose ; Martins, Gabriela ; Guerra, Fernando ; Judas, Fernando ; Figueiredo, Helena</creator><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Margarida ; Henriques, Jose ; Martins, Gabriela ; Guerra, Fernando ; Judas, Fernando ; Figueiredo, Helena</creatorcontrib><description>The present work focuses on the physicochemical characterization of selected mineral‐based biomaterials that are frequently used in dental applications. The selected materials are commercially available as granules from different biological origins: bovine, porcine, and coralline. Natural and calcined human bone were used for comparison purposes. Besides a classical rationalization of chemical composition and crystallinity, a major emphasis was placed on the measurement of various morphostructural properties such as particle size, porosity, density, and specific surface area. Such properties are crucial to acquiring a full interpretation of the in vivo performance. The studied samples exhibited distinct particle sizes (between 200 and 1000 μm) and shapes. Mercury intrusion revealed not only that the total sample porosity varied considerably (33% for OsteoBiol®, 50% for PepGen P‐15®, and 60% for BioOss®) but also that a significant percentage of that porosity corresponded to submicron pores. Biocoral® was not analyzed by this technique as it possesses larger pores than those of the porosimeter upper limit. The density values determined for the calcined samples were close to the theoretical values of hydroxyapatite. However, the values for the collagenated samples were lower, in accordance with their lower mineral content. The specific surface areas ranged from less than 1 m2/g (Biocoral) up to 60 m2/g (BioOss). The chemical and phase composition of most of the samples, the exception being Biocoral (aragonite), were hydroxyapatite based. Nonetheless, the samples exhibited different organic material content as a consequence of the distinct heat treatments that each had received. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2010</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-4973</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1552-4981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31529</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19904820</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anthozoa - chemistry ; Biocompatible Materials - chemistry ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone and Bones - chemistry ; bone graft ; Bone Substitutes - chemistry ; Calcium Carbonate ; Cattle ; Compressive Strength ; Dental Materials - chemistry ; Durapatite - chemistry ; FTIR ; Gases ; Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics ; Humans ; hydroxyapatite ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics ; Medical sciences ; Mercury - chemistry ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; morphology ; Particle Size ; Porosity ; Powders ; Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Swine ; Transplantation, Heterologous ; X-Ray Diffraction</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2010-02, Vol.92B (2), p.409-419</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4999-3ab59f9416a3baf73d958c1bad105740f0d31182a3c72385d78f78b1d83a000f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4999-3ab59f9416a3baf73d958c1bad105740f0d31182a3c72385d78f78b1d83a000f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjbm.b.31529$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjbm.b.31529$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22440031$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19904820$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Margarida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henriques, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerra, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judas, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Helena</creatorcontrib><title>Physicochemical characterization of biomaterials commonly used in dentistry as bone substitutes-Comparison with human bone</title><title>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials</title><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><description>The present work focuses on the physicochemical characterization of selected mineral‐based biomaterials that are frequently used in dental applications. The selected materials are commercially available as granules from different biological origins: bovine, porcine, and coralline. Natural and calcined human bone were used for comparison purposes. Besides a classical rationalization of chemical composition and crystallinity, a major emphasis was placed on the measurement of various morphostructural properties such as particle size, porosity, density, and specific surface area. Such properties are crucial to acquiring a full interpretation of the in vivo performance. The studied samples exhibited distinct particle sizes (between 200 and 1000 μm) and shapes. Mercury intrusion revealed not only that the total sample porosity varied considerably (33% for OsteoBiol®, 50% for PepGen P‐15®, and 60% for BioOss®) but also that a significant percentage of that porosity corresponded to submicron pores. Biocoral® was not analyzed by this technique as it possesses larger pores than those of the porosimeter upper limit. The density values determined for the calcined samples were close to the theoretical values of hydroxyapatite. However, the values for the collagenated samples were lower, in accordance with their lower mineral content. The specific surface areas ranged from less than 1 m2/g (Biocoral) up to 60 m2/g (BioOss). The chemical and phase composition of most of the samples, the exception being Biocoral (aragonite), were hydroxyapatite based. Nonetheless, the samples exhibited different organic material content as a consequence of the distinct heat treatments that each had received. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2010</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthozoa - chemistry</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone and Bones - chemistry</subject><subject>bone graft</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes - chemistry</subject><subject>Calcium Carbonate</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Compressive Strength</subject><subject>Dental Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Durapatite - chemistry</subject><subject>FTIR</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hydroxyapatite</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mercury - chemistry</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>morphology</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Powders</subject><subject>Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Transplantation, Heterologous</subject><subject>X-Ray Diffraction</subject><issn>1552-4973</issn><issn>1552-4981</issn><issn>1552-4981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0Utv1DAUBeAIgegDVuyRN4gFyuBHPLaXMIIWVB5CPCQ21rXjaFzieLATtemvx9MZhh1d2bK-eyzdU1VPCF4QjOnLSxMWZsEIp-pedUw4p3WjJLl_uAt2VJ3kfFnwEnP2sDoiSuFGUnxc3Xxez9nbaNcueAs9smtIYEeX_A2MPg4odsj4GGD7BH1GNoYQh35GU3Yt8gNq3TD6PKYZQUYmDg7lyeTRj9Pocr2KYQPJ55J05cc1Wk8Bhlv2qHrQlUD3eH-eVt_evvm6Oq8vPp29W726qG2jlKoZGK461ZAlMAOdYK3i0hIDLcFcNLjDLSNEUmBWUCZ5K2QnpCGtZIAx7thp9XyXu0nx9-TyqIPP1vU9DC5OWUvJMFnSht8thWqEKlu9UwrGpJSUbOWLnbQp5pxcpzfJB0izJlhv-9OlP230bX9FP93nTia49p_dF1bAsz2AXOrqEgzW54OjtGkwZqQ4snNXvnfz__7U719_-Pt5vZspbbrrwwykX3opmOD6x8czLdX387KHL_on-wNT38Ni</recordid><startdate>201002</startdate><enddate>201002</enddate><creator>Figueiredo, Margarida</creator><creator>Henriques, Jose</creator><creator>Martins, Gabriela</creator><creator>Guerra, Fernando</creator><creator>Judas, Fernando</creator><creator>Figueiredo, Helena</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201002</creationdate><title>Physicochemical characterization of biomaterials commonly used in dentistry as bone substitutes-Comparison with human bone</title><author>Figueiredo, Margarida ; Henriques, Jose ; Martins, Gabriela ; Guerra, Fernando ; Judas, Fernando ; Figueiredo, Helena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4999-3ab59f9416a3baf73d958c1bad105740f0d31182a3c72385d78f78b1d83a000f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthozoa - chemistry</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone and Bones - chemistry</topic><topic>bone graft</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes - chemistry</topic><topic>Calcium Carbonate</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Compressive Strength</topic><topic>Dental Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Durapatite - chemistry</topic><topic>FTIR</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hydroxyapatite</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mercury - chemistry</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>morphology</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Powders</topic><topic>Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Transplantation, Heterologous</topic><topic>X-Ray Diffraction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Margarida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henriques, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerra, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judas, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Helena</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Figueiredo, Margarida</au><au>Henriques, Jose</au><au>Martins, Gabriela</au><au>Guerra, Fernando</au><au>Judas, Fernando</au><au>Figueiredo, Helena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physicochemical characterization of biomaterials commonly used in dentistry as bone substitutes-Comparison with human bone</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials</jtitle><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><date>2010-02</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>92B</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>409</spage><epage>419</epage><pages>409-419</pages><issn>1552-4973</issn><issn>1552-4981</issn><eissn>1552-4981</eissn><abstract>The present work focuses on the physicochemical characterization of selected mineral‐based biomaterials that are frequently used in dental applications. The selected materials are commercially available as granules from different biological origins: bovine, porcine, and coralline. Natural and calcined human bone were used for comparison purposes. Besides a classical rationalization of chemical composition and crystallinity, a major emphasis was placed on the measurement of various morphostructural properties such as particle size, porosity, density, and specific surface area. Such properties are crucial to acquiring a full interpretation of the in vivo performance. The studied samples exhibited distinct particle sizes (between 200 and 1000 μm) and shapes. Mercury intrusion revealed not only that the total sample porosity varied considerably (33% for OsteoBiol®, 50% for PepGen P‐15®, and 60% for BioOss®) but also that a significant percentage of that porosity corresponded to submicron pores. Biocoral® was not analyzed by this technique as it possesses larger pores than those of the porosimeter upper limit. The density values determined for the calcined samples were close to the theoretical values of hydroxyapatite. However, the values for the collagenated samples were lower, in accordance with their lower mineral content. The specific surface areas ranged from less than 1 m2/g (Biocoral) up to 60 m2/g (BioOss). The chemical and phase composition of most of the samples, the exception being Biocoral (aragonite), were hydroxyapatite based. Nonetheless, the samples exhibited different organic material content as a consequence of the distinct heat treatments that each had received. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2010</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>19904820</pmid><doi>10.1002/jbm.b.31529</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1552-4973 |
ispartof | Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2010-02, Vol.92B (2), p.409-419 |
issn | 1552-4973 1552-4981 1552-4981 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883016245 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animals Anthozoa - chemistry Biocompatible Materials - chemistry Biological and medical sciences Bone and Bones - chemistry bone graft Bone Substitutes - chemistry Calcium Carbonate Cattle Compressive Strength Dental Materials - chemistry Durapatite - chemistry FTIR Gases Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics Humans hydroxyapatite Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics Medical sciences Mercury - chemistry Microscopy, Electron, Scanning morphology Particle Size Porosity Powders Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Swine Transplantation, Heterologous X-Ray Diffraction |
title | Physicochemical characterization of biomaterials commonly used in dentistry as bone substitutes-Comparison with human bone |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T16%3A08%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physicochemical%20characterization%20of%20biomaterials%20commonly%20used%20in%20dentistry%20as%20bone%20substitutes-Comparison%20with%20human%20bone&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomedical%20materials%20research.%20Part%20B,%20Applied%20biomaterials&rft.au=Figueiredo,%20Margarida&rft.date=2010-02&rft.volume=92B&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=409&rft.epage=419&rft.pages=409-419&rft.issn=1552-4973&rft.eissn=1552-4981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jbm.b.31529&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E879479155%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733888215&rft_id=info:pmid/19904820&rfr_iscdi=true |