Physicochemical characterization of biomaterials commonly used in dentistry as bone substitutes-Comparison with human bone

The present work focuses on the physicochemical characterization of selected mineral‐based biomaterials that are frequently used in dental applications. The selected materials are commercially available as granules from different biological origins: bovine, porcine, and coralline. Natural and calcin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials Applied biomaterials, 2010-02, Vol.92B (2), p.409-419
Hauptverfasser: Figueiredo, Margarida, Henriques, Jose, Martins, Gabriela, Guerra, Fernando, Judas, Fernando, Figueiredo, Helena
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 419
container_issue 2
container_start_page 409
container_title Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials
container_volume 92B
creator Figueiredo, Margarida
Henriques, Jose
Martins, Gabriela
Guerra, Fernando
Judas, Fernando
Figueiredo, Helena
description The present work focuses on the physicochemical characterization of selected mineral‐based biomaterials that are frequently used in dental applications. The selected materials are commercially available as granules from different biological origins: bovine, porcine, and coralline. Natural and calcined human bone were used for comparison purposes. Besides a classical rationalization of chemical composition and crystallinity, a major emphasis was placed on the measurement of various morphostructural properties such as particle size, porosity, density, and specific surface area. Such properties are crucial to acquiring a full interpretation of the in vivo performance. The studied samples exhibited distinct particle sizes (between 200 and 1000 μm) and shapes. Mercury intrusion revealed not only that the total sample porosity varied considerably (33% for OsteoBiol®, 50% for PepGen P‐15®, and 60% for BioOss®) but also that a significant percentage of that porosity corresponded to submicron pores. Biocoral® was not analyzed by this technique as it possesses larger pores than those of the porosimeter upper limit. The density values determined for the calcined samples were close to the theoretical values of hydroxyapatite. However, the values for the collagenated samples were lower, in accordance with their lower mineral content. The specific surface areas ranged from less than 1 m2/g (Biocoral) up to 60 m2/g (BioOss). The chemical and phase composition of most of the samples, the exception being Biocoral (aragonite), were hydroxyapatite based. Nonetheless, the samples exhibited different organic material content as a consequence of the distinct heat treatments that each had received. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2010
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jbm.b.31529
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883016245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>879479155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4999-3ab59f9416a3baf73d958c1bad105740f0d31182a3c72385d78f78b1d83a000f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0Utv1DAUBeAIgegDVuyRN4gFyuBHPLaXMIIWVB5CPCQ21rXjaFzieLATtemvx9MZhh1d2bK-eyzdU1VPCF4QjOnLSxMWZsEIp-pedUw4p3WjJLl_uAt2VJ3kfFnwEnP2sDoiSuFGUnxc3Xxez9nbaNcueAs9smtIYEeX_A2MPg4odsj4GGD7BH1GNoYQh35GU3Yt8gNq3TD6PKYZQUYmDg7lyeTRj9Pocr2KYQPJ55J05cc1Wk8Bhlv2qHrQlUD3eH-eVt_evvm6Oq8vPp29W726qG2jlKoZGK461ZAlMAOdYK3i0hIDLcFcNLjDLSNEUmBWUCZ5K2QnpCGtZIAx7thp9XyXu0nx9-TyqIPP1vU9DC5OWUvJMFnSht8thWqEKlu9UwrGpJSUbOWLnbQp5pxcpzfJB0izJlhv-9OlP230bX9FP93nTia49p_dF1bAsz2AXOrqEgzW54OjtGkwZqQ4snNXvnfz__7U719_-Pt5vZspbbrrwwykX3opmOD6x8czLdX387KHL_on-wNT38Ni</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733888215</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physicochemical characterization of biomaterials commonly used in dentistry as bone substitutes-Comparison with human bone</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Figueiredo, Margarida ; Henriques, Jose ; Martins, Gabriela ; Guerra, Fernando ; Judas, Fernando ; Figueiredo, Helena</creator><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Margarida ; Henriques, Jose ; Martins, Gabriela ; Guerra, Fernando ; Judas, Fernando ; Figueiredo, Helena</creatorcontrib><description>The present work focuses on the physicochemical characterization of selected mineral‐based biomaterials that are frequently used in dental applications. The selected materials are commercially available as granules from different biological origins: bovine, porcine, and coralline. Natural and calcined human bone were used for comparison purposes. Besides a classical rationalization of chemical composition and crystallinity, a major emphasis was placed on the measurement of various morphostructural properties such as particle size, porosity, density, and specific surface area. Such properties are crucial to acquiring a full interpretation of the in vivo performance. The studied samples exhibited distinct particle sizes (between 200 and 1000 μm) and shapes. Mercury intrusion revealed not only that the total sample porosity varied considerably (33% for OsteoBiol®, 50% for PepGen P‐15®, and 60% for BioOss®) but also that a significant percentage of that porosity corresponded to submicron pores. Biocoral® was not analyzed by this technique as it possesses larger pores than those of the porosimeter upper limit. The density values determined for the calcined samples were close to the theoretical values of hydroxyapatite. However, the values for the collagenated samples were lower, in accordance with their lower mineral content. The specific surface areas ranged from less than 1 m2/g (Biocoral) up to 60 m2/g (BioOss). The chemical and phase composition of most of the samples, the exception being Biocoral (aragonite), were hydroxyapatite based. Nonetheless, the samples exhibited different organic material content as a consequence of the distinct heat treatments that each had received. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2010</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-4973</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1552-4981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31529</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19904820</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anthozoa - chemistry ; Biocompatible Materials - chemistry ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone and Bones - chemistry ; bone graft ; Bone Substitutes - chemistry ; Calcium Carbonate ; Cattle ; Compressive Strength ; Dental Materials - chemistry ; Durapatite - chemistry ; FTIR ; Gases ; Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics ; Humans ; hydroxyapatite ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics ; Medical sciences ; Mercury - chemistry ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; morphology ; Particle Size ; Porosity ; Powders ; Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Swine ; Transplantation, Heterologous ; X-Ray Diffraction</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2010-02, Vol.92B (2), p.409-419</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4999-3ab59f9416a3baf73d958c1bad105740f0d31182a3c72385d78f78b1d83a000f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4999-3ab59f9416a3baf73d958c1bad105740f0d31182a3c72385d78f78b1d83a000f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjbm.b.31529$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjbm.b.31529$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22440031$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19904820$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Margarida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henriques, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerra, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judas, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Helena</creatorcontrib><title>Physicochemical characterization of biomaterials commonly used in dentistry as bone substitutes-Comparison with human bone</title><title>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials</title><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><description>The present work focuses on the physicochemical characterization of selected mineral‐based biomaterials that are frequently used in dental applications. The selected materials are commercially available as granules from different biological origins: bovine, porcine, and coralline. Natural and calcined human bone were used for comparison purposes. Besides a classical rationalization of chemical composition and crystallinity, a major emphasis was placed on the measurement of various morphostructural properties such as particle size, porosity, density, and specific surface area. Such properties are crucial to acquiring a full interpretation of the in vivo performance. The studied samples exhibited distinct particle sizes (between 200 and 1000 μm) and shapes. Mercury intrusion revealed not only that the total sample porosity varied considerably (33% for OsteoBiol®, 50% for PepGen P‐15®, and 60% for BioOss®) but also that a significant percentage of that porosity corresponded to submicron pores. Biocoral® was not analyzed by this technique as it possesses larger pores than those of the porosimeter upper limit. The density values determined for the calcined samples were close to the theoretical values of hydroxyapatite. However, the values for the collagenated samples were lower, in accordance with their lower mineral content. The specific surface areas ranged from less than 1 m2/g (Biocoral) up to 60 m2/g (BioOss). The chemical and phase composition of most of the samples, the exception being Biocoral (aragonite), were hydroxyapatite based. Nonetheless, the samples exhibited different organic material content as a consequence of the distinct heat treatments that each had received. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2010</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthozoa - chemistry</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone and Bones - chemistry</subject><subject>bone graft</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes - chemistry</subject><subject>Calcium Carbonate</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Compressive Strength</subject><subject>Dental Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Durapatite - chemistry</subject><subject>FTIR</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hydroxyapatite</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mercury - chemistry</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>morphology</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Powders</subject><subject>Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Transplantation, Heterologous</subject><subject>X-Ray Diffraction</subject><issn>1552-4973</issn><issn>1552-4981</issn><issn>1552-4981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0Utv1DAUBeAIgegDVuyRN4gFyuBHPLaXMIIWVB5CPCQ21rXjaFzieLATtemvx9MZhh1d2bK-eyzdU1VPCF4QjOnLSxMWZsEIp-pedUw4p3WjJLl_uAt2VJ3kfFnwEnP2sDoiSuFGUnxc3Xxez9nbaNcueAs9smtIYEeX_A2MPg4odsj4GGD7BH1GNoYQh35GU3Yt8gNq3TD6PKYZQUYmDg7lyeTRj9Pocr2KYQPJ55J05cc1Wk8Bhlv2qHrQlUD3eH-eVt_evvm6Oq8vPp29W726qG2jlKoZGK461ZAlMAOdYK3i0hIDLcFcNLjDLSNEUmBWUCZ5K2QnpCGtZIAx7thp9XyXu0nx9-TyqIPP1vU9DC5OWUvJMFnSht8thWqEKlu9UwrGpJSUbOWLnbQp5pxcpzfJB0izJlhv-9OlP230bX9FP93nTia49p_dF1bAsz2AXOrqEgzW54OjtGkwZqQ4snNXvnfz__7U719_-Pt5vZspbbrrwwykX3opmOD6x8czLdX387KHL_on-wNT38Ni</recordid><startdate>201002</startdate><enddate>201002</enddate><creator>Figueiredo, Margarida</creator><creator>Henriques, Jose</creator><creator>Martins, Gabriela</creator><creator>Guerra, Fernando</creator><creator>Judas, Fernando</creator><creator>Figueiredo, Helena</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201002</creationdate><title>Physicochemical characterization of biomaterials commonly used in dentistry as bone substitutes-Comparison with human bone</title><author>Figueiredo, Margarida ; Henriques, Jose ; Martins, Gabriela ; Guerra, Fernando ; Judas, Fernando ; Figueiredo, Helena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4999-3ab59f9416a3baf73d958c1bad105740f0d31182a3c72385d78f78b1d83a000f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthozoa - chemistry</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone and Bones - chemistry</topic><topic>bone graft</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes - chemistry</topic><topic>Calcium Carbonate</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Compressive Strength</topic><topic>Dental Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Durapatite - chemistry</topic><topic>FTIR</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hydroxyapatite</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mercury - chemistry</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>morphology</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Powders</topic><topic>Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Transplantation, Heterologous</topic><topic>X-Ray Diffraction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Margarida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henriques, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerra, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judas, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Helena</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Figueiredo, Margarida</au><au>Henriques, Jose</au><au>Martins, Gabriela</au><au>Guerra, Fernando</au><au>Judas, Fernando</au><au>Figueiredo, Helena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physicochemical characterization of biomaterials commonly used in dentistry as bone substitutes-Comparison with human bone</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials</jtitle><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><date>2010-02</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>92B</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>409</spage><epage>419</epage><pages>409-419</pages><issn>1552-4973</issn><issn>1552-4981</issn><eissn>1552-4981</eissn><abstract>The present work focuses on the physicochemical characterization of selected mineral‐based biomaterials that are frequently used in dental applications. The selected materials are commercially available as granules from different biological origins: bovine, porcine, and coralline. Natural and calcined human bone were used for comparison purposes. Besides a classical rationalization of chemical composition and crystallinity, a major emphasis was placed on the measurement of various morphostructural properties such as particle size, porosity, density, and specific surface area. Such properties are crucial to acquiring a full interpretation of the in vivo performance. The studied samples exhibited distinct particle sizes (between 200 and 1000 μm) and shapes. Mercury intrusion revealed not only that the total sample porosity varied considerably (33% for OsteoBiol®, 50% for PepGen P‐15®, and 60% for BioOss®) but also that a significant percentage of that porosity corresponded to submicron pores. Biocoral® was not analyzed by this technique as it possesses larger pores than those of the porosimeter upper limit. The density values determined for the calcined samples were close to the theoretical values of hydroxyapatite. However, the values for the collagenated samples were lower, in accordance with their lower mineral content. The specific surface areas ranged from less than 1 m2/g (Biocoral) up to 60 m2/g (BioOss). The chemical and phase composition of most of the samples, the exception being Biocoral (aragonite), were hydroxyapatite based. Nonetheless, the samples exhibited different organic material content as a consequence of the distinct heat treatments that each had received. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2010</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>19904820</pmid><doi>10.1002/jbm.b.31529</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1552-4973
ispartof Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2010-02, Vol.92B (2), p.409-419
issn 1552-4973
1552-4981
1552-4981
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883016245
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animals
Anthozoa - chemistry
Biocompatible Materials - chemistry
Biological and medical sciences
Bone and Bones - chemistry
bone graft
Bone Substitutes - chemistry
Calcium Carbonate
Cattle
Compressive Strength
Dental Materials - chemistry
Durapatite - chemistry
FTIR
Gases
Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics
Humans
hydroxyapatite
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics
Medical sciences
Mercury - chemistry
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
morphology
Particle Size
Porosity
Powders
Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Swine
Transplantation, Heterologous
X-Ray Diffraction
title Physicochemical characterization of biomaterials commonly used in dentistry as bone substitutes-Comparison with human bone
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T16%3A08%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physicochemical%20characterization%20of%20biomaterials%20commonly%20used%20in%20dentistry%20as%20bone%20substitutes-Comparison%20with%20human%20bone&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomedical%20materials%20research.%20Part%20B,%20Applied%20biomaterials&rft.au=Figueiredo,%20Margarida&rft.date=2010-02&rft.volume=92B&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=409&rft.epage=419&rft.pages=409-419&rft.issn=1552-4973&rft.eissn=1552-4981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jbm.b.31529&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E879479155%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733888215&rft_id=info:pmid/19904820&rfr_iscdi=true