Bone properties surrounding hydroxyapatite-coated custom osseous integrated dental implants

Calcium phosphate (hydroxyapatite or HA) coatings have been applied to Custom Osseous Integrated Implants (COIIs) to improve the quality of the bone‐implant integration, yet little is known concerning the biomechanical properties of bone surrounding the HA‐coated implants in humans over the long ter...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials Applied biomaterials, 2010-10, Vol.95B (1), p.218-224
Hauptverfasser: Baker, M. I., Eberhardt, A. W., Martin, D. M., McGwin, G., Lemons, J. E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 224
container_issue 1
container_start_page 218
container_title Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials
container_volume 95B
creator Baker, M. I.
Eberhardt, A. W.
Martin, D. M.
McGwin, G.
Lemons, J. E.
description Calcium phosphate (hydroxyapatite or HA) coatings have been applied to Custom Osseous Integrated Implants (COIIs) to improve the quality of the bone‐implant integration, yet little is known concerning the biomechanical properties of bone surrounding the HA‐coated implants in humans over the long term. The purpose of this study was to characterize the mechanical and histomorphometric properties of the bone along the implant interface. Specimens were prepared from three similar mandibular implants that were functional in three female patients for about 11 years. Histomorphometric analyses showed bone‐implant contact averaging 75% for all specimens. Area coverage of residual HA‐coating ranged from 52 to 70%. When compared with previous studies, these results show a relatively high percentage of residual HA after a decade in vivo. Nanoindentation showed similar average values of hardness and modulus (p = 0.53 and p = 0.56, respectively) comparing bone adjacent to residual HA‐coating and regions where the coating was absent. The elastic modulus was significantly lower for bone near the bone‐implant interface (1000 μm) from the interface (p = 0.05), thereby reflecting different properties of the bone near these interfaces. Backscattered electron imaging showed darker gray levels which indicated decreased mineral content in bone adjacent to the implant, consistent with the nanoindentation results. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2010.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jbm.b.31693
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883015837</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>754003939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4663-cdecce70ac04a2c04d1235a19f4f53a085faaa9327eac21df138135b4bc4d2963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDlPBDEMhSME4lio6NF0FGiWHJM5SkCcWi4BoqCIMokHAnORZAT77wm7sCXIkm3Jn5_sh9A2wWOCMd1_LZtxOWYkLdgSWiec0zgpcrK86DO2hjacew1wijlbRWsUZ5QXPF9HT4ddC1Fvux6sN-AiN1jbDa027XP0MtW2-5zKXnrjIVad9KAjNTjfNVHnHHSDi0zr4dnOJhpaL-vINH0tW-820UolawdbP3WEHk6O74_O4sn16fnRwSRWSZqyWGlQCjIsFU4kDUkTyrgkRZVUnEmc80pKWTCagVSU6IqwnDBeJqVKNC1SNkK7c93wxvsAzovGOAV1OOL7QpHnDBOes-xfMuMJxqwIMUJ7c1LZ8KiFSvTWNNJOBcHi23YRbBelmNke6J0f3aFsQC_YX58DQObAh6lh-peWuDi8_BWN5zvGefhc7Ej7JtKMZVw8Xp2Ku4Tg28v7G3HBvgCQtZ7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>754003939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bone properties surrounding hydroxyapatite-coated custom osseous integrated dental implants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Baker, M. I. ; Eberhardt, A. W. ; Martin, D. M. ; McGwin, G. ; Lemons, J. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Baker, M. I. ; Eberhardt, A. W. ; Martin, D. M. ; McGwin, G. ; Lemons, J. E.</creatorcontrib><description>Calcium phosphate (hydroxyapatite or HA) coatings have been applied to Custom Osseous Integrated Implants (COIIs) to improve the quality of the bone‐implant integration, yet little is known concerning the biomechanical properties of bone surrounding the HA‐coated implants in humans over the long term. The purpose of this study was to characterize the mechanical and histomorphometric properties of the bone along the implant interface. Specimens were prepared from three similar mandibular implants that were functional in three female patients for about 11 years. Histomorphometric analyses showed bone‐implant contact averaging 75% for all specimens. Area coverage of residual HA‐coating ranged from 52 to 70%. When compared with previous studies, these results show a relatively high percentage of residual HA after a decade in vivo. Nanoindentation showed similar average values of hardness and modulus (p = 0.53 and p = 0.56, respectively) comparing bone adjacent to residual HA‐coating and regions where the coating was absent. The elastic modulus was significantly lower for bone near the bone‐implant interface (&lt;200 μm) as compared with bone distant (&gt;1000 μm) from the interface (p = 0.05), thereby reflecting different properties of the bone near these interfaces. Backscattered electron imaging showed darker gray levels which indicated decreased mineral content in bone adjacent to the implant, consistent with the nanoindentation results. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2010.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-4973</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1552-4981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31693</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20725958</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena ; bone ; Bone and Bones - drug effects ; Coated Materials, Biocompatible - chemistry ; dental implants ; Dental Implants - adverse effects ; Durapatite - pharmacology ; Elasticity ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; hydroxyapatite ; Mandible ; nanoindentation ; Osseointegration - drug effects</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2010-10, Vol.95B (1), p.218-224</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4663-cdecce70ac04a2c04d1235a19f4f53a085faaa9327eac21df138135b4bc4d2963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4663-cdecce70ac04a2c04d1235a19f4f53a085faaa9327eac21df138135b4bc4d2963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjbm.b.31693$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjbm.b.31693$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20725958$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baker, M. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eberhardt, A. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGwin, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemons, J. E.</creatorcontrib><title>Bone properties surrounding hydroxyapatite-coated custom osseous integrated dental implants</title><title>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials</title><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><description>Calcium phosphate (hydroxyapatite or HA) coatings have been applied to Custom Osseous Integrated Implants (COIIs) to improve the quality of the bone‐implant integration, yet little is known concerning the biomechanical properties of bone surrounding the HA‐coated implants in humans over the long term. The purpose of this study was to characterize the mechanical and histomorphometric properties of the bone along the implant interface. Specimens were prepared from three similar mandibular implants that were functional in three female patients for about 11 years. Histomorphometric analyses showed bone‐implant contact averaging 75% for all specimens. Area coverage of residual HA‐coating ranged from 52 to 70%. When compared with previous studies, these results show a relatively high percentage of residual HA after a decade in vivo. Nanoindentation showed similar average values of hardness and modulus (p = 0.53 and p = 0.56, respectively) comparing bone adjacent to residual HA‐coating and regions where the coating was absent. The elastic modulus was significantly lower for bone near the bone‐implant interface (&lt;200 μm) as compared with bone distant (&gt;1000 μm) from the interface (p = 0.05), thereby reflecting different properties of the bone near these interfaces. Backscattered electron imaging showed darker gray levels which indicated decreased mineral content in bone adjacent to the implant, consistent with the nanoindentation results. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2010.</description><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>bone</subject><subject>Bone and Bones - drug effects</subject><subject>Coated Materials, Biocompatible - chemistry</subject><subject>dental implants</subject><subject>Dental Implants - adverse effects</subject><subject>Durapatite - pharmacology</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hydroxyapatite</subject><subject>Mandible</subject><subject>nanoindentation</subject><subject>Osseointegration - drug effects</subject><issn>1552-4973</issn><issn>1552-4981</issn><issn>1552-4981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkDlPBDEMhSME4lio6NF0FGiWHJM5SkCcWi4BoqCIMokHAnORZAT77wm7sCXIkm3Jn5_sh9A2wWOCMd1_LZtxOWYkLdgSWiec0zgpcrK86DO2hjacew1wijlbRWsUZ5QXPF9HT4ddC1Fvux6sN-AiN1jbDa027XP0MtW2-5zKXnrjIVad9KAjNTjfNVHnHHSDi0zr4dnOJhpaL-vINH0tW-820UolawdbP3WEHk6O74_O4sn16fnRwSRWSZqyWGlQCjIsFU4kDUkTyrgkRZVUnEmc80pKWTCagVSU6IqwnDBeJqVKNC1SNkK7c93wxvsAzovGOAV1OOL7QpHnDBOes-xfMuMJxqwIMUJ7c1LZ8KiFSvTWNNJOBcHi23YRbBelmNke6J0f3aFsQC_YX58DQObAh6lh-peWuDi8_BWN5zvGefhc7Ej7JtKMZVw8Xp2Ku4Tg28v7G3HBvgCQtZ7w</recordid><startdate>201010</startdate><enddate>201010</enddate><creator>Baker, M. I.</creator><creator>Eberhardt, A. W.</creator><creator>Martin, D. M.</creator><creator>McGwin, G.</creator><creator>Lemons, J. E.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201010</creationdate><title>Bone properties surrounding hydroxyapatite-coated custom osseous integrated dental implants</title><author>Baker, M. I. ; Eberhardt, A. W. ; Martin, D. M. ; McGwin, G. ; Lemons, J. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4663-cdecce70ac04a2c04d1235a19f4f53a085faaa9327eac21df138135b4bc4d2963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>bone</topic><topic>Bone and Bones - drug effects</topic><topic>Coated Materials, Biocompatible - chemistry</topic><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>Dental Implants - adverse effects</topic><topic>Durapatite - pharmacology</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hydroxyapatite</topic><topic>Mandible</topic><topic>nanoindentation</topic><topic>Osseointegration - drug effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baker, M. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eberhardt, A. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGwin, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemons, J. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baker, M. I.</au><au>Eberhardt, A. W.</au><au>Martin, D. M.</au><au>McGwin, G.</au><au>Lemons, J. E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bone properties surrounding hydroxyapatite-coated custom osseous integrated dental implants</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials</jtitle><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><date>2010-10</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>95B</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>218</spage><epage>224</epage><pages>218-224</pages><issn>1552-4973</issn><issn>1552-4981</issn><eissn>1552-4981</eissn><abstract>Calcium phosphate (hydroxyapatite or HA) coatings have been applied to Custom Osseous Integrated Implants (COIIs) to improve the quality of the bone‐implant integration, yet little is known concerning the biomechanical properties of bone surrounding the HA‐coated implants in humans over the long term. The purpose of this study was to characterize the mechanical and histomorphometric properties of the bone along the implant interface. Specimens were prepared from three similar mandibular implants that were functional in three female patients for about 11 years. Histomorphometric analyses showed bone‐implant contact averaging 75% for all specimens. Area coverage of residual HA‐coating ranged from 52 to 70%. When compared with previous studies, these results show a relatively high percentage of residual HA after a decade in vivo. Nanoindentation showed similar average values of hardness and modulus (p = 0.53 and p = 0.56, respectively) comparing bone adjacent to residual HA‐coating and regions where the coating was absent. The elastic modulus was significantly lower for bone near the bone‐implant interface (&lt;200 μm) as compared with bone distant (&gt;1000 μm) from the interface (p = 0.05), thereby reflecting different properties of the bone near these interfaces. Backscattered electron imaging showed darker gray levels which indicated decreased mineral content in bone adjacent to the implant, consistent with the nanoindentation results. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2010.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>20725958</pmid><doi>10.1002/jbm.b.31693</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1552-4973
ispartof Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2010-10, Vol.95B (1), p.218-224
issn 1552-4973
1552-4981
1552-4981
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883015837
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Biomechanical Phenomena
bone
Bone and Bones - drug effects
Coated Materials, Biocompatible - chemistry
dental implants
Dental Implants - adverse effects
Durapatite - pharmacology
Elasticity
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
hydroxyapatite
Mandible
nanoindentation
Osseointegration - drug effects
title Bone properties surrounding hydroxyapatite-coated custom osseous integrated dental implants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T19%3A50%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bone%20properties%20surrounding%20hydroxyapatite-coated%20custom%20osseous%20integrated%20dental%20implants&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomedical%20materials%20research.%20Part%20B,%20Applied%20biomaterials&rft.au=Baker,%20M.%20I.&rft.date=2010-10&rft.volume=95B&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=218&rft.epage=224&rft.pages=218-224&rft.issn=1552-4973&rft.eissn=1552-4981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jbm.b.31693&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E754003939%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=754003939&rft_id=info:pmid/20725958&rfr_iscdi=true