Efficacy of dinoprostone and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women

to determine the efficacy and safety of dinoprostone and misoprostol for the induction of vaginal childbirth, with or without the use of oxytocin in nulliparous women. in this retrospective observational study, 238 patients were subjected to the induction of delivery from January 2008 to February 20...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia 2011-03, Vol.33 (3), p.118-122
Hauptverfasser: Oliveira, Tenilson Amaral, Melo, Elisa Matias Vieira de, Aquino, Márcia Maria Auxiliadora de, Mariani Neto, Corintio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:por
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 122
container_issue 3
container_start_page 118
container_title Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia
container_volume 33
creator Oliveira, Tenilson Amaral
Melo, Elisa Matias Vieira de
Aquino, Márcia Maria Auxiliadora de
Mariani Neto, Corintio
description to determine the efficacy and safety of dinoprostone and misoprostol for the induction of vaginal childbirth, with or without the use of oxytocin in nulliparous women. in this retrospective observational study, 238 patients were subjected to the induction of delivery from January 2008 to February 2010 with the use of misoprostol 25 mcg by the vaginal route or a pessary containing 10 mg of dinoprostone. A total of 184 patients were selected, with the following characteristics: nulliparous, gestational age of 37-42 weeks, singleton pregnancies, cephalic presentation, intact membranes, and Bishop score < 3. Obstetric and neonatal data were analyzed and compared between groups. The Student t-test, chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis, with the level of significance set at p
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883008221</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>883008221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p140t-eb956914e8cc85e88e9639773ee0afcf201baca6611b9e4ed0e73f63a0ffd3653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMtqwzAQRUWhJGmaXyjadWXQw5alZQnpAwKh0K6NLI1ARZZcy6bk7yuou7kzDIfhcG_QjkoiKsW52qK7nL8IYS2X9QZtGZVMKVXv0PvJOW-0ueLksPUxjVPKc4qAdbR48Hk9BOzShIPuS_poFzP7FMuG4xKCH_WUlox_0gDxHt06HTIc1rlHn8-nj-Nrdb68vB2fztVIazJX0KtGKFqDNEY2ICUowVXbcgCinXGM0F4bLQSlvYIaLIGWO8E1cc5y0fA9evz7WwS_F8hzV2wNhKAjFJlOSk6IZIwW8mEll34A242TH_R07f5b4L-amFmq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>883008221</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of dinoprostone and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Oliveira, Tenilson Amaral ; Melo, Elisa Matias Vieira de ; Aquino, Márcia Maria Auxiliadora de ; Mariani Neto, Corintio</creator><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Tenilson Amaral ; Melo, Elisa Matias Vieira de ; Aquino, Márcia Maria Auxiliadora de ; Mariani Neto, Corintio</creatorcontrib><description>to determine the efficacy and safety of dinoprostone and misoprostol for the induction of vaginal childbirth, with or without the use of oxytocin in nulliparous women. in this retrospective observational study, 238 patients were subjected to the induction of delivery from January 2008 to February 2010 with the use of misoprostol 25 mcg by the vaginal route or a pessary containing 10 mg of dinoprostone. A total of 184 patients were selected, with the following characteristics: nulliparous, gestational age of 37-42 weeks, singleton pregnancies, cephalic presentation, intact membranes, and Bishop score &lt; 3. Obstetric and neonatal data were analyzed and compared between groups. The Student t-test, chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis, with the level of significance set at p&lt;0.05. the rate of vaginal childbirth did not differ significantly in patients who used misoprostol and dinoprostone (43.2% versus 50%; p = 0.35, respectively). The ripening of cervix was higher in the group treated with misoprostol (87.3% versus 75.6%, p=0.04). The use of oxytocin was necessary in 58.8% of the misoprostol group and 57.3% in the dinoprostone group after the ripening of cervix. Failed induction was the primary indication of caesarean section delivery in both groups, with no significant difference between them. Fetal and maternal adverse events, such as tachysystole and Apgar scores were similar. dinoprostone and misoprostol are both effective for vaginal childbirth induction, although they need to be combined with oxytocin. They showed a similar safety profile, with misoprostol being more efficient regarding cervical ripening.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1806-9339</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21829994</identifier><language>por</language><publisher>Brazil</publisher><subject>Dinoprostone - therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Labor, Induced ; Misoprostol - therapeutic use ; Oxytocics - therapeutic use ; Parity ; Pregnancy ; Retrospective Studies ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia, 2011-03, Vol.33 (3), p.118-122</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21829994$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Tenilson Amaral</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, Elisa Matias Vieira de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aquino, Márcia Maria Auxiliadora de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariani Neto, Corintio</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of dinoprostone and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women</title><title>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia</title><addtitle>Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet</addtitle><description>to determine the efficacy and safety of dinoprostone and misoprostol for the induction of vaginal childbirth, with or without the use of oxytocin in nulliparous women. in this retrospective observational study, 238 patients were subjected to the induction of delivery from January 2008 to February 2010 with the use of misoprostol 25 mcg by the vaginal route or a pessary containing 10 mg of dinoprostone. A total of 184 patients were selected, with the following characteristics: nulliparous, gestational age of 37-42 weeks, singleton pregnancies, cephalic presentation, intact membranes, and Bishop score &lt; 3. Obstetric and neonatal data were analyzed and compared between groups. The Student t-test, chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis, with the level of significance set at p&lt;0.05. the rate of vaginal childbirth did not differ significantly in patients who used misoprostol and dinoprostone (43.2% versus 50%; p = 0.35, respectively). The ripening of cervix was higher in the group treated with misoprostol (87.3% versus 75.6%, p=0.04). The use of oxytocin was necessary in 58.8% of the misoprostol group and 57.3% in the dinoprostone group after the ripening of cervix. Failed induction was the primary indication of caesarean section delivery in both groups, with no significant difference between them. Fetal and maternal adverse events, such as tachysystole and Apgar scores were similar. dinoprostone and misoprostol are both effective for vaginal childbirth induction, although they need to be combined with oxytocin. They showed a similar safety profile, with misoprostol being more efficient regarding cervical ripening.</description><subject>Dinoprostone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Labor, Induced</subject><subject>Misoprostol - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Oxytocics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1806-9339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kMtqwzAQRUWhJGmaXyjadWXQw5alZQnpAwKh0K6NLI1ARZZcy6bk7yuou7kzDIfhcG_QjkoiKsW52qK7nL8IYS2X9QZtGZVMKVXv0PvJOW-0ueLksPUxjVPKc4qAdbR48Hk9BOzShIPuS_poFzP7FMuG4xKCH_WUlox_0gDxHt06HTIc1rlHn8-nj-Nrdb68vB2fztVIazJX0KtGKFqDNEY2ICUowVXbcgCinXGM0F4bLQSlvYIaLIGWO8E1cc5y0fA9evz7WwS_F8hzV2wNhKAjFJlOSk6IZIwW8mEll34A242TH_R07f5b4L-amFmq</recordid><startdate>201103</startdate><enddate>201103</enddate><creator>Oliveira, Tenilson Amaral</creator><creator>Melo, Elisa Matias Vieira de</creator><creator>Aquino, Márcia Maria Auxiliadora de</creator><creator>Mariani Neto, Corintio</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201103</creationdate><title>Efficacy of dinoprostone and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women</title><author>Oliveira, Tenilson Amaral ; Melo, Elisa Matias Vieira de ; Aquino, Márcia Maria Auxiliadora de ; Mariani Neto, Corintio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p140t-eb956914e8cc85e88e9639773ee0afcf201baca6611b9e4ed0e73f63a0ffd3653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>por</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Dinoprostone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Labor, Induced</topic><topic>Misoprostol - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Oxytocics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Tenilson Amaral</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, Elisa Matias Vieira de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aquino, Márcia Maria Auxiliadora de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariani Neto, Corintio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oliveira, Tenilson Amaral</au><au>Melo, Elisa Matias Vieira de</au><au>Aquino, Márcia Maria Auxiliadora de</au><au>Mariani Neto, Corintio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of dinoprostone and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women</atitle><jtitle>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2011-03</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>118</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>118-122</pages><eissn>1806-9339</eissn><abstract>to determine the efficacy and safety of dinoprostone and misoprostol for the induction of vaginal childbirth, with or without the use of oxytocin in nulliparous women. in this retrospective observational study, 238 patients were subjected to the induction of delivery from January 2008 to February 2010 with the use of misoprostol 25 mcg by the vaginal route or a pessary containing 10 mg of dinoprostone. A total of 184 patients were selected, with the following characteristics: nulliparous, gestational age of 37-42 weeks, singleton pregnancies, cephalic presentation, intact membranes, and Bishop score &lt; 3. Obstetric and neonatal data were analyzed and compared between groups. The Student t-test, chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis, with the level of significance set at p&lt;0.05. the rate of vaginal childbirth did not differ significantly in patients who used misoprostol and dinoprostone (43.2% versus 50%; p = 0.35, respectively). The ripening of cervix was higher in the group treated with misoprostol (87.3% versus 75.6%, p=0.04). The use of oxytocin was necessary in 58.8% of the misoprostol group and 57.3% in the dinoprostone group after the ripening of cervix. Failed induction was the primary indication of caesarean section delivery in both groups, with no significant difference between them. Fetal and maternal adverse events, such as tachysystole and Apgar scores were similar. dinoprostone and misoprostol are both effective for vaginal childbirth induction, although they need to be combined with oxytocin. They showed a similar safety profile, with misoprostol being more efficient regarding cervical ripening.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pmid>21829994</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1806-9339
ispartof Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia, 2011-03, Vol.33 (3), p.118-122
issn 1806-9339
language por
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_883008221
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Dinoprostone - therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Labor, Induced
Misoprostol - therapeutic use
Oxytocics - therapeutic use
Parity
Pregnancy
Retrospective Studies
Young Adult
title Efficacy of dinoprostone and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T06%3A47%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20dinoprostone%20and%20misoprostol%20for%20labor%20induction%20in%20nulliparous%20women&rft.jtitle=Revista%20Brasileira%20de%20ginecologia%20e%20obstetr%C3%ADcia&rft.au=Oliveira,%20Tenilson%20Amaral&rft.date=2011-03&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=118&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=118-122&rft.eissn=1806-9339&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E883008221%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=883008221&rft_id=info:pmid/21829994&rfr_iscdi=true