Telling Things Apart: The Distance Between Response Keys Influences Categorization Times
People use spatial distance to talk and think about differences between concepts, and it has been argued that using space to think about different categories provides a scaffold for the categorization process. In the current study, we investigated the possibility that the distance between response k...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological science 2011-07, Vol.22 (7), p.887-890 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 890 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 887 |
container_title | Psychological science |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Lakens, Daniël Schneider, Iris K. Jostmann, Nils B. Schubert, Thomas W. |
description | People use spatial distance to talk and think about differences between concepts, and it has been argued that using space to think about different categories provides a scaffold for the categorization process. In the current study, we investigated the possibility that the distance between response keys can influence categorization times in binary classification tasks. In line with the hypothesis that distance between response keys can facilitate response selection in a key-press version of the Stroop task, our results showed that responses on incongruent Stroop trials were significantly facilitated when participants performed the Stroop task with response keys located far apart, compared with when they performed the task with response keys located close together. These results support the idea that the spatial structuring of response options facilitates categorizations that require cognitive effort, and that people can incorporate environmental structures such as spatial distance in their thought processes. Keeping your hands apart might actually help to keep things apart in your mind. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0956797611412391 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_882620336</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25835472</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0956797611412391</sage_id><sourcerecordid>25835472</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-c0cec491aa7856a9618d05bb6b57d05d64592e328d6b792eb304ff93c68a49913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhoMo7rh696IERTy1pvIdb-v4tbggyAjemnRP9dhDT_dsqhtZf71pZnRlYTGHpEI99VYVL2OPQbwCcO61CMa64CyABqkC3GEL0NYVQXpxly3mdDHnT9gDoq3Ixyl7n51IsCZYZRbs-wq7ru03fPUj38TP9jGNb_IP-buWxtjXyN_i-BOx51-R9kNPyD_jFfHzvukmzHniyzjiZkjtrzi2Q89X7Q7pIbvXxI7w0fE9Zd8-vF8tPxUXXz6eL88uilpLPxa1qLHWAWJ03tgYLPi1MFVlK-NysLbaBIlK-rWtXI4qJXTTBFVbH3UIoE7Zy4PuPg2XE9JY7lqq81Kxx2Gi0ntppVDK_p903oMLEDL57Aa5HabU5zUyFAxIcLPc89sgCCC8BB9EpsSBqtNAlLAp96ndxXRVgihnD8ubHuaSp0fhqdrh-m_BH9My8OIIRKpj16TsUkvXnNYSpJh7FweO4gb_me72xk8O_JbGIV3rGa-MdlL9BrNxtzQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1910821890</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Telling Things Apart: The Distance Between Response Keys Influences Categorization Times</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Lakens, Daniël ; Schneider, Iris K. ; Jostmann, Nils B. ; Schubert, Thomas W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lakens, Daniël ; Schneider, Iris K. ; Jostmann, Nils B. ; Schubert, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><description>People use spatial distance to talk and think about differences between concepts, and it has been argued that using space to think about different categories provides a scaffold for the categorization process. In the current study, we investigated the possibility that the distance between response keys can influence categorization times in binary classification tasks. In line with the hypothesis that distance between response keys can facilitate response selection in a key-press version of the Stroop task, our results showed that responses on incongruent Stroop trials were significantly facilitated when participants performed the Stroop task with response keys located far apart, compared with when they performed the task with response keys located close together. These results support the idea that the spatial structuring of response options facilitates categorizations that require cognitive effort, and that people can incorporate environmental structures such as spatial distance in their thought processes. Keeping your hands apart might actually help to keep things apart in your mind.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-7976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9280</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0956797611412391</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21659635</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSYSET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Classification ; Cognition ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognition. Intelligence ; Comparative analysis ; Conceptualization ; Dualism ; Embodiment ; Experimental psychology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gestures ; Humans ; Judgment ; Male ; Mental stimulation ; Mind ; Observational research ; Physical environment ; Psychological research ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychomotor Performance ; Reaction Time ; Reasoning. Problem solving ; Research Report ; Scaffolds ; Space ; Space Perception ; Stroop effect ; Stroop task ; Stroop Test ; Visual task performance ; Visualization ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychological science, 2011-07, Vol.22 (7), p.887-890</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 Association for Psychological Science</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Jul 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-c0cec491aa7856a9618d05bb6b57d05d64592e328d6b792eb304ff93c68a49913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25835472$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25835472$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,21818,27923,27924,43620,43621,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24421200$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21659635$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lakens, Daniël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Iris K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jostmann, Nils B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><title>Telling Things Apart: The Distance Between Response Keys Influences Categorization Times</title><title>Psychological science</title><addtitle>Psychol Sci</addtitle><description>People use spatial distance to talk and think about differences between concepts, and it has been argued that using space to think about different categories provides a scaffold for the categorization process. In the current study, we investigated the possibility that the distance between response keys can influence categorization times in binary classification tasks. In line with the hypothesis that distance between response keys can facilitate response selection in a key-press version of the Stroop task, our results showed that responses on incongruent Stroop trials were significantly facilitated when participants performed the Stroop task with response keys located far apart, compared with when they performed the task with response keys located close together. These results support the idea that the spatial structuring of response options facilitates categorizations that require cognitive effort, and that people can incorporate environmental structures such as spatial distance in their thought processes. Keeping your hands apart might actually help to keep things apart in your mind.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognition. Intelligence</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Conceptualization</subject><subject>Dualism</subject><subject>Embodiment</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gestures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental stimulation</subject><subject>Mind</subject><subject>Observational research</subject><subject>Physical environment</subject><subject>Psychological research</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reasoning. Problem solving</subject><subject>Research Report</subject><subject>Scaffolds</subject><subject>Space</subject><subject>Space Perception</subject><subject>Stroop effect</subject><subject>Stroop task</subject><subject>Stroop Test</subject><subject>Visual task performance</subject><subject>Visualization</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0956-7976</issn><issn>1467-9280</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhoMo7rh696IERTy1pvIdb-v4tbggyAjemnRP9dhDT_dsqhtZf71pZnRlYTGHpEI99VYVL2OPQbwCcO61CMa64CyABqkC3GEL0NYVQXpxly3mdDHnT9gDoq3Ixyl7n51IsCZYZRbs-wq7ru03fPUj38TP9jGNb_IP-buWxtjXyN_i-BOx51-R9kNPyD_jFfHzvukmzHniyzjiZkjtrzi2Q89X7Q7pIbvXxI7w0fE9Zd8-vF8tPxUXXz6eL88uilpLPxa1qLHWAWJ03tgYLPi1MFVlK-NysLbaBIlK-rWtXI4qJXTTBFVbH3UIoE7Zy4PuPg2XE9JY7lqq81Kxx2Gi0ntppVDK_p903oMLEDL57Aa5HabU5zUyFAxIcLPc89sgCCC8BB9EpsSBqtNAlLAp96ndxXRVgihnD8ubHuaSp0fhqdrh-m_BH9My8OIIRKpj16TsUkvXnNYSpJh7FweO4gb_me72xk8O_JbGIV3rGa-MdlL9BrNxtzQ</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Lakens, Daniël</creator><creator>Schneider, Iris K.</creator><creator>Jostmann, Nils B.</creator><creator>Schubert, Thomas W.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Telling Things Apart: The Distance Between Response Keys Influences Categorization Times</title><author>Lakens, Daniël ; Schneider, Iris K. ; Jostmann, Nils B. ; Schubert, Thomas W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-c0cec491aa7856a9618d05bb6b57d05d64592e328d6b792eb304ff93c68a49913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognition. Intelligence</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Conceptualization</topic><topic>Dualism</topic><topic>Embodiment</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gestures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental stimulation</topic><topic>Mind</topic><topic>Observational research</topic><topic>Physical environment</topic><topic>Psychological research</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reasoning. Problem solving</topic><topic>Research Report</topic><topic>Scaffolds</topic><topic>Space</topic><topic>Space Perception</topic><topic>Stroop effect</topic><topic>Stroop task</topic><topic>Stroop Test</topic><topic>Visual task performance</topic><topic>Visualization</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lakens, Daniël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Iris K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jostmann, Nils B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lakens, Daniël</au><au>Schneider, Iris K.</au><au>Jostmann, Nils B.</au><au>Schubert, Thomas W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Telling Things Apart: The Distance Between Response Keys Influences Categorization Times</atitle><jtitle>Psychological science</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Sci</addtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>887</spage><epage>890</epage><pages>887-890</pages><issn>0956-7976</issn><eissn>1467-9280</eissn><coden>PSYSET</coden><abstract>People use spatial distance to talk and think about differences between concepts, and it has been argued that using space to think about different categories provides a scaffold for the categorization process. In the current study, we investigated the possibility that the distance between response keys can influence categorization times in binary classification tasks. In line with the hypothesis that distance between response keys can facilitate response selection in a key-press version of the Stroop task, our results showed that responses on incongruent Stroop trials were significantly facilitated when participants performed the Stroop task with response keys located far apart, compared with when they performed the task with response keys located close together. These results support the idea that the spatial structuring of response options facilitates categorizations that require cognitive effort, and that people can incorporate environmental structures such as spatial distance in their thought processes. Keeping your hands apart might actually help to keep things apart in your mind.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>21659635</pmid><doi>10.1177/0956797611412391</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0956-7976 |
ispartof | Psychological science, 2011-07, Vol.22 (7), p.887-890 |
issn | 0956-7976 1467-9280 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_882620336 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Classification Cognition Cognition & reasoning Cognition. Intelligence Comparative analysis Conceptualization Dualism Embodiment Experimental psychology Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gestures Humans Judgment Male Mental stimulation Mind Observational research Physical environment Psychological research Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychomotor Performance Reaction Time Reasoning. Problem solving Research Report Scaffolds Space Space Perception Stroop effect Stroop task Stroop Test Visual task performance Visualization Young Adult |
title | Telling Things Apart: The Distance Between Response Keys Influences Categorization Times |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A02%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Telling%20Things%20Apart:%20The%20Distance%20Between%20Response%20Keys%20Influences%20Categorization%20Times&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20science&rft.au=Lakens,%20Dani%C3%ABl&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=887&rft.epage=890&rft.pages=887-890&rft.issn=0956-7976&rft.eissn=1467-9280&rft.coden=PSYSET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0956797611412391&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25835472%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1910821890&rft_id=info:pmid/21659635&rft_jstor_id=25835472&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0956797611412391&rfr_iscdi=true |