Trends in Colorectal Cancer Test Use among Vulnerable Populations in the United States

Evaluating trends in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening use is critical for understanding screening implementation, and whether population groups targeted for screening are receiving it, consistent with guidelines. This study examines recent national trends in CRC test use, including among vulnerable...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention biomarkers & prevention, 2011-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1611-1621
Hauptverfasser: KLABUNDE, Carrie N, CRONIN, Kathleen A, BREEN, Nancy, WALDRON, William R, AMBS, Anita H, NADEL, Marion R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1621
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1611
container_title Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention
container_volume 20
creator KLABUNDE, Carrie N
CRONIN, Kathleen A
BREEN, Nancy
WALDRON, William R
AMBS, Anita H
NADEL, Marion R
description Evaluating trends in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening use is critical for understanding screening implementation, and whether population groups targeted for screening are receiving it, consistent with guidelines. This study examines recent national trends in CRC test use, including among vulnerable populations. We used the 2000, 2003, 2005, and 2008 National Health Interview Survey to examine national trends in CRC screening use overall and for fecal occult blood test (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. We also assessed trends by race/ethnicity, educational attainment, income, time in the United States, and access to health care. During 2000 to 2008, significant declines in FOBT and sigmoidoscopy use and significant increases in colonoscopy use and in the percentages of adults up-to-date with CRC screening occurred overall and for most population subgroups. Subgroups with consistently lower rates of colonoscopy use and being up-to-date included Hispanics; people with minimal education, low income, or no health insurance; recent immigrants; and those with no usual source of care or physician visits in the past year. Among up-to-date adults, there were few subgroup differences in the type of test by which they were up-to-date (i.e., FOBT, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy). Although use of CRC screening and colonoscopy increased among U.S. adults, including those from vulnerable populations, 45% of adults aged 50 to 75-or nearly 35 million people-were not up-to-date with screening in 2008. Continued monitoring of CRC screening rates among population subgroups with consistently low utilization is imperative. Improvement in CRC screening rates among all population groups in the United States is still needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0220
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_882102907</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>882102907</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-d6a18fd1ecd009376294b99e2a1ed93ee6fe2c75baf18badd4a83c9ce1ca2bb83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwE0C5IE4d-Wja5IgmviQkkNi4Rm7iQlHWjqQ98O_pYMDJlvW8tvUQcsrZnHOlLzlTKjOmUPPrp_uM84wJwfbIlCups7JUan_sf5kJOUrpnTFWGqUOyUTwQskil1PysozY-kSbli660EV0PQS6gNZhpEtMPV0lpLDu2lf6MoQWI1QB6VO3GQL0Tdd-R_s3pKu26dHT5x56TMfkoIaQ8GRXZ2R1c71c3GUPj7f3i6uHzEmt-swXwHXtOTrPmJFlIUxeGYMCOHojEYsahStVBTXXFXifg5bOOOQORFVpOSMXP3s3sfsYxnftukkOQ4AWuyFZrQVnwrByJNUP6WKXUsTabmKzhvhpObNbo3Zry25t2dHoOLJbo2PubHdhqNbo_1K_CkfgfAdAchDqOLpr0j-X50JrlssvSAR_zQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>882102907</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trends in Colorectal Cancer Test Use among Vulnerable Populations in the United States</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>American Association for Cancer Research</source><creator>KLABUNDE, Carrie N ; CRONIN, Kathleen A ; BREEN, Nancy ; WALDRON, William R ; AMBS, Anita H ; NADEL, Marion R</creator><creatorcontrib>KLABUNDE, Carrie N ; CRONIN, Kathleen A ; BREEN, Nancy ; WALDRON, William R ; AMBS, Anita H ; NADEL, Marion R</creatorcontrib><description>Evaluating trends in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening use is critical for understanding screening implementation, and whether population groups targeted for screening are receiving it, consistent with guidelines. This study examines recent national trends in CRC test use, including among vulnerable populations. We used the 2000, 2003, 2005, and 2008 National Health Interview Survey to examine national trends in CRC screening use overall and for fecal occult blood test (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. We also assessed trends by race/ethnicity, educational attainment, income, time in the United States, and access to health care. During 2000 to 2008, significant declines in FOBT and sigmoidoscopy use and significant increases in colonoscopy use and in the percentages of adults up-to-date with CRC screening occurred overall and for most population subgroups. Subgroups with consistently lower rates of colonoscopy use and being up-to-date included Hispanics; people with minimal education, low income, or no health insurance; recent immigrants; and those with no usual source of care or physician visits in the past year. Among up-to-date adults, there were few subgroup differences in the type of test by which they were up-to-date (i.e., FOBT, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy). Although use of CRC screening and colonoscopy increased among U.S. adults, including those from vulnerable populations, 45% of adults aged 50 to 75-or nearly 35 million people-were not up-to-date with screening in 2008. Continued monitoring of CRC screening rates among population subgroups with consistently low utilization is imperative. Improvement in CRC screening rates among all population groups in the United States is still needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-9965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0220</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21653643</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CEBPE4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: American Association for Cancer Research</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colonoscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Early Detection of Cancer - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; Male ; Mass Screening - methods ; Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Occult Blood ; Sigmoidoscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Tumors ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers &amp; prevention, 2011-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1611-1621</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2011 AACR.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-d6a18fd1ecd009376294b99e2a1ed93ee6fe2c75baf18badd4a83c9ce1ca2bb83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-d6a18fd1ecd009376294b99e2a1ed93ee6fe2c75baf18badd4a83c9ce1ca2bb83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3358,27931,27932</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24428804$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21653643$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KLABUNDE, Carrie N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRONIN, Kathleen A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BREEN, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WALDRON, William R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AMBS, Anita H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NADEL, Marion R</creatorcontrib><title>Trends in Colorectal Cancer Test Use among Vulnerable Populations in the United States</title><title>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers &amp; prevention</title><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</addtitle><description>Evaluating trends in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening use is critical for understanding screening implementation, and whether population groups targeted for screening are receiving it, consistent with guidelines. This study examines recent national trends in CRC test use, including among vulnerable populations. We used the 2000, 2003, 2005, and 2008 National Health Interview Survey to examine national trends in CRC screening use overall and for fecal occult blood test (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. We also assessed trends by race/ethnicity, educational attainment, income, time in the United States, and access to health care. During 2000 to 2008, significant declines in FOBT and sigmoidoscopy use and significant increases in colonoscopy use and in the percentages of adults up-to-date with CRC screening occurred overall and for most population subgroups. Subgroups with consistently lower rates of colonoscopy use and being up-to-date included Hispanics; people with minimal education, low income, or no health insurance; recent immigrants; and those with no usual source of care or physician visits in the past year. Among up-to-date adults, there were few subgroup differences in the type of test by which they were up-to-date (i.e., FOBT, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy). Although use of CRC screening and colonoscopy increased among U.S. adults, including those from vulnerable populations, 45% of adults aged 50 to 75-or nearly 35 million people-were not up-to-date with screening in 2008. Continued monitoring of CRC screening rates among population subgroups with consistently low utilization is imperative. Improvement in CRC screening rates among all population groups in the United States is still needed.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occult Blood</subject><subject>Sigmoidoscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>1055-9965</issn><issn>1538-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwE0C5IE4d-Wja5IgmviQkkNi4Rm7iQlHWjqQ98O_pYMDJlvW8tvUQcsrZnHOlLzlTKjOmUPPrp_uM84wJwfbIlCups7JUan_sf5kJOUrpnTFWGqUOyUTwQskil1PysozY-kSbli660EV0PQS6gNZhpEtMPV0lpLDu2lf6MoQWI1QB6VO3GQL0Tdd-R_s3pKu26dHT5x56TMfkoIaQ8GRXZ2R1c71c3GUPj7f3i6uHzEmt-swXwHXtOTrPmJFlIUxeGYMCOHojEYsahStVBTXXFXifg5bOOOQORFVpOSMXP3s3sfsYxnftukkOQ4AWuyFZrQVnwrByJNUP6WKXUsTabmKzhvhpObNbo3Zry25t2dHoOLJbo2PubHdhqNbo_1K_CkfgfAdAchDqOLpr0j-X50JrlssvSAR_zQ</recordid><startdate>20110801</startdate><enddate>20110801</enddate><creator>KLABUNDE, Carrie N</creator><creator>CRONIN, Kathleen A</creator><creator>BREEN, Nancy</creator><creator>WALDRON, William R</creator><creator>AMBS, Anita H</creator><creator>NADEL, Marion R</creator><general>American Association for Cancer Research</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110801</creationdate><title>Trends in Colorectal Cancer Test Use among Vulnerable Populations in the United States</title><author>KLABUNDE, Carrie N ; CRONIN, Kathleen A ; BREEN, Nancy ; WALDRON, William R ; AMBS, Anita H ; NADEL, Marion R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-d6a18fd1ecd009376294b99e2a1ed93ee6fe2c75baf18badd4a83c9ce1ca2bb83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occult Blood</topic><topic>Sigmoidoscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KLABUNDE, Carrie N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRONIN, Kathleen A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BREEN, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WALDRON, William R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AMBS, Anita H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NADEL, Marion R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers &amp; prevention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KLABUNDE, Carrie N</au><au>CRONIN, Kathleen A</au><au>BREEN, Nancy</au><au>WALDRON, William R</au><au>AMBS, Anita H</au><au>NADEL, Marion R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trends in Colorectal Cancer Test Use among Vulnerable Populations in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers &amp; prevention</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</addtitle><date>2011-08-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1611</spage><epage>1621</epage><pages>1611-1621</pages><issn>1055-9965</issn><eissn>1538-7755</eissn><coden>CEBPE4</coden><abstract>Evaluating trends in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening use is critical for understanding screening implementation, and whether population groups targeted for screening are receiving it, consistent with guidelines. This study examines recent national trends in CRC test use, including among vulnerable populations. We used the 2000, 2003, 2005, and 2008 National Health Interview Survey to examine national trends in CRC screening use overall and for fecal occult blood test (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. We also assessed trends by race/ethnicity, educational attainment, income, time in the United States, and access to health care. During 2000 to 2008, significant declines in FOBT and sigmoidoscopy use and significant increases in colonoscopy use and in the percentages of adults up-to-date with CRC screening occurred overall and for most population subgroups. Subgroups with consistently lower rates of colonoscopy use and being up-to-date included Hispanics; people with minimal education, low income, or no health insurance; recent immigrants; and those with no usual source of care or physician visits in the past year. Among up-to-date adults, there were few subgroup differences in the type of test by which they were up-to-date (i.e., FOBT, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy). Although use of CRC screening and colonoscopy increased among U.S. adults, including those from vulnerable populations, 45% of adults aged 50 to 75-or nearly 35 million people-were not up-to-date with screening in 2008. Continued monitoring of CRC screening rates among population subgroups with consistently low utilization is imperative. Improvement in CRC screening rates among all population groups in the United States is still needed.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>American Association for Cancer Research</pub><pmid>21653643</pmid><doi>10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0220</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1055-9965
ispartof Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention, 2011-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1611-1621
issn 1055-9965
1538-7755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_882102907
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; American Association for Cancer Research
subjects Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data
Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology
Early Detection of Cancer - methods
Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data
Female
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Humans
Male
Mass Screening - methods
Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Occult Blood
Sigmoidoscopy - statistics & numerical data
Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus
Tumors
United States - epidemiology
title Trends in Colorectal Cancer Test Use among Vulnerable Populations in the United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T04%3A09%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trends%20in%20Colorectal%20Cancer%20Test%20Use%20among%20Vulnerable%20Populations%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20epidemiology,%20biomarkers%20&%20prevention&rft.au=KLABUNDE,%20Carrie%20N&rft.date=2011-08-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1611&rft.epage=1621&rft.pages=1611-1621&rft.issn=1055-9965&rft.eissn=1538-7755&rft.coden=CEBPE4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0220&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E882102907%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=882102907&rft_id=info:pmid/21653643&rfr_iscdi=true