Trends in Colorectal Cancer Test Use among Vulnerable Populations in the United States
Evaluating trends in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening use is critical for understanding screening implementation, and whether population groups targeted for screening are receiving it, consistent with guidelines. This study examines recent national trends in CRC test use, including among vulnerable...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention biomarkers & prevention, 2011-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1611-1621 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1621 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1611 |
container_title | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | KLABUNDE, Carrie N CRONIN, Kathleen A BREEN, Nancy WALDRON, William R AMBS, Anita H NADEL, Marion R |
description | Evaluating trends in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening use is critical for understanding screening implementation, and whether population groups targeted for screening are receiving it, consistent with guidelines. This study examines recent national trends in CRC test use, including among vulnerable populations.
We used the 2000, 2003, 2005, and 2008 National Health Interview Survey to examine national trends in CRC screening use overall and for fecal occult blood test (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. We also assessed trends by race/ethnicity, educational attainment, income, time in the United States, and access to health care.
During 2000 to 2008, significant declines in FOBT and sigmoidoscopy use and significant increases in colonoscopy use and in the percentages of adults up-to-date with CRC screening occurred overall and for most population subgroups. Subgroups with consistently lower rates of colonoscopy use and being up-to-date included Hispanics; people with minimal education, low income, or no health insurance; recent immigrants; and those with no usual source of care or physician visits in the past year. Among up-to-date adults, there were few subgroup differences in the type of test by which they were up-to-date (i.e., FOBT, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy).
Although use of CRC screening and colonoscopy increased among U.S. adults, including those from vulnerable populations, 45% of adults aged 50 to 75-or nearly 35 million people-were not up-to-date with screening in 2008.
Continued monitoring of CRC screening rates among population subgroups with consistently low utilization is imperative. Improvement in CRC screening rates among all population groups in the United States is still needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0220 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_882102907</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>882102907</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-d6a18fd1ecd009376294b99e2a1ed93ee6fe2c75baf18badd4a83c9ce1ca2bb83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwE0C5IE4d-Wja5IgmviQkkNi4Rm7iQlHWjqQ98O_pYMDJlvW8tvUQcsrZnHOlLzlTKjOmUPPrp_uM84wJwfbIlCups7JUan_sf5kJOUrpnTFWGqUOyUTwQskil1PysozY-kSbli660EV0PQS6gNZhpEtMPV0lpLDu2lf6MoQWI1QB6VO3GQL0Tdd-R_s3pKu26dHT5x56TMfkoIaQ8GRXZ2R1c71c3GUPj7f3i6uHzEmt-swXwHXtOTrPmJFlIUxeGYMCOHojEYsahStVBTXXFXifg5bOOOQORFVpOSMXP3s3sfsYxnftukkOQ4AWuyFZrQVnwrByJNUP6WKXUsTabmKzhvhpObNbo3Zry25t2dHoOLJbo2PubHdhqNbo_1K_CkfgfAdAchDqOLpr0j-X50JrlssvSAR_zQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>882102907</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trends in Colorectal Cancer Test Use among Vulnerable Populations in the United States</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>American Association for Cancer Research</source><creator>KLABUNDE, Carrie N ; CRONIN, Kathleen A ; BREEN, Nancy ; WALDRON, William R ; AMBS, Anita H ; NADEL, Marion R</creator><creatorcontrib>KLABUNDE, Carrie N ; CRONIN, Kathleen A ; BREEN, Nancy ; WALDRON, William R ; AMBS, Anita H ; NADEL, Marion R</creatorcontrib><description>Evaluating trends in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening use is critical for understanding screening implementation, and whether population groups targeted for screening are receiving it, consistent with guidelines. This study examines recent national trends in CRC test use, including among vulnerable populations.
We used the 2000, 2003, 2005, and 2008 National Health Interview Survey to examine national trends in CRC screening use overall and for fecal occult blood test (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. We also assessed trends by race/ethnicity, educational attainment, income, time in the United States, and access to health care.
During 2000 to 2008, significant declines in FOBT and sigmoidoscopy use and significant increases in colonoscopy use and in the percentages of adults up-to-date with CRC screening occurred overall and for most population subgroups. Subgroups with consistently lower rates of colonoscopy use and being up-to-date included Hispanics; people with minimal education, low income, or no health insurance; recent immigrants; and those with no usual source of care or physician visits in the past year. Among up-to-date adults, there were few subgroup differences in the type of test by which they were up-to-date (i.e., FOBT, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy).
Although use of CRC screening and colonoscopy increased among U.S. adults, including those from vulnerable populations, 45% of adults aged 50 to 75-or nearly 35 million people-were not up-to-date with screening in 2008.
Continued monitoring of CRC screening rates among population subgroups with consistently low utilization is imperative. Improvement in CRC screening rates among all population groups in the United States is still needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-9965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0220</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21653643</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CEBPE4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: American Association for Cancer Research</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; Male ; Mass Screening - methods ; Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Occult Blood ; Sigmoidoscopy - statistics & numerical data ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Tumors ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention, 2011-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1611-1621</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2011 AACR.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-d6a18fd1ecd009376294b99e2a1ed93ee6fe2c75baf18badd4a83c9ce1ca2bb83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-d6a18fd1ecd009376294b99e2a1ed93ee6fe2c75baf18badd4a83c9ce1ca2bb83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3358,27931,27932</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24428804$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21653643$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KLABUNDE, Carrie N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRONIN, Kathleen A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BREEN, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WALDRON, William R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AMBS, Anita H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NADEL, Marion R</creatorcontrib><title>Trends in Colorectal Cancer Test Use among Vulnerable Populations in the United States</title><title>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention</title><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</addtitle><description>Evaluating trends in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening use is critical for understanding screening implementation, and whether population groups targeted for screening are receiving it, consistent with guidelines. This study examines recent national trends in CRC test use, including among vulnerable populations.
We used the 2000, 2003, 2005, and 2008 National Health Interview Survey to examine national trends in CRC screening use overall and for fecal occult blood test (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. We also assessed trends by race/ethnicity, educational attainment, income, time in the United States, and access to health care.
During 2000 to 2008, significant declines in FOBT and sigmoidoscopy use and significant increases in colonoscopy use and in the percentages of adults up-to-date with CRC screening occurred overall and for most population subgroups. Subgroups with consistently lower rates of colonoscopy use and being up-to-date included Hispanics; people with minimal education, low income, or no health insurance; recent immigrants; and those with no usual source of care or physician visits in the past year. Among up-to-date adults, there were few subgroup differences in the type of test by which they were up-to-date (i.e., FOBT, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy).
Although use of CRC screening and colonoscopy increased among U.S. adults, including those from vulnerable populations, 45% of adults aged 50 to 75-or nearly 35 million people-were not up-to-date with screening in 2008.
Continued monitoring of CRC screening rates among population subgroups with consistently low utilization is imperative. Improvement in CRC screening rates among all population groups in the United States is still needed.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occult Blood</subject><subject>Sigmoidoscopy - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>1055-9965</issn><issn>1538-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwE0C5IE4d-Wja5IgmviQkkNi4Rm7iQlHWjqQ98O_pYMDJlvW8tvUQcsrZnHOlLzlTKjOmUPPrp_uM84wJwfbIlCups7JUan_sf5kJOUrpnTFWGqUOyUTwQskil1PysozY-kSbli660EV0PQS6gNZhpEtMPV0lpLDu2lf6MoQWI1QB6VO3GQL0Tdd-R_s3pKu26dHT5x56TMfkoIaQ8GRXZ2R1c71c3GUPj7f3i6uHzEmt-swXwHXtOTrPmJFlIUxeGYMCOHojEYsahStVBTXXFXifg5bOOOQORFVpOSMXP3s3sfsYxnftukkOQ4AWuyFZrQVnwrByJNUP6WKXUsTabmKzhvhpObNbo3Zry25t2dHoOLJbo2PubHdhqNbo_1K_CkfgfAdAchDqOLpr0j-X50JrlssvSAR_zQ</recordid><startdate>20110801</startdate><enddate>20110801</enddate><creator>KLABUNDE, Carrie N</creator><creator>CRONIN, Kathleen A</creator><creator>BREEN, Nancy</creator><creator>WALDRON, William R</creator><creator>AMBS, Anita H</creator><creator>NADEL, Marion R</creator><general>American Association for Cancer Research</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110801</creationdate><title>Trends in Colorectal Cancer Test Use among Vulnerable Populations in the United States</title><author>KLABUNDE, Carrie N ; CRONIN, Kathleen A ; BREEN, Nancy ; WALDRON, William R ; AMBS, Anita H ; NADEL, Marion R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-d6a18fd1ecd009376294b99e2a1ed93ee6fe2c75baf18badd4a83c9ce1ca2bb83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occult Blood</topic><topic>Sigmoidoscopy - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KLABUNDE, Carrie N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRONIN, Kathleen A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BREEN, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WALDRON, William R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AMBS, Anita H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NADEL, Marion R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KLABUNDE, Carrie N</au><au>CRONIN, Kathleen A</au><au>BREEN, Nancy</au><au>WALDRON, William R</au><au>AMBS, Anita H</au><au>NADEL, Marion R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trends in Colorectal Cancer Test Use among Vulnerable Populations in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</addtitle><date>2011-08-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1611</spage><epage>1621</epage><pages>1611-1621</pages><issn>1055-9965</issn><eissn>1538-7755</eissn><coden>CEBPE4</coden><abstract>Evaluating trends in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening use is critical for understanding screening implementation, and whether population groups targeted for screening are receiving it, consistent with guidelines. This study examines recent national trends in CRC test use, including among vulnerable populations.
We used the 2000, 2003, 2005, and 2008 National Health Interview Survey to examine national trends in CRC screening use overall and for fecal occult blood test (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. We also assessed trends by race/ethnicity, educational attainment, income, time in the United States, and access to health care.
During 2000 to 2008, significant declines in FOBT and sigmoidoscopy use and significant increases in colonoscopy use and in the percentages of adults up-to-date with CRC screening occurred overall and for most population subgroups. Subgroups with consistently lower rates of colonoscopy use and being up-to-date included Hispanics; people with minimal education, low income, or no health insurance; recent immigrants; and those with no usual source of care or physician visits in the past year. Among up-to-date adults, there were few subgroup differences in the type of test by which they were up-to-date (i.e., FOBT, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy).
Although use of CRC screening and colonoscopy increased among U.S. adults, including those from vulnerable populations, 45% of adults aged 50 to 75-or nearly 35 million people-were not up-to-date with screening in 2008.
Continued monitoring of CRC screening rates among population subgroups with consistently low utilization is imperative. Improvement in CRC screening rates among all population groups in the United States is still needed.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>American Association for Cancer Research</pub><pmid>21653643</pmid><doi>10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0220</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1055-9965 |
ispartof | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention, 2011-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1611-1621 |
issn | 1055-9965 1538-7755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_882102907 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; American Association for Cancer Research |
subjects | Aged Biological and medical sciences Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology Early Detection of Cancer - methods Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data Female Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Humans Male Mass Screening - methods Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data Medical sciences Middle Aged Occult Blood Sigmoidoscopy - statistics & numerical data Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus Tumors United States - epidemiology |
title | Trends in Colorectal Cancer Test Use among Vulnerable Populations in the United States |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T04%3A09%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trends%20in%20Colorectal%20Cancer%20Test%20Use%20among%20Vulnerable%20Populations%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20epidemiology,%20biomarkers%20&%20prevention&rft.au=KLABUNDE,%20Carrie%20N&rft.date=2011-08-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1611&rft.epage=1621&rft.pages=1611-1621&rft.issn=1055-9965&rft.eissn=1538-7755&rft.coden=CEBPE4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0220&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E882102907%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=882102907&rft_id=info:pmid/21653643&rfr_iscdi=true |