Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labour: a complete audit cycle

Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was introduced to a small maternity unit where an extensive epidural service was difficult to provide. This was a new service and the New Zealand College of Midwives had serious doubts about the efficacy and safety of remifentanil, so auditing its use...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anaesthesia and intensive care 2011-07, Vol.39 (4), p.666-670
Hauptverfasser: BUEHNER, U, BROADBENT, J. R, CHESTERFIELD, B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 670
container_issue 4
container_start_page 666
container_title Anaesthesia and intensive care
container_volume 39
creator BUEHNER, U
BROADBENT, J. R
CHESTERFIELD, B
description Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was introduced to a small maternity unit where an extensive epidural service was difficult to provide. This was a new service and the New Zealand College of Midwives had serious doubts about the efficacy and safety of remifentanil, so auditing its use was important. In a two-stage audit, clinical notes of 244 consecutive remifentanil users were studied between January 2008 and November 2009. We developed a questionnaire to assess the parturients' satisfaction with remifentanil PCA and designed a proforma to evaluate it against four standards of best practice. During the two audit periods, timely commencement of PCA was achieved in 65% and 82% of cases, respectively. A 70% compliance rate with monitoring standards fell to 10% after the withdrawal of supervision by an acute pain team, but improved to 91% following implementation of regular midwifery training sessions and a redesigned partogram and prescription flowchart. Ninety-four percent of women rated remifentanil PCA as excellent, very good or good. Maternal side-effects were nausea, pruritus and drowsiness. A comparison of Apgar scores of consecutive neonates born by normal vaginal delivery to women receiving no analgesia, with those born to women using remifentanil PCA, demonstrated no difference. As a result of our audit, remifentanil PCA is now viewed by our midwives as an effective and safe method when accompanied by 1:1 care and appropriate monitoring. With our input other maternity units have introduced it, especially where epidural service provision is limited, and for patients in whom epidural analgesia is contraindicated.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0310057x1103900421
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_882085035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A264921622</galeid><sourcerecordid>A264921622</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-2bda0262c80d0e774350d18699c685df383b26f228e2a40128f63377d63ec9e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0d9rFDEQB_Agir1W_wEfZFGKT1snk91Ntm-l-AsOCqLQtyWXTEpKdnMmu2D_e3O902IpeUgInwmT-TL2hsMZ51J-BMEBWvmbcxA9QIP8GVvxplE1oOTP2WoH6iKuj9hxzrcAvEfZvmRHyBUKoeSKrb_T6B1Ns558qLZ69uVcmzjNKYZAttKTDjeUva5cTFXQm7ik80pXJo7bQDNVerF-rsydCfSKvXA6ZHp92E_Yz8-fflx-rddXX75dXqxr00iYa9xYDdihUWCBpGxEC5arru9Np1rrhBIb7ByiItQNcFSuE0JK2wkyPbXihH3Yv7tN8ddCeR5Gnw2FoCeKSx6UQlAtiJ1890jelv7LlwqSirfI79H7PbrRgQY_uTgnbXZPDhfYNT3yDrGosydUWbZMsAyMnC_3_xXgvsCkmHMiN2yTH3W6GzgMuwCHQ4DXDwGWoreHhpfNSPZfyd_ECjg9AJ2NDi7pyfj84BrRC66U-APb9J8o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>878152135</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labour: a complete audit cycle</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>BUEHNER, U ; BROADBENT, J. R ; CHESTERFIELD, B</creator><creatorcontrib>BUEHNER, U ; BROADBENT, J. R ; CHESTERFIELD, B</creatorcontrib><description>Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was introduced to a small maternity unit where an extensive epidural service was difficult to provide. This was a new service and the New Zealand College of Midwives had serious doubts about the efficacy and safety of remifentanil, so auditing its use was important. In a two-stage audit, clinical notes of 244 consecutive remifentanil users were studied between January 2008 and November 2009. We developed a questionnaire to assess the parturients' satisfaction with remifentanil PCA and designed a proforma to evaluate it against four standards of best practice. During the two audit periods, timely commencement of PCA was achieved in 65% and 82% of cases, respectively. A 70% compliance rate with monitoring standards fell to 10% after the withdrawal of supervision by an acute pain team, but improved to 91% following implementation of regular midwifery training sessions and a redesigned partogram and prescription flowchart. Ninety-four percent of women rated remifentanil PCA as excellent, very good or good. Maternal side-effects were nausea, pruritus and drowsiness. A comparison of Apgar scores of consecutive neonates born by normal vaginal delivery to women receiving no analgesia, with those born to women using remifentanil PCA, demonstrated no difference. As a result of our audit, remifentanil PCA is now viewed by our midwives as an effective and safe method when accompanied by 1:1 care and appropriate monitoring. With our input other maternity units have introduced it, especially where epidural service provision is limited, and for patients in whom epidural analgesia is contraindicated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0310-057X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1448-0271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0310057x1103900421</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21823387</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AINCBS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Edgecliff: Anaesthesia Society of Anaesthetists</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analgesia, Obstetrical ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia in obstetrics ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Anesthetics, Intravenous - adverse effects ; Anesthetics, Intravenous - therapeutic use ; Apgar Score ; Biological and medical sciences ; Dosage and administration ; Female ; Fetus - drug effects ; Guideline Adherence ; Humans ; Medical Audit ; Medical sciences ; Midwifery ; Monitoring, Intraoperative ; Monitoring, Physiologic ; New Zealand ; Patient Satisfaction ; Piperidines - adverse effects ; Piperidines - therapeutic use ; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - epidemiology ; Pregnancy ; Pruritus - chemically induced ; Pruritus - epidemiology ; Remifentanil ; Safety and security measures ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia and intensive care, 2011-07, Vol.39 (4), p.666-670</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</rights><rights>Copyright Australian Society of Anaesthetists Jul 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-2bda0262c80d0e774350d18699c685df383b26f228e2a40128f63377d63ec9e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-2bda0262c80d0e774350d18699c685df383b26f228e2a40128f63377d63ec9e53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24393188$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21823387$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BUEHNER, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROADBENT, J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHESTERFIELD, B</creatorcontrib><title>Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labour: a complete audit cycle</title><title>Anaesthesia and intensive care</title><addtitle>Anaesth Intensive Care</addtitle><description>Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was introduced to a small maternity unit where an extensive epidural service was difficult to provide. This was a new service and the New Zealand College of Midwives had serious doubts about the efficacy and safety of remifentanil, so auditing its use was important. In a two-stage audit, clinical notes of 244 consecutive remifentanil users were studied between January 2008 and November 2009. We developed a questionnaire to assess the parturients' satisfaction with remifentanil PCA and designed a proforma to evaluate it against four standards of best practice. During the two audit periods, timely commencement of PCA was achieved in 65% and 82% of cases, respectively. A 70% compliance rate with monitoring standards fell to 10% after the withdrawal of supervision by an acute pain team, but improved to 91% following implementation of regular midwifery training sessions and a redesigned partogram and prescription flowchart. Ninety-four percent of women rated remifentanil PCA as excellent, very good or good. Maternal side-effects were nausea, pruritus and drowsiness. A comparison of Apgar scores of consecutive neonates born by normal vaginal delivery to women receiving no analgesia, with those born to women using remifentanil PCA, demonstrated no difference. As a result of our audit, remifentanil PCA is now viewed by our midwives as an effective and safe method when accompanied by 1:1 care and appropriate monitoring. With our input other maternity units have introduced it, especially where epidural service provision is limited, and for patients in whom epidural analgesia is contraindicated.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesia, Obstetrical</subject><subject>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia in obstetrics</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Intravenous - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Intravenous - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Apgar Score</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetus - drug effects</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical Audit</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Midwifery</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Piperidines - adverse effects</subject><subject>Piperidines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pruritus - chemically induced</subject><subject>Pruritus - epidemiology</subject><subject>Remifentanil</subject><subject>Safety and security measures</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0310-057X</issn><issn>1448-0271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0d9rFDEQB_Agir1W_wEfZFGKT1snk91Ntm-l-AsOCqLQtyWXTEpKdnMmu2D_e3O902IpeUgInwmT-TL2hsMZ51J-BMEBWvmbcxA9QIP8GVvxplE1oOTP2WoH6iKuj9hxzrcAvEfZvmRHyBUKoeSKrb_T6B1Ns558qLZ69uVcmzjNKYZAttKTDjeUva5cTFXQm7ik80pXJo7bQDNVerF-rsydCfSKvXA6ZHp92E_Yz8-fflx-rddXX75dXqxr00iYa9xYDdihUWCBpGxEC5arru9Np1rrhBIb7ByiItQNcFSuE0JK2wkyPbXihH3Yv7tN8ddCeR5Gnw2FoCeKSx6UQlAtiJ1890jelv7LlwqSirfI79H7PbrRgQY_uTgnbXZPDhfYNT3yDrGosydUWbZMsAyMnC_3_xXgvsCkmHMiN2yTH3W6GzgMuwCHQ4DXDwGWoreHhpfNSPZfyd_ECjg9AJ2NDi7pyfj84BrRC66U-APb9J8o</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>BUEHNER, U</creator><creator>BROADBENT, J. R</creator><creator>CHESTERFIELD, B</creator><general>Anaesthesia Society of Anaesthetists</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labour: a complete audit cycle</title><author>BUEHNER, U ; BROADBENT, J. R ; CHESTERFIELD, B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-2bda0262c80d0e774350d18699c685df383b26f228e2a40128f63377d63ec9e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesia, Obstetrical</topic><topic>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia in obstetrics</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Intravenous - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Intravenous - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Apgar Score</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetus - drug effects</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical Audit</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Midwifery</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Piperidines - adverse effects</topic><topic>Piperidines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pruritus - chemically induced</topic><topic>Pruritus - epidemiology</topic><topic>Remifentanil</topic><topic>Safety and security measures</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BUEHNER, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROADBENT, J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHESTERFIELD, B</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Australia &amp; New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia and intensive care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BUEHNER, U</au><au>BROADBENT, J. R</au><au>CHESTERFIELD, B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labour: a complete audit cycle</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia and intensive care</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesth Intensive Care</addtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>666</spage><epage>670</epage><pages>666-670</pages><issn>0310-057X</issn><eissn>1448-0271</eissn><coden>AINCBS</coden><abstract>Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was introduced to a small maternity unit where an extensive epidural service was difficult to provide. This was a new service and the New Zealand College of Midwives had serious doubts about the efficacy and safety of remifentanil, so auditing its use was important. In a two-stage audit, clinical notes of 244 consecutive remifentanil users were studied between January 2008 and November 2009. We developed a questionnaire to assess the parturients' satisfaction with remifentanil PCA and designed a proforma to evaluate it against four standards of best practice. During the two audit periods, timely commencement of PCA was achieved in 65% and 82% of cases, respectively. A 70% compliance rate with monitoring standards fell to 10% after the withdrawal of supervision by an acute pain team, but improved to 91% following implementation of regular midwifery training sessions and a redesigned partogram and prescription flowchart. Ninety-four percent of women rated remifentanil PCA as excellent, very good or good. Maternal side-effects were nausea, pruritus and drowsiness. A comparison of Apgar scores of consecutive neonates born by normal vaginal delivery to women receiving no analgesia, with those born to women using remifentanil PCA, demonstrated no difference. As a result of our audit, remifentanil PCA is now viewed by our midwives as an effective and safe method when accompanied by 1:1 care and appropriate monitoring. With our input other maternity units have introduced it, especially where epidural service provision is limited, and for patients in whom epidural analgesia is contraindicated.</abstract><cop>Edgecliff</cop><pub>Anaesthesia Society of Anaesthetists</pub><pmid>21823387</pmid><doi>10.1177/0310057x1103900421</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0310-057X
ispartof Anaesthesia and intensive care, 2011-07, Vol.39 (4), p.666-670
issn 0310-057X
1448-0271
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_882085035
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Analgesia, Obstetrical
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled
Anesthesia
Anesthesia in obstetrics
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Anesthetics, Intravenous - adverse effects
Anesthetics, Intravenous - therapeutic use
Apgar Score
Biological and medical sciences
Dosage and administration
Female
Fetus - drug effects
Guideline Adherence
Humans
Medical Audit
Medical sciences
Midwifery
Monitoring, Intraoperative
Monitoring, Physiologic
New Zealand
Patient Satisfaction
Piperidines - adverse effects
Piperidines - therapeutic use
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - epidemiology
Pregnancy
Pruritus - chemically induced
Pruritus - epidemiology
Remifentanil
Safety and security measures
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labour: a complete audit cycle
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T18%3A39%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Remifentanil%20patient-controlled%20analgesia%20for%20labour:%20a%20complete%20audit%20cycle&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia%20and%20intensive%20care&rft.au=BUEHNER,%20U&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=666&rft.epage=670&rft.pages=666-670&rft.issn=0310-057X&rft.eissn=1448-0271&rft.coden=AINCBS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0310057x1103900421&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA264921622%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=878152135&rft_id=info:pmid/21823387&rft_galeid=A264921622&rfr_iscdi=true