Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed
Results of reliability and agreement studies are intended to provide information about the amount of error inherent in any diagnosis, score, or measurement. The level of reliability and agreement among users of scales, instruments, or classifications is widely unknown. Therefore, there is a need for...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of nursing studies 2011-06, Vol.48 (6), p.661-671 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 671 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 661 |
| container_title | International journal of nursing studies |
| container_volume | 48 |
| creator | Kottner, Jan Audige, Laurent Brorson, Stig Donner, Allan Gajewski, Byron J. Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn Roberts, Chris Shoukri, Mohamed Streiner, David L. |
| description | Results of reliability and agreement studies are intended to provide information about the amount of error inherent in any diagnosis, score, or measurement. The level of reliability and agreement among users of scales, instruments, or classifications is widely unknown. Therefore, there is a need for rigorously conducted interrater and intrarater reliability and agreement studies. Information about sample selection, study design, and statistical analysis is often incomplete. Because of inadequate reporting, interpretation and synthesis of study results are often difficult. Widely accepted criteria, standards, or guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement in the health care and medical field are lacking. The objective was to develop guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies.
Eight experts in reliability and agreement investigation developed guidelines for reporting.
Fifteen issues that should be addressed when reliability and agreement are reported are proposed. The issues correspond to the headings usually used in publications.
The proposed guidelines intend to improve the quality of reporting. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.01.016 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_881694609</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0020748911000368</els_id><sourcerecordid>879481070</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-88379cc961965ef959957343c9909e05efbc0abcef6b242d2de4f30b65a93ad43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFq3DAQhkVpaLZpXyGYXpoevB1Zsqy5dQntthBI2LTQm7ClcZDx2lvJbsnbV2aTHnpIYEBCfPONpJ-xcw5rDlx97Na-G-YQp3ldAOdrWEq9YCuuK5FL5D9fshVAAXklNZ6y1zF2AMA16FfstOAllyjkit1sZ--o9wPFrB1DtqPDGCY_3KVd7-vG9366z-rBZZu7QLSnYcpup9n5xF9sd7vN7YfsDwXKDmE8jJHcG3bS1n2ktw_rGfvx5fP3y6_51fX22-XmKreyxCnXWlRoLSqOqqQWS8SyElJYRECCdNRYqBtLrWoKWbjCkWwFNKqsUdROijP2_uhNg3_NFCez99FS39cDjXM0WnOFUgE-T1YoNYcKEnnxJMmhEIAy3Seh7_5Du3EOQ3px8hWgSsDFp46QDWOMgVpzCH5fh_tkMkuMpjOPMZolRgNLqdR4_mCfmz25f22PuSXg0xGg9MW_PQUTrafBkvOB7GTc6J-b8RcKC7BG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>872065090</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kottner, Jan ; Audige, Laurent ; Brorson, Stig ; Donner, Allan ; Gajewski, Byron J. ; Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn ; Roberts, Chris ; Shoukri, Mohamed ; Streiner, David L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kottner, Jan ; Audige, Laurent ; Brorson, Stig ; Donner, Allan ; Gajewski, Byron J. ; Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn ; Roberts, Chris ; Shoukri, Mohamed ; Streiner, David L.</creatorcontrib><description>Results of reliability and agreement studies are intended to provide information about the amount of error inherent in any diagnosis, score, or measurement. The level of reliability and agreement among users of scales, instruments, or classifications is widely unknown. Therefore, there is a need for rigorously conducted interrater and intrarater reliability and agreement studies. Information about sample selection, study design, and statistical analysis is often incomplete. Because of inadequate reporting, interpretation and synthesis of study results are often difficult. Widely accepted criteria, standards, or guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement in the health care and medical field are lacking. The objective was to develop guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies.
Eight experts in reliability and agreement investigation developed guidelines for reporting.
Fifteen issues that should be addressed when reliability and agreement are reported are proposed. The issues correspond to the headings usually used in publications.
The proposed guidelines intend to improve the quality of reporting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7489</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-491X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.01.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21514934</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJNUA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agreement ; Classification ; Diagnosis ; Guideline ; Health care ; Interrater ; Intrarater ; Measurement ; Reliability ; Reproducibility ; Statistical analysis ; Studies</subject><ispartof>International journal of nursing studies, 2011-06, Vol.48 (6), p.661-671</ispartof><rights>2011</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-88379cc961965ef959957343c9909e05efbc0abcef6b242d2de4f30b65a93ad43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-88379cc961965ef959957343c9909e05efbc0abcef6b242d2de4f30b65a93ad43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.01.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,31004,31005,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21514934$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kottner, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Audige, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brorson, Stig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donner, Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gajewski, Byron J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoukri, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streiner, David L.</creatorcontrib><title>Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed</title><title>International journal of nursing studies</title><addtitle>Int J Nurs Stud</addtitle><description>Results of reliability and agreement studies are intended to provide information about the amount of error inherent in any diagnosis, score, or measurement. The level of reliability and agreement among users of scales, instruments, or classifications is widely unknown. Therefore, there is a need for rigorously conducted interrater and intrarater reliability and agreement studies. Information about sample selection, study design, and statistical analysis is often incomplete. Because of inadequate reporting, interpretation and synthesis of study results are often difficult. Widely accepted criteria, standards, or guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement in the health care and medical field are lacking. The objective was to develop guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies.
Eight experts in reliability and agreement investigation developed guidelines for reporting.
Fifteen issues that should be addressed when reliability and agreement are reported are proposed. The issues correspond to the headings usually used in publications.
The proposed guidelines intend to improve the quality of reporting.</description><subject>Agreement</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Guideline</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Interrater</subject><subject>Intrarater</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0020-7489</issn><issn>1873-491X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFq3DAQhkVpaLZpXyGYXpoevB1Zsqy5dQntthBI2LTQm7ClcZDx2lvJbsnbV2aTHnpIYEBCfPONpJ-xcw5rDlx97Na-G-YQp3ldAOdrWEq9YCuuK5FL5D9fshVAAXklNZ6y1zF2AMA16FfstOAllyjkit1sZ--o9wPFrB1DtqPDGCY_3KVd7-vG9366z-rBZZu7QLSnYcpup9n5xF9sd7vN7YfsDwXKDmE8jJHcG3bS1n2ktw_rGfvx5fP3y6_51fX22-XmKreyxCnXWlRoLSqOqqQWS8SyElJYRECCdNRYqBtLrWoKWbjCkWwFNKqsUdROijP2_uhNg3_NFCez99FS39cDjXM0WnOFUgE-T1YoNYcKEnnxJMmhEIAy3Seh7_5Du3EOQ3px8hWgSsDFp46QDWOMgVpzCH5fh_tkMkuMpjOPMZolRgNLqdR4_mCfmz25f22PuSXg0xGg9MW_PQUTrafBkvOB7GTc6J-b8RcKC7BG</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Kottner, Jan</creator><creator>Audige, Laurent</creator><creator>Brorson, Stig</creator><creator>Donner, Allan</creator><creator>Gajewski, Byron J.</creator><creator>Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn</creator><creator>Roberts, Chris</creator><creator>Shoukri, Mohamed</creator><creator>Streiner, David L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed</title><author>Kottner, Jan ; Audige, Laurent ; Brorson, Stig ; Donner, Allan ; Gajewski, Byron J. ; Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn ; Roberts, Chris ; Shoukri, Mohamed ; Streiner, David L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-88379cc961965ef959957343c9909e05efbc0abcef6b242d2de4f30b65a93ad43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Agreement</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Guideline</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Interrater</topic><topic>Intrarater</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kottner, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Audige, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brorson, Stig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donner, Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gajewski, Byron J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoukri, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streiner, David L.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of nursing studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kottner, Jan</au><au>Audige, Laurent</au><au>Brorson, Stig</au><au>Donner, Allan</au><au>Gajewski, Byron J.</au><au>Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn</au><au>Roberts, Chris</au><au>Shoukri, Mohamed</au><au>Streiner, David L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed</atitle><jtitle>International journal of nursing studies</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Nurs Stud</addtitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>661</spage><epage>671</epage><pages>661-671</pages><issn>0020-7489</issn><eissn>1873-491X</eissn><coden>IJNUA6</coden><abstract>Results of reliability and agreement studies are intended to provide information about the amount of error inherent in any diagnosis, score, or measurement. The level of reliability and agreement among users of scales, instruments, or classifications is widely unknown. Therefore, there is a need for rigorously conducted interrater and intrarater reliability and agreement studies. Information about sample selection, study design, and statistical analysis is often incomplete. Because of inadequate reporting, interpretation and synthesis of study results are often difficult. Widely accepted criteria, standards, or guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement in the health care and medical field are lacking. The objective was to develop guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies.
Eight experts in reliability and agreement investigation developed guidelines for reporting.
Fifteen issues that should be addressed when reliability and agreement are reported are proposed. The issues correspond to the headings usually used in publications.
The proposed guidelines intend to improve the quality of reporting.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21514934</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.01.016</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0020-7489 |
| ispartof | International journal of nursing studies, 2011-06, Vol.48 (6), p.661-671 |
| issn | 0020-7489 1873-491X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_881694609 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Agreement Classification Diagnosis Guideline Health care Interrater Intrarater Measurement Reliability Reproducibility Statistical analysis Studies |
| title | Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T13%3A55%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Guidelines%20for%20Reporting%20Reliability%20and%20Agreement%20Studies%20(GRRAS)%20were%20proposed&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20nursing%20studies&rft.au=Kottner,%20Jan&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=661&rft.epage=671&rft.pages=661-671&rft.issn=0020-7489&rft.eissn=1873-491X&rft.coden=IJNUA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.01.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E879481070%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=872065090&rft_id=info:pmid/21514934&rft_els_id=S0020748911000368&rfr_iscdi=true |