Compulsory project-level involvement and the use of program-level evaluations: Evaluating the Local Systemic Change for Teacher Enhancement program

In 1995, the National Science Foundation (NSF) contracted with principal investigator Iris Weiss and an evaluation team at Horizon Research, Inc. (HRI) to conduct a national evaluation of the Local Systemic Change for Teacher Enhancement program (LSC). HRI conducted the core evaluation under a $6.25...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:New directions for evaluation 2011-03, Vol.2011 (129), p.17-23
Hauptverfasser: Johnson, Kelli, Weiss, Iris R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 23
container_issue 129
container_start_page 17
container_title New directions for evaluation
container_volume 2011
creator Johnson, Kelli
Weiss, Iris R.
description In 1995, the National Science Foundation (NSF) contracted with principal investigator Iris Weiss and an evaluation team at Horizon Research, Inc. (HRI) to conduct a national evaluation of the Local Systemic Change for Teacher Enhancement program (LSC). HRI conducted the core evaluation under a $6.25 million contract with NSF. This program evaluation project, called the LSC core evaluation, had an overarching program‐wide focus that included all 88 local LSC projects. The LSC core evaluation was a large, multisite program evaluation that included multiple data‐collection and information‐dissemination activities. Each local LSC project was required to have a project‐level evaluator, to collect information by using predesigned data‐collection instruments developed by HRI, and to report findings to the core evaluation on a regular basis. This case study describes the relationship between project‐level involvement in the LSC core evaluation and the use of the core evaluation by project leaders and evaluators. © Wiley Periodicals Inc., and the American Evaluation Association.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ev.350
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_881468673</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ918833</ericid><sourcerecordid>881468673</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2950-8518a5594995a34b252de07ba7f3e6b89d255d32517a1868f71dfa64d84ed45d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhqMKpJYCT8DBp6IeUuzYjp3e0DYU0KoV6kIrLpbXmeymOPHWTlL2OXhhvM2qNyROM-P55v-tmSR5S_AZwTj7AOMZ5fggOSKcslQKfvci5rgQaS5ofpi8CuEeR1AQfpT8mbl2M9jg_BZtvLsH06cWRrCo6UZnR2ih65HuKtSvAQ0BkKt34Mrrdg_CqO2g-8Z14RyV-6JbPQ3MndEW3WxDD21j0GytuxWg2nm0AG3W4FHZxTcz2ex1Xycva20DvNnH4-T7p3Ix-5zOry-_zD7OU5MVHKeSE6k5L1hRcE3ZMuNZBVgstagp5EtZVBnnFc04EZrIXNaCVLXOWSUZVCx2jpP3k270fRgg9KptggFrdQduCEpKwnIZl_Z_ZI4zFsmTiTTeheChVhvftNpvFcFqdx4Fo4rnieC7CQTfmGeo_FoQKenO8XRqPzYWtv8QUeWPSSqd2Cau-fczq_0vFT8vuLq9ulRs_g1fLOiN-kn_Ahj3qgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>881466024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Compulsory project-level involvement and the use of program-level evaluations: Evaluating the Local Systemic Change for Teacher Enhancement program</title><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Johnson, Kelli ; Weiss, Iris R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kelli ; Weiss, Iris R.</creatorcontrib><description>In 1995, the National Science Foundation (NSF) contracted with principal investigator Iris Weiss and an evaluation team at Horizon Research, Inc. (HRI) to conduct a national evaluation of the Local Systemic Change for Teacher Enhancement program (LSC). HRI conducted the core evaluation under a $6.25 million contract with NSF. This program evaluation project, called the LSC core evaluation, had an overarching program‐wide focus that included all 88 local LSC projects. The LSC core evaluation was a large, multisite program evaluation that included multiple data‐collection and information‐dissemination activities. Each local LSC project was required to have a project‐level evaluator, to collect information by using predesigned data‐collection instruments developed by HRI, and to report findings to the core evaluation on a regular basis. This case study describes the relationship between project‐level involvement in the LSC core evaluation and the use of the core evaluation by project leaders and evaluators. © Wiley Periodicals Inc., and the American Evaluation Association.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1097-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-875X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ev.350</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NDFEF4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Administrative Organization ; Case Studies ; Change ; Educational Research ; Evaluation Methods ; Evaluators ; Faculty Development ; Government Agencies ; Information Dissemination ; Knowledge Management ; Organizational Communication ; Participation ; Principals ; Program Evaluation ; STEM Education ; Systems Approach ; Teachers ; Teams</subject><ispartof>New directions for evaluation, 2011-03, Vol.2011 (129), p.17-23</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company, and the American Evaluation Association</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2950-8518a5594995a34b252de07ba7f3e6b89d255d32517a1868f71dfa64d84ed45d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fev.350$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fev.350$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,33752,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ918833$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kelli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Iris R.</creatorcontrib><title>Compulsory project-level involvement and the use of program-level evaluations: Evaluating the Local Systemic Change for Teacher Enhancement program</title><title>New directions for evaluation</title><addtitle>New Directions for Evaluation</addtitle><description>In 1995, the National Science Foundation (NSF) contracted with principal investigator Iris Weiss and an evaluation team at Horizon Research, Inc. (HRI) to conduct a national evaluation of the Local Systemic Change for Teacher Enhancement program (LSC). HRI conducted the core evaluation under a $6.25 million contract with NSF. This program evaluation project, called the LSC core evaluation, had an overarching program‐wide focus that included all 88 local LSC projects. The LSC core evaluation was a large, multisite program evaluation that included multiple data‐collection and information‐dissemination activities. Each local LSC project was required to have a project‐level evaluator, to collect information by using predesigned data‐collection instruments developed by HRI, and to report findings to the core evaluation on a regular basis. This case study describes the relationship between project‐level involvement in the LSC core evaluation and the use of the core evaluation by project leaders and evaluators. © Wiley Periodicals Inc., and the American Evaluation Association.</description><subject>Administrative Organization</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Change</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Evaluators</subject><subject>Faculty Development</subject><subject>Government Agencies</subject><subject>Information Dissemination</subject><subject>Knowledge Management</subject><subject>Organizational Communication</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Principals</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>STEM Education</subject><subject>Systems Approach</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teams</subject><issn>1097-6736</issn><issn>1534-875X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhqMKpJYCT8DBp6IeUuzYjp3e0DYU0KoV6kIrLpbXmeymOPHWTlL2OXhhvM2qNyROM-P55v-tmSR5S_AZwTj7AOMZ5fggOSKcslQKfvci5rgQaS5ofpi8CuEeR1AQfpT8mbl2M9jg_BZtvLsH06cWRrCo6UZnR2ih65HuKtSvAQ0BkKt34Mrrdg_CqO2g-8Z14RyV-6JbPQ3MndEW3WxDD21j0GytuxWg2nm0AG3W4FHZxTcz2ex1Xycva20DvNnH4-T7p3Ix-5zOry-_zD7OU5MVHKeSE6k5L1hRcE3ZMuNZBVgstagp5EtZVBnnFc04EZrIXNaCVLXOWSUZVCx2jpP3k270fRgg9KptggFrdQduCEpKwnIZl_Z_ZI4zFsmTiTTeheChVhvftNpvFcFqdx4Fo4rnieC7CQTfmGeo_FoQKenO8XRqPzYWtv8QUeWPSSqd2Cau-fczq_0vFT8vuLq9ulRs_g1fLOiN-kn_Ahj3qgw</recordid><startdate>201103</startdate><enddate>201103</enddate><creator>Johnson, Kelli</creator><creator>Weiss, Iris R.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Jossey-Bass</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201103</creationdate><title>Compulsory project-level involvement and the use of program-level evaluations: Evaluating the Local Systemic Change for Teacher Enhancement program</title><author>Johnson, Kelli ; Weiss, Iris R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2950-8518a5594995a34b252de07ba7f3e6b89d255d32517a1868f71dfa64d84ed45d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Administrative Organization</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Change</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Evaluators</topic><topic>Faculty Development</topic><topic>Government Agencies</topic><topic>Information Dissemination</topic><topic>Knowledge Management</topic><topic>Organizational Communication</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Principals</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>STEM Education</topic><topic>Systems Approach</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teams</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kelli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Iris R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>New directions for evaluation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Kelli</au><au>Weiss, Iris R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ918833</ericid><atitle>Compulsory project-level involvement and the use of program-level evaluations: Evaluating the Local Systemic Change for Teacher Enhancement program</atitle><jtitle>New directions for evaluation</jtitle><addtitle>New Directions for Evaluation</addtitle><date>2011-03</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>2011</volume><issue>129</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>17-23</pages><issn>1097-6736</issn><eissn>1534-875X</eissn><coden>NDFEF4</coden><abstract>In 1995, the National Science Foundation (NSF) contracted with principal investigator Iris Weiss and an evaluation team at Horizon Research, Inc. (HRI) to conduct a national evaluation of the Local Systemic Change for Teacher Enhancement program (LSC). HRI conducted the core evaluation under a $6.25 million contract with NSF. This program evaluation project, called the LSC core evaluation, had an overarching program‐wide focus that included all 88 local LSC projects. The LSC core evaluation was a large, multisite program evaluation that included multiple data‐collection and information‐dissemination activities. Each local LSC project was required to have a project‐level evaluator, to collect information by using predesigned data‐collection instruments developed by HRI, and to report findings to the core evaluation on a regular basis. This case study describes the relationship between project‐level involvement in the LSC core evaluation and the use of the core evaluation by project leaders and evaluators. © Wiley Periodicals Inc., and the American Evaluation Association.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/ev.350</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1097-6736
ispartof New directions for evaluation, 2011-03, Vol.2011 (129), p.17-23
issn 1097-6736
1534-875X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_881468673
source Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Administrative Organization
Case Studies
Change
Educational Research
Evaluation Methods
Evaluators
Faculty Development
Government Agencies
Information Dissemination
Knowledge Management
Organizational Communication
Participation
Principals
Program Evaluation
STEM Education
Systems Approach
Teachers
Teams
title Compulsory project-level involvement and the use of program-level evaluations: Evaluating the Local Systemic Change for Teacher Enhancement program
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T21%3A25%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Compulsory%20project-level%20involvement%20and%20the%20use%20of%20program-level%20evaluations:%20Evaluating%20the%20Local%20Systemic%20Change%20for%20Teacher%20Enhancement%20program&rft.jtitle=New%20directions%20for%20evaluation&rft.au=Johnson,%20Kelli&rft.date=2011-03&rft.volume=2011&rft.issue=129&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=17-23&rft.issn=1097-6736&rft.eissn=1534-875X&rft.coden=NDFEF4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ev.350&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E881468673%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=881466024&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ918833&rfr_iscdi=true