Foam Sclerotherapy: Investigating the Need for Sterile Air
BACKGROUND Sclerotherapy with foam is becoming increasingly popular for the treatment of varicose veins. There is no consensus on the necessity of sterile air or other gases to produce foam. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the potential risk of bacterial inoculation of polidocanol (POL) foam using room air a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Dermatologic surgery 2011-08, Vol.37 (8), p.1119-1124 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1124 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1119 |
container_title | Dermatologic surgery |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | DE ROOS, KEES‐PETER GROEN, LEON LEENDERS, ALEXANDER C.A.P. |
description | BACKGROUND
Sclerotherapy with foam is becoming increasingly popular for the treatment of varicose veins. There is no consensus on the necessity of sterile air or other gases to produce foam.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the potential risk of bacterial inoculation of polidocanol (POL) foam using room air and the antimicrobial properties of polidocanol.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The amount of airborne microorganisms was quantitatively measured. Four bacterial strains were tested for susceptibility to polidocanol: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Streptococcus pyogenes.
RESULTS
Air measurements varied as a result of air movement and the number of people in the room. Although the risk of introducing one colony‐formin unit can be calculated as less than 1 in 330, the clinical relevance is still to be determined. No inhibition of bacterial growth was achieved with POL in of any of the tested strains.
CONCLUSIONS
Foam sclerotherapy with POL prepared in a standard treatment room is a safe procedure without the risk of introducing a severe bacterial complication. The use of sterile air, nitrogen, or carbon dioxide is unnecessary and will make foam sclerotherapy with POL more elaborate and more expensive to use.
The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02044.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_880714897</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>880714897</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3984-e67761b7a2a009573e74d29bcae51c400547197eeb67658cf772202a2780df003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EolD4BZQNYpUwdvxIkFig8pQQLErXluNMIFXaFDsF-vc4tJQt3nhkn5m5OoREFBIazvk0oYLxmCsmEgaUJsCA8-RrhxxsP3ZDDUrGICgbkEPvpwCU5SnskwGjkgoJ8oBc3LZmFo1tg67t3tCZxeoieph_oO_qV9PV89coPEdPiGVUtS4ad-jqBqOr2h2Rvco0Ho8395BMbm9eRvfx4_Pdw-jqMbZpnvEYpVKSFsowA5ALlaLiJcsLa1BQywEEVzRXiIVUUmS2UooxYIapDMoKIB2Ss_XchWvflyGYntXeYtOYObZLr7MMFOVZrgKZrUnrWu8dVnrh6plxK01B9-L0VPd-dO9H9-L0jzj9FVpPNkuWxQzLbeOvqQCcbgDjrWkqZ-a29n8cV1zIlAXucs19Bk2rfwfQ1-NJX6XfVXGGTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>880714897</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Foam Sclerotherapy: Investigating the Need for Sterile Air</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>DE ROOS, KEES‐PETER ; GROEN, LEON ; LEENDERS, ALEXANDER C.A.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>DE ROOS, KEES‐PETER ; GROEN, LEON ; LEENDERS, ALEXANDER C.A.P.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND
Sclerotherapy with foam is becoming increasingly popular for the treatment of varicose veins. There is no consensus on the necessity of sterile air or other gases to produce foam.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the potential risk of bacterial inoculation of polidocanol (POL) foam using room air and the antimicrobial properties of polidocanol.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The amount of airborne microorganisms was quantitatively measured. Four bacterial strains were tested for susceptibility to polidocanol: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Streptococcus pyogenes.
RESULTS
Air measurements varied as a result of air movement and the number of people in the room. Although the risk of introducing one colony‐formin unit can be calculated as less than 1 in 330, the clinical relevance is still to be determined. No inhibition of bacterial growth was achieved with POL in of any of the tested strains.
CONCLUSIONS
Foam sclerotherapy with POL prepared in a standard treatment room is a safe procedure without the risk of introducing a severe bacterial complication. The use of sterile air, nitrogen, or carbon dioxide is unnecessary and will make foam sclerotherapy with POL more elaborate and more expensive to use.
The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-0512</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4725</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02044.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21615606</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Air Microbiology ; Bacterial Infections - etiology ; Bacterial Infections - prevention & control ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Dermatology ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Polyethylene Glycols ; Pseudomonas aeruginosa - growth & development ; Sclerosing Solutions ; Sclerotherapy - adverse effects ; Skin plastic surgery ; Staphylococcus aureus - growth & development ; Staphylococcus epidermidis - growth & development ; Sterilization ; Streptococcus pyogenes - growth & development ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Varicose Veins - therapy</subject><ispartof>Dermatologic surgery, 2011-08, Vol.37 (8), p.1119-1124</ispartof><rights>2011 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3984-e67761b7a2a009573e74d29bcae51c400547197eeb67658cf772202a2780df003</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1524-4725.2011.02044.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1524-4725.2011.02044.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24745632$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21615606$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DE ROOS, KEES‐PETER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GROEN, LEON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEENDERS, ALEXANDER C.A.P.</creatorcontrib><title>Foam Sclerotherapy: Investigating the Need for Sterile Air</title><title>Dermatologic surgery</title><addtitle>Dermatol Surg</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND
Sclerotherapy with foam is becoming increasingly popular for the treatment of varicose veins. There is no consensus on the necessity of sterile air or other gases to produce foam.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the potential risk of bacterial inoculation of polidocanol (POL) foam using room air and the antimicrobial properties of polidocanol.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The amount of airborne microorganisms was quantitatively measured. Four bacterial strains were tested for susceptibility to polidocanol: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Streptococcus pyogenes.
RESULTS
Air measurements varied as a result of air movement and the number of people in the room. Although the risk of introducing one colony‐formin unit can be calculated as less than 1 in 330, the clinical relevance is still to be determined. No inhibition of bacterial growth was achieved with POL in of any of the tested strains.
CONCLUSIONS
Foam sclerotherapy with POL prepared in a standard treatment room is a safe procedure without the risk of introducing a severe bacterial complication. The use of sterile air, nitrogen, or carbon dioxide is unnecessary and will make foam sclerotherapy with POL more elaborate and more expensive to use.
The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters.</description><subject>Air Microbiology</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - etiology</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols</subject><subject>Pseudomonas aeruginosa - growth & development</subject><subject>Sclerosing Solutions</subject><subject>Sclerotherapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Skin plastic surgery</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - growth & development</subject><subject>Staphylococcus epidermidis - growth & development</subject><subject>Sterilization</subject><subject>Streptococcus pyogenes - growth & development</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Varicose Veins - therapy</subject><issn>1076-0512</issn><issn>1524-4725</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EolD4BZQNYpUwdvxIkFig8pQQLErXluNMIFXaFDsF-vc4tJQt3nhkn5m5OoREFBIazvk0oYLxmCsmEgaUJsCA8-RrhxxsP3ZDDUrGICgbkEPvpwCU5SnskwGjkgoJ8oBc3LZmFo1tg67t3tCZxeoieph_oO_qV9PV89coPEdPiGVUtS4ad-jqBqOr2h2Rvco0Ho8395BMbm9eRvfx4_Pdw-jqMbZpnvEYpVKSFsowA5ALlaLiJcsLa1BQywEEVzRXiIVUUmS2UooxYIapDMoKIB2Ss_XchWvflyGYntXeYtOYObZLr7MMFOVZrgKZrUnrWu8dVnrh6plxK01B9-L0VPd-dO9H9-L0jzj9FVpPNkuWxQzLbeOvqQCcbgDjrWkqZ-a29n8cV1zIlAXucs19Bk2rfwfQ1-NJX6XfVXGGTw</recordid><startdate>201108</startdate><enddate>201108</enddate><creator>DE ROOS, KEES‐PETER</creator><creator>GROEN, LEON</creator><creator>LEENDERS, ALEXANDER C.A.P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201108</creationdate><title>Foam Sclerotherapy: Investigating the Need for Sterile Air</title><author>DE ROOS, KEES‐PETER ; GROEN, LEON ; LEENDERS, ALEXANDER C.A.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3984-e67761b7a2a009573e74d29bcae51c400547197eeb67658cf772202a2780df003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Air Microbiology</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - etiology</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols</topic><topic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa - growth & development</topic><topic>Sclerosing Solutions</topic><topic>Sclerotherapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Skin plastic surgery</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - growth & development</topic><topic>Staphylococcus epidermidis - growth & development</topic><topic>Sterilization</topic><topic>Streptococcus pyogenes - growth & development</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Varicose Veins - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DE ROOS, KEES‐PETER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GROEN, LEON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEENDERS, ALEXANDER C.A.P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Dermatologic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DE ROOS, KEES‐PETER</au><au>GROEN, LEON</au><au>LEENDERS, ALEXANDER C.A.P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Foam Sclerotherapy: Investigating the Need for Sterile Air</atitle><jtitle>Dermatologic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Dermatol Surg</addtitle><date>2011-08</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1119</spage><epage>1124</epage><pages>1119-1124</pages><issn>1076-0512</issn><eissn>1524-4725</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND
Sclerotherapy with foam is becoming increasingly popular for the treatment of varicose veins. There is no consensus on the necessity of sterile air or other gases to produce foam.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the potential risk of bacterial inoculation of polidocanol (POL) foam using room air and the antimicrobial properties of polidocanol.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The amount of airborne microorganisms was quantitatively measured. Four bacterial strains were tested for susceptibility to polidocanol: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Streptococcus pyogenes.
RESULTS
Air measurements varied as a result of air movement and the number of people in the room. Although the risk of introducing one colony‐formin unit can be calculated as less than 1 in 330, the clinical relevance is still to be determined. No inhibition of bacterial growth was achieved with POL in of any of the tested strains.
CONCLUSIONS
Foam sclerotherapy with POL prepared in a standard treatment room is a safe procedure without the risk of introducing a severe bacterial complication. The use of sterile air, nitrogen, or carbon dioxide is unnecessary and will make foam sclerotherapy with POL more elaborate and more expensive to use.
The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>21615606</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02044.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1076-0512 |
ispartof | Dermatologic surgery, 2011-08, Vol.37 (8), p.1119-1124 |
issn | 1076-0512 1524-4725 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_880714897 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload |
subjects | Air Microbiology Bacterial Infections - etiology Bacterial Infections - prevention & control Biological and medical sciences Colony Count, Microbial Dermatology Humans Medical sciences Microbial Sensitivity Tests Polyethylene Glycols Pseudomonas aeruginosa - growth & development Sclerosing Solutions Sclerotherapy - adverse effects Skin plastic surgery Staphylococcus aureus - growth & development Staphylococcus epidermidis - growth & development Sterilization Streptococcus pyogenes - growth & development Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Varicose Veins - therapy |
title | Foam Sclerotherapy: Investigating the Need for Sterile Air |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T05%3A28%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Foam%20Sclerotherapy:%20Investigating%20the%20Need%20for%20Sterile%20Air&rft.jtitle=Dermatologic%20surgery&rft.au=DE%20ROOS,%20KEES%E2%80%90PETER&rft.date=2011-08&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1119&rft.epage=1124&rft.pages=1119-1124&rft.issn=1076-0512&rft.eissn=1524-4725&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02044.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E880714897%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=880714897&rft_id=info:pmid/21615606&rfr_iscdi=true |