Foam Sclerotherapy: Investigating the Need for Sterile Air

BACKGROUND Sclerotherapy with foam is becoming increasingly popular for the treatment of varicose veins. There is no consensus on the necessity of sterile air or other gases to produce foam. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the potential risk of bacterial inoculation of polidocanol (POL) foam using room air a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dermatologic surgery 2011-08, Vol.37 (8), p.1119-1124
Hauptverfasser: DE ROOS, KEES‐PETER, GROEN, LEON, LEENDERS, ALEXANDER C.A.P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1124
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1119
container_title Dermatologic surgery
container_volume 37
creator DE ROOS, KEES‐PETER
GROEN, LEON
LEENDERS, ALEXANDER C.A.P.
description BACKGROUND Sclerotherapy with foam is becoming increasingly popular for the treatment of varicose veins. There is no consensus on the necessity of sterile air or other gases to produce foam. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the potential risk of bacterial inoculation of polidocanol (POL) foam using room air and the antimicrobial properties of polidocanol. MATERIALS AND METHODS The amount of airborne microorganisms was quantitatively measured. Four bacterial strains were tested for susceptibility to polidocanol: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Streptococcus pyogenes. RESULTS Air measurements varied as a result of air movement and the number of people in the room. Although the risk of introducing one colony‐formin unit can be calculated as less than 1 in 330, the clinical relevance is still to be determined. No inhibition of bacterial growth was achieved with POL in of any of the tested strains. CONCLUSIONS Foam sclerotherapy with POL prepared in a standard treatment room is a safe procedure without the risk of introducing a severe bacterial complication. The use of sterile air, nitrogen, or carbon dioxide is unnecessary and will make foam sclerotherapy with POL more elaborate and more expensive to use. The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02044.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_880714897</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>880714897</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3984-e67761b7a2a009573e74d29bcae51c400547197eeb67658cf772202a2780df003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EolD4BZQNYpUwdvxIkFig8pQQLErXluNMIFXaFDsF-vc4tJQt3nhkn5m5OoREFBIazvk0oYLxmCsmEgaUJsCA8-RrhxxsP3ZDDUrGICgbkEPvpwCU5SnskwGjkgoJ8oBc3LZmFo1tg67t3tCZxeoieph_oO_qV9PV89coPEdPiGVUtS4ad-jqBqOr2h2Rvco0Ho8395BMbm9eRvfx4_Pdw-jqMbZpnvEYpVKSFsowA5ALlaLiJcsLa1BQywEEVzRXiIVUUmS2UooxYIapDMoKIB2Ss_XchWvflyGYntXeYtOYObZLr7MMFOVZrgKZrUnrWu8dVnrh6plxK01B9-L0VPd-dO9H9-L0jzj9FVpPNkuWxQzLbeOvqQCcbgDjrWkqZ-a29n8cV1zIlAXucs19Bk2rfwfQ1-NJX6XfVXGGTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>880714897</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Foam Sclerotherapy: Investigating the Need for Sterile Air</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>DE ROOS, KEES‐PETER ; GROEN, LEON ; LEENDERS, ALEXANDER C.A.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>DE ROOS, KEES‐PETER ; GROEN, LEON ; LEENDERS, ALEXANDER C.A.P.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND Sclerotherapy with foam is becoming increasingly popular for the treatment of varicose veins. There is no consensus on the necessity of sterile air or other gases to produce foam. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the potential risk of bacterial inoculation of polidocanol (POL) foam using room air and the antimicrobial properties of polidocanol. MATERIALS AND METHODS The amount of airborne microorganisms was quantitatively measured. Four bacterial strains were tested for susceptibility to polidocanol: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Streptococcus pyogenes. RESULTS Air measurements varied as a result of air movement and the number of people in the room. Although the risk of introducing one colony‐formin unit can be calculated as less than 1 in 330, the clinical relevance is still to be determined. No inhibition of bacterial growth was achieved with POL in of any of the tested strains. CONCLUSIONS Foam sclerotherapy with POL prepared in a standard treatment room is a safe procedure without the risk of introducing a severe bacterial complication. The use of sterile air, nitrogen, or carbon dioxide is unnecessary and will make foam sclerotherapy with POL more elaborate and more expensive to use. The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-0512</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4725</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02044.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21615606</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Air Microbiology ; Bacterial Infections - etiology ; Bacterial Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Dermatology ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Polyethylene Glycols ; Pseudomonas aeruginosa - growth &amp; development ; Sclerosing Solutions ; Sclerotherapy - adverse effects ; Skin plastic surgery ; Staphylococcus aureus - growth &amp; development ; Staphylococcus epidermidis - growth &amp; development ; Sterilization ; Streptococcus pyogenes - growth &amp; development ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Varicose Veins - therapy</subject><ispartof>Dermatologic surgery, 2011-08, Vol.37 (8), p.1119-1124</ispartof><rights>2011 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3984-e67761b7a2a009573e74d29bcae51c400547197eeb67658cf772202a2780df003</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1524-4725.2011.02044.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1524-4725.2011.02044.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24745632$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21615606$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DE ROOS, KEES‐PETER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GROEN, LEON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEENDERS, ALEXANDER C.A.P.</creatorcontrib><title>Foam Sclerotherapy: Investigating the Need for Sterile Air</title><title>Dermatologic surgery</title><addtitle>Dermatol Surg</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND Sclerotherapy with foam is becoming increasingly popular for the treatment of varicose veins. There is no consensus on the necessity of sterile air or other gases to produce foam. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the potential risk of bacterial inoculation of polidocanol (POL) foam using room air and the antimicrobial properties of polidocanol. MATERIALS AND METHODS The amount of airborne microorganisms was quantitatively measured. Four bacterial strains were tested for susceptibility to polidocanol: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Streptococcus pyogenes. RESULTS Air measurements varied as a result of air movement and the number of people in the room. Although the risk of introducing one colony‐formin unit can be calculated as less than 1 in 330, the clinical relevance is still to be determined. No inhibition of bacterial growth was achieved with POL in of any of the tested strains. CONCLUSIONS Foam sclerotherapy with POL prepared in a standard treatment room is a safe procedure without the risk of introducing a severe bacterial complication. The use of sterile air, nitrogen, or carbon dioxide is unnecessary and will make foam sclerotherapy with POL more elaborate and more expensive to use. The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters.</description><subject>Air Microbiology</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - etiology</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols</subject><subject>Pseudomonas aeruginosa - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Sclerosing Solutions</subject><subject>Sclerotherapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Skin plastic surgery</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Staphylococcus epidermidis - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Sterilization</subject><subject>Streptococcus pyogenes - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Varicose Veins - therapy</subject><issn>1076-0512</issn><issn>1524-4725</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EolD4BZQNYpUwdvxIkFig8pQQLErXluNMIFXaFDsF-vc4tJQt3nhkn5m5OoREFBIazvk0oYLxmCsmEgaUJsCA8-RrhxxsP3ZDDUrGICgbkEPvpwCU5SnskwGjkgoJ8oBc3LZmFo1tg67t3tCZxeoieph_oO_qV9PV89coPEdPiGVUtS4ad-jqBqOr2h2Rvco0Ho8395BMbm9eRvfx4_Pdw-jqMbZpnvEYpVKSFsowA5ALlaLiJcsLa1BQywEEVzRXiIVUUmS2UooxYIapDMoKIB2Ss_XchWvflyGYntXeYtOYObZLr7MMFOVZrgKZrUnrWu8dVnrh6plxK01B9-L0VPd-dO9H9-L0jzj9FVpPNkuWxQzLbeOvqQCcbgDjrWkqZ-a29n8cV1zIlAXucs19Bk2rfwfQ1-NJX6XfVXGGTw</recordid><startdate>201108</startdate><enddate>201108</enddate><creator>DE ROOS, KEES‐PETER</creator><creator>GROEN, LEON</creator><creator>LEENDERS, ALEXANDER C.A.P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201108</creationdate><title>Foam Sclerotherapy: Investigating the Need for Sterile Air</title><author>DE ROOS, KEES‐PETER ; GROEN, LEON ; LEENDERS, ALEXANDER C.A.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3984-e67761b7a2a009573e74d29bcae51c400547197eeb67658cf772202a2780df003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Air Microbiology</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - etiology</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols</topic><topic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Sclerosing Solutions</topic><topic>Sclerotherapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Skin plastic surgery</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Staphylococcus epidermidis - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Sterilization</topic><topic>Streptococcus pyogenes - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Varicose Veins - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DE ROOS, KEES‐PETER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GROEN, LEON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEENDERS, ALEXANDER C.A.P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Dermatologic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DE ROOS, KEES‐PETER</au><au>GROEN, LEON</au><au>LEENDERS, ALEXANDER C.A.P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Foam Sclerotherapy: Investigating the Need for Sterile Air</atitle><jtitle>Dermatologic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Dermatol Surg</addtitle><date>2011-08</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1119</spage><epage>1124</epage><pages>1119-1124</pages><issn>1076-0512</issn><eissn>1524-4725</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND Sclerotherapy with foam is becoming increasingly popular for the treatment of varicose veins. There is no consensus on the necessity of sterile air or other gases to produce foam. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the potential risk of bacterial inoculation of polidocanol (POL) foam using room air and the antimicrobial properties of polidocanol. MATERIALS AND METHODS The amount of airborne microorganisms was quantitatively measured. Four bacterial strains were tested for susceptibility to polidocanol: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Streptococcus pyogenes. RESULTS Air measurements varied as a result of air movement and the number of people in the room. Although the risk of introducing one colony‐formin unit can be calculated as less than 1 in 330, the clinical relevance is still to be determined. No inhibition of bacterial growth was achieved with POL in of any of the tested strains. CONCLUSIONS Foam sclerotherapy with POL prepared in a standard treatment room is a safe procedure without the risk of introducing a severe bacterial complication. The use of sterile air, nitrogen, or carbon dioxide is unnecessary and will make foam sclerotherapy with POL more elaborate and more expensive to use. The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>21615606</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02044.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1076-0512
ispartof Dermatologic surgery, 2011-08, Vol.37 (8), p.1119-1124
issn 1076-0512
1524-4725
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_880714897
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
subjects Air Microbiology
Bacterial Infections - etiology
Bacterial Infections - prevention & control
Biological and medical sciences
Colony Count, Microbial
Dermatology
Humans
Medical sciences
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Polyethylene Glycols
Pseudomonas aeruginosa - growth & development
Sclerosing Solutions
Sclerotherapy - adverse effects
Skin plastic surgery
Staphylococcus aureus - growth & development
Staphylococcus epidermidis - growth & development
Sterilization
Streptococcus pyogenes - growth & development
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Varicose Veins - therapy
title Foam Sclerotherapy: Investigating the Need for Sterile Air
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T05%3A28%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Foam%20Sclerotherapy:%20Investigating%20the%20Need%20for%20Sterile%20Air&rft.jtitle=Dermatologic%20surgery&rft.au=DE%20ROOS,%20KEES%E2%80%90PETER&rft.date=2011-08&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1119&rft.epage=1124&rft.pages=1119-1124&rft.issn=1076-0512&rft.eissn=1524-4725&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02044.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E880714897%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=880714897&rft_id=info:pmid/21615606&rfr_iscdi=true