Validating LES-based flow and dispersion models
Validating LES-based flow and dispersion models for the purpose of predicting transient flow and dispersion phenomena is more demanding than validating RANS-based codes. Since the model output is no longer related to stationary or quasi-stationary boundary conditions, and since the model results are...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics 2011-04, Vol.99 (4), p.289-295 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 295 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 289 |
| container_title | Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics |
| container_volume | 99 |
| creator | Harms, F. Leitl, B. Schatzmann, M. Patnaik, G. |
| description | Validating LES-based flow and dispersion models for the purpose of predicting transient flow and dispersion phenomena is more demanding than validating RANS-based codes. Since the model output is no longer related to stationary or quasi-stationary boundary conditions, and since the model results are not meant to be used for predicting mean flow and dispersion patterns, an evaluation of the model based on mean results is not meaningful for most of the model-specific applications. A more sophisticated but also more complex validation approach based on statistically representative ensembles is required. By comparing frequency/probability distributions of flow and dispersion results with qualified reference data the reliability of complex models can be evaluated. Based on a careful comparison of FAST3D-CT simulation results with corresponding systematic wind tunnel data from the JU2003 experiments, an example for an application specific evaluation procedure for instantaneous puff dispersion modeling is given. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jweia.2011.01.007 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_880676823</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167610511000092</els_id><sourcerecordid>880676823</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e63ba99adfde700c256dd95b8acdd74d2893d0f4ec8ab4b20bf5f5c29ac1c233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKu_wM1sxNVMk8wjycKFlPqAgguL23AnuZEM05maTC3-e6cPXAoHzuY753IPIbeMZoyyatZkzQ49ZJwyltFRVJyRCZOCp5IpcU4mIyXSitHyklzF2NCRKEQ-IbMPaL2FwXefyXLxntYQ0Sau7XcJdDaxPm4wRN93ybq32MZrcuGgjXhz8ilZPS1W85d0-fb8On9cpiavyiHFKq9BKbDOoqDU8LKyVpW1BGOtKCyXKrfUFWgk1EXNae1KVxquwDDD83xK7o-1m9B_bTEOeu2jwbaFDvtt1FLSSlTyQOZH0oQ-xoBOb4JfQ_jRjOr9OLrRh3H0fhxNR1Expu5O_RANtC5AZ3z8i_KCKVXmcuQejtz4On57DDoaj51B6wOaQdve_3vnF3fWe0E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>880676823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validating LES-based flow and dispersion models</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Harms, F. ; Leitl, B. ; Schatzmann, M. ; Patnaik, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Harms, F. ; Leitl, B. ; Schatzmann, M. ; Patnaik, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Validating LES-based flow and dispersion models for the purpose of predicting transient flow and dispersion phenomena is more demanding than validating RANS-based codes. Since the model output is no longer related to stationary or quasi-stationary boundary conditions, and since the model results are not meant to be used for predicting mean flow and dispersion patterns, an evaluation of the model based on mean results is not meaningful for most of the model-specific applications. A more sophisticated but also more complex validation approach based on statistically representative ensembles is required. By comparing frequency/probability distributions of flow and dispersion results with qualified reference data the reliability of complex models can be evaluated. Based on a careful comparison of FAST3D-CT simulation results with corresponding systematic wind tunnel data from the JU2003 experiments, an example for an application specific evaluation procedure for instantaneous puff dispersion modeling is given.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6105</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2011.01.007</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWEAD6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aerodynamics ; Applied sciences ; Boundary conditions ; Boundary layer wind tunnel ; Buildings. Public works ; Climatology and bioclimatics for buildings ; Computation methods. Tables. Charts ; Computer simulation ; Dispersions ; Exact sciences and technology ; LES model ; Mathematical models ; Puff dispersion ; Structural analysis. Stresses ; Urban development ; Urban dispersion ; Urban roughness ; Validation ; Wind engineering ; Wind tunnels</subject><ispartof>Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics, 2011-04, Vol.99 (4), p.289-295</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e63ba99adfde700c256dd95b8acdd74d2893d0f4ec8ab4b20bf5f5c29ac1c233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e63ba99adfde700c256dd95b8acdd74d2893d0f4ec8ab4b20bf5f5c29ac1c233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2011.01.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24199538$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harms, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leitl, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schatzmann, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patnaik, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Validating LES-based flow and dispersion models</title><title>Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics</title><description>Validating LES-based flow and dispersion models for the purpose of predicting transient flow and dispersion phenomena is more demanding than validating RANS-based codes. Since the model output is no longer related to stationary or quasi-stationary boundary conditions, and since the model results are not meant to be used for predicting mean flow and dispersion patterns, an evaluation of the model based on mean results is not meaningful for most of the model-specific applications. A more sophisticated but also more complex validation approach based on statistically representative ensembles is required. By comparing frequency/probability distributions of flow and dispersion results with qualified reference data the reliability of complex models can be evaluated. Based on a careful comparison of FAST3D-CT simulation results with corresponding systematic wind tunnel data from the JU2003 experiments, an example for an application specific evaluation procedure for instantaneous puff dispersion modeling is given.</description><subject>Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Boundary layer wind tunnel</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Climatology and bioclimatics for buildings</subject><subject>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Dispersions</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>LES model</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Puff dispersion</subject><subject>Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><subject>Urban development</subject><subject>Urban dispersion</subject><subject>Urban roughness</subject><subject>Validation</subject><subject>Wind engineering</subject><subject>Wind tunnels</subject><issn>0167-6105</issn><issn>1872-8197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKu_wM1sxNVMk8wjycKFlPqAgguL23AnuZEM05maTC3-e6cPXAoHzuY753IPIbeMZoyyatZkzQ49ZJwyltFRVJyRCZOCp5IpcU4mIyXSitHyklzF2NCRKEQ-IbMPaL2FwXefyXLxntYQ0Sau7XcJdDaxPm4wRN93ybq32MZrcuGgjXhz8ilZPS1W85d0-fb8On9cpiavyiHFKq9BKbDOoqDU8LKyVpW1BGOtKCyXKrfUFWgk1EXNae1KVxquwDDD83xK7o-1m9B_bTEOeu2jwbaFDvtt1FLSSlTyQOZH0oQ-xoBOb4JfQ_jRjOr9OLrRh3H0fhxNR1Expu5O_RANtC5AZ3z8i_KCKVXmcuQejtz4On57DDoaj51B6wOaQdve_3vnF3fWe0E</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Harms, F.</creator><creator>Leitl, B.</creator><creator>Schatzmann, M.</creator><creator>Patnaik, G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Validating LES-based flow and dispersion models</title><author>Harms, F. ; Leitl, B. ; Schatzmann, M. ; Patnaik, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e63ba99adfde700c256dd95b8acdd74d2893d0f4ec8ab4b20bf5f5c29ac1c233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Boundary layer wind tunnel</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Climatology and bioclimatics for buildings</topic><topic>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Dispersions</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>LES model</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Puff dispersion</topic><topic>Structural analysis. Stresses</topic><topic>Urban development</topic><topic>Urban dispersion</topic><topic>Urban roughness</topic><topic>Validation</topic><topic>Wind engineering</topic><topic>Wind tunnels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harms, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leitl, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schatzmann, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patnaik, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harms, F.</au><au>Leitl, B.</au><au>Schatzmann, M.</au><au>Patnaik, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validating LES-based flow and dispersion models</atitle><jtitle>Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics</jtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>289-295</pages><issn>0167-6105</issn><eissn>1872-8197</eissn><coden>JWEAD6</coden><abstract>Validating LES-based flow and dispersion models for the purpose of predicting transient flow and dispersion phenomena is more demanding than validating RANS-based codes. Since the model output is no longer related to stationary or quasi-stationary boundary conditions, and since the model results are not meant to be used for predicting mean flow and dispersion patterns, an evaluation of the model based on mean results is not meaningful for most of the model-specific applications. A more sophisticated but also more complex validation approach based on statistically representative ensembles is required. By comparing frequency/probability distributions of flow and dispersion results with qualified reference data the reliability of complex models can be evaluated. Based on a careful comparison of FAST3D-CT simulation results with corresponding systematic wind tunnel data from the JU2003 experiments, an example for an application specific evaluation procedure for instantaneous puff dispersion modeling is given.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jweia.2011.01.007</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0167-6105 |
| ispartof | Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics, 2011-04, Vol.99 (4), p.289-295 |
| issn | 0167-6105 1872-8197 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_880676823 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Aerodynamics Applied sciences Boundary conditions Boundary layer wind tunnel Buildings. Public works Climatology and bioclimatics for buildings Computation methods. Tables. Charts Computer simulation Dispersions Exact sciences and technology LES model Mathematical models Puff dispersion Structural analysis. Stresses Urban development Urban dispersion Urban roughness Validation Wind engineering Wind tunnels |
| title | Validating LES-based flow and dispersion models |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A49%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validating%20LES-based%20flow%20and%20dispersion%20models&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20wind%20engineering%20and%20industrial%20aerodynamics&rft.au=Harms,%20F.&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=289-295&rft.issn=0167-6105&rft.eissn=1872-8197&rft.coden=JWEAD6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jweia.2011.01.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E880676823%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=880676823&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0167610511000092&rfr_iscdi=true |