Competitive priorities, plant improvement and innovation capabilities, and operational performance: A test of two forms of fit

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the strategic contingency of plant improvement capability and innovation capability. Design/methodology/approach - Two forms of fit between the two capabilities and competitive priorities were empirically tested. Data collected from a sample of 238 m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of operations & production management 2011-01, Vol.31 (5), p.484-510
Hauptverfasser: Xiaosong Peng, David, Schroeder, Roger G., Shah, Rachna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 510
container_issue 5
container_start_page 484
container_title International journal of operations & production management
container_volume 31
creator Xiaosong Peng, David
Schroeder, Roger G.
Shah, Rachna
description Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the strategic contingency of plant improvement capability and innovation capability. Design/methodology/approach - Two forms of fit between the two capabilities and competitive priorities were empirically tested. Data collected from a sample of 238 manufacturing plants were used to test the hypotheses using regression. Findings - The results provide partial support for fit as mediation. However, there was no evidence supporting fit as moderation. It was found that improvement capability and innovation capability are associated with different competitive priorities and also have varying impact on different operational performance dimensions. Research limitations/implications - There are two limitations to this research: only three operations management (OM) practices are included in each capability examined; and there are somewhat limited measures of competitive priorities and operational performance. Originality/value - This study examines multiple forms of fit between competitive priorities and operations capabilities. The findings can inform managers to selectively implement OM practices for developing the needed operations capabilities given the chosen competitive priorities.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/01443571111126292
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_880656462</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>880656462</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-3fb26a7e46d6c4f44e7b403b0fdcb1dd304240892688c767d560e2a1352e52e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUMtKxEAQnIOC6-oHeMvNi9GeRybZowRfsOBFz2EeHRhJMnFmNuDfO3H3ZtPQRVXRdDUhNxTuKYXmAagQvKrpWkyyHTsjm5UrM1lfkMsYvwCAcVptiG79OGNyyS1YzMH5kCHGu2Ie1JQKN87BLzhixmqyhZsmv6jk_FQYNSvthpN9Ff2M4U9TQ5Fh78OoJoNX5LxXQ8Tr09ySz-enj_a13L-_vLWP-9IwCankvWZS1SiklUb0QmCtBXANvTWaWstBMAHNjsmmMbWsbSUBmaK8Ypib8y25Pe7NJ38fMKZudNHgkIOgP8SuaUBWUkiWnfToNMHHGLDvcvJRhZ-OQre-sPv3Qv4LaxdnNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>880656462</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Competitive priorities, plant improvement and innovation capabilities, and operational performance: A test of two forms of fit</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Xiaosong Peng, David ; Schroeder, Roger G. ; Shah, Rachna</creator><contributor>Demeter, Krisztina</contributor><creatorcontrib>Xiaosong Peng, David ; Schroeder, Roger G. ; Shah, Rachna ; Demeter, Krisztina</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the strategic contingency of plant improvement capability and innovation capability. Design/methodology/approach - Two forms of fit between the two capabilities and competitive priorities were empirically tested. Data collected from a sample of 238 manufacturing plants were used to test the hypotheses using regression. Findings - The results provide partial support for fit as mediation. However, there was no evidence supporting fit as moderation. It was found that improvement capability and innovation capability are associated with different competitive priorities and also have varying impact on different operational performance dimensions. Research limitations/implications - There are two limitations to this research: only three operations management (OM) practices are included in each capability examined; and there are somewhat limited measures of competitive priorities and operational performance. Originality/value - This study examines multiple forms of fit between competitive priorities and operations capabilities. The findings can inform managers to selectively implement OM practices for developing the needed operations capabilities given the chosen competitive priorities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-3577</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/01443571111126292</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Contingency ; Empirical analysis ; Industrial engineering ; Mediation ; Plants ; Priorities ; Production management ; Regression</subject><ispartof>International journal of operations &amp; production management, 2011-01, Vol.31 (5), p.484-510</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-3fb26a7e46d6c4f44e7b403b0fdcb1dd304240892688c767d560e2a1352e52e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,966,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Demeter, Krisztina</contributor><creatorcontrib>Xiaosong Peng, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Roger G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Rachna</creatorcontrib><title>Competitive priorities, plant improvement and innovation capabilities, and operational performance: A test of two forms of fit</title><title>International journal of operations &amp; production management</title><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the strategic contingency of plant improvement capability and innovation capability. Design/methodology/approach - Two forms of fit between the two capabilities and competitive priorities were empirically tested. Data collected from a sample of 238 manufacturing plants were used to test the hypotheses using regression. Findings - The results provide partial support for fit as mediation. However, there was no evidence supporting fit as moderation. It was found that improvement capability and innovation capability are associated with different competitive priorities and also have varying impact on different operational performance dimensions. Research limitations/implications - There are two limitations to this research: only three operations management (OM) practices are included in each capability examined; and there are somewhat limited measures of competitive priorities and operational performance. Originality/value - This study examines multiple forms of fit between competitive priorities and operations capabilities. The findings can inform managers to selectively implement OM practices for developing the needed operations capabilities given the chosen competitive priorities.</description><subject>Contingency</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Industrial engineering</subject><subject>Mediation</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Priorities</subject><subject>Production management</subject><subject>Regression</subject><issn>0144-3577</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplUMtKxEAQnIOC6-oHeMvNi9GeRybZowRfsOBFz2EeHRhJMnFmNuDfO3H3ZtPQRVXRdDUhNxTuKYXmAagQvKrpWkyyHTsjm5UrM1lfkMsYvwCAcVptiG79OGNyyS1YzMH5kCHGu2Ie1JQKN87BLzhixmqyhZsmv6jk_FQYNSvthpN9Ff2M4U9TQ5Fh78OoJoNX5LxXQ8Tr09ySz-enj_a13L-_vLWP-9IwCankvWZS1SiklUb0QmCtBXANvTWaWstBMAHNjsmmMbWsbSUBmaK8Ypib8y25Pe7NJ38fMKZudNHgkIOgP8SuaUBWUkiWnfToNMHHGLDvcvJRhZ-OQre-sPv3Qv4LaxdnNA</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Xiaosong Peng, David</creator><creator>Schroeder, Roger G.</creator><creator>Shah, Rachna</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Competitive priorities, plant improvement and innovation capabilities, and operational performance</title><author>Xiaosong Peng, David ; Schroeder, Roger G. ; Shah, Rachna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-3fb26a7e46d6c4f44e7b403b0fdcb1dd304240892688c767d560e2a1352e52e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Contingency</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Industrial engineering</topic><topic>Mediation</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Priorities</topic><topic>Production management</topic><topic>Regression</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xiaosong Peng, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Roger G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Rachna</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>International journal of operations &amp; production management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xiaosong Peng, David</au><au>Schroeder, Roger G.</au><au>Shah, Rachna</au><au>Demeter, Krisztina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Competitive priorities, plant improvement and innovation capabilities, and operational performance: A test of two forms of fit</atitle><jtitle>International journal of operations &amp; production management</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>484</spage><epage>510</epage><pages>484-510</pages><issn>0144-3577</issn><abstract>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the strategic contingency of plant improvement capability and innovation capability. Design/methodology/approach - Two forms of fit between the two capabilities and competitive priorities were empirically tested. Data collected from a sample of 238 manufacturing plants were used to test the hypotheses using regression. Findings - The results provide partial support for fit as mediation. However, there was no evidence supporting fit as moderation. It was found that improvement capability and innovation capability are associated with different competitive priorities and also have varying impact on different operational performance dimensions. Research limitations/implications - There are two limitations to this research: only three operations management (OM) practices are included in each capability examined; and there are somewhat limited measures of competitive priorities and operational performance. Originality/value - This study examines multiple forms of fit between competitive priorities and operations capabilities. The findings can inform managers to selectively implement OM practices for developing the needed operations capabilities given the chosen competitive priorities.</abstract><doi>10.1108/01443571111126292</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-3577
ispartof International journal of operations & production management, 2011-01, Vol.31 (5), p.484-510
issn 0144-3577
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_880656462
source Emerald Journals
subjects Contingency
Empirical analysis
Industrial engineering
Mediation
Plants
Priorities
Production management
Regression
title Competitive priorities, plant improvement and innovation capabilities, and operational performance: A test of two forms of fit
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T06%3A09%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Competitive%20priorities,%20plant%20improvement%20and%20innovation%20capabilities,%20and%20operational%20performance:%20A%20test%20of%20two%20forms%20of%20fit&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20operations%20&%20production%20management&rft.au=Xiaosong%20Peng,%20David&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=484&rft.epage=510&rft.pages=484-510&rft.issn=0144-3577&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/01443571111126292&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E880656462%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=880656462&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true