Comparison of Blood and Feather Pulp Samples for the Diagnosis of Marek's Disease and for Monitoring Marek's Disease Vaccination by Real Time-PCR

Comparison of blood and feather pulp (FP) samples for the diagnosis of Marek's disease (MD) and for monitoring Marek's diseases vaccination in chickens (serotypes 2 and 3 vaccines) by real time-PCR was evaluated. For diagnosis of MD, quantification of serotype 1 Marek's disease virus...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Avian diseases 2011-06, Vol.55 (2), p.302-310
Hauptverfasser: Cortes, Aneg L, Montiel, Enrique R, Lemiere, Stephane, Gimeno, Isabel M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 310
container_issue 2
container_start_page 302
container_title Avian diseases
container_volume 55
creator Cortes, Aneg L
Montiel, Enrique R
Lemiere, Stephane
Gimeno, Isabel M
description Comparison of blood and feather pulp (FP) samples for the diagnosis of Marek's disease (MD) and for monitoring Marek's diseases vaccination in chickens (serotypes 2 and 3 vaccines) by real time-PCR was evaluated. For diagnosis of MD, quantification of serotype 1 Marek's disease virus (MDV) DNA load was evaluated in 21 chickens suffering from MD. For each chicken, samples of blood and FP were collected and MDV DNA load was quantified. Solid tumors are the sample of choice for MD diagnosis by real time-PCR and, hence, 14 solid tumors were included in the study as positive controls. Load of MDV DNA in FP was equivalent to that detected in solid tumors (threshold cycle [Ct] ratio above 1.7). MDV DNA load in blood samples was lower than in solid tumors and FP samples. Nonetheless, there was a statistically significant correlation of the results obtained from FP and blood (r  =  0.92). Results of the Pearson correlation test showed that Ct ratio values of 1.7 in FP correspond to Ct ratio values of 1.2 in peripheral blood. For monitoring vaccines, serotypes 2 and 3 MDV DNA load was evaluated in blood and FP samples of vaccinated chickens. Serotype 2 MDV DNA load was evaluated in samples of blood and FP from 34 chickens vaccinated with SB-1 strain. Serotype 3 MDV DNA load was evaluated in blood and FP samples from 53 chickens vaccinated with HVT strain. For both serotypes, frequency of positive samples and load of vaccine DNA was higher in FP than in blood samples. There was not a statistically significant correlation between the load of SB-1 DNA (r  =  0.17) or HVT DNA (r  =  −0.04) in FP and blood. Our results show that the load of serotypes 1, 2, and 3 DNA is higher in FP than in blood. Diagnosis of MD could be done using both FP and blood samples. Monitoring of MD vaccination by real time-PCR required the use of FP samples. There were a high percentage of false negative samples when using blood to detect serotypes 2 and 3 MDV by real time-PCR.
doi_str_mv 10.1637/9578-101510-ResNote.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_880134693</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41319337</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41319337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b407t-5d2492fe67a78666091052237b684ed54ff2e6a47b16092496588dc97ad9fbfa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhEYq8azcpdvy_hKEFpLZUQ2FrOcl1cUniYGcWfQzeGA8ZukFCXV3rnu_cI_kgdETJKZVMvTFC6YoSKiipNpCv4gyn9AlaUcN0xZmgT9GKECKqmmh5gF7kfEcIVUaS5-igLg_GuVmhX-s4TC6FHEccPX7Xx9hhN3b4HNz8HRK-3vYT_uKGqYeMfUy4bPH74G7HmEPeeS5dgh_HuSwzuAx_3DvwMo5hjimMt_8g31zbhtHNoaQ293gDrsc3YYDqer15iZ5512d4tZ-H6Ov52c36Y3Xx-cOn9duLquFEzZXoam5qD1I5paWUxFAi6pqpRmoOneDe1yAdVw0tWmGl0LprjXKd8Y137BAdL3enFH9uIc92CLmFvncjxG22WhPKuDSskCf_JanSogRTRgoqFrRNMecE3k4pDC7dW0rsrje7680uvdl9b5YW3-t9xLYZoHtw_S2qAEcLcJfLnz7onLJSOFNFZ4vehBhHeGTsb8ZSrqY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1785237130</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Blood and Feather Pulp Samples for the Diagnosis of Marek's Disease and for Monitoring Marek's Disease Vaccination by Real Time-PCR</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BioOne</source><creator>Cortes, Aneg L ; Montiel, Enrique R ; Lemiere, Stephane ; Gimeno, Isabel M</creator><creatorcontrib>Cortes, Aneg L ; Montiel, Enrique R ; Lemiere, Stephane ; Gimeno, Isabel M</creatorcontrib><description>Comparison of blood and feather pulp (FP) samples for the diagnosis of Marek's disease (MD) and for monitoring Marek's diseases vaccination in chickens (serotypes 2 and 3 vaccines) by real time-PCR was evaluated. For diagnosis of MD, quantification of serotype 1 Marek's disease virus (MDV) DNA load was evaluated in 21 chickens suffering from MD. For each chicken, samples of blood and FP were collected and MDV DNA load was quantified. Solid tumors are the sample of choice for MD diagnosis by real time-PCR and, hence, 14 solid tumors were included in the study as positive controls. Load of MDV DNA in FP was equivalent to that detected in solid tumors (threshold cycle [Ct] ratio above 1.7). MDV DNA load in blood samples was lower than in solid tumors and FP samples. Nonetheless, there was a statistically significant correlation of the results obtained from FP and blood (r  =  0.92). Results of the Pearson correlation test showed that Ct ratio values of 1.7 in FP correspond to Ct ratio values of 1.2 in peripheral blood. For monitoring vaccines, serotypes 2 and 3 MDV DNA load was evaluated in blood and FP samples of vaccinated chickens. Serotype 2 MDV DNA load was evaluated in samples of blood and FP from 34 chickens vaccinated with SB-1 strain. Serotype 3 MDV DNA load was evaluated in blood and FP samples from 53 chickens vaccinated with HVT strain. For both serotypes, frequency of positive samples and load of vaccine DNA was higher in FP than in blood samples. There was not a statistically significant correlation between the load of SB-1 DNA (r  =  0.17) or HVT DNA (r  =  −0.04) in FP and blood. Our results show that the load of serotypes 1, 2, and 3 DNA is higher in FP than in blood. Diagnosis of MD could be done using both FP and blood samples. Monitoring of MD vaccination by real time-PCR required the use of FP samples. There were a high percentage of false negative samples when using blood to detect serotypes 2 and 3 MDV by real time-PCR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0005-2086</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-4351</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1637/9578-101510-ResNote.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21793449</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>953 College Station Road, Athens, GA 30602-4875: American Association of Avian Pathologists</publisher><subject>Animals ; Blood ; Chickens ; diagnosis ; DNA, Viral - isolation &amp; purification ; Feathers ; Feathers - virology ; Gallid herpesvirus 2 ; Mardivirus - genetics ; Marek Disease - blood ; Marek Disease - diagnosis ; Marek Disease - prevention &amp; control ; Marek Disease Vaccines - immunology ; Marek's disease ; Marek's disease herpesvirus ; Meats ; Plaque assay ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - veterinary ; real time-PCR ; Research Notes ; Tumors ; Vaccination ; vaccines ; Viral diseases ; Viral Plaque Assay ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>Avian diseases, 2011-06, Vol.55 (2), p.302-310</ispartof><rights>American Association of Avian Pathologists</rights><rights>Copyright 2011 American Association of Avian Pathologists, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b407t-5d2492fe67a78666091052237b684ed54ff2e6a47b16092496588dc97ad9fbfa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b407t-5d2492fe67a78666091052237b684ed54ff2e6a47b16092496588dc97ad9fbfa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1637/9578-101510-ResNote.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41319337$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,26955,27901,27902,52338,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21793449$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cortes, Aneg L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montiel, Enrique R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemiere, Stephane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gimeno, Isabel M</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Blood and Feather Pulp Samples for the Diagnosis of Marek's Disease and for Monitoring Marek's Disease Vaccination by Real Time-PCR</title><title>Avian diseases</title><addtitle>Avian Dis</addtitle><description>Comparison of blood and feather pulp (FP) samples for the diagnosis of Marek's disease (MD) and for monitoring Marek's diseases vaccination in chickens (serotypes 2 and 3 vaccines) by real time-PCR was evaluated. For diagnosis of MD, quantification of serotype 1 Marek's disease virus (MDV) DNA load was evaluated in 21 chickens suffering from MD. For each chicken, samples of blood and FP were collected and MDV DNA load was quantified. Solid tumors are the sample of choice for MD diagnosis by real time-PCR and, hence, 14 solid tumors were included in the study as positive controls. Load of MDV DNA in FP was equivalent to that detected in solid tumors (threshold cycle [Ct] ratio above 1.7). MDV DNA load in blood samples was lower than in solid tumors and FP samples. Nonetheless, there was a statistically significant correlation of the results obtained from FP and blood (r  =  0.92). Results of the Pearson correlation test showed that Ct ratio values of 1.7 in FP correspond to Ct ratio values of 1.2 in peripheral blood. For monitoring vaccines, serotypes 2 and 3 MDV DNA load was evaluated in blood and FP samples of vaccinated chickens. Serotype 2 MDV DNA load was evaluated in samples of blood and FP from 34 chickens vaccinated with SB-1 strain. Serotype 3 MDV DNA load was evaluated in blood and FP samples from 53 chickens vaccinated with HVT strain. For both serotypes, frequency of positive samples and load of vaccine DNA was higher in FP than in blood samples. There was not a statistically significant correlation between the load of SB-1 DNA (r  =  0.17) or HVT DNA (r  =  −0.04) in FP and blood. Our results show that the load of serotypes 1, 2, and 3 DNA is higher in FP than in blood. Diagnosis of MD could be done using both FP and blood samples. Monitoring of MD vaccination by real time-PCR required the use of FP samples. There were a high percentage of false negative samples when using blood to detect serotypes 2 and 3 MDV by real time-PCR.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>diagnosis</subject><subject>DNA, Viral - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Feathers</subject><subject>Feathers - virology</subject><subject>Gallid herpesvirus 2</subject><subject>Mardivirus - genetics</subject><subject>Marek Disease - blood</subject><subject>Marek Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Marek Disease - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Marek Disease Vaccines - immunology</subject><subject>Marek's disease</subject><subject>Marek's disease herpesvirus</subject><subject>Meats</subject><subject>Plaque assay</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - veterinary</subject><subject>real time-PCR</subject><subject>Research Notes</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>vaccines</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Viral Plaque Assay</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>0005-2086</issn><issn>1938-4351</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhEYq8azcpdvy_hKEFpLZUQ2FrOcl1cUniYGcWfQzeGA8ZukFCXV3rnu_cI_kgdETJKZVMvTFC6YoSKiipNpCv4gyn9AlaUcN0xZmgT9GKECKqmmh5gF7kfEcIVUaS5-igLg_GuVmhX-s4TC6FHEccPX7Xx9hhN3b4HNz8HRK-3vYT_uKGqYeMfUy4bPH74G7HmEPeeS5dgh_HuSwzuAx_3DvwMo5hjimMt_8g31zbhtHNoaQ293gDrsc3YYDqer15iZ5512d4tZ-H6Ov52c36Y3Xx-cOn9duLquFEzZXoam5qD1I5paWUxFAi6pqpRmoOneDe1yAdVw0tWmGl0LprjXKd8Y137BAdL3enFH9uIc92CLmFvncjxG22WhPKuDSskCf_JanSogRTRgoqFrRNMecE3k4pDC7dW0rsrje7680uvdl9b5YW3-t9xLYZoHtw_S2qAEcLcJfLnz7onLJSOFNFZ4vehBhHeGTsb8ZSrqY</recordid><startdate>201106</startdate><enddate>201106</enddate><creator>Cortes, Aneg L</creator><creator>Montiel, Enrique R</creator><creator>Lemiere, Stephane</creator><creator>Gimeno, Isabel M</creator><general>American Association of Avian Pathologists</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201106</creationdate><title>Comparison of Blood and Feather Pulp Samples for the Diagnosis of Marek's Disease and for Monitoring Marek's Disease Vaccination by Real Time-PCR</title><author>Cortes, Aneg L ; Montiel, Enrique R ; Lemiere, Stephane ; Gimeno, Isabel M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b407t-5d2492fe67a78666091052237b684ed54ff2e6a47b16092496588dc97ad9fbfa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>DNA, Viral - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Feathers</topic><topic>Feathers - virology</topic><topic>Gallid herpesvirus 2</topic><topic>Mardivirus - genetics</topic><topic>Marek Disease - blood</topic><topic>Marek Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Marek Disease - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Marek Disease Vaccines - immunology</topic><topic>Marek's disease</topic><topic>Marek's disease herpesvirus</topic><topic>Meats</topic><topic>Plaque assay</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - veterinary</topic><topic>real time-PCR</topic><topic>Research Notes</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>vaccines</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Viral Plaque Assay</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cortes, Aneg L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montiel, Enrique R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemiere, Stephane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gimeno, Isabel M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Avian diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cortes, Aneg L</au><au>Montiel, Enrique R</au><au>Lemiere, Stephane</au><au>Gimeno, Isabel M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Blood and Feather Pulp Samples for the Diagnosis of Marek's Disease and for Monitoring Marek's Disease Vaccination by Real Time-PCR</atitle><jtitle>Avian diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Avian Dis</addtitle><date>2011-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>302</spage><epage>310</epage><pages>302-310</pages><issn>0005-2086</issn><eissn>1938-4351</eissn><abstract>Comparison of blood and feather pulp (FP) samples for the diagnosis of Marek's disease (MD) and for monitoring Marek's diseases vaccination in chickens (serotypes 2 and 3 vaccines) by real time-PCR was evaluated. For diagnosis of MD, quantification of serotype 1 Marek's disease virus (MDV) DNA load was evaluated in 21 chickens suffering from MD. For each chicken, samples of blood and FP were collected and MDV DNA load was quantified. Solid tumors are the sample of choice for MD diagnosis by real time-PCR and, hence, 14 solid tumors were included in the study as positive controls. Load of MDV DNA in FP was equivalent to that detected in solid tumors (threshold cycle [Ct] ratio above 1.7). MDV DNA load in blood samples was lower than in solid tumors and FP samples. Nonetheless, there was a statistically significant correlation of the results obtained from FP and blood (r  =  0.92). Results of the Pearson correlation test showed that Ct ratio values of 1.7 in FP correspond to Ct ratio values of 1.2 in peripheral blood. For monitoring vaccines, serotypes 2 and 3 MDV DNA load was evaluated in blood and FP samples of vaccinated chickens. Serotype 2 MDV DNA load was evaluated in samples of blood and FP from 34 chickens vaccinated with SB-1 strain. Serotype 3 MDV DNA load was evaluated in blood and FP samples from 53 chickens vaccinated with HVT strain. For both serotypes, frequency of positive samples and load of vaccine DNA was higher in FP than in blood samples. There was not a statistically significant correlation between the load of SB-1 DNA (r  =  0.17) or HVT DNA (r  =  −0.04) in FP and blood. Our results show that the load of serotypes 1, 2, and 3 DNA is higher in FP than in blood. Diagnosis of MD could be done using both FP and blood samples. Monitoring of MD vaccination by real time-PCR required the use of FP samples. There were a high percentage of false negative samples when using blood to detect serotypes 2 and 3 MDV by real time-PCR.</abstract><cop>953 College Station Road, Athens, GA 30602-4875</cop><pub>American Association of Avian Pathologists</pub><pmid>21793449</pmid><doi>10.1637/9578-101510-ResNote.1</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0005-2086
ispartof Avian diseases, 2011-06, Vol.55 (2), p.302-310
issn 0005-2086
1938-4351
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_880134693
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; BioOne
subjects Animals
Blood
Chickens
diagnosis
DNA, Viral - isolation & purification
Feathers
Feathers - virology
Gallid herpesvirus 2
Mardivirus - genetics
Marek Disease - blood
Marek Disease - diagnosis
Marek Disease - prevention & control
Marek Disease Vaccines - immunology
Marek's disease
Marek's disease herpesvirus
Meats
Plaque assay
Polymerase chain reaction
Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods
Polymerase Chain Reaction - veterinary
real time-PCR
Research Notes
Tumors
Vaccination
vaccines
Viral diseases
Viral Plaque Assay
Viruses
title Comparison of Blood and Feather Pulp Samples for the Diagnosis of Marek's Disease and for Monitoring Marek's Disease Vaccination by Real Time-PCR
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T00%3A22%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Blood%20and%20Feather%20Pulp%20Samples%20for%20the%20Diagnosis%20of%20Marek's%20Disease%20and%20for%20Monitoring%20Marek's%20Disease%20Vaccination%20by%20Real%20Time-PCR&rft.jtitle=Avian%20diseases&rft.au=Cortes,%20Aneg%20L&rft.date=2011-06&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=302&rft.epage=310&rft.pages=302-310&rft.issn=0005-2086&rft.eissn=1938-4351&rft_id=info:doi/10.1637/9578-101510-ResNote.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41319337%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1785237130&rft_id=info:pmid/21793449&rft_jstor_id=41319337&rfr_iscdi=true