Trends in Outpatient Transthoracic Echocardiography: Impact of Appropriateness Criteria Publication

Abstract Background The impact of the 2007 American College of Cardiology Foundation Transthoracic Echocardiography Appropriateness Criteria on trends in appropriateness is unknown. Therefore, we sought to identify the appropriateness of outpatient transthoracic echocardiography pre- and postpublica...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of medicine 2011-08, Vol.124 (8), p.740-746
Hauptverfasser: Rahimi, Ali R., MD, MPH, York, Meghan, MD, Gheewala, Neil, MD, Markson, Larry, MD, Hauser, Thomas H., MD, MPH, MSc, Manning, Warren J., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 746
container_issue 8
container_start_page 740
container_title The American journal of medicine
container_volume 124
creator Rahimi, Ali R., MD, MPH
York, Meghan, MD
Gheewala, Neil, MD
Markson, Larry, MD
Hauser, Thomas H., MD, MPH, MSc
Manning, Warren J., MD
description Abstract Background The impact of the 2007 American College of Cardiology Foundation Transthoracic Echocardiography Appropriateness Criteria on trends in appropriateness is unknown. Therefore, we sought to identify the appropriateness of outpatient transthoracic echocardiography pre- and postpublication of this document. Methods The 2007 Appropriateness Criteria were used to classify outpatient echocardiographic studies at an academic medical center during October 2000 and October 2008. The patient's electronic medical record was used to identify echocardiographic indication and appropriateness. Results From October 2000 to October 2008, there was an 85% increase in outpatient echocardiographic volume. Using the Appropriateness Criteria, there was no significant change in inappropriate referrals (13% and 15%, P = .58). Sixty-five studies (12%) were referred for indications “not addressed” by the document, with an increase (7% to 15%, P = .012) from 2000 to 2008. In a second analysis, incorporating the 2008 Valve Guidelines, an increase was demonstrated in the total number of studies that could be classified, but there was no significant change in the proportion of inappropriate referrals ( P = .50). There remained a significant increase (3% to 10%, P = .009) in the proportion of indications “not addressed” by either guideline. Conclusion From October 2000 to October 2008, we experienced a near doubling of outpatient echocardiographic volume, with no significant change in the percent of inappropriate referrals despite interim publication of the Appropriateness Criteria document. In addition, there was an increase in echocardiographic referrals for “not addressed” indications. Future efforts are needed both to refine the Appropriateness Criteria to include unaddressed indications and to promote its effective implementation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.03.030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_879483799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002934311003421</els_id><sourcerecordid>879483799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-56b5e9ef3087afbc33cef103b7ddd8384918f6278b4c9284f1e3ac1bc5b186d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkm2L1DAQx4Mo3nr6DUSKIL7qmsc29cXBsZx6cHCC6-uQTqduap9MUmG_vSm7p3BvhIEw5Dd_ZuY_hLxmdMsoKz50Wzt0AzZbThnbUpGCPiEbppTKS1bwp2RDKeV5JaS4IC9C6FJKK1U8JxeclbqsqNgQ2Hscm5C5Mbtf4myjwzFme2_HEA-Tt-Agu4HDBNY3bvrh7Xw4fsxuh9lCzKY2u55nP83e2YgjhpDtvIuY0uzrUvcOkt40viTPWtsHfHV-L8n3Tzf73Zf87v7z7e76LgfFqpirolZYYSuoLm1bgxCALaOiLpum0ULLium24KWuJVRcy5ahsMBqUDXTRcPFJXl_0k0t_VowRDO4ANj3dsRpCSaNLLUoqyqRbx-R3bT4MTVntJZaF1KpBMkTBH4KwWNr0pyD9UfDqFktMJ05WWBWCwwVKWgqe3PWXur176HoYecJeHcGbADbt2nX4MI_TkquuSgSd3XiMO3st0NvAiR3ABvnEaJpJve_Th4LQO_GZEr_E48Y_o7MTOCGmm_ruazXwhilQnIm_gDS-rvk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>884886455</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trends in Outpatient Transthoracic Echocardiography: Impact of Appropriateness Criteria Publication</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rahimi, Ali R., MD, MPH ; York, Meghan, MD ; Gheewala, Neil, MD ; Markson, Larry, MD ; Hauser, Thomas H., MD, MPH, MSc ; Manning, Warren J., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Rahimi, Ali R., MD, MPH ; York, Meghan, MD ; Gheewala, Neil, MD ; Markson, Larry, MD ; Hauser, Thomas H., MD, MPH, MSc ; Manning, Warren J., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The impact of the 2007 American College of Cardiology Foundation Transthoracic Echocardiography Appropriateness Criteria on trends in appropriateness is unknown. Therefore, we sought to identify the appropriateness of outpatient transthoracic echocardiography pre- and postpublication of this document. Methods The 2007 Appropriateness Criteria were used to classify outpatient echocardiographic studies at an academic medical center during October 2000 and October 2008. The patient's electronic medical record was used to identify echocardiographic indication and appropriateness. Results From October 2000 to October 2008, there was an 85% increase in outpatient echocardiographic volume. Using the Appropriateness Criteria, there was no significant change in inappropriate referrals (13% and 15%, P = .58). Sixty-five studies (12%) were referred for indications “not addressed” by the document, with an increase (7% to 15%, P = .012) from 2000 to 2008. In a second analysis, incorporating the 2008 Valve Guidelines, an increase was demonstrated in the total number of studies that could be classified, but there was no significant change in the proportion of inappropriate referrals ( P = .50). There remained a significant increase (3% to 10%, P = .009) in the proportion of indications “not addressed” by either guideline. Conclusion From October 2000 to October 2008, we experienced a near doubling of outpatient echocardiographic volume, with no significant change in the percent of inappropriate referrals despite interim publication of the Appropriateness Criteria document. In addition, there was an increase in echocardiographic referrals for “not addressed” indications. Future efforts are needed both to refine the Appropriateness Criteria to include unaddressed indications and to promote its effective implementation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9343</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-7162</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.03.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21787903</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJMEAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Ambulatory Care - trends ; Appropriateness ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiac imaging ; Cardiology - methods ; Cardiology - trends ; Cardiovascular disease ; Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Cardiovascular system ; Confounding Factors (Epidemiology) ; Echocardiography ; Echocardiography - standards ; Echocardiography - trends ; Echocardiography - utilization ; Female ; General aspects ; General Practice - methods ; General Practice - trends ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical Records Systems, Computerized ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Outpatients - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Trends ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonic investigative techniques ; Utilization ; Utilization Review</subject><ispartof>The American journal of medicine, 2011-08, Vol.124 (8), p.740-746</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Aug 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-56b5e9ef3087afbc33cef103b7ddd8384918f6278b4c9284f1e3ac1bc5b186d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-56b5e9ef3087afbc33cef103b7ddd8384918f6278b4c9284f1e3ac1bc5b186d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002934311003421$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24428236$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21787903$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rahimi, Ali R., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>York, Meghan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gheewala, Neil, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markson, Larry, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauser, Thomas H., MD, MPH, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, Warren J., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Trends in Outpatient Transthoracic Echocardiography: Impact of Appropriateness Criteria Publication</title><title>The American journal of medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The impact of the 2007 American College of Cardiology Foundation Transthoracic Echocardiography Appropriateness Criteria on trends in appropriateness is unknown. Therefore, we sought to identify the appropriateness of outpatient transthoracic echocardiography pre- and postpublication of this document. Methods The 2007 Appropriateness Criteria were used to classify outpatient echocardiographic studies at an academic medical center during October 2000 and October 2008. The patient's electronic medical record was used to identify echocardiographic indication and appropriateness. Results From October 2000 to October 2008, there was an 85% increase in outpatient echocardiographic volume. Using the Appropriateness Criteria, there was no significant change in inappropriate referrals (13% and 15%, P = .58). Sixty-five studies (12%) were referred for indications “not addressed” by the document, with an increase (7% to 15%, P = .012) from 2000 to 2008. In a second analysis, incorporating the 2008 Valve Guidelines, an increase was demonstrated in the total number of studies that could be classified, but there was no significant change in the proportion of inappropriate referrals ( P = .50). There remained a significant increase (3% to 10%, P = .009) in the proportion of indications “not addressed” by either guideline. Conclusion From October 2000 to October 2008, we experienced a near doubling of outpatient echocardiographic volume, with no significant change in the percent of inappropriate referrals despite interim publication of the Appropriateness Criteria document. In addition, there was an increase in echocardiographic referrals for “not addressed” indications. Future efforts are needed both to refine the Appropriateness Criteria to include unaddressed indications and to promote its effective implementation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care - trends</subject><subject>Appropriateness</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiac imaging</subject><subject>Cardiology - methods</subject><subject>Cardiology - trends</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Echocardiography - standards</subject><subject>Echocardiography - trends</subject><subject>Echocardiography - utilization</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>General Practice - methods</subject><subject>General Practice - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Records Systems, Computerized</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outpatients - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonic investigative techniques</subject><subject>Utilization</subject><subject>Utilization Review</subject><issn>0002-9343</issn><issn>1555-7162</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkm2L1DAQx4Mo3nr6DUSKIL7qmsc29cXBsZx6cHCC6-uQTqduap9MUmG_vSm7p3BvhIEw5Dd_ZuY_hLxmdMsoKz50Wzt0AzZbThnbUpGCPiEbppTKS1bwp2RDKeV5JaS4IC9C6FJKK1U8JxeclbqsqNgQ2Hscm5C5Mbtf4myjwzFme2_HEA-Tt-Agu4HDBNY3bvrh7Xw4fsxuh9lCzKY2u55nP83e2YgjhpDtvIuY0uzrUvcOkt40viTPWtsHfHV-L8n3Tzf73Zf87v7z7e76LgfFqpirolZYYSuoLm1bgxCALaOiLpum0ULLium24KWuJVRcy5ahsMBqUDXTRcPFJXl_0k0t_VowRDO4ANj3dsRpCSaNLLUoqyqRbx-R3bT4MTVntJZaF1KpBMkTBH4KwWNr0pyD9UfDqFktMJ05WWBWCwwVKWgqe3PWXur176HoYecJeHcGbADbt2nX4MI_TkquuSgSd3XiMO3st0NvAiR3ABvnEaJpJve_Th4LQO_GZEr_E48Y_o7MTOCGmm_ruazXwhilQnIm_gDS-rvk</recordid><startdate>20110801</startdate><enddate>20110801</enddate><creator>Rahimi, Ali R., MD, MPH</creator><creator>York, Meghan, MD</creator><creator>Gheewala, Neil, MD</creator><creator>Markson, Larry, MD</creator><creator>Hauser, Thomas H., MD, MPH, MSc</creator><creator>Manning, Warren J., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110801</creationdate><title>Trends in Outpatient Transthoracic Echocardiography: Impact of Appropriateness Criteria Publication</title><author>Rahimi, Ali R., MD, MPH ; York, Meghan, MD ; Gheewala, Neil, MD ; Markson, Larry, MD ; Hauser, Thomas H., MD, MPH, MSc ; Manning, Warren J., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-56b5e9ef3087afbc33cef103b7ddd8384918f6278b4c9284f1e3ac1bc5b186d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care - trends</topic><topic>Appropriateness</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiac imaging</topic><topic>Cardiology - methods</topic><topic>Cardiology - trends</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Echocardiography - standards</topic><topic>Echocardiography - trends</topic><topic>Echocardiography - utilization</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>General Practice - methods</topic><topic>General Practice - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Records Systems, Computerized</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outpatients - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonic investigative techniques</topic><topic>Utilization</topic><topic>Utilization Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rahimi, Ali R., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>York, Meghan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gheewala, Neil, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markson, Larry, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauser, Thomas H., MD, MPH, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, Warren J., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rahimi, Ali R., MD, MPH</au><au>York, Meghan, MD</au><au>Gheewala, Neil, MD</au><au>Markson, Larry, MD</au><au>Hauser, Thomas H., MD, MPH, MSc</au><au>Manning, Warren J., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trends in Outpatient Transthoracic Echocardiography: Impact of Appropriateness Criteria Publication</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Med</addtitle><date>2011-08-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>740</spage><epage>746</epage><pages>740-746</pages><issn>0002-9343</issn><eissn>1555-7162</eissn><coden>AJMEAZ</coden><abstract>Abstract Background The impact of the 2007 American College of Cardiology Foundation Transthoracic Echocardiography Appropriateness Criteria on trends in appropriateness is unknown. Therefore, we sought to identify the appropriateness of outpatient transthoracic echocardiography pre- and postpublication of this document. Methods The 2007 Appropriateness Criteria were used to classify outpatient echocardiographic studies at an academic medical center during October 2000 and October 2008. The patient's electronic medical record was used to identify echocardiographic indication and appropriateness. Results From October 2000 to October 2008, there was an 85% increase in outpatient echocardiographic volume. Using the Appropriateness Criteria, there was no significant change in inappropriate referrals (13% and 15%, P = .58). Sixty-five studies (12%) were referred for indications “not addressed” by the document, with an increase (7% to 15%, P = .012) from 2000 to 2008. In a second analysis, incorporating the 2008 Valve Guidelines, an increase was demonstrated in the total number of studies that could be classified, but there was no significant change in the proportion of inappropriate referrals ( P = .50). There remained a significant increase (3% to 10%, P = .009) in the proportion of indications “not addressed” by either guideline. Conclusion From October 2000 to October 2008, we experienced a near doubling of outpatient echocardiographic volume, with no significant change in the percent of inappropriate referrals despite interim publication of the Appropriateness Criteria document. In addition, there was an increase in echocardiographic referrals for “not addressed” indications. Future efforts are needed both to refine the Appropriateness Criteria to include unaddressed indications and to promote its effective implementation.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21787903</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.03.030</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9343
ispartof The American journal of medicine, 2011-08, Vol.124 (8), p.740-746
issn 0002-9343
1555-7162
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_879483799
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Ambulatory Care - trends
Appropriateness
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiac imaging
Cardiology - methods
Cardiology - trends
Cardiovascular disease
Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnostic imaging
Cardiovascular system
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Echocardiography
Echocardiography - standards
Echocardiography - trends
Echocardiography - utilization
Female
General aspects
General Practice - methods
General Practice - trends
Humans
Internal Medicine
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical Records Systems, Computerized
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Outpatients - statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Trends
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonic investigative techniques
Utilization
Utilization Review
title Trends in Outpatient Transthoracic Echocardiography: Impact of Appropriateness Criteria Publication
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T23%3A35%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trends%20in%20Outpatient%20Transthoracic%20Echocardiography:%20Impact%20of%20Appropriateness%20Criteria%20Publication&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Rahimi,%20Ali%20R.,%20MD,%20MPH&rft.date=2011-08-01&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=740&rft.epage=746&rft.pages=740-746&rft.issn=0002-9343&rft.eissn=1555-7162&rft.coden=AJMEAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.03.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E879483799%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=884886455&rft_id=info:pmid/21787903&rft_els_id=S0002934311003421&rfr_iscdi=true