Trends in Outpatient Transthoracic Echocardiography: Impact of Appropriateness Criteria Publication
Abstract Background The impact of the 2007 American College of Cardiology Foundation Transthoracic Echocardiography Appropriateness Criteria on trends in appropriateness is unknown. Therefore, we sought to identify the appropriateness of outpatient transthoracic echocardiography pre- and postpublica...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of medicine 2011-08, Vol.124 (8), p.740-746 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 746 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 740 |
container_title | The American journal of medicine |
container_volume | 124 |
creator | Rahimi, Ali R., MD, MPH York, Meghan, MD Gheewala, Neil, MD Markson, Larry, MD Hauser, Thomas H., MD, MPH, MSc Manning, Warren J., MD |
description | Abstract Background The impact of the 2007 American College of Cardiology Foundation Transthoracic Echocardiography Appropriateness Criteria on trends in appropriateness is unknown. Therefore, we sought to identify the appropriateness of outpatient transthoracic echocardiography pre- and postpublication of this document. Methods The 2007 Appropriateness Criteria were used to classify outpatient echocardiographic studies at an academic medical center during October 2000 and October 2008. The patient's electronic medical record was used to identify echocardiographic indication and appropriateness. Results From October 2000 to October 2008, there was an 85% increase in outpatient echocardiographic volume. Using the Appropriateness Criteria, there was no significant change in inappropriate referrals (13% and 15%, P = .58). Sixty-five studies (12%) were referred for indications “not addressed” by the document, with an increase (7% to 15%, P = .012) from 2000 to 2008. In a second analysis, incorporating the 2008 Valve Guidelines, an increase was demonstrated in the total number of studies that could be classified, but there was no significant change in the proportion of inappropriate referrals ( P = .50). There remained a significant increase (3% to 10%, P = .009) in the proportion of indications “not addressed” by either guideline. Conclusion From October 2000 to October 2008, we experienced a near doubling of outpatient echocardiographic volume, with no significant change in the percent of inappropriate referrals despite interim publication of the Appropriateness Criteria document. In addition, there was an increase in echocardiographic referrals for “not addressed” indications. Future efforts are needed both to refine the Appropriateness Criteria to include unaddressed indications and to promote its effective implementation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.03.030 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_879483799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002934311003421</els_id><sourcerecordid>879483799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-56b5e9ef3087afbc33cef103b7ddd8384918f6278b4c9284f1e3ac1bc5b186d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkm2L1DAQx4Mo3nr6DUSKIL7qmsc29cXBsZx6cHCC6-uQTqduap9MUmG_vSm7p3BvhIEw5Dd_ZuY_hLxmdMsoKz50Wzt0AzZbThnbUpGCPiEbppTKS1bwp2RDKeV5JaS4IC9C6FJKK1U8JxeclbqsqNgQ2Hscm5C5Mbtf4myjwzFme2_HEA-Tt-Agu4HDBNY3bvrh7Xw4fsxuh9lCzKY2u55nP83e2YgjhpDtvIuY0uzrUvcOkt40viTPWtsHfHV-L8n3Tzf73Zf87v7z7e76LgfFqpirolZYYSuoLm1bgxCALaOiLpum0ULLium24KWuJVRcy5ahsMBqUDXTRcPFJXl_0k0t_VowRDO4ANj3dsRpCSaNLLUoqyqRbx-R3bT4MTVntJZaF1KpBMkTBH4KwWNr0pyD9UfDqFktMJ05WWBWCwwVKWgqe3PWXur176HoYecJeHcGbADbt2nX4MI_TkquuSgSd3XiMO3st0NvAiR3ABvnEaJpJve_Th4LQO_GZEr_E48Y_o7MTOCGmm_ruazXwhilQnIm_gDS-rvk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>884886455</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trends in Outpatient Transthoracic Echocardiography: Impact of Appropriateness Criteria Publication</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rahimi, Ali R., MD, MPH ; York, Meghan, MD ; Gheewala, Neil, MD ; Markson, Larry, MD ; Hauser, Thomas H., MD, MPH, MSc ; Manning, Warren J., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Rahimi, Ali R., MD, MPH ; York, Meghan, MD ; Gheewala, Neil, MD ; Markson, Larry, MD ; Hauser, Thomas H., MD, MPH, MSc ; Manning, Warren J., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The impact of the 2007 American College of Cardiology Foundation Transthoracic Echocardiography Appropriateness Criteria on trends in appropriateness is unknown. Therefore, we sought to identify the appropriateness of outpatient transthoracic echocardiography pre- and postpublication of this document. Methods The 2007 Appropriateness Criteria were used to classify outpatient echocardiographic studies at an academic medical center during October 2000 and October 2008. The patient's electronic medical record was used to identify echocardiographic indication and appropriateness. Results From October 2000 to October 2008, there was an 85% increase in outpatient echocardiographic volume. Using the Appropriateness Criteria, there was no significant change in inappropriate referrals (13% and 15%, P = .58). Sixty-five studies (12%) were referred for indications “not addressed” by the document, with an increase (7% to 15%, P = .012) from 2000 to 2008. In a second analysis, incorporating the 2008 Valve Guidelines, an increase was demonstrated in the total number of studies that could be classified, but there was no significant change in the proportion of inappropriate referrals ( P = .50). There remained a significant increase (3% to 10%, P = .009) in the proportion of indications “not addressed” by either guideline. Conclusion From October 2000 to October 2008, we experienced a near doubling of outpatient echocardiographic volume, with no significant change in the percent of inappropriate referrals despite interim publication of the Appropriateness Criteria document. In addition, there was an increase in echocardiographic referrals for “not addressed” indications. Future efforts are needed both to refine the Appropriateness Criteria to include unaddressed indications and to promote its effective implementation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9343</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-7162</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.03.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21787903</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJMEAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Ambulatory Care - trends ; Appropriateness ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiac imaging ; Cardiology - methods ; Cardiology - trends ; Cardiovascular disease ; Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Cardiovascular system ; Confounding Factors (Epidemiology) ; Echocardiography ; Echocardiography - standards ; Echocardiography - trends ; Echocardiography - utilization ; Female ; General aspects ; General Practice - methods ; General Practice - trends ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical Records Systems, Computerized ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Outpatients - statistics & numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Trends ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonic investigative techniques ; Utilization ; Utilization Review</subject><ispartof>The American journal of medicine, 2011-08, Vol.124 (8), p.740-746</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Aug 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-56b5e9ef3087afbc33cef103b7ddd8384918f6278b4c9284f1e3ac1bc5b186d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-56b5e9ef3087afbc33cef103b7ddd8384918f6278b4c9284f1e3ac1bc5b186d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002934311003421$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24428236$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21787903$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rahimi, Ali R., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>York, Meghan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gheewala, Neil, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markson, Larry, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauser, Thomas H., MD, MPH, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, Warren J., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Trends in Outpatient Transthoracic Echocardiography: Impact of Appropriateness Criteria Publication</title><title>The American journal of medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The impact of the 2007 American College of Cardiology Foundation Transthoracic Echocardiography Appropriateness Criteria on trends in appropriateness is unknown. Therefore, we sought to identify the appropriateness of outpatient transthoracic echocardiography pre- and postpublication of this document. Methods The 2007 Appropriateness Criteria were used to classify outpatient echocardiographic studies at an academic medical center during October 2000 and October 2008. The patient's electronic medical record was used to identify echocardiographic indication and appropriateness. Results From October 2000 to October 2008, there was an 85% increase in outpatient echocardiographic volume. Using the Appropriateness Criteria, there was no significant change in inappropriate referrals (13% and 15%, P = .58). Sixty-five studies (12%) were referred for indications “not addressed” by the document, with an increase (7% to 15%, P = .012) from 2000 to 2008. In a second analysis, incorporating the 2008 Valve Guidelines, an increase was demonstrated in the total number of studies that could be classified, but there was no significant change in the proportion of inappropriate referrals ( P = .50). There remained a significant increase (3% to 10%, P = .009) in the proportion of indications “not addressed” by either guideline. Conclusion From October 2000 to October 2008, we experienced a near doubling of outpatient echocardiographic volume, with no significant change in the percent of inappropriate referrals despite interim publication of the Appropriateness Criteria document. In addition, there was an increase in echocardiographic referrals for “not addressed” indications. Future efforts are needed both to refine the Appropriateness Criteria to include unaddressed indications and to promote its effective implementation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care - trends</subject><subject>Appropriateness</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiac imaging</subject><subject>Cardiology - methods</subject><subject>Cardiology - trends</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Echocardiography - standards</subject><subject>Echocardiography - trends</subject><subject>Echocardiography - utilization</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>General Practice - methods</subject><subject>General Practice - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Records Systems, Computerized</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outpatients - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonic investigative techniques</subject><subject>Utilization</subject><subject>Utilization Review</subject><issn>0002-9343</issn><issn>1555-7162</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkm2L1DAQx4Mo3nr6DUSKIL7qmsc29cXBsZx6cHCC6-uQTqduap9MUmG_vSm7p3BvhIEw5Dd_ZuY_hLxmdMsoKz50Wzt0AzZbThnbUpGCPiEbppTKS1bwp2RDKeV5JaS4IC9C6FJKK1U8JxeclbqsqNgQ2Hscm5C5Mbtf4myjwzFme2_HEA-Tt-Agu4HDBNY3bvrh7Xw4fsxuh9lCzKY2u55nP83e2YgjhpDtvIuY0uzrUvcOkt40viTPWtsHfHV-L8n3Tzf73Zf87v7z7e76LgfFqpirolZYYSuoLm1bgxCALaOiLpum0ULLium24KWuJVRcy5ahsMBqUDXTRcPFJXl_0k0t_VowRDO4ANj3dsRpCSaNLLUoqyqRbx-R3bT4MTVntJZaF1KpBMkTBH4KwWNr0pyD9UfDqFktMJ05WWBWCwwVKWgqe3PWXur176HoYecJeHcGbADbt2nX4MI_TkquuSgSd3XiMO3st0NvAiR3ABvnEaJpJve_Th4LQO_GZEr_E48Y_o7MTOCGmm_ruazXwhilQnIm_gDS-rvk</recordid><startdate>20110801</startdate><enddate>20110801</enddate><creator>Rahimi, Ali R., MD, MPH</creator><creator>York, Meghan, MD</creator><creator>Gheewala, Neil, MD</creator><creator>Markson, Larry, MD</creator><creator>Hauser, Thomas H., MD, MPH, MSc</creator><creator>Manning, Warren J., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110801</creationdate><title>Trends in Outpatient Transthoracic Echocardiography: Impact of Appropriateness Criteria Publication</title><author>Rahimi, Ali R., MD, MPH ; York, Meghan, MD ; Gheewala, Neil, MD ; Markson, Larry, MD ; Hauser, Thomas H., MD, MPH, MSc ; Manning, Warren J., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-56b5e9ef3087afbc33cef103b7ddd8384918f6278b4c9284f1e3ac1bc5b186d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care - trends</topic><topic>Appropriateness</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiac imaging</topic><topic>Cardiology - methods</topic><topic>Cardiology - trends</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Echocardiography - standards</topic><topic>Echocardiography - trends</topic><topic>Echocardiography - utilization</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>General Practice - methods</topic><topic>General Practice - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Records Systems, Computerized</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outpatients - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonic investigative techniques</topic><topic>Utilization</topic><topic>Utilization Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rahimi, Ali R., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>York, Meghan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gheewala, Neil, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markson, Larry, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauser, Thomas H., MD, MPH, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, Warren J., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rahimi, Ali R., MD, MPH</au><au>York, Meghan, MD</au><au>Gheewala, Neil, MD</au><au>Markson, Larry, MD</au><au>Hauser, Thomas H., MD, MPH, MSc</au><au>Manning, Warren J., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trends in Outpatient Transthoracic Echocardiography: Impact of Appropriateness Criteria Publication</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Med</addtitle><date>2011-08-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>740</spage><epage>746</epage><pages>740-746</pages><issn>0002-9343</issn><eissn>1555-7162</eissn><coden>AJMEAZ</coden><abstract>Abstract Background The impact of the 2007 American College of Cardiology Foundation Transthoracic Echocardiography Appropriateness Criteria on trends in appropriateness is unknown. Therefore, we sought to identify the appropriateness of outpatient transthoracic echocardiography pre- and postpublication of this document. Methods The 2007 Appropriateness Criteria were used to classify outpatient echocardiographic studies at an academic medical center during October 2000 and October 2008. The patient's electronic medical record was used to identify echocardiographic indication and appropriateness. Results From October 2000 to October 2008, there was an 85% increase in outpatient echocardiographic volume. Using the Appropriateness Criteria, there was no significant change in inappropriate referrals (13% and 15%, P = .58). Sixty-five studies (12%) were referred for indications “not addressed” by the document, with an increase (7% to 15%, P = .012) from 2000 to 2008. In a second analysis, incorporating the 2008 Valve Guidelines, an increase was demonstrated in the total number of studies that could be classified, but there was no significant change in the proportion of inappropriate referrals ( P = .50). There remained a significant increase (3% to 10%, P = .009) in the proportion of indications “not addressed” by either guideline. Conclusion From October 2000 to October 2008, we experienced a near doubling of outpatient echocardiographic volume, with no significant change in the percent of inappropriate referrals despite interim publication of the Appropriateness Criteria document. In addition, there was an increase in echocardiographic referrals for “not addressed” indications. Future efforts are needed both to refine the Appropriateness Criteria to include unaddressed indications and to promote its effective implementation.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21787903</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.03.030</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9343 |
ispartof | The American journal of medicine, 2011-08, Vol.124 (8), p.740-746 |
issn | 0002-9343 1555-7162 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_879483799 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Ambulatory Care - trends Appropriateness Biological and medical sciences Cardiac imaging Cardiology - methods Cardiology - trends Cardiovascular disease Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnostic imaging Cardiovascular system Confounding Factors (Epidemiology) Echocardiography Echocardiography - standards Echocardiography - trends Echocardiography - utilization Female General aspects General Practice - methods General Practice - trends Humans Internal Medicine Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Male Medical Records Systems, Computerized Medical sciences Middle Aged Outpatients - statistics & numerical data Retrospective Studies Trends Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasonic investigative techniques Utilization Utilization Review |
title | Trends in Outpatient Transthoracic Echocardiography: Impact of Appropriateness Criteria Publication |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T23%3A35%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trends%20in%20Outpatient%20Transthoracic%20Echocardiography:%20Impact%20of%20Appropriateness%20Criteria%20Publication&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Rahimi,%20Ali%20R.,%20MD,%20MPH&rft.date=2011-08-01&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=740&rft.epage=746&rft.pages=740-746&rft.issn=0002-9343&rft.eissn=1555-7162&rft.coden=AJMEAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.03.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E879483799%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=884886455&rft_id=info:pmid/21787903&rft_els_id=S0002934311003421&rfr_iscdi=true |