Adapting auctions for the provision of ecosystem services at the landscape scale

Auctions, or competitive tenders, can overcome information asymmetries to efficiently allocate limited funding for ecosystem services. Most auctions focus on ecosystem services on individual properties to maximise the total amount provided. However, for many services it is not just the total quantit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological economics 2011-07, Vol.70 (9), p.1621-1627
Hauptverfasser: Reeson, Andrew F., Rodriguez, Luis C., Whitten, Stuart M., Williams, Kristen, Nolles, Karel, Windle, Jill, Rolfe, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1627
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1621
container_title Ecological economics
container_volume 70
creator Reeson, Andrew F.
Rodriguez, Luis C.
Whitten, Stuart M.
Williams, Kristen
Nolles, Karel
Windle, Jill
Rolfe, John
description Auctions, or competitive tenders, can overcome information asymmetries to efficiently allocate limited funding for ecosystem services. Most auctions focus on ecosystem services on individual properties to maximise the total amount provided. However, for many services it is not just the total quantity but their location in the landscape relative to other sites that matters. For example, biodiversity conservation may be much more effective if conserved sites are connected. Adapting auctions to address ecosystem services at the landscape scale requires an auction mechanism which can promote coordination while maintaining competition. Multi-round auctions, in which bidding is spread over a number of rounds with information provided between rounds on the location of other bids in the landscape, offer an approach to cost effectively deliver landscape-scale ecosystem services. Experimental economic testing shows these auctions deliver the most cost effective environmental outcomes when the number of rounds is unknown in advance, which minimises rent-seeking behaviour. It also shows that a form of bid-improvement rule facilitates coordination and reduces rent seeking. Where the biophysical science is well developed, such auctions should be relatively straightforward to implement and participate in, and have the potential to provide significantly better outcomes than standard ‘one-shot’ tenders. ► Ecosystem service auctions have seldom targeted landscape-scale synergies. ► We experimentally test a multi-round auction for conservation corridors. ► A multi-round auction can successfully deliver landscape-scale conservation. ► It is more efficient when participants do not know the number of rounds in advance. ► It is more efficient when bid prices cannot be increased between rounds.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_879478387</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0921800911001315</els_id><sourcerecordid>874188503</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-2941f5d35fe780a65e199a09d467276f7c5b27ea6f873b86a37d0a44e077b8863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1r3DAUFCWFbtL-haJbTnafLFsft4bQJIWF5NCehVZ-brR4bVfSLuy_z8tu2msEMwIxM4yGsa8CagFCfdvWGOaRMNUNCFGDrKFpPrCVMFpWSoC6YCuwjagMgP3ELnPeAoBSVq7Y003vlxKnP9zvQ4nzlPkwJ16ekS9pPsRMT3weOMXnYy644xnTIQbM3JeTbPRTn4NfkBOP-Jl9HPyY8cvbfcV-3_34dftQrR_vf97erKvQ6bZUjW3F0PWyG1Ab8KpDYa0H27dKN1oNOnSbRqNXA31iY5SXugfftghab4xR8opdn3Op5t895uJ2MQccqQ7O--yMtq02ktzvK1thTAeSlOqsDGnOOeHglhR3Ph2dAPe6tdu6f1u7160dSEdbk3F9NiZcMPx3IZ2T3B2c9BqIjoSTU_pIsISFIFQjHJF2z2VHcd_PcUgDHiIml0PEKWAfE4bi-jm-1-gFFiukcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>874188503</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adapting auctions for the provision of ecosystem services at the landscape scale</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Reeson, Andrew F. ; Rodriguez, Luis C. ; Whitten, Stuart M. ; Williams, Kristen ; Nolles, Karel ; Windle, Jill ; Rolfe, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Reeson, Andrew F. ; Rodriguez, Luis C. ; Whitten, Stuart M. ; Williams, Kristen ; Nolles, Karel ; Windle, Jill ; Rolfe, John</creatorcontrib><description>Auctions, or competitive tenders, can overcome information asymmetries to efficiently allocate limited funding for ecosystem services. Most auctions focus on ecosystem services on individual properties to maximise the total amount provided. However, for many services it is not just the total quantity but their location in the landscape relative to other sites that matters. For example, biodiversity conservation may be much more effective if conserved sites are connected. Adapting auctions to address ecosystem services at the landscape scale requires an auction mechanism which can promote coordination while maintaining competition. Multi-round auctions, in which bidding is spread over a number of rounds with information provided between rounds on the location of other bids in the landscape, offer an approach to cost effectively deliver landscape-scale ecosystem services. Experimental economic testing shows these auctions deliver the most cost effective environmental outcomes when the number of rounds is unknown in advance, which minimises rent-seeking behaviour. It also shows that a form of bid-improvement rule facilitates coordination and reduces rent seeking. Where the biophysical science is well developed, such auctions should be relatively straightforward to implement and participate in, and have the potential to provide significantly better outcomes than standard ‘one-shot’ tenders. ► Ecosystem service auctions have seldom targeted landscape-scale synergies. ► We experimentally test a multi-round auction for conservation corridors. ► A multi-round auction can successfully deliver landscape-scale conservation. ► It is more efficient when participants do not know the number of rounds in advance. ► It is more efficient when bid prices cannot be increased between rounds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-8009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Auction ; Auctions ; Biodiversity conservation ; Biodiversity conservation Auction Competitive tender Experimental economics Ecosystem services Market-based instrument ; Competition ; Competitive tender ; Economics ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Experimental economics ; Market-based instrument</subject><ispartof>Ecological economics, 2011-07, Vol.70 (9), p.1621-1627</ispartof><rights>2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-2941f5d35fe780a65e199a09d467276f7c5b27ea6f873b86a37d0a44e077b8863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-2941f5d35fe780a65e199a09d467276f7c5b27ea6f873b86a37d0a44e077b8863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800911001315$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,3994,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeecolec/v_3a70_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a9_3ap_3a1621-1627.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reeson, Andrew F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Luis C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitten, Stuart M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nolles, Karel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windle, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rolfe, John</creatorcontrib><title>Adapting auctions for the provision of ecosystem services at the landscape scale</title><title>Ecological economics</title><description>Auctions, or competitive tenders, can overcome information asymmetries to efficiently allocate limited funding for ecosystem services. Most auctions focus on ecosystem services on individual properties to maximise the total amount provided. However, for many services it is not just the total quantity but their location in the landscape relative to other sites that matters. For example, biodiversity conservation may be much more effective if conserved sites are connected. Adapting auctions to address ecosystem services at the landscape scale requires an auction mechanism which can promote coordination while maintaining competition. Multi-round auctions, in which bidding is spread over a number of rounds with information provided between rounds on the location of other bids in the landscape, offer an approach to cost effectively deliver landscape-scale ecosystem services. Experimental economic testing shows these auctions deliver the most cost effective environmental outcomes when the number of rounds is unknown in advance, which minimises rent-seeking behaviour. It also shows that a form of bid-improvement rule facilitates coordination and reduces rent seeking. Where the biophysical science is well developed, such auctions should be relatively straightforward to implement and participate in, and have the potential to provide significantly better outcomes than standard ‘one-shot’ tenders. ► Ecosystem service auctions have seldom targeted landscape-scale synergies. ► We experimentally test a multi-round auction for conservation corridors. ► A multi-round auction can successfully deliver landscape-scale conservation. ► It is more efficient when participants do not know the number of rounds in advance. ► It is more efficient when bid prices cannot be increased between rounds.</description><subject>Auction</subject><subject>Auctions</subject><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>Biodiversity conservation Auction Competitive tender Experimental economics Ecosystem services Market-based instrument</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competitive tender</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Experimental economics</subject><subject>Market-based instrument</subject><issn>0921-8009</issn><issn>1873-6106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUE1r3DAUFCWFbtL-haJbTnafLFsft4bQJIWF5NCehVZ-brR4bVfSLuy_z8tu2msEMwIxM4yGsa8CagFCfdvWGOaRMNUNCFGDrKFpPrCVMFpWSoC6YCuwjagMgP3ELnPeAoBSVq7Y003vlxKnP9zvQ4nzlPkwJ16ekS9pPsRMT3weOMXnYy644xnTIQbM3JeTbPRTn4NfkBOP-Jl9HPyY8cvbfcV-3_34dftQrR_vf97erKvQ6bZUjW3F0PWyG1Ab8KpDYa0H27dKN1oNOnSbRqNXA31iY5SXugfftghab4xR8opdn3Op5t895uJ2MQccqQ7O--yMtq02ktzvK1thTAeSlOqsDGnOOeHglhR3Ph2dAPe6tdu6f1u7160dSEdbk3F9NiZcMPx3IZ2T3B2c9BqIjoSTU_pIsISFIFQjHJF2z2VHcd_PcUgDHiIml0PEKWAfE4bi-jm-1-gFFiukcA</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Reeson, Andrew F.</creator><creator>Rodriguez, Luis C.</creator><creator>Whitten, Stuart M.</creator><creator>Williams, Kristen</creator><creator>Nolles, Karel</creator><creator>Windle, Jill</creator><creator>Rolfe, John</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Adapting auctions for the provision of ecosystem services at the landscape scale</title><author>Reeson, Andrew F. ; Rodriguez, Luis C. ; Whitten, Stuart M. ; Williams, Kristen ; Nolles, Karel ; Windle, Jill ; Rolfe, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-2941f5d35fe780a65e199a09d467276f7c5b27ea6f873b86a37d0a44e077b8863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Auction</topic><topic>Auctions</topic><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>Biodiversity conservation Auction Competitive tender Experimental economics Ecosystem services Market-based instrument</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competitive tender</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Experimental economics</topic><topic>Market-based instrument</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reeson, Andrew F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Luis C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitten, Stuart M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nolles, Karel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windle, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rolfe, John</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reeson, Andrew F.</au><au>Rodriguez, Luis C.</au><au>Whitten, Stuart M.</au><au>Williams, Kristen</au><au>Nolles, Karel</au><au>Windle, Jill</au><au>Rolfe, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adapting auctions for the provision of ecosystem services at the landscape scale</atitle><jtitle>Ecological economics</jtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1621</spage><epage>1627</epage><pages>1621-1627</pages><issn>0921-8009</issn><eissn>1873-6106</eissn><abstract>Auctions, or competitive tenders, can overcome information asymmetries to efficiently allocate limited funding for ecosystem services. Most auctions focus on ecosystem services on individual properties to maximise the total amount provided. However, for many services it is not just the total quantity but their location in the landscape relative to other sites that matters. For example, biodiversity conservation may be much more effective if conserved sites are connected. Adapting auctions to address ecosystem services at the landscape scale requires an auction mechanism which can promote coordination while maintaining competition. Multi-round auctions, in which bidding is spread over a number of rounds with information provided between rounds on the location of other bids in the landscape, offer an approach to cost effectively deliver landscape-scale ecosystem services. Experimental economic testing shows these auctions deliver the most cost effective environmental outcomes when the number of rounds is unknown in advance, which minimises rent-seeking behaviour. It also shows that a form of bid-improvement rule facilitates coordination and reduces rent seeking. Where the biophysical science is well developed, such auctions should be relatively straightforward to implement and participate in, and have the potential to provide significantly better outcomes than standard ‘one-shot’ tenders. ► Ecosystem service auctions have seldom targeted landscape-scale synergies. ► We experimentally test a multi-round auction for conservation corridors. ► A multi-round auction can successfully deliver landscape-scale conservation. ► It is more efficient when participants do not know the number of rounds in advance. ► It is more efficient when bid prices cannot be increased between rounds.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.022</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-8009
ispartof Ecological economics, 2011-07, Vol.70 (9), p.1621-1627
issn 0921-8009
1873-6106
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_879478387
source RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Auction
Auctions
Biodiversity conservation
Biodiversity conservation Auction Competitive tender Experimental economics Ecosystem services Market-based instrument
Competition
Competitive tender
Economics
Ecosystem services
Ecosystems
Experimental economics
Market-based instrument
title Adapting auctions for the provision of ecosystem services at the landscape scale
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T15%3A59%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adapting%20auctions%20for%20the%20provision%20of%20ecosystem%20services%20at%20the%20landscape%20scale&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20economics&rft.au=Reeson,%20Andrew%20F.&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1621&rft.epage=1627&rft.pages=1621-1627&rft.issn=0921-8009&rft.eissn=1873-6106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E874188503%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=874188503&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0921800911001315&rfr_iscdi=true