Blocking Dopamine D2 Receptors by Haloperidol Curtails the Beneficial Impact of Calorie Restriction on the Metabolic Phenotype of High-Fat Diet Induced Obese Mice
Calorie restriction is the most effective way of expanding life‐span and decreasing morbidity. It improves insulin sensitivity and delays the age‐related loss of dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) expression in the brain. Conversely, high‐fat feeding is associated with obesity, insulin resistance and a red...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neuroendocrinology 2011-02, Vol.23 (2), p.158-167 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 167 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 158 |
container_title | Journal of neuroendocrinology |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | de Leeuw van Weenen, J. E. Auvinen, H. E. Parlevliet, E. T. Coomans, C. P. Schröder-van der Elst, J. P. Meijer, O. C. Pijl, H. |
description | Calorie restriction is the most effective way of expanding life‐span and decreasing morbidity. It improves insulin sensitivity and delays the age‐related loss of dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) expression in the brain. Conversely, high‐fat feeding is associated with obesity, insulin resistance and a reduced number of DRD2 binding sites. We hypothesised that the metabolic benefit of calorie restriction involves the preservation of appropriate DRD2 transmission. The food intake of wild‐type C57Bl6 male mice was restricted to 60% of ad lib. intake while they were treated with the DRD2 antagonist haloperidol or vehicle using s.c. implanted pellets. Mice with ad lib. access to food receiving vehicle treatment served as controls. All mice received high‐fat food throughout the experiment. After 10 weeks, an i.p. glucose tolerance test was performed and, after 12 weeks, a hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp. Hypothalamic DRD2 binding was also determined after 12 weeks of treatment. Calorie‐restricted (CR) vehicle mice were glucose tolerant and insulin sensitive compared to ad lib. (AL) fed vehicle mice. CR mice treated with haloperidol were slightly heavier than vehicle treated CR mice. Haloperidol completely abolished the beneficial impact of calorie restriction on glucose tolerance and partly reduced the insulin sensitivity observed in CR vehicle mice. The metabolic differences between AL and CR vehicle mice were not accompanied by alterations in hypothalamic DRD2 binding. In conclusion, blocking DRD2 curtails the metabolic effects of calorie restriction. Although this suggests that the dopaminergic system could be involved in the metabolic benefits of calorie restriction, restricting access to high‐fat food does not increase (hypothalamic) DRD2 binding capacity, which argues against this inference. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2010.02092.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_879472980</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>879472980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3342-a2f7ef2c099d5ddd24e1e294e36f8ebbb90c7bd6aa404fe54be2b04128b706b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1uEzEUhUcIREPhFZA3iNWkHtvz4wULmrRNUJuiCAQ7y_bcaZw64-nYEcnr9EnxkBCWWJZ85fudY0v3JAnK8DiL62I9zmiRp6QixZjgeIsJ5mS8e5GMTo2XyQjznKZVxtlZ8sb7NcZZmVP8OjkjGS4ILatR8nxpnX407QOauk5uTAtoStASNHTB9R6pPZpJ6zroTe0smmz7II31KKwAXUILjdFGWjTfdFIH5Bo0iXRvIFr40BsdjGtR3AN_B0EqZ41GX1fQurDvYFDMzMMqvZYBTQ0ENG_rrYYa3SvwUWI0vE1eNdJ6eHc8z5Pv11ffJrP09v5mPvl8m2pKGUklaUpoiMac13ld14RBBoQzoEVTgVKKY12qupCSYdZAzhQQhVlGKlXiQjF6nnw8-Ha9e9rG74uN8RqslS24rRdVyVlJeIX_T9KS5SzikXx_JLdqA7XoerOR_V78HUAEPhwB6bW0TS9bbfw_jsYXc04j9-nA_TIW9qd-hsUQCLEWw9zFMHcxBEL8CYTYiS-Lq6GK-vSgNz7A7qSX_aMoSlrm4sfiRiwXyzte_Cyi2W-oSbj3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>837454794</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Blocking Dopamine D2 Receptors by Haloperidol Curtails the Beneficial Impact of Calorie Restriction on the Metabolic Phenotype of High-Fat Diet Induced Obese Mice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>de Leeuw van Weenen, J. E. ; Auvinen, H. E. ; Parlevliet, E. T. ; Coomans, C. P. ; Schröder-van der Elst, J. P. ; Meijer, O. C. ; Pijl, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Leeuw van Weenen, J. E. ; Auvinen, H. E. ; Parlevliet, E. T. ; Coomans, C. P. ; Schröder-van der Elst, J. P. ; Meijer, O. C. ; Pijl, H.</creatorcontrib><description>Calorie restriction is the most effective way of expanding life‐span and decreasing morbidity. It improves insulin sensitivity and delays the age‐related loss of dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) expression in the brain. Conversely, high‐fat feeding is associated with obesity, insulin resistance and a reduced number of DRD2 binding sites. We hypothesised that the metabolic benefit of calorie restriction involves the preservation of appropriate DRD2 transmission. The food intake of wild‐type C57Bl6 male mice was restricted to 60% of ad lib. intake while they were treated with the DRD2 antagonist haloperidol or vehicle using s.c. implanted pellets. Mice with ad lib. access to food receiving vehicle treatment served as controls. All mice received high‐fat food throughout the experiment. After 10 weeks, an i.p. glucose tolerance test was performed and, after 12 weeks, a hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp. Hypothalamic DRD2 binding was also determined after 12 weeks of treatment. Calorie‐restricted (CR) vehicle mice were glucose tolerant and insulin sensitive compared to ad lib. (AL) fed vehicle mice. CR mice treated with haloperidol were slightly heavier than vehicle treated CR mice. Haloperidol completely abolished the beneficial impact of calorie restriction on glucose tolerance and partly reduced the insulin sensitivity observed in CR vehicle mice. The metabolic differences between AL and CR vehicle mice were not accompanied by alterations in hypothalamic DRD2 binding. In conclusion, blocking DRD2 curtails the metabolic effects of calorie restriction. Although this suggests that the dopaminergic system could be involved in the metabolic benefits of calorie restriction, restricting access to high‐fat food does not increase (hypothalamic) DRD2 binding capacity, which argues against this inference.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0953-8194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2826</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2010.02092.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21062378</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Age ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Weight ; Brain ; Caloric Restriction - methods ; calorie restriction ; Dietary Fats - adverse effects ; Dopamine Antagonists - pharmacology ; Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists ; Dopamine D2 receptors ; dopamine receptor D2 ; Eating - drug effects ; Feeding ; Food intake ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Glucose Clamp Technique ; Glucose tolerance ; Glucose Tolerance Test ; Haloperidol ; Haloperidol - pharmacology ; High fat diet ; Hypothalamus ; Hypothalamus - metabolism ; Insulin ; Insulin - pharmacology ; Insulin Resistance ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Metabolic diseases ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Mice, Obese ; Morbidity ; Neuropharmacology ; Neurotransmission ; Nutrient deficiency ; Obesity ; Obesity - metabolism ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Preservation ; Psycholeptics: tranquillizer, neuroleptic ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopharmacology ; Receptors, Dopamine D2 - metabolism ; Vertebrates: endocrinology</subject><ispartof>Journal of neuroendocrinology, 2011-02, Vol.23 (2), p.158-167</ispartof><rights>2011 The Authors. Journal of Neuroendocrinology © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2011 The Authors. Journal of Neuroendocrinology © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3342-a2f7ef2c099d5ddd24e1e294e36f8ebbb90c7bd6aa404fe54be2b04128b706b43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2826.2010.02092.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2826.2010.02092.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23729593$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21062378$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Leeuw van Weenen, J. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auvinen, H. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parlevliet, E. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coomans, C. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schröder-van der Elst, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, O. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pijl, H.</creatorcontrib><title>Blocking Dopamine D2 Receptors by Haloperidol Curtails the Beneficial Impact of Calorie Restriction on the Metabolic Phenotype of High-Fat Diet Induced Obese Mice</title><title>Journal of neuroendocrinology</title><addtitle>J Neuroendocrinol</addtitle><description>Calorie restriction is the most effective way of expanding life‐span and decreasing morbidity. It improves insulin sensitivity and delays the age‐related loss of dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) expression in the brain. Conversely, high‐fat feeding is associated with obesity, insulin resistance and a reduced number of DRD2 binding sites. We hypothesised that the metabolic benefit of calorie restriction involves the preservation of appropriate DRD2 transmission. The food intake of wild‐type C57Bl6 male mice was restricted to 60% of ad lib. intake while they were treated with the DRD2 antagonist haloperidol or vehicle using s.c. implanted pellets. Mice with ad lib. access to food receiving vehicle treatment served as controls. All mice received high‐fat food throughout the experiment. After 10 weeks, an i.p. glucose tolerance test was performed and, after 12 weeks, a hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp. Hypothalamic DRD2 binding was also determined after 12 weeks of treatment. Calorie‐restricted (CR) vehicle mice were glucose tolerant and insulin sensitive compared to ad lib. (AL) fed vehicle mice. CR mice treated with haloperidol were slightly heavier than vehicle treated CR mice. Haloperidol completely abolished the beneficial impact of calorie restriction on glucose tolerance and partly reduced the insulin sensitivity observed in CR vehicle mice. The metabolic differences between AL and CR vehicle mice were not accompanied by alterations in hypothalamic DRD2 binding. In conclusion, blocking DRD2 curtails the metabolic effects of calorie restriction. Although this suggests that the dopaminergic system could be involved in the metabolic benefits of calorie restriction, restricting access to high‐fat food does not increase (hypothalamic) DRD2 binding capacity, which argues against this inference.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Caloric Restriction - methods</subject><subject>calorie restriction</subject><subject>Dietary Fats - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dopamine Antagonists - pharmacology</subject><subject>Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists</subject><subject>Dopamine D2 receptors</subject><subject>dopamine receptor D2</subject><subject>Eating - drug effects</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>Food intake</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Glucose Clamp Technique</subject><subject>Glucose tolerance</subject><subject>Glucose Tolerance Test</subject><subject>Haloperidol</subject><subject>Haloperidol - pharmacology</subject><subject>High fat diet</subject><subject>Hypothalamus</subject><subject>Hypothalamus - metabolism</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Insulin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Insulin Resistance</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Metabolic diseases</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred C57BL</subject><subject>Mice, Obese</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>Neurotransmission</subject><subject>Nutrient deficiency</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obesity - metabolism</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Psycholeptics: tranquillizer, neuroleptic</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopharmacology</subject><subject>Receptors, Dopamine D2 - metabolism</subject><subject>Vertebrates: endocrinology</subject><issn>0953-8194</issn><issn>1365-2826</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks1uEzEUhUcIREPhFZA3iNWkHtvz4wULmrRNUJuiCAQ7y_bcaZw64-nYEcnr9EnxkBCWWJZ85fudY0v3JAnK8DiL62I9zmiRp6QixZjgeIsJ5mS8e5GMTo2XyQjznKZVxtlZ8sb7NcZZmVP8OjkjGS4ILatR8nxpnX407QOauk5uTAtoStASNHTB9R6pPZpJ6zroTe0smmz7II31KKwAXUILjdFGWjTfdFIH5Bo0iXRvIFr40BsdjGtR3AN_B0EqZ41GX1fQurDvYFDMzMMqvZYBTQ0ENG_rrYYa3SvwUWI0vE1eNdJ6eHc8z5Pv11ffJrP09v5mPvl8m2pKGUklaUpoiMac13ld14RBBoQzoEVTgVKKY12qupCSYdZAzhQQhVlGKlXiQjF6nnw8-Ha9e9rG74uN8RqslS24rRdVyVlJeIX_T9KS5SzikXx_JLdqA7XoerOR_V78HUAEPhwB6bW0TS9bbfw_jsYXc04j9-nA_TIW9qd-hsUQCLEWw9zFMHcxBEL8CYTYiS-Lq6GK-vSgNz7A7qSX_aMoSlrm4sfiRiwXyzte_Cyi2W-oSbj3</recordid><startdate>201102</startdate><enddate>201102</enddate><creator>de Leeuw van Weenen, J. E.</creator><creator>Auvinen, H. E.</creator><creator>Parlevliet, E. T.</creator><creator>Coomans, C. P.</creator><creator>Schröder-van der Elst, J. P.</creator><creator>Meijer, O. C.</creator><creator>Pijl, H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201102</creationdate><title>Blocking Dopamine D2 Receptors by Haloperidol Curtails the Beneficial Impact of Calorie Restriction on the Metabolic Phenotype of High-Fat Diet Induced Obese Mice</title><author>de Leeuw van Weenen, J. E. ; Auvinen, H. E. ; Parlevliet, E. T. ; Coomans, C. P. ; Schröder-van der Elst, J. P. ; Meijer, O. C. ; Pijl, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3342-a2f7ef2c099d5ddd24e1e294e36f8ebbb90c7bd6aa404fe54be2b04128b706b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Caloric Restriction - methods</topic><topic>calorie restriction</topic><topic>Dietary Fats - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dopamine Antagonists - pharmacology</topic><topic>Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists</topic><topic>Dopamine D2 receptors</topic><topic>dopamine receptor D2</topic><topic>Eating - drug effects</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>Food intake</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Glucose Clamp Technique</topic><topic>Glucose tolerance</topic><topic>Glucose Tolerance Test</topic><topic>Haloperidol</topic><topic>Haloperidol - pharmacology</topic><topic>High fat diet</topic><topic>Hypothalamus</topic><topic>Hypothalamus - metabolism</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Insulin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Insulin Resistance</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Metabolic diseases</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred C57BL</topic><topic>Mice, Obese</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>Neurotransmission</topic><topic>Nutrient deficiency</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obesity - metabolism</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Psycholeptics: tranquillizer, neuroleptic</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopharmacology</topic><topic>Receptors, Dopamine D2 - metabolism</topic><topic>Vertebrates: endocrinology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Leeuw van Weenen, J. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auvinen, H. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parlevliet, E. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coomans, C. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schröder-van der Elst, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, O. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pijl, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of neuroendocrinology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Leeuw van Weenen, J. E.</au><au>Auvinen, H. E.</au><au>Parlevliet, E. T.</au><au>Coomans, C. P.</au><au>Schröder-van der Elst, J. P.</au><au>Meijer, O. C.</au><au>Pijl, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Blocking Dopamine D2 Receptors by Haloperidol Curtails the Beneficial Impact of Calorie Restriction on the Metabolic Phenotype of High-Fat Diet Induced Obese Mice</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neuroendocrinology</jtitle><addtitle>J Neuroendocrinol</addtitle><date>2011-02</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>158</spage><epage>167</epage><pages>158-167</pages><issn>0953-8194</issn><eissn>1365-2826</eissn><abstract>Calorie restriction is the most effective way of expanding life‐span and decreasing morbidity. It improves insulin sensitivity and delays the age‐related loss of dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) expression in the brain. Conversely, high‐fat feeding is associated with obesity, insulin resistance and a reduced number of DRD2 binding sites. We hypothesised that the metabolic benefit of calorie restriction involves the preservation of appropriate DRD2 transmission. The food intake of wild‐type C57Bl6 male mice was restricted to 60% of ad lib. intake while they were treated with the DRD2 antagonist haloperidol or vehicle using s.c. implanted pellets. Mice with ad lib. access to food receiving vehicle treatment served as controls. All mice received high‐fat food throughout the experiment. After 10 weeks, an i.p. glucose tolerance test was performed and, after 12 weeks, a hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp. Hypothalamic DRD2 binding was also determined after 12 weeks of treatment. Calorie‐restricted (CR) vehicle mice were glucose tolerant and insulin sensitive compared to ad lib. (AL) fed vehicle mice. CR mice treated with haloperidol were slightly heavier than vehicle treated CR mice. Haloperidol completely abolished the beneficial impact of calorie restriction on glucose tolerance and partly reduced the insulin sensitivity observed in CR vehicle mice. The metabolic differences between AL and CR vehicle mice were not accompanied by alterations in hypothalamic DRD2 binding. In conclusion, blocking DRD2 curtails the metabolic effects of calorie restriction. Although this suggests that the dopaminergic system could be involved in the metabolic benefits of calorie restriction, restricting access to high‐fat food does not increase (hypothalamic) DRD2 binding capacity, which argues against this inference.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21062378</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2826.2010.02092.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0953-8194 |
ispartof | Journal of neuroendocrinology, 2011-02, Vol.23 (2), p.158-167 |
issn | 0953-8194 1365-2826 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_879472980 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | Age Animals Biological and medical sciences Body Weight Brain Caloric Restriction - methods calorie restriction Dietary Fats - adverse effects Dopamine Antagonists - pharmacology Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists Dopamine D2 receptors dopamine receptor D2 Eating - drug effects Feeding Food intake Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Glucose Clamp Technique Glucose tolerance Glucose Tolerance Test Haloperidol Haloperidol - pharmacology High fat diet Hypothalamus Hypothalamus - metabolism Insulin Insulin - pharmacology Insulin Resistance Male Medical sciences Metabolic diseases Mice Mice, Inbred C57BL Mice, Obese Morbidity Neuropharmacology Neurotransmission Nutrient deficiency Obesity Obesity - metabolism Pharmacology. Drug treatments Preservation Psycholeptics: tranquillizer, neuroleptic Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopharmacology Receptors, Dopamine D2 - metabolism Vertebrates: endocrinology |
title | Blocking Dopamine D2 Receptors by Haloperidol Curtails the Beneficial Impact of Calorie Restriction on the Metabolic Phenotype of High-Fat Diet Induced Obese Mice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T11%3A38%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Blocking%20Dopamine%20D2%20Receptors%20by%20Haloperidol%20Curtails%20the%20Beneficial%20Impact%20of%20Calorie%20Restriction%20on%20the%20Metabolic%20Phenotype%20of%20High-Fat%20Diet%20Induced%20Obese%20Mice&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neuroendocrinology&rft.au=de%20Leeuw%20van%20Weenen,%20J.%20E.&rft.date=2011-02&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=158&rft.epage=167&rft.pages=158-167&rft.issn=0953-8194&rft.eissn=1365-2826&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2826.2010.02092.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E879472980%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=837454794&rft_id=info:pmid/21062378&rfr_iscdi=true |