Capture Probability of Released Males of Two Bactrocera Species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Detection Traps in California

The genus Bactrocera (Diptera: Tephritidae) includes ≈70 polyphagous species that are major pests of fruit and vegetable crops. Most Bactrocera species have limited geographic distributions, but several species are invasive, and many countries operate continuous trapping programs to detect infestati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of economic entomology 2010-12, Vol.103 (6), p.2042-2051
Hauptverfasser: Shelly, T, Nishimoto, J, Diaz, A, Leathers, J, War, M, Shoemaker, R, Al-Zubaidy, M, Joseph, D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2051
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2042
container_title Journal of economic entomology
container_volume 103
creator Shelly, T
Nishimoto, J
Diaz, A
Leathers, J
War, M
Shoemaker, R
Al-Zubaidy, M
Joseph, D
description The genus Bactrocera (Diptera: Tephritidae) includes ≈70 polyphagous species that are major pests of fruit and vegetable crops. Most Bactrocera species have limited geographic distributions, but several species are invasive, and many countries operate continuous trapping programs to detect infestations. In the United States, California maintains ≈25,000 traps (baited with male lures) specifically for Bactrocera detection distributed over an area of ≈6,400 km2 (2,500 miles2) in the Los Angeles area. Although prior studies have used male lures to describe movement of Bactrocera males, they do not explicitly relate capture probability with fly distance from lure-baited traps; consequently, they do not address the relative effectiveness of male lures in detecting incipient populations of Bactrocera species. The objective of this study was to measure the distance-dependent capture probability of marked, released males of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) and Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (methyl eugenol- and cue lure-responding species, respectively) within the detection trapping grid operating in southern California. These data were then used to compute simple probability estimates for detecting populations of different sizes of the two species. Methyl eugenol was the more powerful attractant, and based on the mark—recapture data, we estimated that B. dorsalis populations with as few as ≈50 males would always (>99.9%) be detected using the current trap density of five methyl eugenol-baited traps per 2.6 km2 (1 mile2). By contrast, we estimated that certain detection of B. cucurbitae populations would not occur until these contained ≈350 males. The implications of the results for the California trapping system are discussed, and the findings are compared with mark—release—recapture data obtained for the same two species in Hawaii.
doi_str_mv 10.1603/EC10153
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_879469806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>851477817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b396t-10ac5f3f2ec36afd18546d01f4e413fc405af463fd1353bb3db0e7aac19322833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVtrFEEQhRtRzCaK_0D7RaIPo9W3ueRNJ_ECEcVswLehpqdaW2anx-5eQv69s2R1n8SnglMfp4pzGHsi4JUoQb2-aAUIo-6xlWhUXchGfLvPVgBSFqAbdcSOU_oJIEop4CE7kkJBI6VesZsW57yNxL_E0GPvR59veXD8K42EiQb-CUdKO2V9E_hbtDkGSxH51UzWL5sX537Oi3DG1zT_iD77Aekl9xM_p0w2-zDxdcQ57aQWR-9CnDw-Yg8cjoke7-cJu353sW4_FJef339s31wWvWrKXAhAa5xykqwq0Q2iNrocQDhNWihnNRh0ulTLRhnV92rogSpEu8QgZa3UCTu9851j-LWllLuNT5bGEScK29TVVaPLpoby_6QRuqpqUR1IG0NKkVw3R7_BeNsJ6HZ1dPs6FvLp3nPbb2j4y_3JfwGe7wFMFkcXcbI-HThVQ2Wq3clnd5zD0OH3uDDXVxIWG9FopY05OPU-hIn--dJv6DGlsw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>851477817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Capture Probability of Released Males of Two Bactrocera Species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Detection Traps in California</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>Shelly, T ; Nishimoto, J ; Diaz, A ; Leathers, J ; War, M ; Shoemaker, R ; Al-Zubaidy, M ; Joseph, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Shelly, T ; Nishimoto, J ; Diaz, A ; Leathers, J ; War, M ; Shoemaker, R ; Al-Zubaidy, M ; Joseph, D</creatorcontrib><description>The genus Bactrocera (Diptera: Tephritidae) includes ≈70 polyphagous species that are major pests of fruit and vegetable crops. Most Bactrocera species have limited geographic distributions, but several species are invasive, and many countries operate continuous trapping programs to detect infestations. In the United States, California maintains ≈25,000 traps (baited with male lures) specifically for Bactrocera detection distributed over an area of ≈6,400 km2 (2,500 miles2) in the Los Angeles area. Although prior studies have used male lures to describe movement of Bactrocera males, they do not explicitly relate capture probability with fly distance from lure-baited traps; consequently, they do not address the relative effectiveness of male lures in detecting incipient populations of Bactrocera species. The objective of this study was to measure the distance-dependent capture probability of marked, released males of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) and Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (methyl eugenol- and cue lure-responding species, respectively) within the detection trapping grid operating in southern California. These data were then used to compute simple probability estimates for detecting populations of different sizes of the two species. Methyl eugenol was the more powerful attractant, and based on the mark—recapture data, we estimated that B. dorsalis populations with as few as ≈50 males would always (&gt;99.9%) be detected using the current trap density of five methyl eugenol-baited traps per 2.6 km2 (1 mile2). By contrast, we estimated that certain detection of B. cucurbitae populations would not occur until these contained ≈350 males. The implications of the results for the California trapping system are discussed, and the findings are compared with mark—release—recapture data obtained for the same two species in Hawaii.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1603/EC10153</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21309224</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEENAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lanham, MD: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animals ; Attractants ; Bactrocera ; Bactrocera cucurbitae ; Bactrocera dorsalis ; Biological and medical sciences ; California ; Control ; Crops ; Data processing ; Diptera ; ECOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR ; Fruits ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Generalities ; Geographical distribution ; Infestation ; Insect Control ; Insecta ; invasive fruit flies ; Invertebrates ; Male ; male lures ; mark—recapture ; Methyl eugenol ; Models, Statistical ; Pests ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Protozoa. Invertebrates ; Species Specificity ; surveillance ; Tephritidae ; Trapping ; Traps ; Vegetables</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 2010-12, Vol.103 (6), p.2042-2051</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b396t-10ac5f3f2ec36afd18546d01f4e413fc405af463fd1353bb3db0e7aac19322833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b396t-10ac5f3f2ec36afd18546d01f4e413fc405af463fd1353bb3db0e7aac19322833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1603/EC10153$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,26955,27901,27902,52338</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23807577$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21309224$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shelly, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishimoto, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diaz, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leathers, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>War, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoemaker, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Zubaidy, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joseph, D</creatorcontrib><title>Capture Probability of Released Males of Two Bactrocera Species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Detection Traps in California</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><description>The genus Bactrocera (Diptera: Tephritidae) includes ≈70 polyphagous species that are major pests of fruit and vegetable crops. Most Bactrocera species have limited geographic distributions, but several species are invasive, and many countries operate continuous trapping programs to detect infestations. In the United States, California maintains ≈25,000 traps (baited with male lures) specifically for Bactrocera detection distributed over an area of ≈6,400 km2 (2,500 miles2) in the Los Angeles area. Although prior studies have used male lures to describe movement of Bactrocera males, they do not explicitly relate capture probability with fly distance from lure-baited traps; consequently, they do not address the relative effectiveness of male lures in detecting incipient populations of Bactrocera species. The objective of this study was to measure the distance-dependent capture probability of marked, released males of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) and Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (methyl eugenol- and cue lure-responding species, respectively) within the detection trapping grid operating in southern California. These data were then used to compute simple probability estimates for detecting populations of different sizes of the two species. Methyl eugenol was the more powerful attractant, and based on the mark—recapture data, we estimated that B. dorsalis populations with as few as ≈50 males would always (&gt;99.9%) be detected using the current trap density of five methyl eugenol-baited traps per 2.6 km2 (1 mile2). By contrast, we estimated that certain detection of B. cucurbitae populations would not occur until these contained ≈350 males. The implications of the results for the California trapping system are discussed, and the findings are compared with mark—release—recapture data obtained for the same two species in Hawaii.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Attractants</subject><subject>Bactrocera</subject><subject>Bactrocera cucurbitae</subject><subject>Bactrocera dorsalis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Diptera</subject><subject>ECOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Generalities</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Infestation</subject><subject>Insect Control</subject><subject>Insecta</subject><subject>invasive fruit flies</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>male lures</subject><subject>mark—recapture</subject><subject>Methyl eugenol</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrates</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>surveillance</subject><subject>Tephritidae</subject><subject>Trapping</subject><subject>Traps</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><issn>0022-0493</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVtrFEEQhRtRzCaK_0D7RaIPo9W3ueRNJ_ECEcVswLehpqdaW2anx-5eQv69s2R1n8SnglMfp4pzGHsi4JUoQb2-aAUIo-6xlWhUXchGfLvPVgBSFqAbdcSOU_oJIEop4CE7kkJBI6VesZsW57yNxL_E0GPvR59veXD8K42EiQb-CUdKO2V9E_hbtDkGSxH51UzWL5sX537Oi3DG1zT_iD77Aekl9xM_p0w2-zDxdcQ57aQWR-9CnDw-Yg8cjoke7-cJu353sW4_FJef339s31wWvWrKXAhAa5xykqwq0Q2iNrocQDhNWihnNRh0ulTLRhnV92rogSpEu8QgZa3UCTu9851j-LWllLuNT5bGEScK29TVVaPLpoby_6QRuqpqUR1IG0NKkVw3R7_BeNsJ6HZ1dPs6FvLp3nPbb2j4y_3JfwGe7wFMFkcXcbI-HThVQ2Wq3clnd5zD0OH3uDDXVxIWG9FopY05OPU-hIn--dJv6DGlsw</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Shelly, T</creator><creator>Nishimoto, J</creator><creator>Diaz, A</creator><creator>Leathers, J</creator><creator>War, M</creator><creator>Shoemaker, R</creator><creator>Al-Zubaidy, M</creator><creator>Joseph, D</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Capture Probability of Released Males of Two Bactrocera Species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Detection Traps in California</title><author>Shelly, T ; Nishimoto, J ; Diaz, A ; Leathers, J ; War, M ; Shoemaker, R ; Al-Zubaidy, M ; Joseph, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b396t-10ac5f3f2ec36afd18546d01f4e413fc405af463fd1353bb3db0e7aac19322833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Attractants</topic><topic>Bactrocera</topic><topic>Bactrocera cucurbitae</topic><topic>Bactrocera dorsalis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Diptera</topic><topic>ECOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Generalities</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Infestation</topic><topic>Insect Control</topic><topic>Insecta</topic><topic>invasive fruit flies</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>male lures</topic><topic>mark—recapture</topic><topic>Methyl eugenol</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrates</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>surveillance</topic><topic>Tephritidae</topic><topic>Trapping</topic><topic>Traps</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shelly, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishimoto, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diaz, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leathers, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>War, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoemaker, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Zubaidy, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joseph, D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shelly, T</au><au>Nishimoto, J</au><au>Diaz, A</au><au>Leathers, J</au><au>War, M</au><au>Shoemaker, R</au><au>Al-Zubaidy, M</au><au>Joseph, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Capture Probability of Released Males of Two Bactrocera Species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Detection Traps in California</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2042</spage><epage>2051</epage><pages>2042-2051</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><eissn>0022-0493</eissn><coden>JEENAI</coden><abstract>The genus Bactrocera (Diptera: Tephritidae) includes ≈70 polyphagous species that are major pests of fruit and vegetable crops. Most Bactrocera species have limited geographic distributions, but several species are invasive, and many countries operate continuous trapping programs to detect infestations. In the United States, California maintains ≈25,000 traps (baited with male lures) specifically for Bactrocera detection distributed over an area of ≈6,400 km2 (2,500 miles2) in the Los Angeles area. Although prior studies have used male lures to describe movement of Bactrocera males, they do not explicitly relate capture probability with fly distance from lure-baited traps; consequently, they do not address the relative effectiveness of male lures in detecting incipient populations of Bactrocera species. The objective of this study was to measure the distance-dependent capture probability of marked, released males of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) and Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (methyl eugenol- and cue lure-responding species, respectively) within the detection trapping grid operating in southern California. These data were then used to compute simple probability estimates for detecting populations of different sizes of the two species. Methyl eugenol was the more powerful attractant, and based on the mark—recapture data, we estimated that B. dorsalis populations with as few as ≈50 males would always (&gt;99.9%) be detected using the current trap density of five methyl eugenol-baited traps per 2.6 km2 (1 mile2). By contrast, we estimated that certain detection of B. cucurbitae populations would not occur until these contained ≈350 males. The implications of the results for the California trapping system are discussed, and the findings are compared with mark—release—recapture data obtained for the same two species in Hawaii.</abstract><cop>Lanham, MD</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>21309224</pmid><doi>10.1603/EC10153</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0493
ispartof Journal of economic entomology, 2010-12, Vol.103 (6), p.2042-2051
issn 0022-0493
1938-291X
0022-0493
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_879469806
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; BioOne Complete
subjects Animals
Attractants
Bactrocera
Bactrocera cucurbitae
Bactrocera dorsalis
Biological and medical sciences
California
Control
Crops
Data processing
Diptera
ECOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR
Fruits
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Generalities
Geographical distribution
Infestation
Insect Control
Insecta
invasive fruit flies
Invertebrates
Male
male lures
mark—recapture
Methyl eugenol
Models, Statistical
Pests
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
Protozoa. Invertebrates
Species Specificity
surveillance
Tephritidae
Trapping
Traps
Vegetables
title Capture Probability of Released Males of Two Bactrocera Species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Detection Traps in California
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T01%3A51%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Capture%20Probability%20of%20Released%20Males%20of%20Two%20Bactrocera%20Species%20(Diptera:%20Tephritidae)%20in%20Detection%20Traps%20in%20California&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Shelly,%20T&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2042&rft.epage=2051&rft.pages=2042-2051&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft.coden=JEENAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1603/EC10153&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E851477817%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=851477817&rft_id=info:pmid/21309224&rfr_iscdi=true