Variability in Daily Ration Estimates of Age‐0 Striped Bass in the Chesapeake Bay
Previous studies have developed and applied bioenergetics models to estimate trophic demand for prey by striped bass Morone saxatilis in Chesapeake Bay. Although these models were validated with laboratory studies, no field estimates of daily ration of striped bass were available in Chesapeake Bay f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900) 2000-09, Vol.129 (5), p.1181-1186 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1186 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1181 |
container_title | Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900) |
container_volume | 129 |
creator | Hartman, K. J. |
description | Previous studies have developed and applied bioenergetics models to estimate trophic demand for prey by striped bass Morone saxatilis in Chesapeake Bay. Although these models were validated with laboratory studies, no field estimates of daily ration of striped bass were available in Chesapeake Bay for comparison with bioenergetics model estimates. This study estimated growth and daily ration of age‐0 striped bass in the upper Chesapeake Bay for two dates (6 and 19 October 1993) using the Eggers model. Experiments on the gastric evacuation rate of captive striped bass at 17°C found that stomach contents were evacuated at a rate of e−0.12h, where h is time in hours since feeding. Daily ration estimates only 14 d apart varied by 66% (0.0326 g · g−1 · d−1 on 6 October and 0.0542 g · g−1 · d−1 on 19 October). Bioenergetics model estimates of consumption over this period averaged 0.0559 g · g−1 · d−1. Based on the variability in Eggers estimates, it would require more than two estimates (2.4) of daily ration over this period to estimate consumption to within 25% of the parameter with 95% confidence. However, the bioenergetics model estimate of consumption was within 25% of the average of the Eggers estimates and required significantly less effort to obtain. This study suggests that if bioenergetics models are reasonably corroborated in the field or laboratory, they can provide reasonable estimates of consumption by fish from data commonly collected during fisheries surveys (weight at age, diet), with little additional information (energy content, temperature) and much less effort than daily ration estimates of consumption. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1577/1548-8659(2000)129<1181:VIDREO>2.0.CO;2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_879469734</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>879469734</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3781-d2361cb75ec3418f06757ad3a563448c91bf5c918eb84b9f991336b320f270a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkMtKAzEUhoMoWC_vEBC8LKbNdZKoCHWsVagU2tptyEwzGh07dTIis_MRfEafxAwVly7c5JCTL__hfAD0MOpiLkQPcyYjGXN1TBBCJ5ioc4wlPp3fXk0G4wvSRd1kfEY2QOeX3ASdgJJIMim2wY73T-HKRSw7YDo3lTOpK1zdQLeEV8YVDZyY2pVLOPC1ezG19bDMYf_Bfn18IjitK7eyC3hpvG9_1I8WJo_Wm5U1zza0mz2wlZvC2_2fugvurwez5CYajYe3SX8UZVRIHC0IjXGWCm4zyrDMUSy4MAtqeEwZk5nCac7DKW0qWapypTClcUoJyolABtNdcLTOXVXl65v1tX5xPrNFYZa2fPNaCsViJSgL5OGfJBaSEKRkAIdrMKtK7yub61UVFFSNxki3-nUrVbdSdatfB_261a_X-jXRSCehhKSDn5HGZ6bIK7PMnP-NkywszwN1t6beXWGb_w7Ts_71tH2g33nvnWI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17822098</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variability in Daily Ration Estimates of Age‐0 Striped Bass in the Chesapeake Bay</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hartman, K. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hartman, K. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Previous studies have developed and applied bioenergetics models to estimate trophic demand for prey by striped bass Morone saxatilis in Chesapeake Bay. Although these models were validated with laboratory studies, no field estimates of daily ration of striped bass were available in Chesapeake Bay for comparison with bioenergetics model estimates. This study estimated growth and daily ration of age‐0 striped bass in the upper Chesapeake Bay for two dates (6 and 19 October 1993) using the Eggers model. Experiments on the gastric evacuation rate of captive striped bass at 17°C found that stomach contents were evacuated at a rate of e−0.12h, where h is time in hours since feeding. Daily ration estimates only 14 d apart varied by 66% (0.0326 g · g−1 · d−1 on 6 October and 0.0542 g · g−1 · d−1 on 19 October). Bioenergetics model estimates of consumption over this period averaged 0.0559 g · g−1 · d−1. Based on the variability in Eggers estimates, it would require more than two estimates (2.4) of daily ration over this period to estimate consumption to within 25% of the parameter with 95% confidence. However, the bioenergetics model estimate of consumption was within 25% of the average of the Eggers estimates and required significantly less effort to obtain. This study suggests that if bioenergetics models are reasonably corroborated in the field or laboratory, they can provide reasonable estimates of consumption by fish from data commonly collected during fisheries surveys (weight at age, diet), with little additional information (energy content, temperature) and much less effort than daily ration estimates of consumption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-8659</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1577/1548-8659(2000)129<1181:VIDREO>2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TAFSAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Agnatha. Pisces ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Autoecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brackish ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Marine ; Morone saxatilis ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900), 2000-09, Vol.129 (5), p.1181-1186</ispartof><rights>2000 American Fisheries Society</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3781-d2361cb75ec3418f06757ad3a563448c91bf5c918eb84b9f991336b320f270a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1577%2F1548-8659%282000%29129%3C1181%3AVIDREO%3E2.0.CO%3B2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1577%2F1548-8659%282000%29129%3C1181%3AVIDREO%3E2.0.CO%3B2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=843615$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hartman, K. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Variability in Daily Ration Estimates of Age‐0 Striped Bass in the Chesapeake Bay</title><title>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)</title><description>Previous studies have developed and applied bioenergetics models to estimate trophic demand for prey by striped bass Morone saxatilis in Chesapeake Bay. Although these models were validated with laboratory studies, no field estimates of daily ration of striped bass were available in Chesapeake Bay for comparison with bioenergetics model estimates. This study estimated growth and daily ration of age‐0 striped bass in the upper Chesapeake Bay for two dates (6 and 19 October 1993) using the Eggers model. Experiments on the gastric evacuation rate of captive striped bass at 17°C found that stomach contents were evacuated at a rate of e−0.12h, where h is time in hours since feeding. Daily ration estimates only 14 d apart varied by 66% (0.0326 g · g−1 · d−1 on 6 October and 0.0542 g · g−1 · d−1 on 19 October). Bioenergetics model estimates of consumption over this period averaged 0.0559 g · g−1 · d−1. Based on the variability in Eggers estimates, it would require more than two estimates (2.4) of daily ration over this period to estimate consumption to within 25% of the parameter with 95% confidence. However, the bioenergetics model estimate of consumption was within 25% of the average of the Eggers estimates and required significantly less effort to obtain. This study suggests that if bioenergetics models are reasonably corroborated in the field or laboratory, they can provide reasonable estimates of consumption by fish from data commonly collected during fisheries surveys (weight at age, diet), with little additional information (energy content, temperature) and much less effort than daily ration estimates of consumption.</description><subject>Agnatha. Pisces</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Morone saxatilis</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0002-8487</issn><issn>1548-8659</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkMtKAzEUhoMoWC_vEBC8LKbNdZKoCHWsVagU2tptyEwzGh07dTIis_MRfEafxAwVly7c5JCTL__hfAD0MOpiLkQPcyYjGXN1TBBCJ5ioc4wlPp3fXk0G4wvSRd1kfEY2QOeX3ASdgJJIMim2wY73T-HKRSw7YDo3lTOpK1zdQLeEV8YVDZyY2pVLOPC1ezG19bDMYf_Bfn18IjitK7eyC3hpvG9_1I8WJo_Wm5U1zza0mz2wlZvC2_2fugvurwez5CYajYe3SX8UZVRIHC0IjXGWCm4zyrDMUSy4MAtqeEwZk5nCac7DKW0qWapypTClcUoJyolABtNdcLTOXVXl65v1tX5xPrNFYZa2fPNaCsViJSgL5OGfJBaSEKRkAIdrMKtK7yub61UVFFSNxki3-nUrVbdSdatfB_261a_X-jXRSCehhKSDn5HGZ6bIK7PMnP-NkywszwN1t6beXWGb_w7Ts_71tH2g33nvnWI</recordid><startdate>200009</startdate><enddate>200009</enddate><creator>Hartman, K. J.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>American Fisheries Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200009</creationdate><title>Variability in Daily Ration Estimates of Age‐0 Striped Bass in the Chesapeake Bay</title><author>Hartman, K. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3781-d2361cb75ec3418f06757ad3a563448c91bf5c918eb84b9f991336b320f270a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Agnatha. Pisces</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Morone saxatilis</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hartman, K. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hartman, K. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variability in Daily Ration Estimates of Age‐0 Striped Bass in the Chesapeake Bay</atitle><jtitle>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)</jtitle><date>2000-09</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1181</spage><epage>1186</epage><pages>1181-1186</pages><issn>0002-8487</issn><eissn>1548-8659</eissn><coden>TAFSAI</coden><abstract>Previous studies have developed and applied bioenergetics models to estimate trophic demand for prey by striped bass Morone saxatilis in Chesapeake Bay. Although these models were validated with laboratory studies, no field estimates of daily ration of striped bass were available in Chesapeake Bay for comparison with bioenergetics model estimates. This study estimated growth and daily ration of age‐0 striped bass in the upper Chesapeake Bay for two dates (6 and 19 October 1993) using the Eggers model. Experiments on the gastric evacuation rate of captive striped bass at 17°C found that stomach contents were evacuated at a rate of e−0.12h, where h is time in hours since feeding. Daily ration estimates only 14 d apart varied by 66% (0.0326 g · g−1 · d−1 on 6 October and 0.0542 g · g−1 · d−1 on 19 October). Bioenergetics model estimates of consumption over this period averaged 0.0559 g · g−1 · d−1. Based on the variability in Eggers estimates, it would require more than two estimates (2.4) of daily ration over this period to estimate consumption to within 25% of the parameter with 95% confidence. However, the bioenergetics model estimate of consumption was within 25% of the average of the Eggers estimates and required significantly less effort to obtain. This study suggests that if bioenergetics models are reasonably corroborated in the field or laboratory, they can provide reasonable estimates of consumption by fish from data commonly collected during fisheries surveys (weight at age, diet), with little additional information (energy content, temperature) and much less effort than daily ration estimates of consumption.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1577/1548-8659(2000)129<1181:VIDREO>2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-8487 |
ispartof | Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900), 2000-09, Vol.129 (5), p.1181-1186 |
issn | 0002-8487 1548-8659 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_879469734 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Agnatha. Pisces Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Autoecology Biological and medical sciences Brackish Freshwater Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Marine Morone saxatilis Vertebrata |
title | Variability in Daily Ration Estimates of Age‐0 Striped Bass in the Chesapeake Bay |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A10%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variability%20in%20Daily%20Ration%20Estimates%20of%20Age%E2%80%900%20Striped%20Bass%20in%20the%20Chesapeake%20Bay&rft.jtitle=Transactions%20of%20the%20American%20Fisheries%20Society%20(1900)&rft.au=Hartman,%20K.%20J.&rft.date=2000-09&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1181&rft.epage=1186&rft.pages=1181-1186&rft.issn=0002-8487&rft.eissn=1548-8659&rft.coden=TAFSAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1577/1548-8659(2000)129%3C1181:VIDREO%3E2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E879469734%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17822098&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |