Brook Trout Declines with Land Cover and Temperature Changes in Maryland

We examined the influence of landscape alteration and in situ stream habitat variables on brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis by using a landscape‐scale, space‐for‐time substitution analysis and a smaller data set that tracked long‐term changes in land use over time. Forested land cover within a catch...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:North American journal of fisheries management 2008-08, Vol.28 (4), p.1223-1232
Hauptverfasser: Stranko, Scott A., Hilderbrand, Robert H., Morgan, Raymond P., Staley, Mark W., Becker, Andrew J., Roseberry‐Lincoln, Ann, Perry, Elgin S., Jacobson, Paul T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We examined the influence of landscape alteration and in situ stream habitat variables on brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis by using a landscape‐scale, space‐for‐time substitution analysis and a smaller data set that tracked long‐term changes in land use over time. Forested land cover within a catchment was the overall best landscape‐scale predictor of brook trout occurrence at a given site; measures of impervious land cover and urbanization were also important predictors. Brook trout were almost never found in watersheds where impervious land cover exceeded 4%, as assessed from the 2001 National Land Cover Dataset (2001 NLCD); the single exception was in a stream that displayed consistently low water temperatures. Landscape‐scale analyses indicated that increases in water temperature and erosion were associated with increasing percentages of urbanization and imperviousness and decreasing percentage of forested land cover. Three of six brook trout populations that were followed over time were extirpated within the last 15 years (between 1990 and 2005), coinciding with increases in urbanization and impervious land cover. At these sites, water temperatures were substantially greater than at the three sites with extant brook trout. Land use amounts derived from high‐resolution aerial photography showed substantially greater amounts of urbanization and particularly impervious land cover than did amounts derived from the 2001 NLCD. The differences in measured land cover between imagery types warrant caution when stating upper threshold limits of land cover, because use of imagery methods interchangeably may produce inconsistent results. Our findings suggest that brook trout are very sensitive to landscape alterations in Maryland and disappear at low levels of impervious land cover regardless of the specific mechanism involved.
ISSN:0275-5947
1548-8675
DOI:10.1577/M07-032.1