Multicenter Comparison of High Concentration Contrast Agent Iomeprol-400 With Iso-osmolar Iodixanol-320: Contrast Enhancement and Heart Rate Variation in Coronary Dual-Source Computed Tomographic Angiography

OBJECTIVES:To compare a contrast agent with high iodine concentration with an iso-osmolar contrast agent for coronary dual-source computed tomography angiography (DS-CTA), and to assess whether the contrast agent characteristics may affect the diagnostic quality of coronary DS-CTA. MATERIALS AND MET...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Investigative radiology 2011-07, Vol.46 (7), p.457-464
Hauptverfasser: Becker, Cristoph R, Vanzulli, Angelo, Fink, Christian, de Faveri, Daniele, Fedeli, Stefano, Dore, Roberto, Biondetti, Pietro, Kuettner, Alex, Krix, Martin, Ascenti, Giorgio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 464
container_issue 7
container_start_page 457
container_title Investigative radiology
container_volume 46
creator Becker, Cristoph R
Vanzulli, Angelo
Fink, Christian
de Faveri, Daniele
Fedeli, Stefano
Dore, Roberto
Biondetti, Pietro
Kuettner, Alex
Krix, Martin
Ascenti, Giorgio
description OBJECTIVES:To compare a contrast agent with high iodine concentration with an iso-osmolar contrast agent for coronary dual-source computed tomography angiography (DS-CTA), and to assess whether the contrast agent characteristics may affect the diagnostic quality of coronary DS-CTA. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients were randomized to receive either 80 mL of iodixa:nol-320 (Visipaque, GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, United Kingdom) or iomeprol-400 (Iomeron, Bracco Imaging SpA, Milan, Italy) at 5 mL/s. Mean, minimum, maximum heart rate, and its variation (max-min) were assessed during calcium scoring scan and coronary DS-CTA. Three off-site readers independently evaluated the image sets in terms of technical adequacy, reasons for inadequacy, vessel visualization, diagnostic confidence (based on a 5-point scale), and arterial contrast opacification in Hounsfield units (HUs). RESULTS:Ninety-six patients were included in the final evaluation. No significant differences were observed for pre- and postdose heart rate values for iomeron-400 compared with iodixanol-320, and changes in heart rate variation were also not significantly different (−2.3 ± 11.7 vs. −2.5 ± 7.3 bpm, P > 0.1). Contrast measurements in all analyzed vessels were significantly higher for iomeprol-400 (mean, 391.5–441.4 HU) compared with iodixanol-320 (mean, 332.3–365.5 HU, all P ≤ 0.0038). There was no significant difference in qualitative visualization of coronary arteries (mean scores, 4.3–4.5 for iomeprol, 4.1–4.3 for iodixanol, P = 0.15–0.28), or in diagnostic confidence scores. HU were inversely correlated with the number of insufficiently opacified segments (all readers P ≤ 0.0006). CONCLUSIONS:The high-iodine concentration contrast medium iomeprol-400 demonstrated significant benefit for coronary arterial enhancement compared with the iso-osmolar contrast medium iodixanol-320 when administered at identical flow rates and volumes for coronary DS-CTA. In addition, higher enhancement levels were found to be associated with lower numbers of inadequately visualized segments. Finally, observed mean heart rate changes after intravenous contrast injection were generally small during the examination and comparable for both agents.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31821c7ff4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_879105322</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>879105322</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3044-992843ec378ae9ab51dc283d9e747894541d89af5ce63eef6cbf580238dbe1fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUtBCILoV_gJBvnFL8lY3DbbUUdqVFlUqBY-Q4zxuDE29tR6W_kr-Et2lB6oGT_ebNm_HzIPSakjNK6urd5W57RlpCOXAqGdWVMeIJWtCSLwvCKHmKFoQwUtR1vTxBL2L8QXJdEf4cnTBaVhVlYoF-f55cshrGBAGv_XBQwUY_Ym_wxu77DI3HZlDJZjRX-RoTXu0ziLd-gEPwrhCE4O829XgbfeHj4J0KudvZX2rMbc7I-3-z52OvsuhwVFBjhzegQsKXKgH-lt1nJ3s0C35U4RZ_mJQrvvgpaLh74pSgw1d-8PugDr3VeDXu7VzcvkTPjHIRXt2fp-jrx_Or9abYXXzarle7QnMiRP4UJgUHzSupoFZtSTvNJO9qqEQla1EK2slamVLDkgOYpW5NKQnjsmuBmo6forezbt7_eoKYmsFGDc6pEfwUG1nVlJScscwUM1MHH2MA0xyCHfJeDSXNMckmJ9k8TjKPvbk3mNoBur9DD9FlgpwJN97l8OJPN91AaHpQLvX_1_4DbVOxaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>879105322</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multicenter Comparison of High Concentration Contrast Agent Iomeprol-400 With Iso-osmolar Iodixanol-320: Contrast Enhancement and Heart Rate Variation in Coronary Dual-Source Computed Tomographic Angiography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Becker, Cristoph R ; Vanzulli, Angelo ; Fink, Christian ; de Faveri, Daniele ; Fedeli, Stefano ; Dore, Roberto ; Biondetti, Pietro ; Kuettner, Alex ; Krix, Martin ; Ascenti, Giorgio</creator><creatorcontrib>Becker, Cristoph R ; Vanzulli, Angelo ; Fink, Christian ; de Faveri, Daniele ; Fedeli, Stefano ; Dore, Roberto ; Biondetti, Pietro ; Kuettner, Alex ; Krix, Martin ; Ascenti, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES:To compare a contrast agent with high iodine concentration with an iso-osmolar contrast agent for coronary dual-source computed tomography angiography (DS-CTA), and to assess whether the contrast agent characteristics may affect the diagnostic quality of coronary DS-CTA. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients were randomized to receive either 80 mL of iodixa:nol-320 (Visipaque, GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, United Kingdom) or iomeprol-400 (Iomeron, Bracco Imaging SpA, Milan, Italy) at 5 mL/s. Mean, minimum, maximum heart rate, and its variation (max-min) were assessed during calcium scoring scan and coronary DS-CTA. Three off-site readers independently evaluated the image sets in terms of technical adequacy, reasons for inadequacy, vessel visualization, diagnostic confidence (based on a 5-point scale), and arterial contrast opacification in Hounsfield units (HUs). RESULTS:Ninety-six patients were included in the final evaluation. No significant differences were observed for pre- and postdose heart rate values for iomeron-400 compared with iodixanol-320, and changes in heart rate variation were also not significantly different (−2.3 ± 11.7 vs. −2.5 ± 7.3 bpm, P &gt; 0.1). Contrast measurements in all analyzed vessels were significantly higher for iomeprol-400 (mean, 391.5–441.4 HU) compared with iodixanol-320 (mean, 332.3–365.5 HU, all P ≤ 0.0038). There was no significant difference in qualitative visualization of coronary arteries (mean scores, 4.3–4.5 for iomeprol, 4.1–4.3 for iodixanol, P = 0.15–0.28), or in diagnostic confidence scores. HU were inversely correlated with the number of insufficiently opacified segments (all readers P ≤ 0.0006). CONCLUSIONS:The high-iodine concentration contrast medium iomeprol-400 demonstrated significant benefit for coronary arterial enhancement compared with the iso-osmolar contrast medium iodixanol-320 when administered at identical flow rates and volumes for coronary DS-CTA. In addition, higher enhancement levels were found to be associated with lower numbers of inadequately visualized segments. Finally, observed mean heart rate changes after intravenous contrast injection were generally small during the examination and comparable for both agents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-9996</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-0210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31821c7ff4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21577124</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage ; Coronary Angiography - methods ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Heart Rate - drug effects ; Humans ; Iopamidol - administration &amp; dosage ; Iopamidol - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Triiodobenzoic Acids - administration &amp; dosage</subject><ispartof>Investigative radiology, 2011-07, Vol.46 (7), p.457-464</ispartof><rights>2011 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3044-992843ec378ae9ab51dc283d9e747894541d89af5ce63eef6cbf580238dbe1fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21577124$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Becker, Cristoph R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanzulli, Angelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Faveri, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedeli, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dore, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biondetti, Pietro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuettner, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krix, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ascenti, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><title>Multicenter Comparison of High Concentration Contrast Agent Iomeprol-400 With Iso-osmolar Iodixanol-320: Contrast Enhancement and Heart Rate Variation in Coronary Dual-Source Computed Tomographic Angiography</title><title>Investigative radiology</title><addtitle>Invest Radiol</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVES:To compare a contrast agent with high iodine concentration with an iso-osmolar contrast agent for coronary dual-source computed tomography angiography (DS-CTA), and to assess whether the contrast agent characteristics may affect the diagnostic quality of coronary DS-CTA. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients were randomized to receive either 80 mL of iodixa:nol-320 (Visipaque, GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, United Kingdom) or iomeprol-400 (Iomeron, Bracco Imaging SpA, Milan, Italy) at 5 mL/s. Mean, minimum, maximum heart rate, and its variation (max-min) were assessed during calcium scoring scan and coronary DS-CTA. Three off-site readers independently evaluated the image sets in terms of technical adequacy, reasons for inadequacy, vessel visualization, diagnostic confidence (based on a 5-point scale), and arterial contrast opacification in Hounsfield units (HUs). RESULTS:Ninety-six patients were included in the final evaluation. No significant differences were observed for pre- and postdose heart rate values for iomeron-400 compared with iodixanol-320, and changes in heart rate variation were also not significantly different (−2.3 ± 11.7 vs. −2.5 ± 7.3 bpm, P &gt; 0.1). Contrast measurements in all analyzed vessels were significantly higher for iomeprol-400 (mean, 391.5–441.4 HU) compared with iodixanol-320 (mean, 332.3–365.5 HU, all P ≤ 0.0038). There was no significant difference in qualitative visualization of coronary arteries (mean scores, 4.3–4.5 for iomeprol, 4.1–4.3 for iodixanol, P = 0.15–0.28), or in diagnostic confidence scores. HU were inversely correlated with the number of insufficiently opacified segments (all readers P ≤ 0.0006). CONCLUSIONS:The high-iodine concentration contrast medium iomeprol-400 demonstrated significant benefit for coronary arterial enhancement compared with the iso-osmolar contrast medium iodixanol-320 when administered at identical flow rates and volumes for coronary DS-CTA. In addition, higher enhancement levels were found to be associated with lower numbers of inadequately visualized segments. Finally, observed mean heart rate changes after intravenous contrast injection were generally small during the examination and comparable for both agents.</description><subject>Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography - methods</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Rate - drug effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iopamidol - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Iopamidol - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Triiodobenzoic Acids - administration &amp; dosage</subject><issn>0020-9996</issn><issn>1536-0210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUtBCILoV_gJBvnFL8lY3DbbUUdqVFlUqBY-Q4zxuDE29tR6W_kr-Et2lB6oGT_ebNm_HzIPSakjNK6urd5W57RlpCOXAqGdWVMeIJWtCSLwvCKHmKFoQwUtR1vTxBL2L8QXJdEf4cnTBaVhVlYoF-f55cshrGBAGv_XBQwUY_Ym_wxu77DI3HZlDJZjRX-RoTXu0ziLd-gEPwrhCE4O829XgbfeHj4J0KudvZX2rMbc7I-3-z52OvsuhwVFBjhzegQsKXKgH-lt1nJ3s0C35U4RZ_mJQrvvgpaLh74pSgw1d-8PugDr3VeDXu7VzcvkTPjHIRXt2fp-jrx_Or9abYXXzarle7QnMiRP4UJgUHzSupoFZtSTvNJO9qqEQla1EK2slamVLDkgOYpW5NKQnjsmuBmo6forezbt7_eoKYmsFGDc6pEfwUG1nVlJScscwUM1MHH2MA0xyCHfJeDSXNMckmJ9k8TjKPvbk3mNoBur9DD9FlgpwJN97l8OJPN91AaHpQLvX_1_4DbVOxaA</recordid><startdate>201107</startdate><enddate>201107</enddate><creator>Becker, Cristoph R</creator><creator>Vanzulli, Angelo</creator><creator>Fink, Christian</creator><creator>de Faveri, Daniele</creator><creator>Fedeli, Stefano</creator><creator>Dore, Roberto</creator><creator>Biondetti, Pietro</creator><creator>Kuettner, Alex</creator><creator>Krix, Martin</creator><creator>Ascenti, Giorgio</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201107</creationdate><title>Multicenter Comparison of High Concentration Contrast Agent Iomeprol-400 With Iso-osmolar Iodixanol-320: Contrast Enhancement and Heart Rate Variation in Coronary Dual-Source Computed Tomographic Angiography</title><author>Becker, Cristoph R ; Vanzulli, Angelo ; Fink, Christian ; de Faveri, Daniele ; Fedeli, Stefano ; Dore, Roberto ; Biondetti, Pietro ; Kuettner, Alex ; Krix, Martin ; Ascenti, Giorgio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3044-992843ec378ae9ab51dc283d9e747894541d89af5ce63eef6cbf580238dbe1fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography - methods</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Rate - drug effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iopamidol - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Iopamidol - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Triiodobenzoic Acids - administration &amp; dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Becker, Cristoph R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanzulli, Angelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Faveri, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedeli, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dore, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biondetti, Pietro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuettner, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krix, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ascenti, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Investigative radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Becker, Cristoph R</au><au>Vanzulli, Angelo</au><au>Fink, Christian</au><au>de Faveri, Daniele</au><au>Fedeli, Stefano</au><au>Dore, Roberto</au><au>Biondetti, Pietro</au><au>Kuettner, Alex</au><au>Krix, Martin</au><au>Ascenti, Giorgio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multicenter Comparison of High Concentration Contrast Agent Iomeprol-400 With Iso-osmolar Iodixanol-320: Contrast Enhancement and Heart Rate Variation in Coronary Dual-Source Computed Tomographic Angiography</atitle><jtitle>Investigative radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Invest Radiol</addtitle><date>2011-07</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>457</spage><epage>464</epage><pages>457-464</pages><issn>0020-9996</issn><eissn>1536-0210</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVES:To compare a contrast agent with high iodine concentration with an iso-osmolar contrast agent for coronary dual-source computed tomography angiography (DS-CTA), and to assess whether the contrast agent characteristics may affect the diagnostic quality of coronary DS-CTA. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients were randomized to receive either 80 mL of iodixa:nol-320 (Visipaque, GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, United Kingdom) or iomeprol-400 (Iomeron, Bracco Imaging SpA, Milan, Italy) at 5 mL/s. Mean, minimum, maximum heart rate, and its variation (max-min) were assessed during calcium scoring scan and coronary DS-CTA. Three off-site readers independently evaluated the image sets in terms of technical adequacy, reasons for inadequacy, vessel visualization, diagnostic confidence (based on a 5-point scale), and arterial contrast opacification in Hounsfield units (HUs). RESULTS:Ninety-six patients were included in the final evaluation. No significant differences were observed for pre- and postdose heart rate values for iomeron-400 compared with iodixanol-320, and changes in heart rate variation were also not significantly different (−2.3 ± 11.7 vs. −2.5 ± 7.3 bpm, P &gt; 0.1). Contrast measurements in all analyzed vessels were significantly higher for iomeprol-400 (mean, 391.5–441.4 HU) compared with iodixanol-320 (mean, 332.3–365.5 HU, all P ≤ 0.0038). There was no significant difference in qualitative visualization of coronary arteries (mean scores, 4.3–4.5 for iomeprol, 4.1–4.3 for iodixanol, P = 0.15–0.28), or in diagnostic confidence scores. HU were inversely correlated with the number of insufficiently opacified segments (all readers P ≤ 0.0006). CONCLUSIONS:The high-iodine concentration contrast medium iomeprol-400 demonstrated significant benefit for coronary arterial enhancement compared with the iso-osmolar contrast medium iodixanol-320 when administered at identical flow rates and volumes for coronary DS-CTA. In addition, higher enhancement levels were found to be associated with lower numbers of inadequately visualized segments. Finally, observed mean heart rate changes after intravenous contrast injection were generally small during the examination and comparable for both agents.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>21577124</pmid><doi>10.1097/RLI.0b013e31821c7ff4</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-9996
ispartof Investigative radiology, 2011-07, Vol.46 (7), p.457-464
issn 0020-9996
1536-0210
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_879105322
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Contrast Media - administration & dosage
Coronary Angiography - methods
Double-Blind Method
Female
Heart Rate - drug effects
Humans
Iopamidol - administration & dosage
Iopamidol - analogs & derivatives
Male
Middle Aged
Triiodobenzoic Acids - administration & dosage
title Multicenter Comparison of High Concentration Contrast Agent Iomeprol-400 With Iso-osmolar Iodixanol-320: Contrast Enhancement and Heart Rate Variation in Coronary Dual-Source Computed Tomographic Angiography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T03%3A27%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multicenter%20Comparison%20of%20High%20Concentration%20Contrast%20Agent%20Iomeprol-400%20With%20Iso-osmolar%20Iodixanol-320:%20Contrast%20Enhancement%20and%20Heart%20Rate%20Variation%20in%20Coronary%20Dual-Source%20Computed%20Tomographic%20Angiography&rft.jtitle=Investigative%20radiology&rft.au=Becker,%20Cristoph%20R&rft.date=2011-07&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=457&rft.epage=464&rft.pages=457-464&rft.issn=0020-9996&rft.eissn=1536-0210&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/RLI.0b013e31821c7ff4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E879105322%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=879105322&rft_id=info:pmid/21577124&rfr_iscdi=true