3D tumor localization through real-time volumetric x-ray imaging for lung cancer radiotherapy
Purpose : To evaluate an algorithm for real-time 3D tumor localization from a single x-ray projection image for lung cancer radiotherapy. Methods : Recently, we have developed an algorithm for reconstructing volumetric images and extracting 3D tumor motion information from a single x-ray projection...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) 2011-05, Vol.38 (5), p.2783-2794 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2794 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2783 |
container_title | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Li, Ruijiang Lewis, John H. Jia, Xun Gu, Xuejun Folkerts, Michael Men, Chunhua Song, William Y. Jiang, Steve B. |
description | Purpose
: To evaluate an algorithm for real-time 3D tumor localization from a single x-ray projection image for lung cancer radiotherapy.
Methods
: Recently, we have developed an algorithm for reconstructing volumetric images and extracting 3D tumor motion information from a single x-ray projection [Liet al., Med. Phys. 37, 2822–2826 (2010)]. We have demonstrated its feasibility using a digital respiratory phantom with regular breathing patterns. In this work, we present a detailed description and a comprehensive evaluation of the improved algorithm. The algorithm was improved by incorporating respiratory motion prediction. The accuracy and efficiency of using this algorithm for 3D tumor localization were then evaluated on (1) a digital respiratory phantom, (2) a physical respiratory phantom, and (3) five lung cancer patients. These evaluation cases include both regular and irregular breathing patterns that are different from the training dataset.
Results
: For the digital respiratory phantom with regular and irregular breathing, the average 3D tumor localization error is less than 1 mm which does not seem to be affected by amplitude change, period change, or baseline shift. On an NVIDIA Tesla C1060 graphic processing unit (GPU) card, the average computation time for 3D tumor localization from each projection ranges between 0.19 and 0.26 s, for both regular and irregular breathing, which is about a 10% improvement over previously reported results. For the physical respiratory phantom, an average tumor localization error below 1 mm was achieved with an average computation time of 0.13 and 0.16 s on the same graphic processing unit (GPU) card, for regular and irregular breathing, respectively. For the five lung cancer patients, the average tumor localization error is below 2 mm in both the axial and tangential directions. The average computation time on the same GPU card ranges between 0.26 and 0.34 s.
Conclusions
: Through a comprehensive evaluation of our algorithm, we have established its accuracy in 3D tumor localization to be on the order of 1 mm on average and 2 mm at 95 percentile for both digital and physical phantoms, and within 2 mm on average and 4 mm at 95 percentile for lung cancer patients. The results also indicate that the accuracy is not affected by the breathing pattern, be it regular or irregular. High computational efficiency can be achieved on GPU, requiring 0.1–0.3 s for each x-ray projection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1118/1.3582693 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_878822669</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>878822669</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5143-34f8628e876341646333e2841f7bcd8ce9e1ad4eaa98fb15677f65fce66986603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLw0AQxxdRbK0e_AKyN0FI3Vc2m4sgrS-o6EGPsmw3k3YlaeomqcZPb_rwAaKnGZjf_If5IXRISZ9Sqk5pn4eKyZhvoS4TEQ8EI_E26hISi4AJEnbQXlk-E0IkD8ku6jAaRVLRsIue-BBXdV54nBXWZO7dVK6Y4Wrqi3oyxR5MFlQuB7wosjqHyjuL3wJvGuxyM3GzCU6Xu3XbWDOz4LE3iSuqKXgzb_bRTmqyEg42tYceLy8eBtfB6O7qZnA-CmxIBQ-4SJVkClQkuaBSSM45MCVoGo1toizEQE0iwJhYpWMayihKZZhakDJWUhLeQ8fr3LkvXmooK5270kKWmRkUdalVpBRjLd2SRxuyHueQ6Llv__CN_jTSAsEaeHUZNF9zSvRStaZ6o1rf3i9Ly5-t-dK6aiXv7x0-1CvX-ofrNuDkr4BFi34fnCfpf_Dvax-ZR6E0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>878822669</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>3D tumor localization through real-time volumetric x-ray imaging for lung cancer radiotherapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Li, Ruijiang ; Lewis, John H. ; Jia, Xun ; Gu, Xuejun ; Folkerts, Michael ; Men, Chunhua ; Song, William Y. ; Jiang, Steve B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Ruijiang ; Lewis, John H. ; Jia, Xun ; Gu, Xuejun ; Folkerts, Michael ; Men, Chunhua ; Song, William Y. ; Jiang, Steve B.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
: To evaluate an algorithm for real-time 3D tumor localization from a single x-ray projection image for lung cancer radiotherapy.
Methods
: Recently, we have developed an algorithm for reconstructing volumetric images and extracting 3D tumor motion information from a single x-ray projection [Liet al., Med. Phys. 37, 2822–2826 (2010)]. We have demonstrated its feasibility using a digital respiratory phantom with regular breathing patterns. In this work, we present a detailed description and a comprehensive evaluation of the improved algorithm. The algorithm was improved by incorporating respiratory motion prediction. The accuracy and efficiency of using this algorithm for 3D tumor localization were then evaluated on (1) a digital respiratory phantom, (2) a physical respiratory phantom, and (3) five lung cancer patients. These evaluation cases include both regular and irregular breathing patterns that are different from the training dataset.
Results
: For the digital respiratory phantom with regular and irregular breathing, the average 3D tumor localization error is less than 1 mm which does not seem to be affected by amplitude change, period change, or baseline shift. On an NVIDIA Tesla C1060 graphic processing unit (GPU) card, the average computation time for 3D tumor localization from each projection ranges between 0.19 and 0.26 s, for both regular and irregular breathing, which is about a 10% improvement over previously reported results. For the physical respiratory phantom, an average tumor localization error below 1 mm was achieved with an average computation time of 0.13 and 0.16 s on the same graphic processing unit (GPU) card, for regular and irregular breathing, respectively. For the five lung cancer patients, the average tumor localization error is below 2 mm in both the axial and tangential directions. The average computation time on the same GPU card ranges between 0.26 and 0.34 s.
Conclusions
: Through a comprehensive evaluation of our algorithm, we have established its accuracy in 3D tumor localization to be on the order of 1 mm on average and 2 mm at 95 percentile for both digital and physical phantoms, and within 2 mm on average and 4 mm at 95 percentile for lung cancer patients. The results also indicate that the accuracy is not affected by the breathing pattern, be it regular or irregular. High computational efficiency can be achieved on GPU, requiring 0.1–0.3 s for each x-ray projection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.3582693</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21776815</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Cancer ; Computer Systems ; Cone beam computed tomography ; diagnostic radiography ; Digital radiography ; Eigenvalues ; GPU ; Humans ; image reconstruction ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; lung ; lung cancer radiotherapy ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Lungs ; medical image processing ; Medical image reconstruction ; Medical imaging ; Medical X‐ray imaging ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Pneumodyamics, respiration ; pneumodynamics ; radiation therapy ; Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiotherapy, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Reconstruction ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Therapeutic applications, including brachytherapy ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Treatment strategy ; tumor localization ; tumours ; X‐ray imaging</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2011-05, Vol.38 (5), p.2783-2794</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2011 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5143-34f8628e876341646333e2841f7bcd8ce9e1ad4eaa98fb15677f65fce66986603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5143-34f8628e876341646333e2841f7bcd8ce9e1ad4eaa98fb15677f65fce66986603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.3582693$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.3582693$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21776815$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Ruijiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Xun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Xuejun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folkerts, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Men, Chunhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, William Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Steve B.</creatorcontrib><title>3D tumor localization through real-time volumetric x-ray imaging for lung cancer radiotherapy</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose
: To evaluate an algorithm for real-time 3D tumor localization from a single x-ray projection image for lung cancer radiotherapy.
Methods
: Recently, we have developed an algorithm for reconstructing volumetric images and extracting 3D tumor motion information from a single x-ray projection [Liet al., Med. Phys. 37, 2822–2826 (2010)]. We have demonstrated its feasibility using a digital respiratory phantom with regular breathing patterns. In this work, we present a detailed description and a comprehensive evaluation of the improved algorithm. The algorithm was improved by incorporating respiratory motion prediction. The accuracy and efficiency of using this algorithm for 3D tumor localization were then evaluated on (1) a digital respiratory phantom, (2) a physical respiratory phantom, and (3) five lung cancer patients. These evaluation cases include both regular and irregular breathing patterns that are different from the training dataset.
Results
: For the digital respiratory phantom with regular and irregular breathing, the average 3D tumor localization error is less than 1 mm which does not seem to be affected by amplitude change, period change, or baseline shift. On an NVIDIA Tesla C1060 graphic processing unit (GPU) card, the average computation time for 3D tumor localization from each projection ranges between 0.19 and 0.26 s, for both regular and irregular breathing, which is about a 10% improvement over previously reported results. For the physical respiratory phantom, an average tumor localization error below 1 mm was achieved with an average computation time of 0.13 and 0.16 s on the same graphic processing unit (GPU) card, for regular and irregular breathing, respectively. For the five lung cancer patients, the average tumor localization error is below 2 mm in both the axial and tangential directions. The average computation time on the same GPU card ranges between 0.26 and 0.34 s.
Conclusions
: Through a comprehensive evaluation of our algorithm, we have established its accuracy in 3D tumor localization to be on the order of 1 mm on average and 2 mm at 95 percentile for both digital and physical phantoms, and within 2 mm on average and 4 mm at 95 percentile for lung cancer patients. The results also indicate that the accuracy is not affected by the breathing pattern, be it regular or irregular. High computational efficiency can be achieved on GPU, requiring 0.1–0.3 s for each x-ray projection.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Computer Systems</subject><subject>Cone beam computed tomography</subject><subject>diagnostic radiography</subject><subject>Digital radiography</subject><subject>Eigenvalues</subject><subject>GPU</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>image reconstruction</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>lung</subject><subject>lung cancer radiotherapy</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Lungs</subject><subject>medical image processing</subject><subject>Medical image reconstruction</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical X‐ray imaging</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Pneumodyamics, respiration</subject><subject>pneumodynamics</subject><subject>radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Reconstruction</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Therapeutic applications, including brachytherapy</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Treatment strategy</subject><subject>tumor localization</subject><subject>tumours</subject><subject>X‐ray imaging</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLw0AQxxdRbK0e_AKyN0FI3Vc2m4sgrS-o6EGPsmw3k3YlaeomqcZPb_rwAaKnGZjf_If5IXRISZ9Sqk5pn4eKyZhvoS4TEQ8EI_E26hISi4AJEnbQXlk-E0IkD8ku6jAaRVLRsIue-BBXdV54nBXWZO7dVK6Y4Wrqi3oyxR5MFlQuB7wosjqHyjuL3wJvGuxyM3GzCU6Xu3XbWDOz4LE3iSuqKXgzb_bRTmqyEg42tYceLy8eBtfB6O7qZnA-CmxIBQ-4SJVkClQkuaBSSM45MCVoGo1toizEQE0iwJhYpWMayihKZZhakDJWUhLeQ8fr3LkvXmooK5270kKWmRkUdalVpBRjLd2SRxuyHueQ6Llv__CN_jTSAsEaeHUZNF9zSvRStaZ6o1rf3i9Ly5-t-dK6aiXv7x0-1CvX-ofrNuDkr4BFi34fnCfpf_Dvax-ZR6E0</recordid><startdate>201105</startdate><enddate>201105</enddate><creator>Li, Ruijiang</creator><creator>Lewis, John H.</creator><creator>Jia, Xun</creator><creator>Gu, Xuejun</creator><creator>Folkerts, Michael</creator><creator>Men, Chunhua</creator><creator>Song, William Y.</creator><creator>Jiang, Steve B.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201105</creationdate><title>3D tumor localization through real-time volumetric x-ray imaging for lung cancer radiotherapy</title><author>Li, Ruijiang ; Lewis, John H. ; Jia, Xun ; Gu, Xuejun ; Folkerts, Michael ; Men, Chunhua ; Song, William Y. ; Jiang, Steve B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5143-34f8628e876341646333e2841f7bcd8ce9e1ad4eaa98fb15677f65fce66986603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Computer Systems</topic><topic>Cone beam computed tomography</topic><topic>diagnostic radiography</topic><topic>Digital radiography</topic><topic>Eigenvalues</topic><topic>GPU</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>image reconstruction</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>lung</topic><topic>lung cancer radiotherapy</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Lungs</topic><topic>medical image processing</topic><topic>Medical image reconstruction</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical X‐ray imaging</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Pneumodyamics, respiration</topic><topic>pneumodynamics</topic><topic>radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Reconstruction</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Therapeutic applications, including brachytherapy</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Treatment strategy</topic><topic>tumor localization</topic><topic>tumours</topic><topic>X‐ray imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Ruijiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Xun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Xuejun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folkerts, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Men, Chunhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, William Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Steve B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Ruijiang</au><au>Lewis, John H.</au><au>Jia, Xun</au><au>Gu, Xuejun</au><au>Folkerts, Michael</au><au>Men, Chunhua</au><au>Song, William Y.</au><au>Jiang, Steve B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>3D tumor localization through real-time volumetric x-ray imaging for lung cancer radiotherapy</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2011-05</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2783</spage><epage>2794</epage><pages>2783-2794</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose
: To evaluate an algorithm for real-time 3D tumor localization from a single x-ray projection image for lung cancer radiotherapy.
Methods
: Recently, we have developed an algorithm for reconstructing volumetric images and extracting 3D tumor motion information from a single x-ray projection [Liet al., Med. Phys. 37, 2822–2826 (2010)]. We have demonstrated its feasibility using a digital respiratory phantom with regular breathing patterns. In this work, we present a detailed description and a comprehensive evaluation of the improved algorithm. The algorithm was improved by incorporating respiratory motion prediction. The accuracy and efficiency of using this algorithm for 3D tumor localization were then evaluated on (1) a digital respiratory phantom, (2) a physical respiratory phantom, and (3) five lung cancer patients. These evaluation cases include both regular and irregular breathing patterns that are different from the training dataset.
Results
: For the digital respiratory phantom with regular and irregular breathing, the average 3D tumor localization error is less than 1 mm which does not seem to be affected by amplitude change, period change, or baseline shift. On an NVIDIA Tesla C1060 graphic processing unit (GPU) card, the average computation time for 3D tumor localization from each projection ranges between 0.19 and 0.26 s, for both regular and irregular breathing, which is about a 10% improvement over previously reported results. For the physical respiratory phantom, an average tumor localization error below 1 mm was achieved with an average computation time of 0.13 and 0.16 s on the same graphic processing unit (GPU) card, for regular and irregular breathing, respectively. For the five lung cancer patients, the average tumor localization error is below 2 mm in both the axial and tangential directions. The average computation time on the same GPU card ranges between 0.26 and 0.34 s.
Conclusions
: Through a comprehensive evaluation of our algorithm, we have established its accuracy in 3D tumor localization to be on the order of 1 mm on average and 2 mm at 95 percentile for both digital and physical phantoms, and within 2 mm on average and 4 mm at 95 percentile for lung cancer patients. The results also indicate that the accuracy is not affected by the breathing pattern, be it regular or irregular. High computational efficiency can be achieved on GPU, requiring 0.1–0.3 s for each x-ray projection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>21776815</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.3582693</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2405 |
ispartof | Medical physics (Lancaster), 2011-05, Vol.38 (5), p.2783-2794 |
issn | 0094-2405 2473-4209 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_878822669 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Algorithms Cancer Computer Systems Cone beam computed tomography diagnostic radiography Digital radiography Eigenvalues GPU Humans image reconstruction Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods lung lung cancer radiotherapy Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy Lungs medical image processing Medical image reconstruction Medical imaging Medical X‐ray imaging Phantoms, Imaging Pneumodyamics, respiration pneumodynamics radiation therapy Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Radiotherapy, Computer-Assisted - methods Reconstruction Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Therapeutic applications, including brachytherapy Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods Treatment strategy tumor localization tumours X‐ray imaging |
title | 3D tumor localization through real-time volumetric x-ray imaging for lung cancer radiotherapy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A32%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=3D%20tumor%20localization%20through%20real-time%20volumetric%20x-ray%20imaging%20for%20lung%20cancer%20radiotherapy&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Li,%20Ruijiang&rft.date=2011-05&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2783&rft.epage=2794&rft.pages=2783-2794&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.3582693&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E878822669%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=878822669&rft_id=info:pmid/21776815&rfr_iscdi=true |