Trends in the utilization of invasive prenatal diagnosis in The Netherlands during 2000-2009

Objective To analyze trends in the number and type of invasive procedure, reasons for referral, maternal age and chromosomal abnormalities over a 10‐year period and correlate the trends to changes in the national prenatal screening policy. Methods Data from 10 706 invasive prenatal procedures yieldi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Prenatal diagnosis 2011-08, Vol.31 (8), p.765-772
Hauptverfasser: Lichtenbelt, Klaske D., Alizadeh, Behrooz Z., Scheffer, Peter G., Stoutenbeek, Philip, Schielen, Peter C. J. I., Page-Christiaens, Lieve C. M. L., Schuring-Blom, G. Heleen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To analyze trends in the number and type of invasive procedure, reasons for referral, maternal age and chromosomal abnormalities over a 10‐year period and correlate the trends to changes in the national prenatal screening policy. Methods Data from 10 706 invasive prenatal procedures yielding a full karyotype, performed between 2000 and 2009 were extracted from the cytogenetic database in the central region of The Netherlands. Trends were analyzed. Results Over a 10‐year period, the number of invasive procedures halved and the percentage of chromosomal abnormalities detected, increased from 5.5 to 9.4%. After 2007, however, 5.7% of karyotypes in women over 36 years were found to be abnormal, versus 18.1% in women below 36 years. In 2009, 71.5% of women over 36 are still referred for invasive prenatal diagnosis on the indication advanced maternal age. Conclusions Changes in prenatal screening policy significantly increased referral after screening and improved the efficacy of invasive prenatal diagnosis. We show the continuing effect of the different policies applied in the past to women below and above the age of 36. To further improve efficacy of invasive prenatal diagnosis, first trimester combination screening should be actively offered to women of all ages. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISSN:0197-3851
1097-0223
DOI:10.1002/pd.2764