Short wavelength fundus autofluorescence versus near-infrared fundus autofluorescence, with microperimetric correspondence, in patients with geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration
AimTo compare standard short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (SW-FAF) and near infrared-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (NIR-FAF) in detecting geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration, and its retinal sensitivity impairment.MethodsTwenty-five consecutive patients (...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of ophthalmology 2011-08, Vol.95 (8), p.1140-1144 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1144 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 1140 |
| container_title | British journal of ophthalmology |
| container_volume | 95 |
| creator | Pilotto, Elisabetta Vujosevic, Stela Melis, Riccardo Convento, Enrica Sportiello, Patrik Alemany-Rubio, Ernesto Segalina, Sara Midena, Edoardo |
| description | AimTo compare standard short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (SW-FAF) and near infrared-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (NIR-FAF) in detecting geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration, and its retinal sensitivity impairment.MethodsTwenty-five consecutive patients (36 eyes) affected by GA were studied by means of fundus autofluorescence imaging, using both SW-FAF (excitation: 488 nm, emission >500 nm) and NIR-FAF (excitation: 787 nm, emission >800 nm). All patients underwent microperimetry to assess fixation characteristics and retinal sensitivity.ResultsIn the extrafoveal region, the total hypoautofluorescent (hypo-FAF) area was significantly wider with NIR-FAF than with SW-FAF (8.03±6.68 mm2 vs 7.37±6.34 mm2 respectively; p=0.005). In the foveal area, the total hypo-FAF area was smaller with NIR-FAF than with SW-FAF (0.19±0.03 mm2 versus 0.42±0.12 mm2 respectively; p=0.008). Foveal sparing was larger at NIR-FAF compared with SW-FAF (p=0.021). In nine cases (25%) the site of fixation was hypoautofluorescent on SW-FAF, but normal on NIR-FAF with preserved retinal sensitivity.ConclusionsStandard SW-FAF may overestimate GA in the foveal area, correctly detected by NIR-FAF. In the extrafoveal area, SW-FAF may underestimate GA. Standard SW-FAF should be integrated with NIR FAF when detecting and following GA to avoid inconsistent results and misinterpretation, from both a morphological and functional perspective. Microperimetry helps to quantify retinal sensitivity in GA. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bjo.2010.187344 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_878277299</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>878277299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b427t-7ebc16e90e4752ba44754f8b3582428f7b84f73661203df34657d2b1e024443d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0V2L1DAUBuAiijuuXnsnARFB7G6Spkl7qYPuCosK6noZ0vZ0pmOb1Hzsur_Qv-UZOq4giFch6XNOT_Jm2WNGTxgr5Gmzcyec7neVKoS4k62YkFXOqarvZitKqcoZk-woexDCDrdcMnU_O-K0VkJytcp-fto6H8m1uYIR7CZuSZ9slwIxKbp-TM5DaMG2QK7ABzy3YHw-2N4bD92_8EtyPWCraWi9m8EPE0Q_tKR1HsXsbLegwZLZxAFsDEvBBtzGm3mL1kQs3d6QLgGJjpgN5B5GE_Gnk2nTaDzpYAMWPHZw9mF2rzdjgEeH9Tj78vbN5_V5fvHh7N361UXeCK5irqBpmYSaglAlb4zARfRVU5QVF7zqVVOJXhVSMk6Lri-ELFXHGwaUCyGKrjjOni99Z---JwhRTwPeeRyNBZeCrlTFleJ1jfLpX3Lnkrc4nGZKVbWQopaoTheFLxWCh17P-FzG32hG9T5ijRHrfcR6iRgrnhz6pmaC7tb_zhTBswMwoTUjJmXbIfxxokBV7gfMFzeECD9uvxv_TUtVqFK_v1zrj5ev6_Ozr6Uu0b9YfDPt_jvlL--x0FQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778946496</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short wavelength fundus autofluorescence versus near-infrared fundus autofluorescence, with microperimetric correspondence, in patients with geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pilotto, Elisabetta ; Vujosevic, Stela ; Melis, Riccardo ; Convento, Enrica ; Sportiello, Patrik ; Alemany-Rubio, Ernesto ; Segalina, Sara ; Midena, Edoardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Pilotto, Elisabetta ; Vujosevic, Stela ; Melis, Riccardo ; Convento, Enrica ; Sportiello, Patrik ; Alemany-Rubio, Ernesto ; Segalina, Sara ; Midena, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><description>AimTo compare standard short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (SW-FAF) and near infrared-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (NIR-FAF) in detecting geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration, and its retinal sensitivity impairment.MethodsTwenty-five consecutive patients (36 eyes) affected by GA were studied by means of fundus autofluorescence imaging, using both SW-FAF (excitation: 488 nm, emission >500 nm) and NIR-FAF (excitation: 787 nm, emission >800 nm). All patients underwent microperimetry to assess fixation characteristics and retinal sensitivity.ResultsIn the extrafoveal region, the total hypoautofluorescent (hypo-FAF) area was significantly wider with NIR-FAF than with SW-FAF (8.03±6.68 mm2 vs 7.37±6.34 mm2 respectively; p=0.005). In the foveal area, the total hypo-FAF area was smaller with NIR-FAF than with SW-FAF (0.19±0.03 mm2 versus 0.42±0.12 mm2 respectively; p=0.008). Foveal sparing was larger at NIR-FAF compared with SW-FAF (p=0.021). In nine cases (25%) the site of fixation was hypoautofluorescent on SW-FAF, but normal on NIR-FAF with preserved retinal sensitivity.ConclusionsStandard SW-FAF may overestimate GA in the foveal area, correctly detected by NIR-FAF. In the extrafoveal area, SW-FAF may underestimate GA. Standard SW-FAF should be integrated with NIR FAF when detecting and following GA to avoid inconsistent results and misinterpretation, from both a morphological and functional perspective. Microperimetry helps to quantify retinal sensitivity in GA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2010.187344</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20974627</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJOPAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>age-related macular degeneration ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; degeneration ; Diabetes ; Diabetic retinopathy ; diagnostic tests/investigation ; Female ; Fluorescence ; Fovea Centralis - metabolism ; Fovea Centralis - pathology ; fundus autofluorescence ; Geographic atrophy ; Geographic Atrophy - etiology ; Geographic Atrophy - metabolism ; Geographic Atrophy - pathology ; Humans ; imaging ; Infrared Rays ; macula ; Macular degeneration ; Macular Degeneration - complications ; Macular Degeneration - metabolism ; Macular Degeneration - pathology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; microperimetry ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Ophthalmology ; Ophthalmoscopy - methods ; Ophthalmoscopy - standards ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retinopathies ; Sensory Thresholds ; Software ; vision ; Visual Acuity ; Visual Field Tests - methods ; Visual Field Tests - standards ; Visual Fields</subject><ispartof>British journal of ophthalmology, 2011-08, Vol.95 (8), p.1140-1144</ispartof><rights>2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2011 (c) 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b427t-7ebc16e90e4752ba44754f8b3582428f7b84f73661203df34657d2b1e024443d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bjo.bmj.com/content/95/8/1140.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bjo.bmj.com/content/95/8/1140.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23552,27903,27904,77346,77377</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24362759$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20974627$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pilotto, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vujosevic, Stela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melis, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Convento, Enrica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sportiello, Patrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alemany-Rubio, Ernesto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segalina, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Midena, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><title>Short wavelength fundus autofluorescence versus near-infrared fundus autofluorescence, with microperimetric correspondence, in patients with geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration</title><title>British journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>AimTo compare standard short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (SW-FAF) and near infrared-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (NIR-FAF) in detecting geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration, and its retinal sensitivity impairment.MethodsTwenty-five consecutive patients (36 eyes) affected by GA were studied by means of fundus autofluorescence imaging, using both SW-FAF (excitation: 488 nm, emission >500 nm) and NIR-FAF (excitation: 787 nm, emission >800 nm). All patients underwent microperimetry to assess fixation characteristics and retinal sensitivity.ResultsIn the extrafoveal region, the total hypoautofluorescent (hypo-FAF) area was significantly wider with NIR-FAF than with SW-FAF (8.03±6.68 mm2 vs 7.37±6.34 mm2 respectively; p=0.005). In the foveal area, the total hypo-FAF area was smaller with NIR-FAF than with SW-FAF (0.19±0.03 mm2 versus 0.42±0.12 mm2 respectively; p=0.008). Foveal sparing was larger at NIR-FAF compared with SW-FAF (p=0.021). In nine cases (25%) the site of fixation was hypoautofluorescent on SW-FAF, but normal on NIR-FAF with preserved retinal sensitivity.ConclusionsStandard SW-FAF may overestimate GA in the foveal area, correctly detected by NIR-FAF. In the extrafoveal area, SW-FAF may underestimate GA. Standard SW-FAF should be integrated with NIR FAF when detecting and following GA to avoid inconsistent results and misinterpretation, from both a morphological and functional perspective. Microperimetry helps to quantify retinal sensitivity in GA.</description><subject>age-related macular degeneration</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>degeneration</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>diagnostic tests/investigation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Fovea Centralis - metabolism</subject><subject>Fovea Centralis - pathology</subject><subject>fundus autofluorescence</subject><subject>Geographic atrophy</subject><subject>Geographic Atrophy - etiology</subject><subject>Geographic Atrophy - metabolism</subject><subject>Geographic Atrophy - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>imaging</subject><subject>Infrared Rays</subject><subject>macula</subject><subject>Macular degeneration</subject><subject>Macular Degeneration - complications</subject><subject>Macular Degeneration - metabolism</subject><subject>Macular Degeneration - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>microperimetry</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Ophthalmoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Ophthalmoscopy - standards</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retinopathies</subject><subject>Sensory Thresholds</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>vision</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><subject>Visual Field Tests - methods</subject><subject>Visual Field Tests - standards</subject><subject>Visual Fields</subject><issn>0007-1161</issn><issn>1468-2079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0V2L1DAUBuAiijuuXnsnARFB7G6Spkl7qYPuCosK6noZ0vZ0pmOb1Hzsur_Qv-UZOq4giFch6XNOT_Jm2WNGTxgr5Gmzcyec7neVKoS4k62YkFXOqarvZitKqcoZk-woexDCDrdcMnU_O-K0VkJytcp-fto6H8m1uYIR7CZuSZ9slwIxKbp-TM5DaMG2QK7ABzy3YHw-2N4bD92_8EtyPWCraWi9m8EPE0Q_tKR1HsXsbLegwZLZxAFsDEvBBtzGm3mL1kQs3d6QLgGJjpgN5B5GE_Gnk2nTaDzpYAMWPHZw9mF2rzdjgEeH9Tj78vbN5_V5fvHh7N361UXeCK5irqBpmYSaglAlb4zARfRVU5QVF7zqVVOJXhVSMk6Lri-ELFXHGwaUCyGKrjjOni99Z---JwhRTwPeeRyNBZeCrlTFleJ1jfLpX3Lnkrc4nGZKVbWQopaoTheFLxWCh17P-FzG32hG9T5ijRHrfcR6iRgrnhz6pmaC7tb_zhTBswMwoTUjJmXbIfxxokBV7gfMFzeECD9uvxv_TUtVqFK_v1zrj5ev6_Ozr6Uu0b9YfDPt_jvlL--x0FQ</recordid><startdate>20110801</startdate><enddate>20110801</enddate><creator>Pilotto, Elisabetta</creator><creator>Vujosevic, Stela</creator><creator>Melis, Riccardo</creator><creator>Convento, Enrica</creator><creator>Sportiello, Patrik</creator><creator>Alemany-Rubio, Ernesto</creator><creator>Segalina, Sara</creator><creator>Midena, Edoardo</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110801</creationdate><title>Short wavelength fundus autofluorescence versus near-infrared fundus autofluorescence, with microperimetric correspondence, in patients with geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration</title><author>Pilotto, Elisabetta ; Vujosevic, Stela ; Melis, Riccardo ; Convento, Enrica ; Sportiello, Patrik ; Alemany-Rubio, Ernesto ; Segalina, Sara ; Midena, Edoardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b427t-7ebc16e90e4752ba44754f8b3582428f7b84f73661203df34657d2b1e024443d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>age-related macular degeneration</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>degeneration</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>diagnostic tests/investigation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Fovea Centralis - metabolism</topic><topic>Fovea Centralis - pathology</topic><topic>fundus autofluorescence</topic><topic>Geographic atrophy</topic><topic>Geographic Atrophy - etiology</topic><topic>Geographic Atrophy - metabolism</topic><topic>Geographic Atrophy - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>imaging</topic><topic>Infrared Rays</topic><topic>macula</topic><topic>Macular degeneration</topic><topic>Macular Degeneration - complications</topic><topic>Macular Degeneration - metabolism</topic><topic>Macular Degeneration - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>microperimetry</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Ophthalmoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Ophthalmoscopy - standards</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retinopathies</topic><topic>Sensory Thresholds</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>vision</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><topic>Visual Field Tests - methods</topic><topic>Visual Field Tests - standards</topic><topic>Visual Fields</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pilotto, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vujosevic, Stela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melis, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Convento, Enrica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sportiello, Patrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alemany-Rubio, Ernesto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segalina, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Midena, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pilotto, Elisabetta</au><au>Vujosevic, Stela</au><au>Melis, Riccardo</au><au>Convento, Enrica</au><au>Sportiello, Patrik</au><au>Alemany-Rubio, Ernesto</au><au>Segalina, Sara</au><au>Midena, Edoardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short wavelength fundus autofluorescence versus near-infrared fundus autofluorescence, with microperimetric correspondence, in patients with geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration</atitle><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2011-08-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1140</spage><epage>1144</epage><pages>1140-1144</pages><issn>0007-1161</issn><eissn>1468-2079</eissn><coden>BJOPAL</coden><abstract>AimTo compare standard short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (SW-FAF) and near infrared-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (NIR-FAF) in detecting geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration, and its retinal sensitivity impairment.MethodsTwenty-five consecutive patients (36 eyes) affected by GA were studied by means of fundus autofluorescence imaging, using both SW-FAF (excitation: 488 nm, emission >500 nm) and NIR-FAF (excitation: 787 nm, emission >800 nm). All patients underwent microperimetry to assess fixation characteristics and retinal sensitivity.ResultsIn the extrafoveal region, the total hypoautofluorescent (hypo-FAF) area was significantly wider with NIR-FAF than with SW-FAF (8.03±6.68 mm2 vs 7.37±6.34 mm2 respectively; p=0.005). In the foveal area, the total hypo-FAF area was smaller with NIR-FAF than with SW-FAF (0.19±0.03 mm2 versus 0.42±0.12 mm2 respectively; p=0.008). Foveal sparing was larger at NIR-FAF compared with SW-FAF (p=0.021). In nine cases (25%) the site of fixation was hypoautofluorescent on SW-FAF, but normal on NIR-FAF with preserved retinal sensitivity.ConclusionsStandard SW-FAF may overestimate GA in the foveal area, correctly detected by NIR-FAF. In the extrafoveal area, SW-FAF may underestimate GA. Standard SW-FAF should be integrated with NIR FAF when detecting and following GA to avoid inconsistent results and misinterpretation, from both a morphological and functional perspective. Microperimetry helps to quantify retinal sensitivity in GA.</abstract><cop>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>20974627</pmid><doi>10.1136/bjo.2010.187344</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0007-1161 |
| ispartof | British journal of ophthalmology, 2011-08, Vol.95 (8), p.1140-1144 |
| issn | 0007-1161 1468-2079 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_878277299 |
| source | MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; PubMed Central |
| subjects | age-related macular degeneration Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences degeneration Diabetes Diabetic retinopathy diagnostic tests/investigation Female Fluorescence Fovea Centralis - metabolism Fovea Centralis - pathology fundus autofluorescence Geographic atrophy Geographic Atrophy - etiology Geographic Atrophy - metabolism Geographic Atrophy - pathology Humans imaging Infrared Rays macula Macular degeneration Macular Degeneration - complications Macular Degeneration - metabolism Macular Degeneration - pathology Male Medical sciences microperimetry Middle Aged Miscellaneous Ophthalmology Ophthalmoscopy - methods Ophthalmoscopy - standards Reproducibility of Results Retinopathies Sensory Thresholds Software vision Visual Acuity Visual Field Tests - methods Visual Field Tests - standards Visual Fields |
| title | Short wavelength fundus autofluorescence versus near-infrared fundus autofluorescence, with microperimetric correspondence, in patients with geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T06%3A49%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short%20wavelength%20fundus%20autofluorescence%20versus%20near-infrared%20fundus%20autofluorescence,%20with%20microperimetric%20correspondence,%20in%20patients%20with%20geographic%20atrophy%20due%20to%20age-related%20macular%20degeneration&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Pilotto,%20Elisabetta&rft.date=2011-08-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1140&rft.epage=1144&rft.pages=1140-1144&rft.issn=0007-1161&rft.eissn=1468-2079&rft.coden=BJOPAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bjo.2010.187344&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E878277299%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778946496&rft_id=info:pmid/20974627&rfr_iscdi=true |