Barriers to adaptive reasoning in community ecology

Recent high‐profile calls for a more trait‐focused approach to community ecology have the potential to open up novel research areas, generate new insights and to transform community ecology into a more predictive science. However, a renewed emphasis on function and phenotype also requires a fundamen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 2011-08, Vol.86 (3), p.543-548
Hauptverfasser: McLachlan, Athol J., Ladle, Richard J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 548
container_issue 3
container_start_page 543
container_title Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
container_volume 86
creator McLachlan, Athol J.
Ladle, Richard J.
description Recent high‐profile calls for a more trait‐focused approach to community ecology have the potential to open up novel research areas, generate new insights and to transform community ecology into a more predictive science. However, a renewed emphasis on function and phenotype also requires a fundamental shift in approach and research philosophy within community ecology to more fully embrace evolutionary reasoning. Such a subject‐wise transformation will be difficult due to at least four factors: (1) the historical development of the academic discipline of ecology and its roots as a descriptive science; (2) the dominating role of the ecosystem concept in the driving of contemporary ecological thought; (3) the practical difficulties associated with defining and identifying (phenotypic) adaptations, and; (4) scaling effects in ecology; the difficulty of teasing apart the overlapping and shifting hierarchical processes that generate the observed environment‐trait correlations in nature. We argue that the ability to predict future ecological conditions through a sufficient understanding of ecological processes will not be achieved without the placement of the concept of adaptation at the centre of ecology, with influence radiating outwards through all the related (and rapidly specializing) sub‐disciplines.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00159.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_878029454</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1022563876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4659-320f15db1f6f0abf3c2a7eed2d64daf1ee328821807300b0462a5eecf498db213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtvEzEUhS1ERUPhL6ARG9hM6vfYEhtSlQQRgUR5ZGd5Zu5UDjPjYM-0yb-v07RZdIHwxlf2d450z0EoI3hK0jlfTwmXOidKrKYUp1eMidDT7TM0OX48v595XmhGTtHLGNcJ4lKyF-iUYi0Ek2SC2MyG4CDEbPCZre1mcDeQBbDR966_zlyfVb7rxt4Nuwwq3_rr3St00tg2wuuH-wz9_HT542KRL7_NP198XOYVl0LnjOKGiLokjWywLRtWUVsA1LSWvLYNAWBUKUoULhjGJeaSWgFQNVyruqSEnaF3B99N8H9HiIPpXKygbW0PfoxGFQpTzQVP5Pt_kgRTKiRThUzo2yfo2o-hT3sYpbBO-RCdIHWAquBjDNCYTXCdDbvkZPYNmLXZB232QZt9A-a-AbNN0jcP_mPZQX0UPkaegA8H4Na1sPtvYzP7_isNSZ4f5C4OsD3KbfhjZMEKYX5_nZvZ1UouvrArs2J339eiWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>880966319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Barriers to adaptive reasoning in community ecology</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>McLachlan, Athol J. ; Ladle, Richard J.</creator><creatorcontrib>McLachlan, Athol J. ; Ladle, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent high‐profile calls for a more trait‐focused approach to community ecology have the potential to open up novel research areas, generate new insights and to transform community ecology into a more predictive science. However, a renewed emphasis on function and phenotype also requires a fundamental shift in approach and research philosophy within community ecology to more fully embrace evolutionary reasoning. Such a subject‐wise transformation will be difficult due to at least four factors: (1) the historical development of the academic discipline of ecology and its roots as a descriptive science; (2) the dominating role of the ecosystem concept in the driving of contemporary ecological thought; (3) the practical difficulties associated with defining and identifying (phenotypic) adaptations, and; (4) scaling effects in ecology; the difficulty of teasing apart the overlapping and shifting hierarchical processes that generate the observed environment‐trait correlations in nature. We argue that the ability to predict future ecological conditions through a sufficient understanding of ecological processes will not be achieved without the placement of the concept of adaptation at the centre of ecology, with influence radiating outwards through all the related (and rapidly specializing) sub‐disciplines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-7931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-185X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00159.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20955361</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRCPAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Adaptation, Psychological ; Biological Evolution ; Community ecology ; Decision Making ; Ecology - methods ; Ecosystem ; ecosystem concept ; Ecosystems ; functional traits ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; Humans ; phenotype ; scale</subject><ispartof>Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2011-08, Vol.86 (3), p.543-548</ispartof><rights>2010 The Authors. Biological Reviews © 2010 Cambridge Philosophical Society</rights><rights>2010 The Authors. Biological Reviews © 2010 Cambridge Philosophical Society.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Aug 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4659-320f15db1f6f0abf3c2a7eed2d64daf1ee328821807300b0462a5eecf498db213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4659-320f15db1f6f0abf3c2a7eed2d64daf1ee328821807300b0462a5eecf498db213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1469-185X.2010.00159.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1469-185X.2010.00159.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20955361$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McLachlan, Athol J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladle, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><title>Barriers to adaptive reasoning in community ecology</title><title>Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society</title><addtitle>Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc</addtitle><description>Recent high‐profile calls for a more trait‐focused approach to community ecology have the potential to open up novel research areas, generate new insights and to transform community ecology into a more predictive science. However, a renewed emphasis on function and phenotype also requires a fundamental shift in approach and research philosophy within community ecology to more fully embrace evolutionary reasoning. Such a subject‐wise transformation will be difficult due to at least four factors: (1) the historical development of the academic discipline of ecology and its roots as a descriptive science; (2) the dominating role of the ecosystem concept in the driving of contemporary ecological thought; (3) the practical difficulties associated with defining and identifying (phenotypic) adaptations, and; (4) scaling effects in ecology; the difficulty of teasing apart the overlapping and shifting hierarchical processes that generate the observed environment‐trait correlations in nature. We argue that the ability to predict future ecological conditions through a sufficient understanding of ecological processes will not be achieved without the placement of the concept of adaptation at the centre of ecology, with influence radiating outwards through all the related (and rapidly specializing) sub‐disciplines.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Community ecology</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Ecology - methods</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>ecosystem concept</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>functional traits</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>phenotype</subject><subject>scale</subject><issn>1464-7931</issn><issn>1469-185X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtvEzEUhS1ERUPhL6ARG9hM6vfYEhtSlQQRgUR5ZGd5Zu5UDjPjYM-0yb-v07RZdIHwxlf2d450z0EoI3hK0jlfTwmXOidKrKYUp1eMidDT7TM0OX48v595XmhGTtHLGNcJ4lKyF-iUYi0Ek2SC2MyG4CDEbPCZre1mcDeQBbDR966_zlyfVb7rxt4Nuwwq3_rr3St00tg2wuuH-wz9_HT542KRL7_NP198XOYVl0LnjOKGiLokjWywLRtWUVsA1LSWvLYNAWBUKUoULhjGJeaSWgFQNVyruqSEnaF3B99N8H9HiIPpXKygbW0PfoxGFQpTzQVP5Pt_kgRTKiRThUzo2yfo2o-hT3sYpbBO-RCdIHWAquBjDNCYTXCdDbvkZPYNmLXZB232QZt9A-a-AbNN0jcP_mPZQX0UPkaegA8H4Na1sPtvYzP7_isNSZ4f5C4OsD3KbfhjZMEKYX5_nZvZ1UouvrArs2J339eiWg</recordid><startdate>201108</startdate><enddate>201108</enddate><creator>McLachlan, Athol J.</creator><creator>Ladle, Richard J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201108</creationdate><title>Barriers to adaptive reasoning in community ecology</title><author>McLachlan, Athol J. ; Ladle, Richard J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4659-320f15db1f6f0abf3c2a7eed2d64daf1ee328821807300b0462a5eecf498db213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Community ecology</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Ecology - methods</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>ecosystem concept</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>functional traits</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>phenotype</topic><topic>scale</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McLachlan, Athol J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladle, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McLachlan, Athol J.</au><au>Ladle, Richard J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Barriers to adaptive reasoning in community ecology</atitle><jtitle>Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society</jtitle><addtitle>Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc</addtitle><date>2011-08</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>543</spage><epage>548</epage><pages>543-548</pages><issn>1464-7931</issn><eissn>1469-185X</eissn><coden>BRCPAH</coden><abstract>Recent high‐profile calls for a more trait‐focused approach to community ecology have the potential to open up novel research areas, generate new insights and to transform community ecology into a more predictive science. However, a renewed emphasis on function and phenotype also requires a fundamental shift in approach and research philosophy within community ecology to more fully embrace evolutionary reasoning. Such a subject‐wise transformation will be difficult due to at least four factors: (1) the historical development of the academic discipline of ecology and its roots as a descriptive science; (2) the dominating role of the ecosystem concept in the driving of contemporary ecological thought; (3) the practical difficulties associated with defining and identifying (phenotypic) adaptations, and; (4) scaling effects in ecology; the difficulty of teasing apart the overlapping and shifting hierarchical processes that generate the observed environment‐trait correlations in nature. We argue that the ability to predict future ecological conditions through a sufficient understanding of ecological processes will not be achieved without the placement of the concept of adaptation at the centre of ecology, with influence radiating outwards through all the related (and rapidly specializing) sub‐disciplines.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20955361</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00159.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-7931
ispartof Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2011-08, Vol.86 (3), p.543-548
issn 1464-7931
1469-185X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_878029454
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adaptation
Adaptation, Psychological
Biological Evolution
Community ecology
Decision Making
Ecology - methods
Ecosystem
ecosystem concept
Ecosystems
functional traits
Genotype & phenotype
Humans
phenotype
scale
title Barriers to adaptive reasoning in community ecology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T20%3A37%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Barriers%20to%20adaptive%20reasoning%20in%20community%20ecology&rft.jtitle=Biological%20reviews%20of%20the%20Cambridge%20Philosophical%20Society&rft.au=McLachlan,%20Athol%20J.&rft.date=2011-08&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=543&rft.epage=548&rft.pages=543-548&rft.issn=1464-7931&rft.eissn=1469-185X&rft.coden=BRCPAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00159.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1022563876%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=880966319&rft_id=info:pmid/20955361&rfr_iscdi=true