Barriers to adaptive reasoning in community ecology
Recent high‐profile calls for a more trait‐focused approach to community ecology have the potential to open up novel research areas, generate new insights and to transform community ecology into a more predictive science. However, a renewed emphasis on function and phenotype also requires a fundamen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 2011-08, Vol.86 (3), p.543-548 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 548 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 543 |
container_title | Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society |
container_volume | 86 |
creator | McLachlan, Athol J. Ladle, Richard J. |
description | Recent high‐profile calls for a more trait‐focused approach to community ecology have the potential to open up novel research areas, generate new insights and to transform community ecology into a more predictive science. However, a renewed emphasis on function and phenotype also requires a fundamental shift in approach and research philosophy within community ecology to more fully embrace evolutionary reasoning. Such a subject‐wise transformation will be difficult due to at least four factors: (1) the historical development of the academic discipline of ecology and its roots as a descriptive science; (2) the dominating role of the ecosystem concept in the driving of contemporary ecological thought; (3) the practical difficulties associated with defining and identifying (phenotypic) adaptations, and; (4) scaling effects in ecology; the difficulty of teasing apart the overlapping and shifting hierarchical processes that generate the observed environment‐trait correlations in nature. We argue that the ability to predict future ecological conditions through a sufficient understanding of ecological processes will not be achieved without the placement of the concept of adaptation at the centre of ecology, with influence radiating outwards through all the related (and rapidly specializing) sub‐disciplines. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00159.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_878029454</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1022563876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4659-320f15db1f6f0abf3c2a7eed2d64daf1ee328821807300b0462a5eecf498db213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtvEzEUhS1ERUPhL6ARG9hM6vfYEhtSlQQRgUR5ZGd5Zu5UDjPjYM-0yb-v07RZdIHwxlf2d450z0EoI3hK0jlfTwmXOidKrKYUp1eMidDT7TM0OX48v595XmhGTtHLGNcJ4lKyF-iUYi0Ek2SC2MyG4CDEbPCZre1mcDeQBbDR966_zlyfVb7rxt4Nuwwq3_rr3St00tg2wuuH-wz9_HT542KRL7_NP198XOYVl0LnjOKGiLokjWywLRtWUVsA1LSWvLYNAWBUKUoULhjGJeaSWgFQNVyruqSEnaF3B99N8H9HiIPpXKygbW0PfoxGFQpTzQVP5Pt_kgRTKiRThUzo2yfo2o-hT3sYpbBO-RCdIHWAquBjDNCYTXCdDbvkZPYNmLXZB232QZt9A-a-AbNN0jcP_mPZQX0UPkaegA8H4Na1sPtvYzP7_isNSZ4f5C4OsD3KbfhjZMEKYX5_nZvZ1UouvrArs2J339eiWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>880966319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Barriers to adaptive reasoning in community ecology</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>McLachlan, Athol J. ; Ladle, Richard J.</creator><creatorcontrib>McLachlan, Athol J. ; Ladle, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent high‐profile calls for a more trait‐focused approach to community ecology have the potential to open up novel research areas, generate new insights and to transform community ecology into a more predictive science. However, a renewed emphasis on function and phenotype also requires a fundamental shift in approach and research philosophy within community ecology to more fully embrace evolutionary reasoning. Such a subject‐wise transformation will be difficult due to at least four factors: (1) the historical development of the academic discipline of ecology and its roots as a descriptive science; (2) the dominating role of the ecosystem concept in the driving of contemporary ecological thought; (3) the practical difficulties associated with defining and identifying (phenotypic) adaptations, and; (4) scaling effects in ecology; the difficulty of teasing apart the overlapping and shifting hierarchical processes that generate the observed environment‐trait correlations in nature. We argue that the ability to predict future ecological conditions through a sufficient understanding of ecological processes will not be achieved without the placement of the concept of adaptation at the centre of ecology, with influence radiating outwards through all the related (and rapidly specializing) sub‐disciplines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-7931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-185X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00159.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20955361</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRCPAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Adaptation, Psychological ; Biological Evolution ; Community ecology ; Decision Making ; Ecology - methods ; Ecosystem ; ecosystem concept ; Ecosystems ; functional traits ; Genotype & phenotype ; Humans ; phenotype ; scale</subject><ispartof>Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2011-08, Vol.86 (3), p.543-548</ispartof><rights>2010 The Authors. Biological Reviews © 2010 Cambridge Philosophical Society</rights><rights>2010 The Authors. Biological Reviews © 2010 Cambridge Philosophical Society.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Aug 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4659-320f15db1f6f0abf3c2a7eed2d64daf1ee328821807300b0462a5eecf498db213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4659-320f15db1f6f0abf3c2a7eed2d64daf1ee328821807300b0462a5eecf498db213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1469-185X.2010.00159.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1469-185X.2010.00159.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20955361$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McLachlan, Athol J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladle, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><title>Barriers to adaptive reasoning in community ecology</title><title>Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society</title><addtitle>Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc</addtitle><description>Recent high‐profile calls for a more trait‐focused approach to community ecology have the potential to open up novel research areas, generate new insights and to transform community ecology into a more predictive science. However, a renewed emphasis on function and phenotype also requires a fundamental shift in approach and research philosophy within community ecology to more fully embrace evolutionary reasoning. Such a subject‐wise transformation will be difficult due to at least four factors: (1) the historical development of the academic discipline of ecology and its roots as a descriptive science; (2) the dominating role of the ecosystem concept in the driving of contemporary ecological thought; (3) the practical difficulties associated with defining and identifying (phenotypic) adaptations, and; (4) scaling effects in ecology; the difficulty of teasing apart the overlapping and shifting hierarchical processes that generate the observed environment‐trait correlations in nature. We argue that the ability to predict future ecological conditions through a sufficient understanding of ecological processes will not be achieved without the placement of the concept of adaptation at the centre of ecology, with influence radiating outwards through all the related (and rapidly specializing) sub‐disciplines.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Community ecology</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Ecology - methods</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>ecosystem concept</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>functional traits</subject><subject>Genotype & phenotype</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>phenotype</subject><subject>scale</subject><issn>1464-7931</issn><issn>1469-185X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtvEzEUhS1ERUPhL6ARG9hM6vfYEhtSlQQRgUR5ZGd5Zu5UDjPjYM-0yb-v07RZdIHwxlf2d450z0EoI3hK0jlfTwmXOidKrKYUp1eMidDT7TM0OX48v595XmhGTtHLGNcJ4lKyF-iUYi0Ek2SC2MyG4CDEbPCZre1mcDeQBbDR966_zlyfVb7rxt4Nuwwq3_rr3St00tg2wuuH-wz9_HT542KRL7_NP198XOYVl0LnjOKGiLokjWywLRtWUVsA1LSWvLYNAWBUKUoULhjGJeaSWgFQNVyruqSEnaF3B99N8H9HiIPpXKygbW0PfoxGFQpTzQVP5Pt_kgRTKiRThUzo2yfo2o-hT3sYpbBO-RCdIHWAquBjDNCYTXCdDbvkZPYNmLXZB232QZt9A-a-AbNN0jcP_mPZQX0UPkaegA8H4Na1sPtvYzP7_isNSZ4f5C4OsD3KbfhjZMEKYX5_nZvZ1UouvrArs2J339eiWg</recordid><startdate>201108</startdate><enddate>201108</enddate><creator>McLachlan, Athol J.</creator><creator>Ladle, Richard J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201108</creationdate><title>Barriers to adaptive reasoning in community ecology</title><author>McLachlan, Athol J. ; Ladle, Richard J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4659-320f15db1f6f0abf3c2a7eed2d64daf1ee328821807300b0462a5eecf498db213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Community ecology</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Ecology - methods</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>ecosystem concept</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>functional traits</topic><topic>Genotype & phenotype</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>phenotype</topic><topic>scale</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McLachlan, Athol J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladle, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McLachlan, Athol J.</au><au>Ladle, Richard J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Barriers to adaptive reasoning in community ecology</atitle><jtitle>Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society</jtitle><addtitle>Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc</addtitle><date>2011-08</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>543</spage><epage>548</epage><pages>543-548</pages><issn>1464-7931</issn><eissn>1469-185X</eissn><coden>BRCPAH</coden><abstract>Recent high‐profile calls for a more trait‐focused approach to community ecology have the potential to open up novel research areas, generate new insights and to transform community ecology into a more predictive science. However, a renewed emphasis on function and phenotype also requires a fundamental shift in approach and research philosophy within community ecology to more fully embrace evolutionary reasoning. Such a subject‐wise transformation will be difficult due to at least four factors: (1) the historical development of the academic discipline of ecology and its roots as a descriptive science; (2) the dominating role of the ecosystem concept in the driving of contemporary ecological thought; (3) the practical difficulties associated with defining and identifying (phenotypic) adaptations, and; (4) scaling effects in ecology; the difficulty of teasing apart the overlapping and shifting hierarchical processes that generate the observed environment‐trait correlations in nature. We argue that the ability to predict future ecological conditions through a sufficient understanding of ecological processes will not be achieved without the placement of the concept of adaptation at the centre of ecology, with influence radiating outwards through all the related (and rapidly specializing) sub‐disciplines.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20955361</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00159.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1464-7931 |
ispartof | Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2011-08, Vol.86 (3), p.543-548 |
issn | 1464-7931 1469-185X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_878029454 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adaptation Adaptation, Psychological Biological Evolution Community ecology Decision Making Ecology - methods Ecosystem ecosystem concept Ecosystems functional traits Genotype & phenotype Humans phenotype scale |
title | Barriers to adaptive reasoning in community ecology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T20%3A37%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Barriers%20to%20adaptive%20reasoning%20in%20community%20ecology&rft.jtitle=Biological%20reviews%20of%20the%20Cambridge%20Philosophical%20Society&rft.au=McLachlan,%20Athol%20J.&rft.date=2011-08&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=543&rft.epage=548&rft.pages=543-548&rft.issn=1464-7931&rft.eissn=1469-185X&rft.coden=BRCPAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00159.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1022563876%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=880966319&rft_id=info:pmid/20955361&rfr_iscdi=true |