Improvement in working memory is not related to increased intelligence scores
The acknowledged high relationship between working memory and intelligence suggests common underlying cognitive mechanisms and, perhaps, shared biological substrates. If this is the case, improvement in working memory by repeated exposure to challenging span tasks might be reflected in increased int...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Intelligence (Norwood) 2010-09, Vol.38 (5), p.497-505 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 505 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 497 |
container_title | Intelligence (Norwood) |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Colom, Roberto Quiroga, Mª Ángeles Shih, Pei Chun Martínez, Kenia Burgaleta, Miguel Martínez-Molina, Agustín Román, Francisco J. Requena, Laura Ramírez, Isabel |
description | The acknowledged high relationship between working memory and intelligence suggests common underlying cognitive mechanisms and, perhaps, shared biological substrates. If this is the case, improvement in working memory by repeated exposure to challenging span tasks might be reflected in increased intelligence scores. Here we report a study in which 288 university undergraduates completed the odd numbered items of four intelligence tests on time 1 and the even numbered items of the same tests one month later (time 2). In between, 173 participants completed three sessions, separated by exactly one week, comprising verbal, numerical, and spatial short-term memory (STM) and working memory (WMC) tasks imposing high processing demands (STM–WMC group). 115 participants also completed three sessions, separated by exactly one week, but comprising verbal, numerical, and spatial simple speed tasks (processing speed, PS, and attention, ATT) with very low processing demands (PS-ATT group). The main finding reveals increased scores from the pre-test to the post-test intelligence session (more than half a standard deviation on average). However, there was no differential improvement on intelligence between the STM-WMC and PS-ATT groups. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.intell.2010.06.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_877595440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ895302</ericid><els_id>S0160289610000590</els_id><sourcerecordid>2137373641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-e01da69e033e5fcf4d0943abd10a1bddd2a6e5bf5418997e1c148e9e2d4d1b723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv3CAQhVHVSt0m_Qc5WJWqnrwdMBi4VKqitEmVqJfkjFgYR2xtSMGbKv--WF7lkEN7QjDfzHu8IeSMwpYC7T_vtyHOOI5bBvUJ-i2AekU2VMmulboTr8mmYtAypfu35F0pewAQlKsNubmaHnJ6xAnj3ITY_En5V4j3zYRTyk9NKE1Mc5NxtDP6Zk6VcRltqZdVM9xjdNgUlzKWU_JmsGPB98fzhNx9u7g9v2yvf36_Ov963TrO1dwiUG97jdB1KAY3cA-ad3bnKVi6894z26PYDYJTpbVE6qpX1Mg893QnWXdCPq1zq_ffByyzmUJx1Y2NmA7FKCmFFpzDf0kpGes55bKSH16Q-3TIsX7DSAGcgewXYb5CLqdSMg7mIYfJ5idDwSy7MHuz5mKWXRjoTd1Fbft4nG2Ls-OQbXShPPeyjqqqQCt3tnKYg3suX_xQWnSwqH85lmu2jwGzKS4s8fuQ0c3Gp_BvH38B-5qqjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>750420762</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improvement in working memory is not related to increased intelligence scores</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Colom, Roberto ; Quiroga, Mª Ángeles ; Shih, Pei Chun ; Martínez, Kenia ; Burgaleta, Miguel ; Martínez-Molina, Agustín ; Román, Francisco J. ; Requena, Laura ; Ramírez, Isabel</creator><creatorcontrib>Colom, Roberto ; Quiroga, Mª Ángeles ; Shih, Pei Chun ; Martínez, Kenia ; Burgaleta, Miguel ; Martínez-Molina, Agustín ; Román, Francisco J. ; Requena, Laura ; Ramírez, Isabel</creatorcontrib><description>The acknowledged high relationship between working memory and intelligence suggests common underlying cognitive mechanisms and, perhaps, shared biological substrates. If this is the case, improvement in working memory by repeated exposure to challenging span tasks might be reflected in increased intelligence scores. Here we report a study in which 288 university undergraduates completed the odd numbered items of four intelligence tests on time 1 and the even numbered items of the same tests one month later (time 2). In between, 173 participants completed three sessions, separated by exactly one week, comprising verbal, numerical, and spatial short-term memory (STM) and working memory (WMC) tasks imposing high processing demands (STM–WMC group). 115 participants also completed three sessions, separated by exactly one week, but comprising verbal, numerical, and spatial simple speed tasks (processing speed, PS, and attention, ATT) with very low processing demands (PS-ATT group). The main finding reveals increased scores from the pre-test to the post-test intelligence session (more than half a standard deviation on average). However, there was no differential improvement on intelligence between the STM-WMC and PS-ATT groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-2896</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2010.06.008</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NTLLDT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Attention ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognitive Ability ; Cognitive improvements ; College students ; Correlation ; Deviation ; Difficulty Level ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Information processing ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Intelligence ; Intelligence Tests ; Learning. Memory ; Memory ; Pretests Posttests ; Processing speed ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Scores ; Separated ; Short Term Memory ; Student Improvement ; Undergraduate Students ; Working memory</subject><ispartof>Intelligence (Norwood), 2010-09, Vol.38 (5), p.497-505</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Ablex Publishing Corporation Sep/Oct 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-e01da69e033e5fcf4d0943abd10a1bddd2a6e5bf5418997e1c148e9e2d4d1b723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-e01da69e033e5fcf4d0943abd10a1bddd2a6e5bf5418997e1c148e9e2d4d1b723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.06.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,30997,30998,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ895302$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23180421$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Colom, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quiroga, Mª Ángeles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih, Pei Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, Kenia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgaleta, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Molina, Agustín</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Román, Francisco J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Requena, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez, Isabel</creatorcontrib><title>Improvement in working memory is not related to increased intelligence scores</title><title>Intelligence (Norwood)</title><description>The acknowledged high relationship between working memory and intelligence suggests common underlying cognitive mechanisms and, perhaps, shared biological substrates. If this is the case, improvement in working memory by repeated exposure to challenging span tasks might be reflected in increased intelligence scores. Here we report a study in which 288 university undergraduates completed the odd numbered items of four intelligence tests on time 1 and the even numbered items of the same tests one month later (time 2). In between, 173 participants completed three sessions, separated by exactly one week, comprising verbal, numerical, and spatial short-term memory (STM) and working memory (WMC) tasks imposing high processing demands (STM–WMC group). 115 participants also completed three sessions, separated by exactly one week, but comprising verbal, numerical, and spatial simple speed tasks (processing speed, PS, and attention, ATT) with very low processing demands (PS-ATT group). The main finding reveals increased scores from the pre-test to the post-test intelligence session (more than half a standard deviation on average). However, there was no differential improvement on intelligence between the STM-WMC and PS-ATT groups.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>Cognitive improvements</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Deviation</subject><subject>Difficulty Level</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Intelligence Tests</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Processing speed</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Separated</subject><subject>Short Term Memory</subject><subject>Student Improvement</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Working memory</subject><issn>0160-2896</issn><issn>1873-7935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv3CAQhVHVSt0m_Qc5WJWqnrwdMBi4VKqitEmVqJfkjFgYR2xtSMGbKv--WF7lkEN7QjDfzHu8IeSMwpYC7T_vtyHOOI5bBvUJ-i2AekU2VMmulboTr8mmYtAypfu35F0pewAQlKsNubmaHnJ6xAnj3ITY_En5V4j3zYRTyk9NKE1Mc5NxtDP6Zk6VcRltqZdVM9xjdNgUlzKWU_JmsGPB98fzhNx9u7g9v2yvf36_Ov963TrO1dwiUG97jdB1KAY3cA-ad3bnKVi6894z26PYDYJTpbVE6qpX1Mg893QnWXdCPq1zq_ffByyzmUJx1Y2NmA7FKCmFFpzDf0kpGes55bKSH16Q-3TIsX7DSAGcgewXYb5CLqdSMg7mIYfJ5idDwSy7MHuz5mKWXRjoTd1Fbft4nG2Ls-OQbXShPPeyjqqqQCt3tnKYg3suX_xQWnSwqH85lmu2jwGzKS4s8fuQ0c3Gp_BvH38B-5qqjg</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Colom, Roberto</creator><creator>Quiroga, Mª Ángeles</creator><creator>Shih, Pei Chun</creator><creator>Martínez, Kenia</creator><creator>Burgaleta, Miguel</creator><creator>Martínez-Molina, Agustín</creator><creator>Román, Francisco J.</creator><creator>Requena, Laura</creator><creator>Ramírez, Isabel</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Improvement in working memory is not related to increased intelligence scores</title><author>Colom, Roberto ; Quiroga, Mª Ángeles ; Shih, Pei Chun ; Martínez, Kenia ; Burgaleta, Miguel ; Martínez-Molina, Agustín ; Román, Francisco J. ; Requena, Laura ; Ramírez, Isabel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-e01da69e033e5fcf4d0943abd10a1bddd2a6e5bf5418997e1c148e9e2d4d1b723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>Cognitive improvements</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Deviation</topic><topic>Difficulty Level</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Intelligence Tests</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Processing speed</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Separated</topic><topic>Short Term Memory</topic><topic>Student Improvement</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Working memory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Colom, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quiroga, Mª Ángeles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih, Pei Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, Kenia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgaleta, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Molina, Agustín</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Román, Francisco J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Requena, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez, Isabel</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Intelligence (Norwood)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Colom, Roberto</au><au>Quiroga, Mª Ángeles</au><au>Shih, Pei Chun</au><au>Martínez, Kenia</au><au>Burgaleta, Miguel</au><au>Martínez-Molina, Agustín</au><au>Román, Francisco J.</au><au>Requena, Laura</au><au>Ramírez, Isabel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ895302</ericid><atitle>Improvement in working memory is not related to increased intelligence scores</atitle><jtitle>Intelligence (Norwood)</jtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>497</spage><epage>505</epage><pages>497-505</pages><issn>0160-2896</issn><eissn>1873-7935</eissn><coden>NTLLDT</coden><abstract>The acknowledged high relationship between working memory and intelligence suggests common underlying cognitive mechanisms and, perhaps, shared biological substrates. If this is the case, improvement in working memory by repeated exposure to challenging span tasks might be reflected in increased intelligence scores. Here we report a study in which 288 university undergraduates completed the odd numbered items of four intelligence tests on time 1 and the even numbered items of the same tests one month later (time 2). In between, 173 participants completed three sessions, separated by exactly one week, comprising verbal, numerical, and spatial short-term memory (STM) and working memory (WMC) tasks imposing high processing demands (STM–WMC group). 115 participants also completed three sessions, separated by exactly one week, but comprising verbal, numerical, and spatial simple speed tasks (processing speed, PS, and attention, ATT) with very low processing demands (PS-ATT group). The main finding reveals increased scores from the pre-test to the post-test intelligence session (more than half a standard deviation on average). However, there was no differential improvement on intelligence between the STM-WMC and PS-ATT groups.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.intell.2010.06.008</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0160-2896 |
ispartof | Intelligence (Norwood), 2010-09, Vol.38 (5), p.497-505 |
issn | 0160-2896 1873-7935 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_877595440 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Attention Biological and medical sciences Cognitive Ability Cognitive improvements College students Correlation Deviation Difficulty Level Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Information processing Instructional Effectiveness Intelligence Intelligence Tests Learning. Memory Memory Pretests Posttests Processing speed Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Scores Separated Short Term Memory Student Improvement Undergraduate Students Working memory |
title | Improvement in working memory is not related to increased intelligence scores |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T18%3A19%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improvement%20in%20working%20memory%20is%20not%20related%20to%20increased%20intelligence%20scores&rft.jtitle=Intelligence%20(Norwood)&rft.au=Colom,%20Roberto&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=497&rft.epage=505&rft.pages=497-505&rft.issn=0160-2896&rft.eissn=1873-7935&rft.coden=NTLLDT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.intell.2010.06.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2137373641%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=750420762&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ895302&rft_els_id=S0160289610000590&rfr_iscdi=true |