Improvement in working memory is not related to increased intelligence scores

The acknowledged high relationship between working memory and intelligence suggests common underlying cognitive mechanisms and, perhaps, shared biological substrates. If this is the case, improvement in working memory by repeated exposure to challenging span tasks might be reflected in increased int...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Intelligence (Norwood) 2010-09, Vol.38 (5), p.497-505
Hauptverfasser: Colom, Roberto, Quiroga, Mª Ángeles, Shih, Pei Chun, Martínez, Kenia, Burgaleta, Miguel, Martínez-Molina, Agustín, Román, Francisco J., Requena, Laura, Ramírez, Isabel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 505
container_issue 5
container_start_page 497
container_title Intelligence (Norwood)
container_volume 38
creator Colom, Roberto
Quiroga, Mª Ángeles
Shih, Pei Chun
Martínez, Kenia
Burgaleta, Miguel
Martínez-Molina, Agustín
Román, Francisco J.
Requena, Laura
Ramírez, Isabel
description The acknowledged high relationship between working memory and intelligence suggests common underlying cognitive mechanisms and, perhaps, shared biological substrates. If this is the case, improvement in working memory by repeated exposure to challenging span tasks might be reflected in increased intelligence scores. Here we report a study in which 288 university undergraduates completed the odd numbered items of four intelligence tests on time 1 and the even numbered items of the same tests one month later (time 2). In between, 173 participants completed three sessions, separated by exactly one week, comprising verbal, numerical, and spatial short-term memory (STM) and working memory (WMC) tasks imposing high processing demands (STM–WMC group). 115 participants also completed three sessions, separated by exactly one week, but comprising verbal, numerical, and spatial simple speed tasks (processing speed, PS, and attention, ATT) with very low processing demands (PS-ATT group). The main finding reveals increased scores from the pre-test to the post-test intelligence session (more than half a standard deviation on average). However, there was no differential improvement on intelligence between the STM-WMC and PS-ATT groups.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.intell.2010.06.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_877595440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ895302</ericid><els_id>S0160289610000590</els_id><sourcerecordid>2137373641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-e01da69e033e5fcf4d0943abd10a1bddd2a6e5bf5418997e1c148e9e2d4d1b723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv3CAQhVHVSt0m_Qc5WJWqnrwdMBi4VKqitEmVqJfkjFgYR2xtSMGbKv--WF7lkEN7QjDfzHu8IeSMwpYC7T_vtyHOOI5bBvUJ-i2AekU2VMmulboTr8mmYtAypfu35F0pewAQlKsNubmaHnJ6xAnj3ITY_En5V4j3zYRTyk9NKE1Mc5NxtDP6Zk6VcRltqZdVM9xjdNgUlzKWU_JmsGPB98fzhNx9u7g9v2yvf36_Ov963TrO1dwiUG97jdB1KAY3cA-ad3bnKVi6894z26PYDYJTpbVE6qpX1Mg893QnWXdCPq1zq_ffByyzmUJx1Y2NmA7FKCmFFpzDf0kpGes55bKSH16Q-3TIsX7DSAGcgewXYb5CLqdSMg7mIYfJ5idDwSy7MHuz5mKWXRjoTd1Fbft4nG2Ls-OQbXShPPeyjqqqQCt3tnKYg3suX_xQWnSwqH85lmu2jwGzKS4s8fuQ0c3Gp_BvH38B-5qqjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>750420762</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improvement in working memory is not related to increased intelligence scores</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Colom, Roberto ; Quiroga, Mª Ángeles ; Shih, Pei Chun ; Martínez, Kenia ; Burgaleta, Miguel ; Martínez-Molina, Agustín ; Román, Francisco J. ; Requena, Laura ; Ramírez, Isabel</creator><creatorcontrib>Colom, Roberto ; Quiroga, Mª Ángeles ; Shih, Pei Chun ; Martínez, Kenia ; Burgaleta, Miguel ; Martínez-Molina, Agustín ; Román, Francisco J. ; Requena, Laura ; Ramírez, Isabel</creatorcontrib><description>The acknowledged high relationship between working memory and intelligence suggests common underlying cognitive mechanisms and, perhaps, shared biological substrates. If this is the case, improvement in working memory by repeated exposure to challenging span tasks might be reflected in increased intelligence scores. Here we report a study in which 288 university undergraduates completed the odd numbered items of four intelligence tests on time 1 and the even numbered items of the same tests one month later (time 2). In between, 173 participants completed three sessions, separated by exactly one week, comprising verbal, numerical, and spatial short-term memory (STM) and working memory (WMC) tasks imposing high processing demands (STM–WMC group). 115 participants also completed three sessions, separated by exactly one week, but comprising verbal, numerical, and spatial simple speed tasks (processing speed, PS, and attention, ATT) with very low processing demands (PS-ATT group). The main finding reveals increased scores from the pre-test to the post-test intelligence session (more than half a standard deviation on average). However, there was no differential improvement on intelligence between the STM-WMC and PS-ATT groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-2896</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2010.06.008</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NTLLDT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Attention ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognitive Ability ; Cognitive improvements ; College students ; Correlation ; Deviation ; Difficulty Level ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Information processing ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Intelligence ; Intelligence Tests ; Learning. Memory ; Memory ; Pretests Posttests ; Processing speed ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Scores ; Separated ; Short Term Memory ; Student Improvement ; Undergraduate Students ; Working memory</subject><ispartof>Intelligence (Norwood), 2010-09, Vol.38 (5), p.497-505</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Ablex Publishing Corporation Sep/Oct 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-e01da69e033e5fcf4d0943abd10a1bddd2a6e5bf5418997e1c148e9e2d4d1b723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-e01da69e033e5fcf4d0943abd10a1bddd2a6e5bf5418997e1c148e9e2d4d1b723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.06.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,30997,30998,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ895302$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23180421$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Colom, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quiroga, Mª Ángeles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih, Pei Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, Kenia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgaleta, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Molina, Agustín</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Román, Francisco J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Requena, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez, Isabel</creatorcontrib><title>Improvement in working memory is not related to increased intelligence scores</title><title>Intelligence (Norwood)</title><description>The acknowledged high relationship between working memory and intelligence suggests common underlying cognitive mechanisms and, perhaps, shared biological substrates. If this is the case, improvement in working memory by repeated exposure to challenging span tasks might be reflected in increased intelligence scores. Here we report a study in which 288 university undergraduates completed the odd numbered items of four intelligence tests on time 1 and the even numbered items of the same tests one month later (time 2). In between, 173 participants completed three sessions, separated by exactly one week, comprising verbal, numerical, and spatial short-term memory (STM) and working memory (WMC) tasks imposing high processing demands (STM–WMC group). 115 participants also completed three sessions, separated by exactly one week, but comprising verbal, numerical, and spatial simple speed tasks (processing speed, PS, and attention, ATT) with very low processing demands (PS-ATT group). The main finding reveals increased scores from the pre-test to the post-test intelligence session (more than half a standard deviation on average). However, there was no differential improvement on intelligence between the STM-WMC and PS-ATT groups.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>Cognitive improvements</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Deviation</subject><subject>Difficulty Level</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Intelligence Tests</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Processing speed</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Separated</subject><subject>Short Term Memory</subject><subject>Student Improvement</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Working memory</subject><issn>0160-2896</issn><issn>1873-7935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv3CAQhVHVSt0m_Qc5WJWqnrwdMBi4VKqitEmVqJfkjFgYR2xtSMGbKv--WF7lkEN7QjDfzHu8IeSMwpYC7T_vtyHOOI5bBvUJ-i2AekU2VMmulboTr8mmYtAypfu35F0pewAQlKsNubmaHnJ6xAnj3ITY_En5V4j3zYRTyk9NKE1Mc5NxtDP6Zk6VcRltqZdVM9xjdNgUlzKWU_JmsGPB98fzhNx9u7g9v2yvf36_Ov963TrO1dwiUG97jdB1KAY3cA-ad3bnKVi6894z26PYDYJTpbVE6qpX1Mg893QnWXdCPq1zq_ffByyzmUJx1Y2NmA7FKCmFFpzDf0kpGes55bKSH16Q-3TIsX7DSAGcgewXYb5CLqdSMg7mIYfJ5idDwSy7MHuz5mKWXRjoTd1Fbft4nG2Ls-OQbXShPPeyjqqqQCt3tnKYg3suX_xQWnSwqH85lmu2jwGzKS4s8fuQ0c3Gp_BvH38B-5qqjg</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Colom, Roberto</creator><creator>Quiroga, Mª Ángeles</creator><creator>Shih, Pei Chun</creator><creator>Martínez, Kenia</creator><creator>Burgaleta, Miguel</creator><creator>Martínez-Molina, Agustín</creator><creator>Román, Francisco J.</creator><creator>Requena, Laura</creator><creator>Ramírez, Isabel</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Improvement in working memory is not related to increased intelligence scores</title><author>Colom, Roberto ; Quiroga, Mª Ángeles ; Shih, Pei Chun ; Martínez, Kenia ; Burgaleta, Miguel ; Martínez-Molina, Agustín ; Román, Francisco J. ; Requena, Laura ; Ramírez, Isabel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-e01da69e033e5fcf4d0943abd10a1bddd2a6e5bf5418997e1c148e9e2d4d1b723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>Cognitive improvements</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Deviation</topic><topic>Difficulty Level</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Intelligence Tests</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Processing speed</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Separated</topic><topic>Short Term Memory</topic><topic>Student Improvement</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Working memory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Colom, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quiroga, Mª Ángeles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih, Pei Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, Kenia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgaleta, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Molina, Agustín</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Román, Francisco J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Requena, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez, Isabel</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Intelligence (Norwood)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Colom, Roberto</au><au>Quiroga, Mª Ángeles</au><au>Shih, Pei Chun</au><au>Martínez, Kenia</au><au>Burgaleta, Miguel</au><au>Martínez-Molina, Agustín</au><au>Román, Francisco J.</au><au>Requena, Laura</au><au>Ramírez, Isabel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ895302</ericid><atitle>Improvement in working memory is not related to increased intelligence scores</atitle><jtitle>Intelligence (Norwood)</jtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>497</spage><epage>505</epage><pages>497-505</pages><issn>0160-2896</issn><eissn>1873-7935</eissn><coden>NTLLDT</coden><abstract>The acknowledged high relationship between working memory and intelligence suggests common underlying cognitive mechanisms and, perhaps, shared biological substrates. If this is the case, improvement in working memory by repeated exposure to challenging span tasks might be reflected in increased intelligence scores. Here we report a study in which 288 university undergraduates completed the odd numbered items of four intelligence tests on time 1 and the even numbered items of the same tests one month later (time 2). In between, 173 participants completed three sessions, separated by exactly one week, comprising verbal, numerical, and spatial short-term memory (STM) and working memory (WMC) tasks imposing high processing demands (STM–WMC group). 115 participants also completed three sessions, separated by exactly one week, but comprising verbal, numerical, and spatial simple speed tasks (processing speed, PS, and attention, ATT) with very low processing demands (PS-ATT group). The main finding reveals increased scores from the pre-test to the post-test intelligence session (more than half a standard deviation on average). However, there was no differential improvement on intelligence between the STM-WMC and PS-ATT groups.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.intell.2010.06.008</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0160-2896
ispartof Intelligence (Norwood), 2010-09, Vol.38 (5), p.497-505
issn 0160-2896
1873-7935
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_877595440
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Attention
Biological and medical sciences
Cognitive Ability
Cognitive improvements
College students
Correlation
Deviation
Difficulty Level
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Information processing
Instructional Effectiveness
Intelligence
Intelligence Tests
Learning. Memory
Memory
Pretests Posttests
Processing speed
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Scores
Separated
Short Term Memory
Student Improvement
Undergraduate Students
Working memory
title Improvement in working memory is not related to increased intelligence scores
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T18%3A19%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improvement%20in%20working%20memory%20is%20not%20related%20to%20increased%20intelligence%20scores&rft.jtitle=Intelligence%20(Norwood)&rft.au=Colom,%20Roberto&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=497&rft.epage=505&rft.pages=497-505&rft.issn=0160-2896&rft.eissn=1873-7935&rft.coden=NTLLDT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.intell.2010.06.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2137373641%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=750420762&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ895302&rft_els_id=S0160289610000590&rfr_iscdi=true