Nonvascularized iliac bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction--requirements and limitations

Treatment of intraoral malignant tumors often leads to continuity defects of the mandible. Whereas the use of free vascularised flaps has shortcomings regarding donor site morbidity and a worse-fitting bone geometry, the nonvascularized iliac crest graft could be an alternative option. The purpose o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:In vivo (Athens) 2011-09, Vol.25 (5), p.795-799
Hauptverfasser: Handschel, Jörg, Hassanyar, Hirama, Depprich, Rita A, Ommerborn, Michelle A, Sproll, Karl Christoph, Hofer, Matthias, Kübler, Norbert R, Naujoks, Christian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 799
container_issue 5
container_start_page 795
container_title In vivo (Athens)
container_volume 25
creator Handschel, Jörg
Hassanyar, Hirama
Depprich, Rita A
Ommerborn, Michelle A
Sproll, Karl Christoph
Hofer, Matthias
Kübler, Norbert R
Naujoks, Christian
description Treatment of intraoral malignant tumors often leads to continuity defects of the mandible. Whereas the use of free vascularised flaps has shortcomings regarding donor site morbidity and a worse-fitting bone geometry, the nonvascularized iliac crest graft could be an alternative option. The purpose of this study was to describe the treatment outcome with nonvascularized iliac crest grafts over a 10-year period and to determine possible limitations of their use. Eighty-four patients with bicortical nonvascularized iliac crest grafts for mandibular reconstruction were examined at least one year after reconstruction. Patients' records and the radiological and/or surgical data were analyzed. Sixty-three patients (75%) showed complete healing, in 20 patients the treatment was not successful and in one patient the treatment result was unclear. Interestingly, comparing the successfully and the unsuccessfully treated patients, only the irradiation dose played a crucial role. Neither defect length nor defect localisation, nor time interval between resection and reconstruction were statistically significant parameters in graft success. Comparing only patients with malignancies, the non-irradiated patients had a higher success rate (77.3%). The nonvaslcularized iliac crest graft seems to be a reasonably reliable treatment option for reconstruction of mandibular defects up to about 5-6 cm in size. Radiotherapy is a strong confounder reducing the success rate. Necessary constraints are sufficient soft tissue conditions. However, primary reconstruction by free flaps (e.g. fibula flap) has a higher success rate in literature and should be preferred whenever possible.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_877405944</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>877405944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p210t-c997ef0d3ea10687d5fceb115eed2ff21da915b243b131f2f6986ee152dd2e7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo10M1KAzEUBeAgiK3VV5DsXA3kJpPJZCnFPyi60aUMmeRGIjNJm8wI-vS2tK7O4nycxTkjS1AaKiVrvSCXpXwx1ijG-AVZcFBSgGiW5OMlxW9T7DyYHH7R0TAEY2mfItLPbPxUqE-Zjia60B8QzWhTLFOe7RRSrKqMuzlkHDHu7Z7RIYxhMoeyXJFzb4aC16dckfeH-7f1U7V5fXxe322qLQc2VVZrhZ45gQZY0yonvcUeQCI67j0HZzTInteiBwGe-0a3DSJI7hxHhWJFbo-725x2M5apG0OxOAwmYppL1ypVM6nrei9vTnLuR3TdNofR5J_u_xHxBxtrXrY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>877405944</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nonvascularized iliac bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction--requirements and limitations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Handschel, Jörg ; Hassanyar, Hirama ; Depprich, Rita A ; Ommerborn, Michelle A ; Sproll, Karl Christoph ; Hofer, Matthias ; Kübler, Norbert R ; Naujoks, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Handschel, Jörg ; Hassanyar, Hirama ; Depprich, Rita A ; Ommerborn, Michelle A ; Sproll, Karl Christoph ; Hofer, Matthias ; Kübler, Norbert R ; Naujoks, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>Treatment of intraoral malignant tumors often leads to continuity defects of the mandible. Whereas the use of free vascularised flaps has shortcomings regarding donor site morbidity and a worse-fitting bone geometry, the nonvascularized iliac crest graft could be an alternative option. The purpose of this study was to describe the treatment outcome with nonvascularized iliac crest grafts over a 10-year period and to determine possible limitations of their use. Eighty-four patients with bicortical nonvascularized iliac crest grafts for mandibular reconstruction were examined at least one year after reconstruction. Patients' records and the radiological and/or surgical data were analyzed. Sixty-three patients (75%) showed complete healing, in 20 patients the treatment was not successful and in one patient the treatment result was unclear. Interestingly, comparing the successfully and the unsuccessfully treated patients, only the irradiation dose played a crucial role. Neither defect length nor defect localisation, nor time interval between resection and reconstruction were statistically significant parameters in graft success. Comparing only patients with malignancies, the non-irradiated patients had a higher success rate (77.3%). The nonvaslcularized iliac crest graft seems to be a reasonably reliable treatment option for reconstruction of mandibular defects up to about 5-6 cm in size. Radiotherapy is a strong confounder reducing the success rate. Necessary constraints are sufficient soft tissue conditions. However, primary reconstruction by free flaps (e.g. fibula flap) has a higher success rate in literature and should be preferred whenever possible.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1791-7549</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21753136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Greece</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Ameloblastoma - surgery ; Bone Transplantation - adverse effects ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery ; Cysts - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Ilium - transplantation ; Male ; Mandible - surgery ; Mandibular Diseases - surgery ; Middle Aged ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>In vivo (Athens), 2011-09, Vol.25 (5), p.795-799</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21753136$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Handschel, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassanyar, Hirama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Depprich, Rita A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ommerborn, Michelle A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sproll, Karl Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofer, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kübler, Norbert R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naujoks, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Nonvascularized iliac bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction--requirements and limitations</title><title>In vivo (Athens)</title><addtitle>In Vivo</addtitle><description>Treatment of intraoral malignant tumors often leads to continuity defects of the mandible. Whereas the use of free vascularised flaps has shortcomings regarding donor site morbidity and a worse-fitting bone geometry, the nonvascularized iliac crest graft could be an alternative option. The purpose of this study was to describe the treatment outcome with nonvascularized iliac crest grafts over a 10-year period and to determine possible limitations of their use. Eighty-four patients with bicortical nonvascularized iliac crest grafts for mandibular reconstruction were examined at least one year after reconstruction. Patients' records and the radiological and/or surgical data were analyzed. Sixty-three patients (75%) showed complete healing, in 20 patients the treatment was not successful and in one patient the treatment result was unclear. Interestingly, comparing the successfully and the unsuccessfully treated patients, only the irradiation dose played a crucial role. Neither defect length nor defect localisation, nor time interval between resection and reconstruction were statistically significant parameters in graft success. Comparing only patients with malignancies, the non-irradiated patients had a higher success rate (77.3%). The nonvaslcularized iliac crest graft seems to be a reasonably reliable treatment option for reconstruction of mandibular defects up to about 5-6 cm in size. Radiotherapy is a strong confounder reducing the success rate. Necessary constraints are sufficient soft tissue conditions. However, primary reconstruction by free flaps (e.g. fibula flap) has a higher success rate in literature and should be preferred whenever possible.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ameloblastoma - surgery</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Cysts - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ilium - transplantation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mandible - surgery</subject><subject>Mandibular Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1791-7549</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo10M1KAzEUBeAgiK3VV5DsXA3kJpPJZCnFPyi60aUMmeRGIjNJm8wI-vS2tK7O4nycxTkjS1AaKiVrvSCXpXwx1ijG-AVZcFBSgGiW5OMlxW9T7DyYHH7R0TAEY2mfItLPbPxUqE-Zjia60B8QzWhTLFOe7RRSrKqMuzlkHDHu7Z7RIYxhMoeyXJFzb4aC16dckfeH-7f1U7V5fXxe322qLQc2VVZrhZ45gQZY0yonvcUeQCI67j0HZzTInteiBwGe-0a3DSJI7hxHhWJFbo-725x2M5apG0OxOAwmYppL1ypVM6nrei9vTnLuR3TdNofR5J_u_xHxBxtrXrY</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>Handschel, Jörg</creator><creator>Hassanyar, Hirama</creator><creator>Depprich, Rita A</creator><creator>Ommerborn, Michelle A</creator><creator>Sproll, Karl Christoph</creator><creator>Hofer, Matthias</creator><creator>Kübler, Norbert R</creator><creator>Naujoks, Christian</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>Nonvascularized iliac bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction--requirements and limitations</title><author>Handschel, Jörg ; Hassanyar, Hirama ; Depprich, Rita A ; Ommerborn, Michelle A ; Sproll, Karl Christoph ; Hofer, Matthias ; Kübler, Norbert R ; Naujoks, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p210t-c997ef0d3ea10687d5fceb115eed2ff21da915b243b131f2f6986ee152dd2e7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ameloblastoma - surgery</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Cysts - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ilium - transplantation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mandible - surgery</topic><topic>Mandibular Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Handschel, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassanyar, Hirama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Depprich, Rita A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ommerborn, Michelle A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sproll, Karl Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofer, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kübler, Norbert R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naujoks, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>In vivo (Athens)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Handschel, Jörg</au><au>Hassanyar, Hirama</au><au>Depprich, Rita A</au><au>Ommerborn, Michelle A</au><au>Sproll, Karl Christoph</au><au>Hofer, Matthias</au><au>Kübler, Norbert R</au><au>Naujoks, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nonvascularized iliac bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction--requirements and limitations</atitle><jtitle>In vivo (Athens)</jtitle><addtitle>In Vivo</addtitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>795</spage><epage>799</epage><pages>795-799</pages><eissn>1791-7549</eissn><abstract>Treatment of intraoral malignant tumors often leads to continuity defects of the mandible. Whereas the use of free vascularised flaps has shortcomings regarding donor site morbidity and a worse-fitting bone geometry, the nonvascularized iliac crest graft could be an alternative option. The purpose of this study was to describe the treatment outcome with nonvascularized iliac crest grafts over a 10-year period and to determine possible limitations of their use. Eighty-four patients with bicortical nonvascularized iliac crest grafts for mandibular reconstruction were examined at least one year after reconstruction. Patients' records and the radiological and/or surgical data were analyzed. Sixty-three patients (75%) showed complete healing, in 20 patients the treatment was not successful and in one patient the treatment result was unclear. Interestingly, comparing the successfully and the unsuccessfully treated patients, only the irradiation dose played a crucial role. Neither defect length nor defect localisation, nor time interval between resection and reconstruction were statistically significant parameters in graft success. Comparing only patients with malignancies, the non-irradiated patients had a higher success rate (77.3%). The nonvaslcularized iliac crest graft seems to be a reasonably reliable treatment option for reconstruction of mandibular defects up to about 5-6 cm in size. Radiotherapy is a strong confounder reducing the success rate. Necessary constraints are sufficient soft tissue conditions. However, primary reconstruction by free flaps (e.g. fibula flap) has a higher success rate in literature and should be preferred whenever possible.</abstract><cop>Greece</cop><pmid>21753136</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1791-7549
ispartof In vivo (Athens), 2011-09, Vol.25 (5), p.795-799
issn 1791-7549
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_877405944
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Ameloblastoma - surgery
Bone Transplantation - adverse effects
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery
Cysts - surgery
Female
Humans
Ilium - transplantation
Male
Mandible - surgery
Mandibular Diseases - surgery
Middle Aged
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
title Nonvascularized iliac bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction--requirements and limitations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T21%3A31%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nonvascularized%20iliac%20bone%20grafts%20for%20mandibular%20reconstruction--requirements%20and%20limitations&rft.jtitle=In%20vivo%20(Athens)&rft.au=Handschel,%20J%C3%B6rg&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=795&rft.epage=799&rft.pages=795-799&rft.eissn=1791-7549&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E877405944%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=877405944&rft_id=info:pmid/21753136&rfr_iscdi=true