Inter-row Mulch Increase the Water Use Efficiency of Furrow-Irrigated Maize in an Arid Environment

The effect inter‐row polyethylene mulch on the water use efficiency and crop productivity of furrow‐ and drip‐irrigated maize (Zea mays L.) was evaluated in a field study. In contrast to the traditional ‘on ridge’ mulching, the inter‐row polyethylene mulch was placed in such a way that it could be e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of agronomy and crop science (1986) 2011-06, Vol.197 (3), p.237-248
Hauptverfasser: Zegada-Lizarazu, W., Berliner, P. R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 248
container_issue 3
container_start_page 237
container_title Journal of agronomy and crop science (1986)
container_volume 197
creator Zegada-Lizarazu, W.
Berliner, P. R.
description The effect inter‐row polyethylene mulch on the water use efficiency and crop productivity of furrow‐ and drip‐irrigated maize (Zea mays L.) was evaluated in a field study. In contrast to the traditional ‘on ridge’ mulching, the inter‐row polyethylene mulch was placed in such a way that it could be easily removed for reuse since the row of plants itself was not covered but the furrows were completely covered. Irrigation needs were computed by multiplying the cumulative Class A Pan evaporation between irrigations by a crop coefficient that changed through the growing season. Our results indicate that inter‐row mulching induced earliness under both irrigation treatments. Seventy five percent of canopy density was attained in the mulched treatments contrasting with 45–61 % in the non‐mulched treatments at 34 days after sowing. Throughout the growing period, shoot biomass was significantly higher for the mulched treatments that had as well higher root biomasses. The overall estimated evaporative losses from the non‐mulched treatments were between 37 % and 39 % of the total water applied. The whole gross canopy water use efficiency in the furrow and drip mulched treatments was 64 % and 45 % higher than in the respective non‐mulched treatments. These results indicate that inter‐row polyethylene mulch is an efficient technique by which soil evaporation is reduced and plant productivity increased.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2010.00451.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_876244179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>876244179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3631-79dd923c54788fb3300b92219c8aec8221d3a4b57d248f436c8d97a9a79b1ab93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kFtPwyAYhonRxHn4D9wYrzo5tZTEm2XZ5oynZBqNN4RSqsyOKnS6-eulbhk3fPA-LyEPABCjPo7rYt7HjIoEUf7SJyjeIsRS3F_tgd4u2Ac9JChOCEnRITgKYY4QygihPVBMXWt84psfeLus9TucOu2NCga27wY-qxjCp3gaVZXV1ji9hk0Fx0sfG8nUe_sWkRLeKvtroHVQOTjwtoQj92194xbGtSfgoFJ1MKfb_Rg8jUePw6vk5n4yHQ5uEk2z-DkuylIQqlPG87wqKEWoEIRgoXNldB6nkipWpLwkLK8YzXReCq6E4qLAqhD0GJxv3v30zdfShFYubNCmrpUzzTLInGeEMcw78mxLqqBVXXnltA3y09uF8mtJGKaUIR65yw33Y2uz3uUYyU69nMvOsOwMy069_FcvV_J6MIxDrCebug2tWe3qyn_IjFOeyue7iXx4FeMZmbzKGf0DJhuH6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>876244179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inter-row Mulch Increase the Water Use Efficiency of Furrow-Irrigated Maize in an Arid Environment</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Zegada-Lizarazu, W. ; Berliner, P. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zegada-Lizarazu, W. ; Berliner, P. R.</creatorcontrib><description>The effect inter‐row polyethylene mulch on the water use efficiency and crop productivity of furrow‐ and drip‐irrigated maize (Zea mays L.) was evaluated in a field study. In contrast to the traditional ‘on ridge’ mulching, the inter‐row polyethylene mulch was placed in such a way that it could be easily removed for reuse since the row of plants itself was not covered but the furrows were completely covered. Irrigation needs were computed by multiplying the cumulative Class A Pan evaporation between irrigations by a crop coefficient that changed through the growing season. Our results indicate that inter‐row mulching induced earliness under both irrigation treatments. Seventy five percent of canopy density was attained in the mulched treatments contrasting with 45–61 % in the non‐mulched treatments at 34 days after sowing. Throughout the growing period, shoot biomass was significantly higher for the mulched treatments that had as well higher root biomasses. The overall estimated evaporative losses from the non‐mulched treatments were between 37 % and 39 % of the total water applied. The whole gross canopy water use efficiency in the furrow and drip mulched treatments was 64 % and 45 % higher than in the respective non‐mulched treatments. These results indicate that inter‐row polyethylene mulch is an efficient technique by which soil evaporation is reduced and plant productivity increased.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-2250</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-037X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2010.00451.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASCEV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; biomass production ; consumptive water use ; Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage ; drip-irrigation ; evaporation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Irrigation. Drainage ; plastic mulch ; Protected cultivation ; Soilless cultures. Protected cultivation ; Tending. Growth control ; Tillage. Tending. Growth control ; transpiration ; water saving ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Journal of agronomy and crop science (1986), 2011-06, Vol.197 (3), p.237-248</ispartof><rights>2010 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3631-79dd923c54788fb3300b92219c8aec8221d3a4b57d248f436c8d97a9a79b1ab93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1439-037X.2010.00451.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1439-037X.2010.00451.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24133407$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zegada-Lizarazu, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berliner, P. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Inter-row Mulch Increase the Water Use Efficiency of Furrow-Irrigated Maize in an Arid Environment</title><title>Journal of agronomy and crop science (1986)</title><description>The effect inter‐row polyethylene mulch on the water use efficiency and crop productivity of furrow‐ and drip‐irrigated maize (Zea mays L.) was evaluated in a field study. In contrast to the traditional ‘on ridge’ mulching, the inter‐row polyethylene mulch was placed in such a way that it could be easily removed for reuse since the row of plants itself was not covered but the furrows were completely covered. Irrigation needs were computed by multiplying the cumulative Class A Pan evaporation between irrigations by a crop coefficient that changed through the growing season. Our results indicate that inter‐row mulching induced earliness under both irrigation treatments. Seventy five percent of canopy density was attained in the mulched treatments contrasting with 45–61 % in the non‐mulched treatments at 34 days after sowing. Throughout the growing period, shoot biomass was significantly higher for the mulched treatments that had as well higher root biomasses. The overall estimated evaporative losses from the non‐mulched treatments were between 37 % and 39 % of the total water applied. The whole gross canopy water use efficiency in the furrow and drip mulched treatments was 64 % and 45 % higher than in the respective non‐mulched treatments. These results indicate that inter‐row polyethylene mulch is an efficient technique by which soil evaporation is reduced and plant productivity increased.</description><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>biomass production</subject><subject>consumptive water use</subject><subject>Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage</subject><subject>drip-irrigation</subject><subject>evaporation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>plastic mulch</subject><subject>Protected cultivation</subject><subject>Soilless cultures. Protected cultivation</subject><subject>Tending. Growth control</subject><subject>Tillage. Tending. Growth control</subject><subject>transpiration</subject><subject>water saving</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0931-2250</issn><issn>1439-037X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kFtPwyAYhonRxHn4D9wYrzo5tZTEm2XZ5oynZBqNN4RSqsyOKnS6-eulbhk3fPA-LyEPABCjPo7rYt7HjIoEUf7SJyjeIsRS3F_tgd4u2Ac9JChOCEnRITgKYY4QygihPVBMXWt84psfeLus9TucOu2NCga27wY-qxjCp3gaVZXV1ji9hk0Fx0sfG8nUe_sWkRLeKvtroHVQOTjwtoQj92194xbGtSfgoFJ1MKfb_Rg8jUePw6vk5n4yHQ5uEk2z-DkuylIQqlPG87wqKEWoEIRgoXNldB6nkipWpLwkLK8YzXReCq6E4qLAqhD0GJxv3v30zdfShFYubNCmrpUzzTLInGeEMcw78mxLqqBVXXnltA3y09uF8mtJGKaUIR65yw33Y2uz3uUYyU69nMvOsOwMy069_FcvV_J6MIxDrCebug2tWe3qyn_IjFOeyue7iXx4FeMZmbzKGf0DJhuH6w</recordid><startdate>201106</startdate><enddate>201106</enddate><creator>Zegada-Lizarazu, W.</creator><creator>Berliner, P. R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201106</creationdate><title>Inter-row Mulch Increase the Water Use Efficiency of Furrow-Irrigated Maize in an Arid Environment</title><author>Zegada-Lizarazu, W. ; Berliner, P. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3631-79dd923c54788fb3300b92219c8aec8221d3a4b57d248f436c8d97a9a79b1ab93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>biomass production</topic><topic>consumptive water use</topic><topic>Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage</topic><topic>drip-irrigation</topic><topic>evaporation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>plastic mulch</topic><topic>Protected cultivation</topic><topic>Soilless cultures. Protected cultivation</topic><topic>Tending. Growth control</topic><topic>Tillage. Tending. Growth control</topic><topic>transpiration</topic><topic>water saving</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zegada-Lizarazu, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berliner, P. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of agronomy and crop science (1986)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zegada-Lizarazu, W.</au><au>Berliner, P. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inter-row Mulch Increase the Water Use Efficiency of Furrow-Irrigated Maize in an Arid Environment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agronomy and crop science (1986)</jtitle><date>2011-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>197</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>237</spage><epage>248</epage><pages>237-248</pages><issn>0931-2250</issn><eissn>1439-037X</eissn><coden>JASCEV</coden><abstract>The effect inter‐row polyethylene mulch on the water use efficiency and crop productivity of furrow‐ and drip‐irrigated maize (Zea mays L.) was evaluated in a field study. In contrast to the traditional ‘on ridge’ mulching, the inter‐row polyethylene mulch was placed in such a way that it could be easily removed for reuse since the row of plants itself was not covered but the furrows were completely covered. Irrigation needs were computed by multiplying the cumulative Class A Pan evaporation between irrigations by a crop coefficient that changed through the growing season. Our results indicate that inter‐row mulching induced earliness under both irrigation treatments. Seventy five percent of canopy density was attained in the mulched treatments contrasting with 45–61 % in the non‐mulched treatments at 34 days after sowing. Throughout the growing period, shoot biomass was significantly higher for the mulched treatments that had as well higher root biomasses. The overall estimated evaporative losses from the non‐mulched treatments were between 37 % and 39 % of the total water applied. The whole gross canopy water use efficiency in the furrow and drip mulched treatments was 64 % and 45 % higher than in the respective non‐mulched treatments. These results indicate that inter‐row polyethylene mulch is an efficient technique by which soil evaporation is reduced and plant productivity increased.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1439-037X.2010.00451.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0931-2250
ispartof Journal of agronomy and crop science (1986), 2011-06, Vol.197 (3), p.237-248
issn 0931-2250
1439-037X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_876244179
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
biomass production
consumptive water use
Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage
drip-irrigation
evaporation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agronomy. Plant production
Irrigation. Drainage
plastic mulch
Protected cultivation
Soilless cultures. Protected cultivation
Tending. Growth control
Tillage. Tending. Growth control
transpiration
water saving
Zea mays
title Inter-row Mulch Increase the Water Use Efficiency of Furrow-Irrigated Maize in an Arid Environment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T06%3A23%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inter-row%20Mulch%20Increase%20the%20Water%20Use%20Efficiency%20of%20Furrow-Irrigated%20Maize%20in%20an%20Arid%20Environment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agronomy%20and%20crop%20science%20(1986)&rft.au=Zegada-Lizarazu,%20W.&rft.date=2011-06&rft.volume=197&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=248&rft.pages=237-248&rft.issn=0931-2250&rft.eissn=1439-037X&rft.coden=JASCEV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2010.00451.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E876244179%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=876244179&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true