Inter-row Mulch Increase the Water Use Efficiency of Furrow-Irrigated Maize in an Arid Environment
The effect inter‐row polyethylene mulch on the water use efficiency and crop productivity of furrow‐ and drip‐irrigated maize (Zea mays L.) was evaluated in a field study. In contrast to the traditional ‘on ridge’ mulching, the inter‐row polyethylene mulch was placed in such a way that it could be e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of agronomy and crop science (1986) 2011-06, Vol.197 (3), p.237-248 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 248 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 237 |
container_title | Journal of agronomy and crop science (1986) |
container_volume | 197 |
creator | Zegada-Lizarazu, W. Berliner, P. R. |
description | The effect inter‐row polyethylene mulch on the water use efficiency and crop productivity of furrow‐ and drip‐irrigated maize (Zea mays L.) was evaluated in a field study. In contrast to the traditional ‘on ridge’ mulching, the inter‐row polyethylene mulch was placed in such a way that it could be easily removed for reuse since the row of plants itself was not covered but the furrows were completely covered. Irrigation needs were computed by multiplying the cumulative Class A Pan evaporation between irrigations by a crop coefficient that changed through the growing season. Our results indicate that inter‐row mulching induced earliness under both irrigation treatments. Seventy five percent of canopy density was attained in the mulched treatments contrasting with 45–61 % in the non‐mulched treatments at 34 days after sowing. Throughout the growing period, shoot biomass was significantly higher for the mulched treatments that had as well higher root biomasses. The overall estimated evaporative losses from the non‐mulched treatments were between 37 % and 39 % of the total water applied. The whole gross canopy water use efficiency in the furrow and drip mulched treatments was 64 % and 45 % higher than in the respective non‐mulched treatments. These results indicate that inter‐row polyethylene mulch is an efficient technique by which soil evaporation is reduced and plant productivity increased. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2010.00451.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_876244179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>876244179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3631-79dd923c54788fb3300b92219c8aec8221d3a4b57d248f436c8d97a9a79b1ab93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kFtPwyAYhonRxHn4D9wYrzo5tZTEm2XZ5oynZBqNN4RSqsyOKnS6-eulbhk3fPA-LyEPABCjPo7rYt7HjIoEUf7SJyjeIsRS3F_tgd4u2Ac9JChOCEnRITgKYY4QygihPVBMXWt84psfeLus9TucOu2NCga27wY-qxjCp3gaVZXV1ji9hk0Fx0sfG8nUe_sWkRLeKvtroHVQOTjwtoQj92194xbGtSfgoFJ1MKfb_Rg8jUePw6vk5n4yHQ5uEk2z-DkuylIQqlPG87wqKEWoEIRgoXNldB6nkipWpLwkLK8YzXReCq6E4qLAqhD0GJxv3v30zdfShFYubNCmrpUzzTLInGeEMcw78mxLqqBVXXnltA3y09uF8mtJGKaUIR65yw33Y2uz3uUYyU69nMvOsOwMy069_FcvV_J6MIxDrCebug2tWe3qyn_IjFOeyue7iXx4FeMZmbzKGf0DJhuH6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>876244179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inter-row Mulch Increase the Water Use Efficiency of Furrow-Irrigated Maize in an Arid Environment</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Zegada-Lizarazu, W. ; Berliner, P. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zegada-Lizarazu, W. ; Berliner, P. R.</creatorcontrib><description>The effect inter‐row polyethylene mulch on the water use efficiency and crop productivity of furrow‐ and drip‐irrigated maize (Zea mays L.) was evaluated in a field study. In contrast to the traditional ‘on ridge’ mulching, the inter‐row polyethylene mulch was placed in such a way that it could be easily removed for reuse since the row of plants itself was not covered but the furrows were completely covered. Irrigation needs were computed by multiplying the cumulative Class A Pan evaporation between irrigations by a crop coefficient that changed through the growing season. Our results indicate that inter‐row mulching induced earliness under both irrigation treatments. Seventy five percent of canopy density was attained in the mulched treatments contrasting with 45–61 % in the non‐mulched treatments at 34 days after sowing. Throughout the growing period, shoot biomass was significantly higher for the mulched treatments that had as well higher root biomasses. The overall estimated evaporative losses from the non‐mulched treatments were between 37 % and 39 % of the total water applied. The whole gross canopy water use efficiency in the furrow and drip mulched treatments was 64 % and 45 % higher than in the respective non‐mulched treatments. These results indicate that inter‐row polyethylene mulch is an efficient technique by which soil evaporation is reduced and plant productivity increased.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-2250</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-037X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2010.00451.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASCEV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; biomass production ; consumptive water use ; Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage ; drip-irrigation ; evaporation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Irrigation. Drainage ; plastic mulch ; Protected cultivation ; Soilless cultures. Protected cultivation ; Tending. Growth control ; Tillage. Tending. Growth control ; transpiration ; water saving ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Journal of agronomy and crop science (1986), 2011-06, Vol.197 (3), p.237-248</ispartof><rights>2010 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3631-79dd923c54788fb3300b92219c8aec8221d3a4b57d248f436c8d97a9a79b1ab93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1439-037X.2010.00451.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1439-037X.2010.00451.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24133407$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zegada-Lizarazu, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berliner, P. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Inter-row Mulch Increase the Water Use Efficiency of Furrow-Irrigated Maize in an Arid Environment</title><title>Journal of agronomy and crop science (1986)</title><description>The effect inter‐row polyethylene mulch on the water use efficiency and crop productivity of furrow‐ and drip‐irrigated maize (Zea mays L.) was evaluated in a field study. In contrast to the traditional ‘on ridge’ mulching, the inter‐row polyethylene mulch was placed in such a way that it could be easily removed for reuse since the row of plants itself was not covered but the furrows were completely covered. Irrigation needs were computed by multiplying the cumulative Class A Pan evaporation between irrigations by a crop coefficient that changed through the growing season. Our results indicate that inter‐row mulching induced earliness under both irrigation treatments. Seventy five percent of canopy density was attained in the mulched treatments contrasting with 45–61 % in the non‐mulched treatments at 34 days after sowing. Throughout the growing period, shoot biomass was significantly higher for the mulched treatments that had as well higher root biomasses. The overall estimated evaporative losses from the non‐mulched treatments were between 37 % and 39 % of the total water applied. The whole gross canopy water use efficiency in the furrow and drip mulched treatments was 64 % and 45 % higher than in the respective non‐mulched treatments. These results indicate that inter‐row polyethylene mulch is an efficient technique by which soil evaporation is reduced and plant productivity increased.</description><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>biomass production</subject><subject>consumptive water use</subject><subject>Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage</subject><subject>drip-irrigation</subject><subject>evaporation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>plastic mulch</subject><subject>Protected cultivation</subject><subject>Soilless cultures. Protected cultivation</subject><subject>Tending. Growth control</subject><subject>Tillage. Tending. Growth control</subject><subject>transpiration</subject><subject>water saving</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0931-2250</issn><issn>1439-037X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kFtPwyAYhonRxHn4D9wYrzo5tZTEm2XZ5oynZBqNN4RSqsyOKnS6-eulbhk3fPA-LyEPABCjPo7rYt7HjIoEUf7SJyjeIsRS3F_tgd4u2Ac9JChOCEnRITgKYY4QygihPVBMXWt84psfeLus9TucOu2NCga27wY-qxjCp3gaVZXV1ji9hk0Fx0sfG8nUe_sWkRLeKvtroHVQOTjwtoQj92194xbGtSfgoFJ1MKfb_Rg8jUePw6vk5n4yHQ5uEk2z-DkuylIQqlPG87wqKEWoEIRgoXNldB6nkipWpLwkLK8YzXReCq6E4qLAqhD0GJxv3v30zdfShFYubNCmrpUzzTLInGeEMcw78mxLqqBVXXnltA3y09uF8mtJGKaUIR65yw33Y2uz3uUYyU69nMvOsOwMy069_FcvV_J6MIxDrCebug2tWe3qyn_IjFOeyue7iXx4FeMZmbzKGf0DJhuH6w</recordid><startdate>201106</startdate><enddate>201106</enddate><creator>Zegada-Lizarazu, W.</creator><creator>Berliner, P. R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201106</creationdate><title>Inter-row Mulch Increase the Water Use Efficiency of Furrow-Irrigated Maize in an Arid Environment</title><author>Zegada-Lizarazu, W. ; Berliner, P. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3631-79dd923c54788fb3300b92219c8aec8221d3a4b57d248f436c8d97a9a79b1ab93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>biomass production</topic><topic>consumptive water use</topic><topic>Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage</topic><topic>drip-irrigation</topic><topic>evaporation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>plastic mulch</topic><topic>Protected cultivation</topic><topic>Soilless cultures. Protected cultivation</topic><topic>Tending. Growth control</topic><topic>Tillage. Tending. Growth control</topic><topic>transpiration</topic><topic>water saving</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zegada-Lizarazu, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berliner, P. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of agronomy and crop science (1986)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zegada-Lizarazu, W.</au><au>Berliner, P. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inter-row Mulch Increase the Water Use Efficiency of Furrow-Irrigated Maize in an Arid Environment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agronomy and crop science (1986)</jtitle><date>2011-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>197</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>237</spage><epage>248</epage><pages>237-248</pages><issn>0931-2250</issn><eissn>1439-037X</eissn><coden>JASCEV</coden><abstract>The effect inter‐row polyethylene mulch on the water use efficiency and crop productivity of furrow‐ and drip‐irrigated maize (Zea mays L.) was evaluated in a field study. In contrast to the traditional ‘on ridge’ mulching, the inter‐row polyethylene mulch was placed in such a way that it could be easily removed for reuse since the row of plants itself was not covered but the furrows were completely covered. Irrigation needs were computed by multiplying the cumulative Class A Pan evaporation between irrigations by a crop coefficient that changed through the growing season. Our results indicate that inter‐row mulching induced earliness under both irrigation treatments. Seventy five percent of canopy density was attained in the mulched treatments contrasting with 45–61 % in the non‐mulched treatments at 34 days after sowing. Throughout the growing period, shoot biomass was significantly higher for the mulched treatments that had as well higher root biomasses. The overall estimated evaporative losses from the non‐mulched treatments were between 37 % and 39 % of the total water applied. The whole gross canopy water use efficiency in the furrow and drip mulched treatments was 64 % and 45 % higher than in the respective non‐mulched treatments. These results indicate that inter‐row polyethylene mulch is an efficient technique by which soil evaporation is reduced and plant productivity increased.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1439-037X.2010.00451.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0931-2250 |
ispartof | Journal of agronomy and crop science (1986), 2011-06, Vol.197 (3), p.237-248 |
issn | 0931-2250 1439-037X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_876244179 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences biomass production consumptive water use Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage drip-irrigation evaporation Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agronomy. Plant production Irrigation. Drainage plastic mulch Protected cultivation Soilless cultures. Protected cultivation Tending. Growth control Tillage. Tending. Growth control transpiration water saving Zea mays |
title | Inter-row Mulch Increase the Water Use Efficiency of Furrow-Irrigated Maize in an Arid Environment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T06%3A23%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inter-row%20Mulch%20Increase%20the%20Water%20Use%20Efficiency%20of%20Furrow-Irrigated%20Maize%20in%20an%20Arid%20Environment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agronomy%20and%20crop%20science%20(1986)&rft.au=Zegada-Lizarazu,%20W.&rft.date=2011-06&rft.volume=197&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=248&rft.pages=237-248&rft.issn=0931-2250&rft.eissn=1439-037X&rft.coden=JASCEV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2010.00451.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E876244179%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=876244179&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |