Application of biological monitoring for exposure assessment following chemical incidents: A procedure for decision making
Determination of the level of exposure during and after a chemical incident is crucial for the assessment of public health risks and for appropriate medical treatment, as well as for subsequent health studies that may be part of disaster management. Immediately after such an incident, there is usual...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology 2011-05, Vol.21 (3), p.247-261 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 261 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 247 |
container_title | Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Scheepers, Paul T J Bos, Peter M J Konings, Joke Janssen, Nicole A H Grievink, Linda |
description | Determination of the level of exposure during and after a chemical incident is crucial for the assessment of public health risks and for appropriate medical treatment, as well as for subsequent health studies that may be part of disaster management. Immediately after such an incident, there is usually no opportunity to collect reliable quantitative information on personal exposures and environmental concentrations may fall below detectable levels shortly after the incident has passed. However, many substances persist longer in biological tissues and thus biological monitoring strategies may have the potential to support exposure assessment, as part of health studies, even after the acute phase of a chemical incident is over. Reported successful applications involve very persistent chemical substances such as protein adducts and include those rare cases in which biological tissues were collected within a few hours after an incident. The persistence of a biomarker in biological tissues, the mechanism of toxicity, and the sensitivity of the analysis of a biomarker were identified as the key parameters to support a decision on the feasibility and usefulness of biological monitoring to be applied after an incident involving the release of hazardous chemicals. These input parameters could be retrieved from published methods on applications of biomarkers. Methods for rapid decision making on the usefulness and feasibility of using biological monitoring are needed. In this contribution, a stepwise procedure for taking such a decision is proposed. The persistence of a biomarker in biological tissues, the mechanism of toxicity, and the sensitivity of the analysis of a biomarker were identified as the key parameters to support such a decision. The procedure proposed for decision making is illustrated by case studies based on two documented chemical incidents in the Netherlands. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/jes.2010.4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_876231314</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A254971971</galeid><sourcerecordid>A254971971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-d43307c39789a03fdc1f0d1a186a056556f0ac74ecf78bfca78afbb47d00a0053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl2P1CAUhhujcdfVG3-AaTTRRDPjoXy13k02fiWbeKOJd4RSmGGkUKGNH79ecNZx16iBBDg874EDb1XdR7BGgNvne53WDeQVuVGdIkq7FTDy8eZxjtFJdSelPQAhnMHt6qQBjBmQ7rT6vpkmZ5WcbfB1MHVvgwvbHHD1GLydQ7R-W5sQa_11CmmJupYp6ZRG7eccdy58KYTa6fGnynplh7yXXtSbeopB6aGISoZBK5vKOaP8lDV3q1tGuqTvXY5n1YdXL9-fv1ldvHv99nxzsVKUsXk1EIyBK9zxtpOAzaCQgQFJ1DIJlFHKDEjFiVaGt71RkrfS9D3hA4AEoPisenLIm2_zedFpFqNNSjsnvQ5LEi1nDUYYkUw-_IPchyX6fDnRsoYh3jZNhh79C2oYAYYoJ1eorXRaWG_CHKUqB4tNQ0nHUe6ZWv-Fym0orxm8NjbHrwkeXxHstHTzLgW3lO9L18GnB1DFkFLURkzRjjJ-EwhEcY3IrhHFNaLU_eCypKUf9XBEf9kkA88OQJqKH3T8XfP_0nk5578_pstIIQj-AXnR1Ro</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2640615742</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application of biological monitoring for exposure assessment following chemical incidents: A procedure for decision making</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Scheepers, Paul T J ; Bos, Peter M J ; Konings, Joke ; Janssen, Nicole A H ; Grievink, Linda</creator><creatorcontrib>Scheepers, Paul T J ; Bos, Peter M J ; Konings, Joke ; Janssen, Nicole A H ; Grievink, Linda</creatorcontrib><description>Determination of the level of exposure during and after a chemical incident is crucial for the assessment of public health risks and for appropriate medical treatment, as well as for subsequent health studies that may be part of disaster management. Immediately after such an incident, there is usually no opportunity to collect reliable quantitative information on personal exposures and environmental concentrations may fall below detectable levels shortly after the incident has passed. However, many substances persist longer in biological tissues and thus biological monitoring strategies may have the potential to support exposure assessment, as part of health studies, even after the acute phase of a chemical incident is over. Reported successful applications involve very persistent chemical substances such as protein adducts and include those rare cases in which biological tissues were collected within a few hours after an incident. The persistence of a biomarker in biological tissues, the mechanism of toxicity, and the sensitivity of the analysis of a biomarker were identified as the key parameters to support a decision on the feasibility and usefulness of biological monitoring to be applied after an incident involving the release of hazardous chemicals. These input parameters could be retrieved from published methods on applications of biomarkers. Methods for rapid decision making on the usefulness and feasibility of using biological monitoring are needed. In this contribution, a stepwise procedure for taking such a decision is proposed. The persistence of a biomarker in biological tissues, the mechanism of toxicity, and the sensitivity of the analysis of a biomarker were identified as the key parameters to support such a decision. The procedure proposed for decision making is illustrated by case studies based on two documented chemical incidents in the Netherlands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-0631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-064X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/jes.2010.4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20336049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Nature Publishing Group US</publisher><subject>692/53 ; 692/700/228 ; 704/172/169/895 ; Adducts ; Analysis ; Biological monitoring ; Biomarkers ; Biomarkers - metabolism ; Biomonitoring ; Case studies ; Decision making ; Decision Making, Organizational ; Disaster management ; Disasters ; Emergency preparedness ; Environmental Exposure ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Epidemiology ; Exposure ; Feasibility ; Hazardous Substances - metabolism ; Hazardous Substances - pharmacokinetics ; Hazardous Substances - toxicity ; Health risks ; Health services ; Humans ; Limit of Detection ; Medical treatment ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Parameter identification ; Protein adducts ; Public health ; Risk assessment ; Sensitivity analysis ; Telemedicine ; Tissues ; Toxicity</subject><ispartof>Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2011-05, Vol.21 (3), p.247-261</ispartof><rights>Nature America, Inc. 2011</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Nature America, Inc. 2011.</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group May 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-d43307c39789a03fdc1f0d1a186a056556f0ac74ecf78bfca78afbb47d00a0053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-d43307c39789a03fdc1f0d1a186a056556f0ac74ecf78bfca78afbb47d00a0053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/jes.2010.4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/jes.2010.4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20336049$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scheepers, Paul T J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bos, Peter M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konings, Joke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Nicole A H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grievink, Linda</creatorcontrib><title>Application of biological monitoring for exposure assessment following chemical incidents: A procedure for decision making</title><title>Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology</title><addtitle>J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol</addtitle><addtitle>J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Determination of the level of exposure during and after a chemical incident is crucial for the assessment of public health risks and for appropriate medical treatment, as well as for subsequent health studies that may be part of disaster management. Immediately after such an incident, there is usually no opportunity to collect reliable quantitative information on personal exposures and environmental concentrations may fall below detectable levels shortly after the incident has passed. However, many substances persist longer in biological tissues and thus biological monitoring strategies may have the potential to support exposure assessment, as part of health studies, even after the acute phase of a chemical incident is over. Reported successful applications involve very persistent chemical substances such as protein adducts and include those rare cases in which biological tissues were collected within a few hours after an incident. The persistence of a biomarker in biological tissues, the mechanism of toxicity, and the sensitivity of the analysis of a biomarker were identified as the key parameters to support a decision on the feasibility and usefulness of biological monitoring to be applied after an incident involving the release of hazardous chemicals. These input parameters could be retrieved from published methods on applications of biomarkers. Methods for rapid decision making on the usefulness and feasibility of using biological monitoring are needed. In this contribution, a stepwise procedure for taking such a decision is proposed. The persistence of a biomarker in biological tissues, the mechanism of toxicity, and the sensitivity of the analysis of a biomarker were identified as the key parameters to support such a decision. The procedure proposed for decision making is illustrated by case studies based on two documented chemical incidents in the Netherlands.</description><subject>692/53</subject><subject>692/700/228</subject><subject>704/172/169/895</subject><subject>Adducts</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biological monitoring</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biomarkers - metabolism</subject><subject>Biomonitoring</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision Making, Organizational</subject><subject>Disaster management</subject><subject>Disasters</subject><subject>Emergency preparedness</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Hazardous Substances - metabolism</subject><subject>Hazardous Substances - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Hazardous Substances - toxicity</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Limit of Detection</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Parameter identification</subject><subject>Protein adducts</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><issn>1559-0631</issn><issn>1559-064X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kl2P1CAUhhujcdfVG3-AaTTRRDPjoXy13k02fiWbeKOJd4RSmGGkUKGNH79ecNZx16iBBDg874EDb1XdR7BGgNvne53WDeQVuVGdIkq7FTDy8eZxjtFJdSelPQAhnMHt6qQBjBmQ7rT6vpkmZ5WcbfB1MHVvgwvbHHD1GLydQ7R-W5sQa_11CmmJupYp6ZRG7eccdy58KYTa6fGnynplh7yXXtSbeopB6aGISoZBK5vKOaP8lDV3q1tGuqTvXY5n1YdXL9-fv1ldvHv99nxzsVKUsXk1EIyBK9zxtpOAzaCQgQFJ1DIJlFHKDEjFiVaGt71RkrfS9D3hA4AEoPisenLIm2_zedFpFqNNSjsnvQ5LEi1nDUYYkUw-_IPchyX6fDnRsoYh3jZNhh79C2oYAYYoJ1eorXRaWG_CHKUqB4tNQ0nHUe6ZWv-Fym0orxm8NjbHrwkeXxHstHTzLgW3lO9L18GnB1DFkFLURkzRjjJ-EwhEcY3IrhHFNaLU_eCypKUf9XBEf9kkA88OQJqKH3T8XfP_0nk5578_pstIIQj-AXnR1Ro</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Scheepers, Paul T J</creator><creator>Bos, Peter M J</creator><creator>Konings, Joke</creator><creator>Janssen, Nicole A H</creator><creator>Grievink, Linda</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group US</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Application of biological monitoring for exposure assessment following chemical incidents: A procedure for decision making</title><author>Scheepers, Paul T J ; Bos, Peter M J ; Konings, Joke ; Janssen, Nicole A H ; Grievink, Linda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-d43307c39789a03fdc1f0d1a186a056556f0ac74ecf78bfca78afbb47d00a0053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>692/53</topic><topic>692/700/228</topic><topic>704/172/169/895</topic><topic>Adducts</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biological monitoring</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biomarkers - metabolism</topic><topic>Biomonitoring</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision Making, Organizational</topic><topic>Disaster management</topic><topic>Disasters</topic><topic>Emergency preparedness</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Hazardous Substances - metabolism</topic><topic>Hazardous Substances - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Hazardous Substances - toxicity</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Limit of Detection</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Parameter identification</topic><topic>Protein adducts</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scheepers, Paul T J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bos, Peter M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konings, Joke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Nicole A H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grievink, Linda</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scheepers, Paul T J</au><au>Bos, Peter M J</au><au>Konings, Joke</au><au>Janssen, Nicole A H</au><au>Grievink, Linda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application of biological monitoring for exposure assessment following chemical incidents: A procedure for decision making</atitle><jtitle>Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology</jtitle><stitle>J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol</stitle><addtitle>J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>247</spage><epage>261</epage><pages>247-261</pages><issn>1559-0631</issn><eissn>1559-064X</eissn><abstract>Determination of the level of exposure during and after a chemical incident is crucial for the assessment of public health risks and for appropriate medical treatment, as well as for subsequent health studies that may be part of disaster management. Immediately after such an incident, there is usually no opportunity to collect reliable quantitative information on personal exposures and environmental concentrations may fall below detectable levels shortly after the incident has passed. However, many substances persist longer in biological tissues and thus biological monitoring strategies may have the potential to support exposure assessment, as part of health studies, even after the acute phase of a chemical incident is over. Reported successful applications involve very persistent chemical substances such as protein adducts and include those rare cases in which biological tissues were collected within a few hours after an incident. The persistence of a biomarker in biological tissues, the mechanism of toxicity, and the sensitivity of the analysis of a biomarker were identified as the key parameters to support a decision on the feasibility and usefulness of biological monitoring to be applied after an incident involving the release of hazardous chemicals. These input parameters could be retrieved from published methods on applications of biomarkers. Methods for rapid decision making on the usefulness and feasibility of using biological monitoring are needed. In this contribution, a stepwise procedure for taking such a decision is proposed. The persistence of a biomarker in biological tissues, the mechanism of toxicity, and the sensitivity of the analysis of a biomarker were identified as the key parameters to support such a decision. The procedure proposed for decision making is illustrated by case studies based on two documented chemical incidents in the Netherlands.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group US</pub><pmid>20336049</pmid><doi>10.1038/jes.2010.4</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1559-0631 |
ispartof | Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2011-05, Vol.21 (3), p.247-261 |
issn | 1559-0631 1559-064X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_876231314 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | 692/53 692/700/228 704/172/169/895 Adducts Analysis Biological monitoring Biomarkers Biomarkers - metabolism Biomonitoring Case studies Decision making Decision Making, Organizational Disaster management Disasters Emergency preparedness Environmental Exposure Environmental Monitoring - methods Epidemiology Exposure Feasibility Hazardous Substances - metabolism Hazardous Substances - pharmacokinetics Hazardous Substances - toxicity Health risks Health services Humans Limit of Detection Medical treatment Medicine Medicine & Public Health Parameter identification Protein adducts Public health Risk assessment Sensitivity analysis Telemedicine Tissues Toxicity |
title | Application of biological monitoring for exposure assessment following chemical incidents: A procedure for decision making |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T15%3A46%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20of%20biological%20monitoring%20for%20exposure%20assessment%20following%20chemical%20incidents:%20A%20procedure%20for%20decision%20making&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20exposure%20science%20&%20environmental%20epidemiology&rft.au=Scheepers,%20Paul%20T%20J&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=247&rft.epage=261&rft.pages=247-261&rft.issn=1559-0631&rft.eissn=1559-064X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/jes.2010.4&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA254971971%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2640615742&rft_id=info:pmid/20336049&rft_galeid=A254971971&rfr_iscdi=true |