Experience with quantitative ecosystem assessment tools in the northeast Pacific

We consider the question of which quantitative modelling tools can be used to support an ecosystem approach to management (EAM), with a focus on evaluating the implication of decisions on the biological system being managed. Managers of federal fisheries in the eastern Bering Sea, USA, have adopted...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England) England), 2011-06, Vol.12 (2), p.189-208
Hauptverfasser: Hollowed, Anne B, Aydin, Kerim Y, Essington, Timothy E, Ianelli, James N, Megrey, Bernard A, Punt, André E, Smith, Anthony D M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 208
container_issue 2
container_start_page 189
container_title Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)
container_volume 12
creator Hollowed, Anne B
Aydin, Kerim Y
Essington, Timothy E
Ianelli, James N
Megrey, Bernard A
Punt, André E
Smith, Anthony D M
description We consider the question of which quantitative modelling tools can be used to support an ecosystem approach to management (EAM), with a focus on evaluating the implication of decisions on the biological system being managed. Managers of federal fisheries in the eastern Bering Sea, USA, have adopted an EAM. The tools used to support EAM in the eastern Bering Sea serve as a guide to what types of models could be used elsewhere. A review of the role of natural science in the implementation of EAM shows that scientific advice enters into decision‐making at a variety of steps. Single‐species stock assessment and projection models are the most commonly used tools employed to inform managers. Comprehensive assessments (e.g. management strategy evaluation) are emerging as a new and potentially valuable analysis technique for use in assessing trade‐offs of different strategic alternatives. In the case of management in the eastern Bering Sea, end‐to‐end models and coupled biophysical models have been used primarily to advance scientific understanding, but have not been applied in a management context. This review highlights that implementation of an EAM in a management environment such as eastern Bering Sea requires substantial commitments to the collection and analysis of data and support for a group of analysts with interdisciplinary training in population dynamics, oceanography and ecology. This review supports the growing recognition that a diverse suite of modelling tools is needed to address tactical and strategic management issues germane to the adoption of the ecosystem approach to fisheries management.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00413.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_876228976</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2344668361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4093-ae1ddce7a1a8cf5870f2c62b5e178adfef58b882ecd466caad902e194498e83d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhiMEEuXjP1gsTAl2ktqOxFIq2iJV0AGExHIyzkW4pElru7T99zgUdWDCw93p_D6W9UQRYTRh4dzME5ZzEaeFKJKUMpZQmrMs2R5FvcPF8WHm9DQ6c25OKeWS5b1odr9dojXYaCQb4z_Iaq0ab7zy5gsJ6tbtnMcFUc6hcwtsPPFtWztiGuI_kDStDU05T2ZKm8roi-ikUrXDy99-Hr2M7p-Hk3j6NH4YDqaxzmmRxQpZWWoUiimpq74UtEo1T9_7yIRUZYVh9y5lirrMOddKlQVNkRV5XkiUWZmdR9f7d5e2Xa3ReVgYp7GuVYPt2oEUPE1lIXhIXv1Jztu1bcLnQHJOZRZqCMl9SNvWOYsVLK1ZKLsDRqETDXPoHELnEzrR8CMatgG93aMbU-Pu3xyMBqMwBDze4yaI3h5wZT-Bi0z04fVxDLmY3dHJ4xuI7BvHg5Rs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>866083866</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experience with quantitative ecosystem assessment tools in the northeast Pacific</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Hollowed, Anne B ; Aydin, Kerim Y ; Essington, Timothy E ; Ianelli, James N ; Megrey, Bernard A ; Punt, André E ; Smith, Anthony D M</creator><creatorcontrib>Hollowed, Anne B ; Aydin, Kerim Y ; Essington, Timothy E ; Ianelli, James N ; Megrey, Bernard A ; Punt, André E ; Smith, Anthony D M</creatorcontrib><description>We consider the question of which quantitative modelling tools can be used to support an ecosystem approach to management (EAM), with a focus on evaluating the implication of decisions on the biological system being managed. Managers of federal fisheries in the eastern Bering Sea, USA, have adopted an EAM. The tools used to support EAM in the eastern Bering Sea serve as a guide to what types of models could be used elsewhere. A review of the role of natural science in the implementation of EAM shows that scientific advice enters into decision‐making at a variety of steps. Single‐species stock assessment and projection models are the most commonly used tools employed to inform managers. Comprehensive assessments (e.g. management strategy evaluation) are emerging as a new and potentially valuable analysis technique for use in assessing trade‐offs of different strategic alternatives. In the case of management in the eastern Bering Sea, end‐to‐end models and coupled biophysical models have been used primarily to advance scientific understanding, but have not been applied in a management context. This review highlights that implementation of an EAM in a management environment such as eastern Bering Sea requires substantial commitments to the collection and analysis of data and support for a group of analysts with interdisciplinary training in population dynamics, oceanography and ecology. This review supports the growing recognition that a diverse suite of modelling tools is needed to address tactical and strategic management issues germane to the adoption of the ecosystem approach to fisheries management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-2960</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-2979</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00413.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Data analysis ; Ecosystem approach to management ; Ecosystems ; end-to-end models ; fisheries management ; individual-based models ; management strategy evaluation ; population dynamics ; stock assessment</subject><ispartof>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England), 2011-06, Vol.12 (2), p.189-208</ispartof><rights>2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4093-ae1ddce7a1a8cf5870f2c62b5e178adfef58b882ecd466caad902e194498e83d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4093-ae1ddce7a1a8cf5870f2c62b5e178adfef58b882ecd466caad902e194498e83d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1467-2979.2011.00413.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1467-2979.2011.00413.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hollowed, Anne B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydin, Kerim Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Essington, Timothy E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ianelli, James N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Megrey, Bernard A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Punt, André E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Anthony D M</creatorcontrib><title>Experience with quantitative ecosystem assessment tools in the northeast Pacific</title><title>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)</title><description>We consider the question of which quantitative modelling tools can be used to support an ecosystem approach to management (EAM), with a focus on evaluating the implication of decisions on the biological system being managed. Managers of federal fisheries in the eastern Bering Sea, USA, have adopted an EAM. The tools used to support EAM in the eastern Bering Sea serve as a guide to what types of models could be used elsewhere. A review of the role of natural science in the implementation of EAM shows that scientific advice enters into decision‐making at a variety of steps. Single‐species stock assessment and projection models are the most commonly used tools employed to inform managers. Comprehensive assessments (e.g. management strategy evaluation) are emerging as a new and potentially valuable analysis technique for use in assessing trade‐offs of different strategic alternatives. In the case of management in the eastern Bering Sea, end‐to‐end models and coupled biophysical models have been used primarily to advance scientific understanding, but have not been applied in a management context. This review highlights that implementation of an EAM in a management environment such as eastern Bering Sea requires substantial commitments to the collection and analysis of data and support for a group of analysts with interdisciplinary training in population dynamics, oceanography and ecology. This review supports the growing recognition that a diverse suite of modelling tools is needed to address tactical and strategic management issues germane to the adoption of the ecosystem approach to fisheries management.</description><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Ecosystem approach to management</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>end-to-end models</subject><subject>fisheries management</subject><subject>individual-based models</subject><subject>management strategy evaluation</subject><subject>population dynamics</subject><subject>stock assessment</subject><issn>1467-2960</issn><issn>1467-2979</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhiMEEuXjP1gsTAl2ktqOxFIq2iJV0AGExHIyzkW4pElru7T99zgUdWDCw93p_D6W9UQRYTRh4dzME5ZzEaeFKJKUMpZQmrMs2R5FvcPF8WHm9DQ6c25OKeWS5b1odr9dojXYaCQb4z_Iaq0ab7zy5gsJ6tbtnMcFUc6hcwtsPPFtWztiGuI_kDStDU05T2ZKm8roi-ikUrXDy99-Hr2M7p-Hk3j6NH4YDqaxzmmRxQpZWWoUiimpq74UtEo1T9_7yIRUZYVh9y5lirrMOddKlQVNkRV5XkiUWZmdR9f7d5e2Xa3ReVgYp7GuVYPt2oEUPE1lIXhIXv1Jztu1bcLnQHJOZRZqCMl9SNvWOYsVLK1ZKLsDRqETDXPoHELnEzrR8CMatgG93aMbU-Pu3xyMBqMwBDze4yaI3h5wZT-Bi0z04fVxDLmY3dHJ4xuI7BvHg5Rs</recordid><startdate>201106</startdate><enddate>201106</enddate><creator>Hollowed, Anne B</creator><creator>Aydin, Kerim Y</creator><creator>Essington, Timothy E</creator><creator>Ianelli, James N</creator><creator>Megrey, Bernard A</creator><creator>Punt, André E</creator><creator>Smith, Anthony D M</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201106</creationdate><title>Experience with quantitative ecosystem assessment tools in the northeast Pacific</title><author>Hollowed, Anne B ; Aydin, Kerim Y ; Essington, Timothy E ; Ianelli, James N ; Megrey, Bernard A ; Punt, André E ; Smith, Anthony D M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4093-ae1ddce7a1a8cf5870f2c62b5e178adfef58b882ecd466caad902e194498e83d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Ecosystem approach to management</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>end-to-end models</topic><topic>fisheries management</topic><topic>individual-based models</topic><topic>management strategy evaluation</topic><topic>population dynamics</topic><topic>stock assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hollowed, Anne B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydin, Kerim Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Essington, Timothy E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ianelli, James N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Megrey, Bernard A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Punt, André E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Anthony D M</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hollowed, Anne B</au><au>Aydin, Kerim Y</au><au>Essington, Timothy E</au><au>Ianelli, James N</au><au>Megrey, Bernard A</au><au>Punt, André E</au><au>Smith, Anthony D M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experience with quantitative ecosystem assessment tools in the northeast Pacific</atitle><jtitle>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)</jtitle><date>2011-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>208</epage><pages>189-208</pages><issn>1467-2960</issn><eissn>1467-2979</eissn><abstract>We consider the question of which quantitative modelling tools can be used to support an ecosystem approach to management (EAM), with a focus on evaluating the implication of decisions on the biological system being managed. Managers of federal fisheries in the eastern Bering Sea, USA, have adopted an EAM. The tools used to support EAM in the eastern Bering Sea serve as a guide to what types of models could be used elsewhere. A review of the role of natural science in the implementation of EAM shows that scientific advice enters into decision‐making at a variety of steps. Single‐species stock assessment and projection models are the most commonly used tools employed to inform managers. Comprehensive assessments (e.g. management strategy evaluation) are emerging as a new and potentially valuable analysis technique for use in assessing trade‐offs of different strategic alternatives. In the case of management in the eastern Bering Sea, end‐to‐end models and coupled biophysical models have been used primarily to advance scientific understanding, but have not been applied in a management context. This review highlights that implementation of an EAM in a management environment such as eastern Bering Sea requires substantial commitments to the collection and analysis of data and support for a group of analysts with interdisciplinary training in population dynamics, oceanography and ecology. This review supports the growing recognition that a diverse suite of modelling tools is needed to address tactical and strategic management issues germane to the adoption of the ecosystem approach to fisheries management.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00413.x</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1467-2960
ispartof Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England), 2011-06, Vol.12 (2), p.189-208
issn 1467-2960
1467-2979
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_876228976
source Wiley Journals
subjects Data analysis
Ecosystem approach to management
Ecosystems
end-to-end models
fisheries management
individual-based models
management strategy evaluation
population dynamics
stock assessment
title Experience with quantitative ecosystem assessment tools in the northeast Pacific
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T21%3A07%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experience%20with%20quantitative%20ecosystem%20assessment%20tools%20in%20the%20northeast%20Pacific&rft.jtitle=Fish%20and%20fisheries%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Hollowed,%20Anne%20B&rft.date=2011-06&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=208&rft.pages=189-208&rft.issn=1467-2960&rft.eissn=1467-2979&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00413.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2344668361%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=866083866&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true