Carbon exchange between ecosystems and atmosphere in the Czech Republic is affected by climate factors
By comparing five ecosystem types in the Czech Republic over several years, we recorded the highest carbon sequestration potential in an evergreen Norway spruce forest (100%) and an agroecosystem (65%), followed by European beech forest (25%) and a wetland ecosystem (20%). Because of a massive ecosy...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental pollution (1987) 2011-05, Vol.159 (5), p.1035-1039 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1039 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1035 |
| container_title | Environmental pollution (1987) |
| container_volume | 159 |
| creator | Marek, Michal V. Janouš, Dalibor Taufarová, Klára Havránková, Kateřina Pavelka, Marian Kaplan, Věroslav Marková, Irena |
| description | By comparing five ecosystem types in the Czech Republic over several years, we recorded the highest carbon sequestration potential in an evergreen Norway spruce forest (100%) and an agroecosystem (65%), followed by European beech forest (25%) and a wetland ecosystem (20%). Because of a massive ecosystem respiration, the final carbon gain of the grassland was negative. Climate was shown to be an important factor of carbon uptake by ecosystems: by varying the growing season length (a 22-d longer season in 2005 than in 2007 increased carbon sink by 13%) or by the effect of short- term synoptic situations (e.g. summer hot and dry days reduced net carbon storage by 58% relative to hot and wet days). Carbon uptake is strongly affected by the ontogeny and a production strategy which is demonstrated by the comparison of seasonal course of carbon uptake between coniferous (Norway spruce) and deciduous (European beech) stands.
► Highest carbon sequestration potential in evergreen Norway spruce forest (100%) and an agroecosystem (65%), followed by European beech forest (25%) and a wetland ecosystem (20%). ► The final carbon gain of the grassland was negative (massive ecosystem respiration). ► Climate is important factor of net primary productivity. ► Carbon uptake is strongly affected by the ontogeny and a production strategy of ecosystem.
Identification of the apparent differences in the carbon storage by different ecosystem types. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.11.025 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_876226451</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0269749110005361</els_id><sourcerecordid>861207812</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-f29addc2f53bd42290dd4aeb237729276944e5ec659a363af1313a8395bd8ae33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U2L1DAYwPEgijuufgPRXGS9dMxr014WZFhfYEFQ9xzS5MlOhrapSWd1_PRm7Ki39RQIv-QJ-SP0nJI1JbR-s1vDeDfFfs3IcYuuCZMP0Io2ile1YOIhWhFWt5USLT1DT3LeEUIE5_wxOmOUCylls0J-Y1IXRww_7NaMt4A7mL8DlA0b8yHPMGRsRofNPMQ8bSEBDiOet4A3P8Fu8WeY9l0fLA7FeQ92Boe7A7Z9GMwM2Bs7x5Sfokfe9BmendZzdPPu6uvmQ3X96f3HzdvryoqGzJVnrXHOMi955wRjLXFOGOgYV4q1TNWtECDB1rI1vObGU065aXgrO9cY4PwcXSz3Til-20Oe9RCyhb43I8R91o2qGauFpP-XNWVENZQV-fpeSZVSlAhJmkLFQm2KOSfwekrlH9JBU6KP1fROL9X0sZqmVJdq5diL04R9N4D7e-hPpgJenYDJ1vQ-mdGG_M8J0hD1e_7LxXkTtblNxdx8KZNkSU-a8oVFXC4CSoW7AElnG2C04EIq8bSL4f63_gIOpMA1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777104508</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Carbon exchange between ecosystems and atmosphere in the Czech Republic is affected by climate factors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Marek, Michal V. ; Janouš, Dalibor ; Taufarová, Klára ; Havránková, Kateřina ; Pavelka, Marian ; Kaplan, Věroslav ; Marková, Irena</creator><creatorcontrib>Marek, Michal V. ; Janouš, Dalibor ; Taufarová, Klára ; Havránková, Kateřina ; Pavelka, Marian ; Kaplan, Věroslav ; Marková, Irena</creatorcontrib><description>By comparing five ecosystem types in the Czech Republic over several years, we recorded the highest carbon sequestration potential in an evergreen Norway spruce forest (100%) and an agroecosystem (65%), followed by European beech forest (25%) and a wetland ecosystem (20%). Because of a massive ecosystem respiration, the final carbon gain of the grassland was negative. Climate was shown to be an important factor of carbon uptake by ecosystems: by varying the growing season length (a 22-d longer season in 2005 than in 2007 increased carbon sink by 13%) or by the effect of short- term synoptic situations (e.g. summer hot and dry days reduced net carbon storage by 58% relative to hot and wet days). Carbon uptake is strongly affected by the ontogeny and a production strategy which is demonstrated by the comparison of seasonal course of carbon uptake between coniferous (Norway spruce) and deciduous (European beech) stands.
► Highest carbon sequestration potential in evergreen Norway spruce forest (100%) and an agroecosystem (65%), followed by European beech forest (25%) and a wetland ecosystem (20%). ► The final carbon gain of the grassland was negative (massive ecosystem respiration). ► Climate is important factor of net primary productivity. ► Carbon uptake is strongly affected by the ontogeny and a production strategy of ecosystem.
Identification of the apparent differences in the carbon storage by different ecosystem types.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-7491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6424</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.11.025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21345558</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENVPAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Agroecosystem ; agroecosystems ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Beech ; Beech forest ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carbon ; Carbon fluxes ; Carbon Sequestration ; carbon sinks ; Climate ; Climate factors ; climatic factors ; Czech Republic ; Ecosystem ; ecosystem respiration ; Ecosystems ; Fagus - metabolism ; Fagus sylvatica subsp. sylvatica ; Forestry ; Forests ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agroecology ; General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping ; General agronomy. Plant production ; General aspects ; General forest ecology ; Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development ; Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology ; Grassland ; Grasslands ; growing season ; Net ecosystem exchange ; ontogeny ; Picea - metabolism ; Picea abies ; Poaceae - metabolism ; Seasons ; Spruce forest ; Synecology ; Trees - metabolism ; Uptakes ; Wetland</subject><ispartof>Environmental pollution (1987), 2011-05, Vol.159 (5), p.1035-1039</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-f29addc2f53bd42290dd4aeb237729276944e5ec659a363af1313a8395bd8ae33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-f29addc2f53bd42290dd4aeb237729276944e5ec659a363af1313a8395bd8ae33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749110005361$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24080708$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21345558$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marek, Michal V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janouš, Dalibor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taufarová, Klára</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Havránková, Kateřina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavelka, Marian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Věroslav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marková, Irena</creatorcontrib><title>Carbon exchange between ecosystems and atmosphere in the Czech Republic is affected by climate factors</title><title>Environmental pollution (1987)</title><addtitle>Environ Pollut</addtitle><description>By comparing five ecosystem types in the Czech Republic over several years, we recorded the highest carbon sequestration potential in an evergreen Norway spruce forest (100%) and an agroecosystem (65%), followed by European beech forest (25%) and a wetland ecosystem (20%). Because of a massive ecosystem respiration, the final carbon gain of the grassland was negative. Climate was shown to be an important factor of carbon uptake by ecosystems: by varying the growing season length (a 22-d longer season in 2005 than in 2007 increased carbon sink by 13%) or by the effect of short- term synoptic situations (e.g. summer hot and dry days reduced net carbon storage by 58% relative to hot and wet days). Carbon uptake is strongly affected by the ontogeny and a production strategy which is demonstrated by the comparison of seasonal course of carbon uptake between coniferous (Norway spruce) and deciduous (European beech) stands.
► Highest carbon sequestration potential in evergreen Norway spruce forest (100%) and an agroecosystem (65%), followed by European beech forest (25%) and a wetland ecosystem (20%). ► The final carbon gain of the grassland was negative (massive ecosystem respiration). ► Climate is important factor of net primary productivity. ► Carbon uptake is strongly affected by the ontogeny and a production strategy of ecosystem.
Identification of the apparent differences in the carbon storage by different ecosystem types.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agroecosystem</subject><subject>agroecosystems</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Beech</subject><subject>Beech forest</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon fluxes</subject><subject>Carbon Sequestration</subject><subject>carbon sinks</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate factors</subject><subject>climatic factors</subject><subject>Czech Republic</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>ecosystem respiration</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Fagus - metabolism</subject><subject>Fagus sylvatica subsp. sylvatica</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agroecology</subject><subject>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>General forest ecology</subject><subject>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</subject><subject>Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology</subject><subject>Grassland</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>growing season</subject><subject>Net ecosystem exchange</subject><subject>ontogeny</subject><subject>Picea - metabolism</subject><subject>Picea abies</subject><subject>Poaceae - metabolism</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Spruce forest</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Trees - metabolism</subject><subject>Uptakes</subject><subject>Wetland</subject><issn>0269-7491</issn><issn>1873-6424</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U2L1DAYwPEgijuufgPRXGS9dMxr014WZFhfYEFQ9xzS5MlOhrapSWd1_PRm7Ki39RQIv-QJ-SP0nJI1JbR-s1vDeDfFfs3IcYuuCZMP0Io2ile1YOIhWhFWt5USLT1DT3LeEUIE5_wxOmOUCylls0J-Y1IXRww_7NaMt4A7mL8DlA0b8yHPMGRsRofNPMQ8bSEBDiOet4A3P8Fu8WeY9l0fLA7FeQ92Boe7A7Z9GMwM2Bs7x5Sfokfe9BmendZzdPPu6uvmQ3X96f3HzdvryoqGzJVnrXHOMi955wRjLXFOGOgYV4q1TNWtECDB1rI1vObGU065aXgrO9cY4PwcXSz3Til-20Oe9RCyhb43I8R91o2qGauFpP-XNWVENZQV-fpeSZVSlAhJmkLFQm2KOSfwekrlH9JBU6KP1fROL9X0sZqmVJdq5diL04R9N4D7e-hPpgJenYDJ1vQ-mdGG_M8J0hD1e_7LxXkTtblNxdx8KZNkSU-a8oVFXC4CSoW7AElnG2C04EIq8bSL4f63_gIOpMA1</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Marek, Michal V.</creator><creator>Janouš, Dalibor</creator><creator>Taufarová, Klára</creator><creator>Havránková, Kateřina</creator><creator>Pavelka, Marian</creator><creator>Kaplan, Věroslav</creator><creator>Marková, Irena</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Carbon exchange between ecosystems and atmosphere in the Czech Republic is affected by climate factors</title><author>Marek, Michal V. ; Janouš, Dalibor ; Taufarová, Klára ; Havránková, Kateřina ; Pavelka, Marian ; Kaplan, Věroslav ; Marková, Irena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-f29addc2f53bd42290dd4aeb237729276944e5ec659a363af1313a8395bd8ae33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agroecosystem</topic><topic>agroecosystems</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Beech</topic><topic>Beech forest</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon fluxes</topic><topic>Carbon Sequestration</topic><topic>carbon sinks</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate factors</topic><topic>climatic factors</topic><topic>Czech Republic</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>ecosystem respiration</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Fagus - metabolism</topic><topic>Fagus sylvatica subsp. sylvatica</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agroecology</topic><topic>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>General forest ecology</topic><topic>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</topic><topic>Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology</topic><topic>Grassland</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>growing season</topic><topic>Net ecosystem exchange</topic><topic>ontogeny</topic><topic>Picea - metabolism</topic><topic>Picea abies</topic><topic>Poaceae - metabolism</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Spruce forest</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Trees - metabolism</topic><topic>Uptakes</topic><topic>Wetland</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marek, Michal V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janouš, Dalibor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taufarová, Klára</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Havránková, Kateřina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavelka, Marian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Věroslav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marková, Irena</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marek, Michal V.</au><au>Janouš, Dalibor</au><au>Taufarová, Klára</au><au>Havránková, Kateřina</au><au>Pavelka, Marian</au><au>Kaplan, Věroslav</au><au>Marková, Irena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Carbon exchange between ecosystems and atmosphere in the Czech Republic is affected by climate factors</atitle><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Pollut</addtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1035</spage><epage>1039</epage><pages>1035-1039</pages><issn>0269-7491</issn><eissn>1873-6424</eissn><coden>ENVPAF</coden><abstract>By comparing five ecosystem types in the Czech Republic over several years, we recorded the highest carbon sequestration potential in an evergreen Norway spruce forest (100%) and an agroecosystem (65%), followed by European beech forest (25%) and a wetland ecosystem (20%). Because of a massive ecosystem respiration, the final carbon gain of the grassland was negative. Climate was shown to be an important factor of carbon uptake by ecosystems: by varying the growing season length (a 22-d longer season in 2005 than in 2007 increased carbon sink by 13%) or by the effect of short- term synoptic situations (e.g. summer hot and dry days reduced net carbon storage by 58% relative to hot and wet days). Carbon uptake is strongly affected by the ontogeny and a production strategy which is demonstrated by the comparison of seasonal course of carbon uptake between coniferous (Norway spruce) and deciduous (European beech) stands.
► Highest carbon sequestration potential in evergreen Norway spruce forest (100%) and an agroecosystem (65%), followed by European beech forest (25%) and a wetland ecosystem (20%). ► The final carbon gain of the grassland was negative (massive ecosystem respiration). ► Climate is important factor of net primary productivity. ► Carbon uptake is strongly affected by the ontogeny and a production strategy of ecosystem.
Identification of the apparent differences in the carbon storage by different ecosystem types.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21345558</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.envpol.2010.11.025</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0269-7491 |
| ispartof | Environmental pollution (1987), 2011-05, Vol.159 (5), p.1035-1039 |
| issn | 0269-7491 1873-6424 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_876226451 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Agriculture Agroecosystem agroecosystems Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Beech Beech forest Biological and medical sciences Carbon Carbon fluxes Carbon Sequestration carbon sinks Climate Climate factors climatic factors Czech Republic Ecosystem ecosystem respiration Ecosystems Fagus - metabolism Fagus sylvatica subsp. sylvatica Forestry Forests Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agroecology General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping General agronomy. Plant production General aspects General forest ecology Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology Grassland Grasslands growing season Net ecosystem exchange ontogeny Picea - metabolism Picea abies Poaceae - metabolism Seasons Spruce forest Synecology Trees - metabolism Uptakes Wetland |
| title | Carbon exchange between ecosystems and atmosphere in the Czech Republic is affected by climate factors |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T01%3A04%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Carbon%20exchange%20between%20ecosystems%20and%20atmosphere%20in%20the%20Czech%20Republic%20is%20affected%20by%20climate%20factors&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20pollution%20(1987)&rft.au=Marek,%20Michal%20V.&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1035&rft.epage=1039&rft.pages=1035-1039&rft.issn=0269-7491&rft.eissn=1873-6424&rft.coden=ENVPAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.11.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E861207812%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777104508&rft_id=info:pmid/21345558&rft_els_id=S0269749110005361&rfr_iscdi=true |