To be or not to be (ethnic): Public vs. private expressions of ethnic identification differentially impact national inclusion of White and non-White groups
Many pluralistic nations are witnessing vigorous debate about multiculturalism. In the U.S., Americans generally embrace principles of ethnic diversity but dislike minorities who express strong ethnic identification. Two experiments examined this seeming contradiction by differentiating between ethn...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental social psychology 2011-09, Vol.47 (5), p.908-914 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 914 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 908 |
container_title | Journal of experimental social psychology |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Yogeeswaran, Kumar Dasgupta, Nilanjana Adelman, Levi Eccleston, Alison Parker, Michael T. |
description | Many pluralistic nations are witnessing vigorous debate about multiculturalism. In the U.S., Americans generally embrace principles of ethnic diversity but dislike minorities who express strong ethnic identification. Two experiments examined this seeming contradiction by differentiating between ethnic identity expressed in private vs. public by non-White and White individuals. Then we tested whether individuals' identity expressions differentially affected perceivers' construal of their entire ethnic group as legitimately American. Results indicated that at a conscious level, White and non-White ethnic groups were held to the same standard and construed as significantly less American when members expressed their ethnic identity publicly vs. privately. However, at an unconscious level, a double standard emerged: non-White ethnic groups were implicitly rejected as less American if members expressed ethnic identity publicly, while White ethnics were implicitly accepted as legitimate Americans regardless of where they expressed ethnic identity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_876189980</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022103111000734</els_id><sourcerecordid>876189980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-943181bb2b8be9183b674cf8e38ab031f5ab47d1c1be3ddb9b98c5705c8634133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-L1jAQxoso-Lr6BTwFQXQPrZmmfxLxIourwoIeVjyGJJ26KX2TmqQv7mfxy5puFw8ePA0z85snmXmK4jnQCih0b6ZqwrhUNQWoKKso0AfFAajoStp07cPiQGldl0AZPC6exDhRSgWt4VD8vvZEI_GBOJ9IukteY7px1py_JV9XPVtDTrEiS7AnlZDgryVgjNa7SPxIdpTYAV2yozUq5Q4Z7Dhi2Epqnm-JPS7KJOLummom1pl53SQ2he83NssqN-QfuHLPfgS_LvFp8WhUc8Rn9_Gs-Hb54friU3n15ePni_dXpWFcpFI0DDhoXWuuUQBnuusbM3JkXOm88dgq3fQDGNDIhkELLbhpe9oa3rEGGDsrXu26S_A_V4xJHm00OM_KoV-j5H0HXAhOM_niH3Lya8grbVALAH29ydU7ZIKPMeAo8-2OKtxKoHJzS05yc0tubknKZHYrD728V1bRqHkMyhkb_07WTS04sC5z73YO80FOFoOMxqIzONiAJsnB2_898wc6Pax8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>875111723</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>To be or not to be (ethnic): Public vs. private expressions of ethnic identification differentially impact national inclusion of White and non-White groups</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Yogeeswaran, Kumar ; Dasgupta, Nilanjana ; Adelman, Levi ; Eccleston, Alison ; Parker, Michael T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yogeeswaran, Kumar ; Dasgupta, Nilanjana ; Adelman, Levi ; Eccleston, Alison ; Parker, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><description>Many pluralistic nations are witnessing vigorous debate about multiculturalism. In the U.S., Americans generally embrace principles of ethnic diversity but dislike minorities who express strong ethnic identification. Two experiments examined this seeming contradiction by differentiating between ethnic identity expressed in private vs. public by non-White and White individuals. Then we tested whether individuals' identity expressions differentially affected perceivers' construal of their entire ethnic group as legitimately American. Results indicated that at a conscious level, White and non-White ethnic groups were held to the same standard and construed as significantly less American when members expressed their ethnic identity publicly vs. privately. However, at an unconscious level, a double standard emerged: non-White ethnic groups were implicitly rejected as less American if members expressed ethnic identity publicly, while White ethnics were implicitly accepted as legitimate Americans regardless of where they expressed ethnic identity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1031</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.010</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JESPAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>American identity ; Americans ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cultural diversity ; Cultural identity ; Ethnic identity ; Ethnicity ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Groups ; Identification ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Multiculturalism ; Multiculturalism & pluralism ; National culture ; National inclusion ; Private sphere ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Public sphere ; Social integration ; Social interactions. Communication. Group processes ; Social psychology ; U.S.A</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental social psychology, 2011-09, Vol.47 (5), p.908-914</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Sep 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-943181bb2b8be9183b674cf8e38ab031f5ab47d1c1be3ddb9b98c5705c8634133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-943181bb2b8be9183b674cf8e38ab031f5ab47d1c1be3ddb9b98c5705c8634133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103111000734$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24298136$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yogeeswaran, Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Nilanjana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adelman, Levi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eccleston, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><title>To be or not to be (ethnic): Public vs. private expressions of ethnic identification differentially impact national inclusion of White and non-White groups</title><title>Journal of experimental social psychology</title><description>Many pluralistic nations are witnessing vigorous debate about multiculturalism. In the U.S., Americans generally embrace principles of ethnic diversity but dislike minorities who express strong ethnic identification. Two experiments examined this seeming contradiction by differentiating between ethnic identity expressed in private vs. public by non-White and White individuals. Then we tested whether individuals' identity expressions differentially affected perceivers' construal of their entire ethnic group as legitimately American. Results indicated that at a conscious level, White and non-White ethnic groups were held to the same standard and construed as significantly less American when members expressed their ethnic identity publicly vs. privately. However, at an unconscious level, a double standard emerged: non-White ethnic groups were implicitly rejected as less American if members expressed ethnic identity publicly, while White ethnics were implicitly accepted as legitimate Americans regardless of where they expressed ethnic identity.</description><subject>American identity</subject><subject>Americans</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cultural diversity</subject><subject>Cultural identity</subject><subject>Ethnic identity</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Groups</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Minority & ethnic groups</subject><subject>Multiculturalism</subject><subject>Multiculturalism & pluralism</subject><subject>National culture</subject><subject>National inclusion</subject><subject>Private sphere</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Public sphere</subject><subject>Social integration</subject><subject>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><issn>0022-1031</issn><issn>1096-0465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU-L1jAQxoso-Lr6BTwFQXQPrZmmfxLxIourwoIeVjyGJJ26KX2TmqQv7mfxy5puFw8ePA0z85snmXmK4jnQCih0b6ZqwrhUNQWoKKso0AfFAajoStp07cPiQGldl0AZPC6exDhRSgWt4VD8vvZEI_GBOJ9IukteY7px1py_JV9XPVtDTrEiS7AnlZDgryVgjNa7SPxIdpTYAV2yozUq5Q4Z7Dhi2Epqnm-JPS7KJOLummom1pl53SQ2he83NssqN-QfuHLPfgS_LvFp8WhUc8Rn9_Gs-Hb54friU3n15ePni_dXpWFcpFI0DDhoXWuuUQBnuusbM3JkXOm88dgq3fQDGNDIhkELLbhpe9oa3rEGGDsrXu26S_A_V4xJHm00OM_KoV-j5H0HXAhOM_niH3Lya8grbVALAH29ydU7ZIKPMeAo8-2OKtxKoHJzS05yc0tubknKZHYrD728V1bRqHkMyhkb_07WTS04sC5z73YO80FOFoOMxqIzONiAJsnB2_898wc6Pax8</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>Yogeeswaran, Kumar</creator><creator>Dasgupta, Nilanjana</creator><creator>Adelman, Levi</creator><creator>Eccleston, Alison</creator><creator>Parker, Michael T.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>To be or not to be (ethnic): Public vs. private expressions of ethnic identification differentially impact national inclusion of White and non-White groups</title><author>Yogeeswaran, Kumar ; Dasgupta, Nilanjana ; Adelman, Levi ; Eccleston, Alison ; Parker, Michael T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-943181bb2b8be9183b674cf8e38ab031f5ab47d1c1be3ddb9b98c5705c8634133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>American identity</topic><topic>Americans</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cultural diversity</topic><topic>Cultural identity</topic><topic>Ethnic identity</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Groups</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Minority & ethnic groups</topic><topic>Multiculturalism</topic><topic>Multiculturalism & pluralism</topic><topic>National culture</topic><topic>National inclusion</topic><topic>Private sphere</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Public sphere</topic><topic>Social integration</topic><topic>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yogeeswaran, Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Nilanjana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adelman, Levi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eccleston, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yogeeswaran, Kumar</au><au>Dasgupta, Nilanjana</au><au>Adelman, Levi</au><au>Eccleston, Alison</au><au>Parker, Michael T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>To be or not to be (ethnic): Public vs. private expressions of ethnic identification differentially impact national inclusion of White and non-White groups</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental social psychology</jtitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>908</spage><epage>914</epage><pages>908-914</pages><issn>0022-1031</issn><eissn>1096-0465</eissn><coden>JESPAQ</coden><abstract>Many pluralistic nations are witnessing vigorous debate about multiculturalism. In the U.S., Americans generally embrace principles of ethnic diversity but dislike minorities who express strong ethnic identification. Two experiments examined this seeming contradiction by differentiating between ethnic identity expressed in private vs. public by non-White and White individuals. Then we tested whether individuals' identity expressions differentially affected perceivers' construal of their entire ethnic group as legitimately American. Results indicated that at a conscious level, White and non-White ethnic groups were held to the same standard and construed as significantly less American when members expressed their ethnic identity publicly vs. privately. However, at an unconscious level, a double standard emerged: non-White ethnic groups were implicitly rejected as less American if members expressed ethnic identity publicly, while White ethnics were implicitly accepted as legitimate Americans regardless of where they expressed ethnic identity.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.010</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1031 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental social psychology, 2011-09, Vol.47 (5), p.908-914 |
issn | 0022-1031 1096-0465 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_876189980 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | American identity Americans Biological and medical sciences Cultural diversity Cultural identity Ethnic identity Ethnicity Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Groups Identification Minority & ethnic groups Multiculturalism Multiculturalism & pluralism National culture National inclusion Private sphere Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Public sphere Social integration Social interactions. Communication. Group processes Social psychology U.S.A |
title | To be or not to be (ethnic): Public vs. private expressions of ethnic identification differentially impact national inclusion of White and non-White groups |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T03%3A37%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=To%20be%20or%20not%20to%20be%20(ethnic):%20Public%20vs.%20private%20expressions%20of%20ethnic%20identification%20differentially%20impact%20national%20inclusion%20of%20White%20and%20non-White%20groups&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Yogeeswaran,%20Kumar&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=908&rft.epage=914&rft.pages=908-914&rft.issn=0022-1031&rft.eissn=1096-0465&rft.coden=JESPAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E876189980%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=875111723&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022103111000734&rfr_iscdi=true |