To be or not to be (ethnic): Public vs. private expressions of ethnic identification differentially impact national inclusion of White and non-White groups

Many pluralistic nations are witnessing vigorous debate about multiculturalism. In the U.S., Americans generally embrace principles of ethnic diversity but dislike minorities who express strong ethnic identification. Two experiments examined this seeming contradiction by differentiating between ethn...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental social psychology 2011-09, Vol.47 (5), p.908-914
Hauptverfasser: Yogeeswaran, Kumar, Dasgupta, Nilanjana, Adelman, Levi, Eccleston, Alison, Parker, Michael T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 914
container_issue 5
container_start_page 908
container_title Journal of experimental social psychology
container_volume 47
creator Yogeeswaran, Kumar
Dasgupta, Nilanjana
Adelman, Levi
Eccleston, Alison
Parker, Michael T.
description Many pluralistic nations are witnessing vigorous debate about multiculturalism. In the U.S., Americans generally embrace principles of ethnic diversity but dislike minorities who express strong ethnic identification. Two experiments examined this seeming contradiction by differentiating between ethnic identity expressed in private vs. public by non-White and White individuals. Then we tested whether individuals' identity expressions differentially affected perceivers' construal of their entire ethnic group as legitimately American. Results indicated that at a conscious level, White and non-White ethnic groups were held to the same standard and construed as significantly less American when members expressed their ethnic identity publicly vs. privately. However, at an unconscious level, a double standard emerged: non-White ethnic groups were implicitly rejected as less American if members expressed ethnic identity publicly, while White ethnics were implicitly accepted as legitimate Americans regardless of where they expressed ethnic identity.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_876189980</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022103111000734</els_id><sourcerecordid>876189980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-943181bb2b8be9183b674cf8e38ab031f5ab47d1c1be3ddb9b98c5705c8634133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-L1jAQxoso-Lr6BTwFQXQPrZmmfxLxIourwoIeVjyGJJ26KX2TmqQv7mfxy5puFw8ePA0z85snmXmK4jnQCih0b6ZqwrhUNQWoKKso0AfFAajoStp07cPiQGldl0AZPC6exDhRSgWt4VD8vvZEI_GBOJ9IukteY7px1py_JV9XPVtDTrEiS7AnlZDgryVgjNa7SPxIdpTYAV2yozUq5Q4Z7Dhi2Epqnm-JPS7KJOLummom1pl53SQ2he83NssqN-QfuHLPfgS_LvFp8WhUc8Rn9_Gs-Hb54friU3n15ePni_dXpWFcpFI0DDhoXWuuUQBnuusbM3JkXOm88dgq3fQDGNDIhkELLbhpe9oa3rEGGDsrXu26S_A_V4xJHm00OM_KoV-j5H0HXAhOM_niH3Lya8grbVALAH29ydU7ZIKPMeAo8-2OKtxKoHJzS05yc0tubknKZHYrD728V1bRqHkMyhkb_07WTS04sC5z73YO80FOFoOMxqIzONiAJsnB2_898wc6Pax8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>875111723</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>To be or not to be (ethnic): Public vs. private expressions of ethnic identification differentially impact national inclusion of White and non-White groups</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Yogeeswaran, Kumar ; Dasgupta, Nilanjana ; Adelman, Levi ; Eccleston, Alison ; Parker, Michael T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yogeeswaran, Kumar ; Dasgupta, Nilanjana ; Adelman, Levi ; Eccleston, Alison ; Parker, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><description>Many pluralistic nations are witnessing vigorous debate about multiculturalism. In the U.S., Americans generally embrace principles of ethnic diversity but dislike minorities who express strong ethnic identification. Two experiments examined this seeming contradiction by differentiating between ethnic identity expressed in private vs. public by non-White and White individuals. Then we tested whether individuals' identity expressions differentially affected perceivers' construal of their entire ethnic group as legitimately American. Results indicated that at a conscious level, White and non-White ethnic groups were held to the same standard and construed as significantly less American when members expressed their ethnic identity publicly vs. privately. However, at an unconscious level, a double standard emerged: non-White ethnic groups were implicitly rejected as less American if members expressed ethnic identity publicly, while White ethnics were implicitly accepted as legitimate Americans regardless of where they expressed ethnic identity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1031</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.010</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JESPAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>American identity ; Americans ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cultural diversity ; Cultural identity ; Ethnic identity ; Ethnicity ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Groups ; Identification ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Multiculturalism ; Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism ; National culture ; National inclusion ; Private sphere ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Public sphere ; Social integration ; Social interactions. Communication. Group processes ; Social psychology ; U.S.A</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental social psychology, 2011-09, Vol.47 (5), p.908-914</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Sep 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-943181bb2b8be9183b674cf8e38ab031f5ab47d1c1be3ddb9b98c5705c8634133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-943181bb2b8be9183b674cf8e38ab031f5ab47d1c1be3ddb9b98c5705c8634133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103111000734$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24298136$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yogeeswaran, Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Nilanjana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adelman, Levi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eccleston, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><title>To be or not to be (ethnic): Public vs. private expressions of ethnic identification differentially impact national inclusion of White and non-White groups</title><title>Journal of experimental social psychology</title><description>Many pluralistic nations are witnessing vigorous debate about multiculturalism. In the U.S., Americans generally embrace principles of ethnic diversity but dislike minorities who express strong ethnic identification. Two experiments examined this seeming contradiction by differentiating between ethnic identity expressed in private vs. public by non-White and White individuals. Then we tested whether individuals' identity expressions differentially affected perceivers' construal of their entire ethnic group as legitimately American. Results indicated that at a conscious level, White and non-White ethnic groups were held to the same standard and construed as significantly less American when members expressed their ethnic identity publicly vs. privately. However, at an unconscious level, a double standard emerged: non-White ethnic groups were implicitly rejected as less American if members expressed ethnic identity publicly, while White ethnics were implicitly accepted as legitimate Americans regardless of where they expressed ethnic identity.</description><subject>American identity</subject><subject>Americans</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cultural diversity</subject><subject>Cultural identity</subject><subject>Ethnic identity</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Groups</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Multiculturalism</subject><subject>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</subject><subject>National culture</subject><subject>National inclusion</subject><subject>Private sphere</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Public sphere</subject><subject>Social integration</subject><subject>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><issn>0022-1031</issn><issn>1096-0465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU-L1jAQxoso-Lr6BTwFQXQPrZmmfxLxIourwoIeVjyGJJ26KX2TmqQv7mfxy5puFw8ePA0z85snmXmK4jnQCih0b6ZqwrhUNQWoKKso0AfFAajoStp07cPiQGldl0AZPC6exDhRSgWt4VD8vvZEI_GBOJ9IukteY7px1py_JV9XPVtDTrEiS7AnlZDgryVgjNa7SPxIdpTYAV2yozUq5Q4Z7Dhi2Epqnm-JPS7KJOLummom1pl53SQ2he83NssqN-QfuHLPfgS_LvFp8WhUc8Rn9_Gs-Hb54friU3n15ePni_dXpWFcpFI0DDhoXWuuUQBnuusbM3JkXOm88dgq3fQDGNDIhkELLbhpe9oa3rEGGDsrXu26S_A_V4xJHm00OM_KoV-j5H0HXAhOM_niH3Lya8grbVALAH29ydU7ZIKPMeAo8-2OKtxKoHJzS05yc0tubknKZHYrD728V1bRqHkMyhkb_07WTS04sC5z73YO80FOFoOMxqIzONiAJsnB2_898wc6Pax8</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>Yogeeswaran, Kumar</creator><creator>Dasgupta, Nilanjana</creator><creator>Adelman, Levi</creator><creator>Eccleston, Alison</creator><creator>Parker, Michael T.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>To be or not to be (ethnic): Public vs. private expressions of ethnic identification differentially impact national inclusion of White and non-White groups</title><author>Yogeeswaran, Kumar ; Dasgupta, Nilanjana ; Adelman, Levi ; Eccleston, Alison ; Parker, Michael T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-943181bb2b8be9183b674cf8e38ab031f5ab47d1c1be3ddb9b98c5705c8634133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>American identity</topic><topic>Americans</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cultural diversity</topic><topic>Cultural identity</topic><topic>Ethnic identity</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Groups</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Multiculturalism</topic><topic>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</topic><topic>National culture</topic><topic>National inclusion</topic><topic>Private sphere</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Public sphere</topic><topic>Social integration</topic><topic>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yogeeswaran, Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Nilanjana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adelman, Levi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eccleston, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yogeeswaran, Kumar</au><au>Dasgupta, Nilanjana</au><au>Adelman, Levi</au><au>Eccleston, Alison</au><au>Parker, Michael T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>To be or not to be (ethnic): Public vs. private expressions of ethnic identification differentially impact national inclusion of White and non-White groups</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental social psychology</jtitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>908</spage><epage>914</epage><pages>908-914</pages><issn>0022-1031</issn><eissn>1096-0465</eissn><coden>JESPAQ</coden><abstract>Many pluralistic nations are witnessing vigorous debate about multiculturalism. In the U.S., Americans generally embrace principles of ethnic diversity but dislike minorities who express strong ethnic identification. Two experiments examined this seeming contradiction by differentiating between ethnic identity expressed in private vs. public by non-White and White individuals. Then we tested whether individuals' identity expressions differentially affected perceivers' construal of their entire ethnic group as legitimately American. Results indicated that at a conscious level, White and non-White ethnic groups were held to the same standard and construed as significantly less American when members expressed their ethnic identity publicly vs. privately. However, at an unconscious level, a double standard emerged: non-White ethnic groups were implicitly rejected as less American if members expressed ethnic identity publicly, while White ethnics were implicitly accepted as legitimate Americans regardless of where they expressed ethnic identity.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.010</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1031
ispartof Journal of experimental social psychology, 2011-09, Vol.47 (5), p.908-914
issn 0022-1031
1096-0465
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_876189980
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects American identity
Americans
Biological and medical sciences
Cultural diversity
Cultural identity
Ethnic identity
Ethnicity
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Groups
Identification
Minority & ethnic groups
Multiculturalism
Multiculturalism & pluralism
National culture
National inclusion
Private sphere
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Public sphere
Social integration
Social interactions. Communication. Group processes
Social psychology
U.S.A
title To be or not to be (ethnic): Public vs. private expressions of ethnic identification differentially impact national inclusion of White and non-White groups
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T03%3A37%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=To%20be%20or%20not%20to%20be%20(ethnic):%20Public%20vs.%20private%20expressions%20of%20ethnic%20identification%20differentially%20impact%20national%20inclusion%20of%20White%20and%20non-White%20groups&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Yogeeswaran,%20Kumar&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=908&rft.epage=914&rft.pages=908-914&rft.issn=0022-1031&rft.eissn=1096-0465&rft.coden=JESPAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E876189980%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=875111723&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022103111000734&rfr_iscdi=true