Early prostate cancer – which treatment do men prefer and why?

Study Type – Preference (prospective cohort)
Level of Evidence 1b What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? In general the literature suggests that there is a need for improvement in aiding men diagnosed with early prostate cancer in their decision making about treatment options and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJU international 2011-06, Vol.107 (11), p.1762-1768
Hauptverfasser: Anandadas, Carmel N., Clarke, Noel W., Davidson, Susan E., O’Reilly, Patrick H., Logue, John P., Gilmore, Lynne, Swindell, Ric, Brough, Richard J., Wemyss‐Holden, Guy D., Lau, Maurice W., Javle, Pradip M., Ramani, Vijay A.C., Wylie, James P., Collins, Gerald N., Brown, Stephen, Cowan, Richard A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Study Type – Preference (prospective cohort)
Level of Evidence 1b What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? In general the literature suggests that there is a need for improvement in aiding men diagnosed with early prostate cancer in their decision making about treatment options and that our understanding of this process is inadequate. There is limited data analyzing the reasons why these men decide between potentially curative or observational treatments and data evaluating patients’ views before and after definitive therapy are scarce. This study begins the process of understanding the reasons underlying a patient’s final treatment decision. Being a prospective study, it looks at the thought processes of these men before treatment during the time the decision is made. It also documents how satisfied patients are with their choice after their treatment and whether they would choose the same treatment again. OBJECTIVE • To identify the reasons for patients with localised prostate cancer choosing between treatments and the relationship of procedure type to patient satisfaction post‐treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS • 768 men with prostate cancer (stage T1/2, Gleason ≤7, PSA
ISSN:1464-4096
1464-410X
DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09833.x