Social equity and the assemblage of values in Australian higher education
The paper argues that the policy concept of social equity cannot be adequately understood in a generalised abstract manner, but is better viewed as an assemblage that brings together a number of contrasting, and sometimes competing, values. Our use of assemblage is somewhat eclectic and is designed...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Cambridge journal of education 2011-03, Vol.41 (1), p.5-22 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 22 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 5 |
| container_title | Cambridge journal of education |
| container_volume | 41 |
| creator | Rizvi, Fazal Lingard, Bob |
| description | The paper argues that the policy concept of social equity cannot be adequately understood in a generalised abstract manner, but is better viewed as an assemblage that brings together a number of contrasting, and sometimes competing, values. Our use of assemblage is somewhat eclectic and is designed to underscore the performative character of policy in attempts to bring together a range of considerations that might not normally be aligned. We use this idea of assemblage in order to examine the concept of social equity embedded in a recent report on higher education for the Australian government - the Bradley Report. We show how the Report's notion of social equity is assembled across a number of related concepts such as excellence, autonomy and efficiency, as well as a set of governmental techniques associated with a neo-liberal approach to politics, including a focus on the market and policy as numbers. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/0305764X.2010.549459 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_875717480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ919184</ericid><informt_id>10.3316/aeipt.186037</informt_id><sourcerecordid>875717480</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-daf1069c1af3de2767633df5bea276ea611c46d0ef1d0c07e10f3adfcd539f223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kTtvFDEUhS0EEsvCP0hh0UAzwV4_p0IhCiQoEgUg0Vk3fuw6mh1vbE_Q_ns8TEJBkcqyz3fuPdZB6ISSU0o0-UAYEUryX6cb0p4E77non6EV5bLvmFDqOVrNSDczL9GrUm4JIUL3coWuvicbYcD-bor1iGF0uO48hlL8_maArccp4HsYJl9wHPHZVGqGIcKId3G78xl7N1moMY2v0YsAQ_FvHs41-vn54sf5ZXf97cvV-dl1Z7nqa-cgUCJ7SyEw5zdKKsmYC-LGQ7t4kJRaLh3xgTpiifKUBAYuWCdYHzYbtkbvlrmHnO5arGr2sVg_DDD6NBWjlVBUcU0a-f5JkqqNllwLIhr69j_0Nk15bP8wWmgpCWsx14gvkM2plOyDOeS4h3w0lJi5CPNYhJmLMEsRzXay2HyO9p_l4mtPe6p5kz8tct7HasDHQzW7Wg_FOKhg4hjSXyXlrXEpzrsYo_KBpHrO1oZ8XIYsOPxOeXCmwnFIOWQYbSyGPZnyD8WksBE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>858660376</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social equity and the assemblage of values in Australian higher education</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Rizvi, Fazal ; Lingard, Bob</creator><creatorcontrib>Rizvi, Fazal ; Lingard, Bob</creatorcontrib><description>The paper argues that the policy concept of social equity cannot be adequately understood in a generalised abstract manner, but is better viewed as an assemblage that brings together a number of contrasting, and sometimes competing, values. Our use of assemblage is somewhat eclectic and is designed to underscore the performative character of policy in attempts to bring together a range of considerations that might not normally be aligned. We use this idea of assemblage in order to examine the concept of social equity embedded in a recent report on higher education for the Australian government - the Bradley Report. We show how the Report's notion of social equity is assembled across a number of related concepts such as excellence, autonomy and efficiency, as well as a set of governmental techniques associated with a neo-liberal approach to politics, including a focus on the market and policy as numbers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-764X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-3577</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0305764X.2010.549459</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJEDEI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Routledge</publisher><subject>Access to education ; Assemblage ; Australia ; Autonomy ; Bradley Review of Higher Education ; Colleges and universities ; Education policy ; Educational policy ; Efficiency ; Equal Education ; Equality ; Equity ; Foreign Countries ; Government Publications ; Higher Education ; International Cooperation ; Markets ; Neoliberalism ; Political Attitudes ; Politics ; Politics of education ; Postsecondary education ; Social justice ; Social Policy ; Values</subject><ispartof>Cambridge journal of education, 2011-03, Vol.41 (1), p.5-22</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Cambridge, Faculty of Education 2011</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. Mar 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-daf1069c1af3de2767633df5bea276ea611c46d0ef1d0c07e10f3adfcd539f223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-daf1069c1af3de2767633df5bea276ea611c46d0ef1d0c07e10f3adfcd539f223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27870,27871,27929,27930,33780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ919184$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rizvi, Fazal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lingard, Bob</creatorcontrib><title>Social equity and the assemblage of values in Australian higher education</title><title>Cambridge journal of education</title><description>The paper argues that the policy concept of social equity cannot be adequately understood in a generalised abstract manner, but is better viewed as an assemblage that brings together a number of contrasting, and sometimes competing, values. Our use of assemblage is somewhat eclectic and is designed to underscore the performative character of policy in attempts to bring together a range of considerations that might not normally be aligned. We use this idea of assemblage in order to examine the concept of social equity embedded in a recent report on higher education for the Australian government - the Bradley Report. We show how the Report's notion of social equity is assembled across a number of related concepts such as excellence, autonomy and efficiency, as well as a set of governmental techniques associated with a neo-liberal approach to politics, including a focus on the market and policy as numbers.</description><subject>Access to education</subject><subject>Assemblage</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Bradley Review of Higher Education</subject><subject>Colleges and universities</subject><subject>Education policy</subject><subject>Educational policy</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Equal Education</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Government Publications</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Political Attitudes</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Politics of education</subject><subject>Postsecondary education</subject><subject>Social justice</subject><subject>Social Policy</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0305-764X</issn><issn>1469-3577</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kTtvFDEUhS0EEsvCP0hh0UAzwV4_p0IhCiQoEgUg0Vk3fuw6mh1vbE_Q_ns8TEJBkcqyz3fuPdZB6ISSU0o0-UAYEUryX6cb0p4E77non6EV5bLvmFDqOVrNSDczL9GrUm4JIUL3coWuvicbYcD-bor1iGF0uO48hlL8_maArccp4HsYJl9wHPHZVGqGIcKId3G78xl7N1moMY2v0YsAQ_FvHs41-vn54sf5ZXf97cvV-dl1Z7nqa-cgUCJ7SyEw5zdKKsmYC-LGQ7t4kJRaLh3xgTpiifKUBAYuWCdYHzYbtkbvlrmHnO5arGr2sVg_DDD6NBWjlVBUcU0a-f5JkqqNllwLIhr69j_0Nk15bP8wWmgpCWsx14gvkM2plOyDOeS4h3w0lJi5CPNYhJmLMEsRzXay2HyO9p_l4mtPe6p5kz8tct7HasDHQzW7Wg_FOKhg4hjSXyXlrXEpzrsYo_KBpHrO1oZ8XIYsOPxOeXCmwnFIOWQYbSyGPZnyD8WksBE</recordid><startdate>201103</startdate><enddate>201103</enddate><creator>Rizvi, Fazal</creator><creator>Lingard, Bob</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201103</creationdate><title>Social equity and the assemblage of values in Australian higher education</title><author>Rizvi, Fazal ; Lingard, Bob</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-daf1069c1af3de2767633df5bea276ea611c46d0ef1d0c07e10f3adfcd539f223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Access to education</topic><topic>Assemblage</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Bradley Review of Higher Education</topic><topic>Colleges and universities</topic><topic>Education policy</topic><topic>Educational policy</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Equal Education</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Government Publications</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Political Attitudes</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Politics of education</topic><topic>Postsecondary education</topic><topic>Social justice</topic><topic>Social Policy</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rizvi, Fazal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lingard, Bob</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Cambridge journal of education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rizvi, Fazal</au><au>Lingard, Bob</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ919184</ericid><atitle>Social equity and the assemblage of values in Australian higher education</atitle><jtitle>Cambridge journal of education</jtitle><date>2011-03</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>5-22</pages><issn>0305-764X</issn><eissn>1469-3577</eissn><coden>CJEDEI</coden><abstract>The paper argues that the policy concept of social equity cannot be adequately understood in a generalised abstract manner, but is better viewed as an assemblage that brings together a number of contrasting, and sometimes competing, values. Our use of assemblage is somewhat eclectic and is designed to underscore the performative character of policy in attempts to bring together a range of considerations that might not normally be aligned. We use this idea of assemblage in order to examine the concept of social equity embedded in a recent report on higher education for the Australian government - the Bradley Report. We show how the Report's notion of social equity is assembled across a number of related concepts such as excellence, autonomy and efficiency, as well as a set of governmental techniques associated with a neo-liberal approach to politics, including a focus on the market and policy as numbers.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/0305764X.2010.549459</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0305-764X |
| ispartof | Cambridge journal of education, 2011-03, Vol.41 (1), p.5-22 |
| issn | 0305-764X 1469-3577 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_875717480 |
| source | PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts; Education Source |
| subjects | Access to education Assemblage Australia Autonomy Bradley Review of Higher Education Colleges and universities Education policy Educational policy Efficiency Equal Education Equality Equity Foreign Countries Government Publications Higher Education International Cooperation Markets Neoliberalism Political Attitudes Politics Politics of education Postsecondary education Social justice Social Policy Values |
| title | Social equity and the assemblage of values in Australian higher education |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T07%3A52%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20equity%20and%20the%20assemblage%20of%20values%20in%20Australian%20higher%20education&rft.jtitle=Cambridge%20journal%20of%20education&rft.au=Rizvi,%20Fazal&rft.date=2011-03&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=5-22&rft.issn=0305-764X&rft.eissn=1469-3577&rft.coden=CJEDEI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0305764X.2010.549459&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E875717480%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=858660376&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ919184&rft_informt_id=10.3316/aeipt.186037&rfr_iscdi=true |