The 2008 Gendered Campaign and the Problem with "Hillary Studies"
The critical question of when and how we will gain an American president who is also a woman has entered the public imagination via popular culture, and has driven more than one academic investigation, so we might be well served to pay particular attention to post-2008 analyses that describe, interp...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Rhetoric & public affairs 2011-04, Vol.14 (1), p.155-167 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 167 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 155 |
| container_title | Rhetoric & public affairs |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | Edwards, Janis L. |
| description | The critical question of when and how we will gain an American president who is also a woman has entered the public imagination via popular culture, and has driven more than one academic investigation, so we might be well served to pay particular attention to post-2008 analyses that describe, interpret, and evaluate Hillary Clinton's closely fought campaign for the office of president, as do the four books I examine here. [...] these books are instructive about the condition and future directions of gender studies in the context of political communication research, even though that is not necessarily their intent. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1353/rap.2011.0009 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_875716239</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41940527</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41940527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-e641a344b29dcd5ed44d47478ebbea78527ba5c7eabdfebabce2fce79439ed63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM9LwzAUx4MoOKdHj0LZxVNnfrbJcQzdhIHCdg9p8-pa-sukRfzvTZlM8JSEfN73vfdB6J7gJWGCPTnTLykmZIkxVhdoRgTjsaBMXoY7VjyWTNFrdON9FQgshZyh1eEIEQ2PaAOtBQc2WpumN-VHG5nWRkP4fnddVkMTfZXDMVpsy7o27jvaD6MtwS9u0VVhag93v-ccHV6eD-ttvHvbvK5Xuzinig0xJJwYxnlGlc2tAMu55SlPJWQZmFQKmmZG5CmYzBaQmSwHWuSQKs4U2ITN0eMptnfd5wh-0E3pcwiztNCNXstUpCShTAVy8Y-sutG1YTYtE0ZDnpIBik9Q7jrvHRS6d2UT9tIE68mmDjb1ZFNPNgPPz6EV5EMzevjL5TRJCNX7yfgknBASqgQLZQ-nssoPnTv34ERxHDZmPzsggEs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>863243998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The 2008 Gendered Campaign and the Problem with "Hillary Studies"</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Edwards, Janis L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Janis L.</creatorcontrib><description>The critical question of when and how we will gain an American president who is also a woman has entered the public imagination via popular culture, and has driven more than one academic investigation, so we might be well served to pay particular attention to post-2008 analyses that describe, interpret, and evaluate Hillary Clinton's closely fought campaign for the office of president, as do the four books I examine here. [...] these books are instructive about the condition and future directions of gender studies in the context of political communication research, even though that is not necessarily their intent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-8392</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1534-5238</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-5238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/rap.2011.0009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>East Lansing: Michigan State University Press</publisher><subject>BOOK REVIEW ESSAY ; Candidates ; Clinton, Hillary Rodham ; Communication research ; Feminism ; First ladies ; Gender studies ; Mass Media ; Political analysis ; Political Campaigns ; Political communication ; Political factors ; Politics ; Popular culture ; Presidents ; Primaries & caucuses ; Race ; Sexual Inequality ; Studies ; Women</subject><ispartof>Rhetoric & public affairs, 2011-04, Vol.14 (1), p.155-167</ispartof><rights>2011 Michigan State University Board of Trustees</rights><rights>Copyright © Michigan State University Press.</rights><rights>Copyright Michigan State University Press Spring 2011</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-e641a344b29dcd5ed44d47478ebbea78527ba5c7eabdfebabce2fce79439ed63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41940527$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41940527$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,803,12845,27922,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Janis L.</creatorcontrib><title>The 2008 Gendered Campaign and the Problem with "Hillary Studies"</title><title>Rhetoric & public affairs</title><description>The critical question of when and how we will gain an American president who is also a woman has entered the public imagination via popular culture, and has driven more than one academic investigation, so we might be well served to pay particular attention to post-2008 analyses that describe, interpret, and evaluate Hillary Clinton's closely fought campaign for the office of president, as do the four books I examine here. [...] these books are instructive about the condition and future directions of gender studies in the context of political communication research, even though that is not necessarily their intent.</description><subject>BOOK REVIEW ESSAY</subject><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Clinton, Hillary Rodham</subject><subject>Communication research</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>First ladies</subject><subject>Gender studies</subject><subject>Mass Media</subject><subject>Political analysis</subject><subject>Political Campaigns</subject><subject>Political communication</subject><subject>Political factors</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Popular culture</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Primaries & caucuses</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Sexual Inequality</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1094-8392</issn><issn>1534-5238</issn><issn>1534-5238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkM9LwzAUx4MoOKdHj0LZxVNnfrbJcQzdhIHCdg9p8-pa-sukRfzvTZlM8JSEfN73vfdB6J7gJWGCPTnTLykmZIkxVhdoRgTjsaBMXoY7VjyWTNFrdON9FQgshZyh1eEIEQ2PaAOtBQc2WpumN-VHG5nWRkP4fnddVkMTfZXDMVpsy7o27jvaD6MtwS9u0VVhag93v-ccHV6eD-ttvHvbvK5Xuzinig0xJJwYxnlGlc2tAMu55SlPJWQZmFQKmmZG5CmYzBaQmSwHWuSQKs4U2ITN0eMptnfd5wh-0E3pcwiztNCNXstUpCShTAVy8Y-sutG1YTYtE0ZDnpIBik9Q7jrvHRS6d2UT9tIE68mmDjb1ZFNPNgPPz6EV5EMzevjL5TRJCNX7yfgknBASqgQLZQ-nssoPnTv34ERxHDZmPzsggEs</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Edwards, Janis L.</creator><general>Michigan State University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>The 2008 Gendered Campaign and the Problem with "Hillary Studies"</title><author>Edwards, Janis L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-e641a344b29dcd5ed44d47478ebbea78527ba5c7eabdfebabce2fce79439ed63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>BOOK REVIEW ESSAY</topic><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Clinton, Hillary Rodham</topic><topic>Communication research</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>First ladies</topic><topic>Gender studies</topic><topic>Mass Media</topic><topic>Political analysis</topic><topic>Political Campaigns</topic><topic>Political communication</topic><topic>Political factors</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Popular culture</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Primaries & caucuses</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Sexual Inequality</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Janis L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Rhetoric & public affairs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Edwards, Janis L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The 2008 Gendered Campaign and the Problem with "Hillary Studies"</atitle><jtitle>Rhetoric & public affairs</jtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>167</epage><pages>155-167</pages><issn>1094-8392</issn><issn>1534-5238</issn><eissn>1534-5238</eissn><abstract>The critical question of when and how we will gain an American president who is also a woman has entered the public imagination via popular culture, and has driven more than one academic investigation, so we might be well served to pay particular attention to post-2008 analyses that describe, interpret, and evaluate Hillary Clinton's closely fought campaign for the office of president, as do the four books I examine here. [...] these books are instructive about the condition and future directions of gender studies in the context of political communication research, even though that is not necessarily their intent.</abstract><cop>East Lansing</cop><pub>Michigan State University Press</pub><doi>10.1353/rap.2011.0009</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1094-8392 |
| ispartof | Rhetoric & public affairs, 2011-04, Vol.14 (1), p.155-167 |
| issn | 1094-8392 1534-5238 1534-5238 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_875716239 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete |
| subjects | BOOK REVIEW ESSAY Candidates Clinton, Hillary Rodham Communication research Feminism First ladies Gender studies Mass Media Political analysis Political Campaigns Political communication Political factors Politics Popular culture Presidents Primaries & caucuses Race Sexual Inequality Studies Women |
| title | The 2008 Gendered Campaign and the Problem with "Hillary Studies" |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T00%3A11%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%202008%20Gendered%20Campaign%20and%20the%20Problem%20with%20%22Hillary%20Studies%22&rft.jtitle=Rhetoric%20&%20public%20affairs&rft.au=Edwards,%20Janis%20L.&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=167&rft.pages=155-167&rft.issn=1094-8392&rft.eissn=1534-5238&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/rap.2011.0009&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41940527%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=863243998&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41940527&rfr_iscdi=true |